Banner - University Medical Center Tucson (BUMCT), formerly University Medical Center and the University of Arizona Medical Center, is a private, non-profit, 479-bed acute-care teaching hospital located on the campus of the University of Arizona in Tucson, Arizona. BUMCT is part of the University of Arizona Health Sciences (UAHS) center campus which includes the university's Colleges of Medicine, Nursing, Pharmacy and Public Health. It is Southern Arizona's only trauma center for both adult and pediatric patients. BUMCT is one of two University of Arizona affiliated academic medical centers in Tucson with Banner - University Medical Center South (formerly Kino Community Hospital, University Physicians Healthcare Hospital, and University of Arizona Medical Center - South Campus) being the other such institution. The area's only dedicated children's hospital, Banner Children's at Diamond Children's Medical Center, is located within and adjacent to BUMCT, providing care to infants, children, teens, and young adults aged 0–21.
We assess racial disparities in the prevalence and incidence of clinical outcomes in alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) in a diverse US population. This is a retrospective multicenter study on patients aged 18–80 years with ALD in the Banner Health System from 2012 to 2024. Patients with major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) (ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatocellular carcinoma, esophageal variceal bleeding) at baseline were excluded. Primary outcomes included mortality and the incidence of MALO, cardiovascular diseases (CVD) (coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure (CHF), cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), peripheral artery disease), type II diabetes mellitus (DM), cirrhosis, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (CAD, CHF, CVA, mortality), and all-cause cancer. Competing risk and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used for outcome modeling. The cohort included 16,693 patients with ALD. The median age was 50.3 and 67.8
BACKGROUND AND AIM:Significant health disparities persist in alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), largely driven by social determinants of health (SDOH). However, the influence of neighbourhood-level SDOH on ALD outcomes remains underexplored. In this study, we aimed to evaluate how neighbourhood-level SDOH are associated with disease burden, comorbid conditions, and mortality in individuals with ALD. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with ALD in the Banner Health System, representing hospitals across Arizona, California, Nevada, Wyoming and Colorado, from January 2012 to October 2024 using ICD codes. Neighbourhood-level SDOH were quantified using the Social Deprivation Index (SDI). Patients were stratified into quartiles based on SDI score, with Quartile 4 representing the most socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Primary outcomes included incidence of mortality, cirrhosis, major adverse liver outcome (MALO), Type 2 diabetes mellitus, any cancer, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). A multivariable competing risk analysis was performed adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance type, primary language, smoking status, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, aspirin use, statin use, alcohol use disorder and a composite mental-health/substance-use disorder variable encompassing depression, anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and non-alcohol substance use disorders. RESULTS:Among 11,394 patients with ALD and available SDI data, 6747 had ≥ 365 days of follow-up. The average age was 51 years and 65.6% were female; 68.8% were non-Hispanic White, 19.7% Hispanic, 5.9% Native American/Alaskan Native (NA), 3.2% Black, and 0.4% Asian/Pacific Islanders. Patients residing in the most disadvantaged neighbourhoods (Quartile 4) were significantly younger, more likely to be female, had a higher median BMI, and more frequently reported a non-English primary language compared with those in the least disadvantaged areas (Quartile 1). Patients in the most deprived neighbourhoods were more likely to be Hispanic, Black, or Native American/Alaska Native and to be uninsured or on Medicaid, whereas those in the least disadvantaged neighbourhoods predominantly had private insurance. Individuals in Quartile 4 had increased mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.48, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.09-2.01) compared with individuals in Quartile 1. CONCLUSIONS:In this large and demographically diverse ALD cohort, residing in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods was associated with increased risk of mortality. These findings support the need for contextually tailored clinical interventions and broader treatment strategies that target upstream sociocultural and environmental factors that are associated with health outcomes. Addressing neighbourhood-level SDOH through community engagement, policy reform, and cross-sector partnerships to improve collaborative care efforts is needed to reduce health disparities in ALD.
Occupational radiation exposure has a clear association with long-term health effects and has a particular impact on women, trainees, and supporting staff. There is a reliance on limited, traditional radiation protection and nonergonomic equipment, which carries associated orthopedic injury rates with adverse impacts on both individual career trajectories and health systems, and with significant challenges to widespread implementation of enhanced radiation protection devices. During the 2025 Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions Scientific Sessions in Washington, DC, a multidisciplinary Think Tank summit was convened and included representatives from multiple stakeholders, including other professional societies, advocacy groups, and industry partners. The focus of discussion was on the dual dangers of both ionizing radiation and the musculoskeletal injuries associated with current-generation protection equipment. This document summarizes the main points of discussion and outlines actionable next steps to advocate for more widespread implementation of enhanced radiation protection technologies and imaging systems in order to achieve ALARA+ (as low and as light as reasonably achievable).
Chronic liver disease is a rapidly growing cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and this increase is largely driven by steatotic liver disease (SLD) comprising metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), and MASLD and increased alcohol intake (MetALD). Hepatic steatosis and fibrosis are highly heritable and genetic variation has also associated with risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatic decompensation. This review summarizes the state of the art of genetics and genomics in SLD, with particular emphasis on potential clinical utility. Variants in/near genes including PNPLA3, TM6SF2, and HSD17B13 have been associated with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in both MASLD and ALD, while others such as those in GCKR, TRIB1, and GPAM have been consistently associated with greater risk of hepatic steatosis in MASLD with much weaker effects if any on cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. While data on MetALD genetics are limited, we believe that the genetic risk factors for liver steatosis, cirrhosis, and HCC will be similar in MetALD compared to MASLD and ALD based on the largely shared genetic risk factors for MASLD and ALD. Finally, we discuss future directions in SLD genetics, notably genetically-defined disease subtypes, gene-environment interactions and its implications for therapy, and utility of genetics in clinical risk stratification. Genetic studies have provided insight into important disease processes in SLD and may have an upcoming role in clinical care.
Patient navigation programs have demonstrated intervention efficacy associated with barrier reduction and health outcome improvements in the context of cancer care. Greater characterization of barriers and barrier resolution likelihoods may support program optimization. A 3-month longitudinal, non-comparative community-focused (i.e., lay navigator) patient navigation program was implemented at an NCI-designed cancer center between 2018 and 2021. Barriers to cancer care were reported by patients (n = 207) at pre-intervention and re-assessed at post-intervention. Descriptive analyses examined patient-level associations among pre-intervention barriers and post-intervention rates of barrier resolution. Logistic regressions were conducted at the barrier level and patient level to estimate the likelihood of barrier resolution associated with Health Access, Financial, and Psychosocial barrier domains. Participants reported an average of 3.54 distinct barriers to cancer care. Barriers associated with Health Access and Financial domains were most frequently endorsed. Post-navigation, barriers were found to differ in their resolution rates. At the barrier domain level, resolution rates differed significantly (X2(2) = 7.826, p = 0.02), with Financial barriers significantly less likely (OR = 0.61; 95