• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    B

    BirdLife International

    EST. 1922
    286论文总数
    1.6万引用总数

    BirdLife International is a global partnership of non-governmental organizations that strives to conserve birds and their habitats. BirdLife International's priorities include preventing extinction of bird species, identifying and safeguarding important sites for birds, maintaining and restoring key bird habitats, and empowering conservationists worldwide.It has a membership of more than 2.5 million people across 116 country partner organizations, including the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, the Wild Bird Society of Japan, the National Audubon Society and American Bird Conservancy.BirdLife International has identified 13,000 Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas and is the official International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List authority for birds. As of 2015, BirdLife International has established that 1,375 bird species (13% of the total) are threatened with extinction (critically endangered, endangered or vulnerable).BirdLife International publishes a quarterly magazine, BirdLife: The Magazine, which contains recent news and authoritative articles about birds and their conservation.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Stuart Butchart
    Stuart Butchart
    Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge;Global Science Division, BirdLife International
    论文:41引用:0H-index:0
    Nigel J. Collar
    Nigel J. Collar
    BirdLife International
    论文:32引用:0H-index:0
    Thomas M. Brooks (Thomas Brooks)
    Thomas M. Brooks (Thomas Brooks)
    International Union for Conservation of Nature;School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania;University of the Philippines Los Banos
    论文:19引用:0H-index:0
    Simon Stuart
    Simon Stuart
    Synchronicity Earth
    论文:11引用:0H-index:0
    Paul Donald
    Paul Donald
    Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge;BirdLife International
    论文:11引用:0H-index:0
    Ian J. Burfield
    Ian J. Burfield
    European Division Office, BirdLife International
    论文:10引用:0H-index:0
    Maria P. Dias
    Maria P. Dias
    BirdLife Int
    论文:9引用:0H-index:0
    Andrew Balmford
    Andrew Balmford
    Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge
    论文:9引用:0H-index:0
    Leon Bennun
    Leon Bennun
    The Biodiversity Consultancy
    论文:7引用:0H-index:0

    论文(286)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1The Extent of Oil Palm Cultivation in Key Biodiversity Areas
    Fraser Bell,Graeme M. Buchanan,Olivia Crowe,Alison E. Beresford

    Oil palm production has known negative effects on biodiversity. The conversion of native forests to oil palm causes local species extinctions, alters community composition, and reduces ecosystem function. Quantifying the extent of this conversion within sites of high conservation importance is crucial to identify conservation priorities, but such global data are currently lacking. Here, we quantify the extent of oil palm (derived from satellite remote sensing) in 3,025 Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs), within the global region suitable for growing oil palm. KBAs are areas identified for global biodiversity importance, but which do not necessarily benefit from protection. We found that oil palm is present in 8

    2026Biodiversity and Conservation(2026)引用:48
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Extent, Characteristics and Policy Applications of Key Biodiversity Areas
    Stuart H M Butchart,Olivia Crowe, Tom Scott, Andrew J Plumptre, Megan Eldred, Ellen McKee,Zoltan Waliczky, Ibrahim Al Hasani,Adrián B Azpiroz,Daniele Baisero, Fred Barasa,Alison E Beresford,

    A global standard for the identification of Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) was published 10 years ago to provide a unified set of criteria for identifying 'sites of significance for the global persistence of biodiversity'. We review the initiative's origins, the KBA identification process, characteristics of the current network, threats, policy uptake, private sector applications and future priorities. KBAs are identified using criteria with quantitative thresholds relating to threatened or geographically restricted species or ecosystems, ecological integrity, biological processes, or irreplaceability. These criteria can be applied in terrestrial, inland water, marine and subterranean environments, and to all taxonomic groups. A total of 16,596 KBAs covering 22.1 million km2 has been identified, with 29% of these sites in marine and 26% in freshwater ecosystems. KBAs range from 0.001 km2 to 712,457 km2 in extent, with a median size of 141 km2 and a mean of 1,364 km2. Most (63%) qualify due to the globally threatened species they support, with 48% being important for biological processes and 39% for geographically restricted species. KBAs have been identified for 18,365 qualifying species in total, of which 37% are plants and 32% are birds. The most prevalent threats are biological resource use (hunting, logging, fishing, etc., impacting 40.8% of sites with available data), unsustainable agriculture (40.7%), human intrusions and disturbance (38.4%) and natural systems modifications (water management and fire; 33.4%). KBAs are important for delivering ecosystem services to people, both locally and globally. KBAs have had widespread impact in informing protected area designation in all regions. In total, 10,054 sites (62%) are covered completely or partially by protected areas. Hence, KBAs are highly relevant to Target 3 (and other targets) in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, and to Sustainable Development Goals 14.5, 15.1, and 15.4. Indicators based on KBA data are therefore being used by the Convention on Biological Diversity and United Nations to track progress towards these targets. Many companies and financial institutions use KBAs to assess their exposure to nature-related risks and to identify opportunities for site-level, nature-positive actions. Future priorities include expanding and updating KBA assessments, and strengthening efforts to protect, conserve and safeguard these sites effectively.

    2026Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society(2026)引用:2
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Distribution and Habitat Selection of the Threatened Green Avadavat Amandava Formosa at Mount Abu Wildlife Sanctuary, Rajasthan, India
    Sahil Zutshi, Nigel J. Collar,Stuart J. Marsden

    Summary The endemic Green Avadavat Amandava formosa occurs within a restricted range in India and is categorised as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List. Ecological requirements of the species and the factors responsible for its highly localised distribution are not well understood. Surveys to establish its distribution and habitat requirements at Mount Abu Wildlife Sanctuary, Rajasthan, a stronghold, were carried out during the non-breeding season (March–August 2023). Presence of the species using visual/vocal detection was recorded in 129 1×1 km 2 squares within the study area. In each square, percentage cover of grass and shrubs, the latter comprising three species ( Carissa spinarum and the invasive Lantana camara and Biancaea decapetala ), was recorded, along with mean altitude and survey duration time. The avadavat was detected in 40 of 129 surveyed squares mainly situated in the north and centre of the study area, but was absent around the periphery of the sanctuary (both at higher altitudes and in the foothills). The best-supported linear model (GLM) indicated that it is associated with areas with high percentage of grasses and shrubs at higher altitudes. These habitats are at increasing risk from sprawl and land-use change. Although invasive shrub vegetation such as Lantana and Biancaea tend to pose a threat to biodiversity, its removal from the sanctuary needs to be managed experimentally in order to gauge its value as cover for the avadavat.

    2026Bird Conservation International(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4The Timor Green Pigeon Treron Psittaceus of Eastern Indonesia and Timor-Leste May Be on the Verge of Extinction
    Colin R. Trainor, Jafet Potenzo Lopes, Pedro Pinto, Rui Miguel Da Silva Pinto, Alex J. Berryman

    The Timor green pigeon Treron psittaceus, endemic to Timor, Rote, and adjacent satellite islands (eastern Indonesia and Timor-Leste), is declining because of severe hunting pressure and forest conversion. During 2002-2025, we conducted > 1,400 field days of surveys throughout the species' range. Prior to 2000, most records were from Indonesian West Timor. Since 2000, most records (93%) and nearly all individuals (98%) have been observed in Timor-Leste, primarily within Lautem District. The scarcity of recent records throughout much of the species' range, including Camplong (last record 1991), Bipolo forest (last record 1999), elsewhere in West Timor (last record 2005) and Rote (four records of 1-2 birds during 2004-2013), suggests that only a small, declining population persists. The population in Indonesia is possibly nearly extinct (and probably functionally so), and that in Timor-Leste is predicted to be lower than current estimates suggest. We conservatively estimate the global population to be 100-500 individuals distributed across eight sites, and consider it plausible that the population size lies towards the lower end of this estimate. A population of > 50 birds is likely restricted to a single site, Nino Konis Santana National Park, underscoring the species' precarious status. We advocate for a reassessment as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List. Effective action plans are required in both Indonesia and Timor-Leste. In Lautem, community-based conservation efforts will be crucial to reduce hunting pressure. Further surveys should focus on Mount Timau (West Timor), and Lautem, Manatuto and Manufahi Districts (Timor-Leste).

    2026ORYX(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Assessment of Land-Based Threats to Atlantic Pelagic Seabirds
    Ioannis Kalaitzakis, Ana S. L. Rodrigues,Maria P. Dias, Tammy E. Davies, Mark A. Baran, Nina Bhola,Thierry Boulinier,Joel Bried,Letizia Campioni,Filipe R. Ceia,Federico De Pascalis,Nina Dehnhard,

    Seabirds are exposed to numerous threats throughout their life-cycles, including land-based threats during their breeding season such as invasive species, diseases, or light pollution. Here we assess the timing, scope, and severity of land-based threats to populations of highly mobile petrels, albatrosses, storm-petrels, and alcids in the Atlantic Ocean, to guide priorities for their conservation across their mostly island-breeding areas. By combining our own field expertise of these species with a literature review, we built a dataset characterizing 18 threats for 49 species across 38 Large Marine Ecosystems. We analyze this dataset by highlighting the most impactful threats and the most impacted regions. Addressing invasive alien species on Tristan da Cunha & Gough and on the islands of the Canary Current are the interventions with the greatest potential to stimulate seabird population recovery across the Atlantic Ocean. Our results highlight priorities for targeted management actions that can support seabird conservation.

    2026CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 286 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    剑桥大学合作论文 42
    伦敦动物学会合作论文 23
    皇家鸟类保护协会合作论文 21
    保护国际合作论文 17
    昆士兰大学合作论文 15
    野生动物保护协会合作论文 13
    United Nations Environment Programme合作论文 13
    牛津大学合作论文 12
    曼彻斯特城市大学合作论文 11
    自然历史博物馆合作论文 10

    机构统计