Medication history taking at hospital admission is still prone to errors. Despite numerous quality improvement initiatives, new strategies to improve medication history taking are still sought and evaluated. Unfortunately, the gold standard research methodology for evaluation is resource-intensive, as it requires each patient to complete two medication history interviews. Therefore, a new study design and quality parameter were developed. We aimed to pilot our newly developed study design and quality parameter in a study on medication history taking by telephone. In this prospective interventional study, patients with scheduled admissions had their medication histories taken either by telephone before admission (intervention) by a pharmacist or in-person by physicians or medical interns upon admission (control). Following the newly developed design, we compared a patients’ new medication histories to the respective pre-visit medication lists available in the medical records to calculate the new endpoint: the difference in the number of updates per patient. Further, we surveyed patients and staff on their satisfaction. We enrolled 76 intervention and 75 control patients. In the intervention group, a mean of 4.93 (± 4.45, 0–18) updates were found vs. 3.40 (± 3.75, 0–21) in the control group. Accordingly, the incident rate of number of updates per patient was 1.34 times higher in the intervention group (p = 0.044). The distribution of the types of updates was similar with the most common type of update being newly initiated medicines in both groups. Medication history taking by telephone took 15.7 ± 9.8 min (mean ± SD), including preparation, interview, and documentation. Survey results showed that intervention patients felt positive about the telephone interviews. Both groups were open to other digital approaches, e.g., online platforms. The new study design proved feasible to evaluate medication history taking by telephone with comprehensible results. The telephone approach delivered more updates compared to standard care, however, the proposed endpoint needs to be validated against the gold standard before widespread application Patient acceptance for this and other digital approaches was high in both groups.
PurposeFormative assessments can help motivate students and ease students' learning through feedback. There is a pressing need for improvement of clinical pharmacotherapy (CPT) education since junior doctors make many prescribing errors. The aim of this study was to determine whether a formative assessment with personalized narrative feedback helps medical students to increase their prescribing skills.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted among masters' medical students at Erasmus Medical Centre, The Netherlands. Students made a formative and a summative skill-based prescription assessment, both during clerkships as part of their regular curriculum. Errors in both assessments were categorized by type and possible consequence and compared with each other.ResultsA total of 388 students made 1964 errors in the formative assessment and 1016 in the summative assessment. Most improvements after the formative assessment were seen for mentioning the weight of a child on the prescription (n = 242, 19%). Most new and repeated errors in the summative assessment were missing usage instructions (n = 82, 16% and n = 121, 41%).ConclusionsThis formative assessment with personalized and individual narrative feedback has helped students to increase the technical correctness of their prescriptions. However, errors repeated after the feedback were predominantly errors showing that only one formative assessment has not yet enhanced the clinical prescribing enough.
Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy may improve hyperglycaemia in humans with type 2 diabetes, but underlying mechanisms are unclear. Our objective was to examine the glucometabolic effects of HBO on whole-body glucose disposal in humans with type 2 diabetes. In a randomised placebo-controlled crossover trial located at the German Diabetes Center, 12 male individuals with type 2 diabetes (age 18–75 years, BMI <35 kg/m2, HbA1c 42–75 mmol/mol [6–9 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04219215 German Federal Ministry of Health, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, North-Rhine Westfalia Ministry of Culture and Science, European-Regional-Development-Fund, German-Research-Foundation (DFG), Schmutzler Stiftung
Objectives: This study was designed to evaluate compliance with the goals provided by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program and how this affects patient outcomes.
