• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    A

    American Evaluation Association

    企业EST. 1986
    5论文总数
    305引用总数

    The American Evaluation Association (AEA) is a professional association for evaluators and those with a professional interest in the field of evaluation, including practitioners, faculty, students, funders, managers, and government decision-makers. As of 2014[update], AEA has approximately 7057 members from all 50 US states and over 60 other countries.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Carol Hirschon Weiss
    Carol Hirschon Weiss
    Graduate School of Education
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Louise Yarnall
    Louise Yarnall
    SRI Education
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Paul R. Brandon
    Paul R. Brandon
    University of Hawaiʻi at Manoa
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Margaret Kakande
    Margaret Kakande
    Evaluation Association
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Eleanor Chelimsky
    Eleanor Chelimsky
    American Evaluation Association
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Michael Quinn Patton
    Michael Quinn Patton
    Utilization-Focused Evaluation
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Nick L. Smith
    Nick L. Smith
    Nick L. Smith • School of Education, Syracuse University
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Veronica G. Thomas
    Veronica G. Thomas
    Howard University
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Hwalek Melanie
    Hwalek Melanie
    SPEC Associates
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0

    论文(5)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Improving the Match Between Sustainability Questions and Evaluation Practice: Some Reflections and a Checklist
    Eleanor Chelimsky

    There is increasing evaluative interest in assessing not just the current effectiveness of programs but also their likely sustainability. Assessing the likely sustainability of a program, however, requires methodological judgments about the future and about the influences of many complex political, economic, and social factors, which themselves are likely to change. While strong confidence in these types of prospective judgments may continue to be elusive, careful consideration of some major factors—including the cyclical character of certain public interest values and the predictable influence of special interest groups—should be helpful in improving the current ability of evaluation practice to address sustainability issues. This chapter ends with a checklist of seventeen questions to help focus attention on relevant, accessible, but often ignored, program or policy areas affecting sustainability.

    2019New Directions for Evaluation(2019)引用:7
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Looking Ahead: the Future of Evaluation
    Nick L. Smith,Paul R. Brandon,Melanie Hwalek, Susan J. Kistler,Susan N. Labin, Jim Rugh,Veronica G. Thomas,Louise Yarnall
    2011引用:29
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Evaluation for Decisions: is Anybody There? Does Anybody Care?
    Carol H. Weiss
    1988Evaluation Practice(1988)引用:239
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Integrating Evaluation into a Program for Increased Utility and Cost‐effectiveness
    Michael Quinn Patton

    AbstractThe most useful and possibly the cheapest form of evaluation would yield results coinciding with ongoing management procedures. While this kind of evaluation may never be fully realized, it is possible to provide a continuous stream of evaluative data and analysis by introducing evaluation into project management at its inception. This chapter outlines such an approach.

    1988New Directions for Program Evaluation(1988)引用:7
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5National Evaluation Capacity in Uganda
    Margaret Kakande
    引用:23
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间

    合作机构(5)

    Instructional Research Group合作论文 1
    夏威夷大學馬諾阿分校合作论文 1
    霍华德大学合作论文 1
    Stratton Park Engineering Company (United States)合作论文 1
    SRI 国际合作论文 1

    机构统计