The rhizome-, shoot- and leaf-feeding armoured scale Rhizaspidiotus donacis (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) was released for biological control of invasive arundo (Arundo donax) in the Sacramento and San Joaquin River watersheds of the Central Valley of northern California. One year after release, short-term establishment of R. donacis was confirmed at all nine field sites (11 release sites). Four to eight years after release, 47% of the nodes of side shoots removed from live main shoots in the release plots at the nine field sites supported at least one adult female of R. donacis, verifying long-term establishment, and at five sites \100% of the plots examined had established populations. Pre-release mechanical control of A. donax (ground-cutting, mowing or no cutting) did not influence short or long-term establishment. To determine dispersal of R. donacis, side shoot nodes were examined at various distances from 16 plots across eight sites. Scale prevalence and abundance were negatively related to distance from release plot. Reproductive adult females dispersed 10 m or less from 13 of these plots, with annual dispersal under 2 m per year, consistent with general expectations of armoured scale crawler active dispersal ability, and maximum dispersal distance was not dependent on scale density in the release plot. Dispersal between 40-73 m in two plots was possibly caused by disturbance. The armoured scale R. donacis was confirmed as being well-established, dispersing and building populations, with potential to negatively impact A. donax.
Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) form one of the four largest animal orders, with published estimates that around 174,250 species had been described up to 2009 (Chapman 2009). Many species are conspicuous, charismatic and regularly recorded by citizen scientists. As a result, iNaturalist contains more than 15 million Lepidoptera observations (10.5% of all observations), and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) includes more than 83 million occurrence records for the group from all sources (3.5% of all biodiversity data and 9.8% of all non-bird data). A modern and comprehensive checklist of global moths and butterflies would therefore play a significant role in improving our ability to interpret biodiversity patterns and change. However, there is still no dataset that adequately covers the order, and good accessible digital checklists exist for a minority of families. The Global Lepidoptera Names Index (LepIndex) has served as the primary checklist for Lepidoptera used by Catalogue of Life (COL), the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and other global biodiversity informatics initiatives, with selected families sourced for other well-curated projects. LepIndex is the digitised version of a card index developed and maintained over decades at the Natural History Museum, London. Its intended purpose was to link published species names with the original literature references. LepIndex includes most names published prior to around 1985 (with some geographical bias) and additions for some groups up to around 1995. Since the card index was developed purely as a nomenclatural resource, no effort was made to track changes in generic placement and generally reflect taxonomic opinion from the time when each card was added. As a result, binomial combinations in LepIndex do not necessarily reflect either the original author's published binomial or contemporary classification. In superfamilies such as Gelechioidea and Noctuoidea, which have undergone significant reorganisation in the light of modern findings, many names are not associated even with the currently recognised family for the species. LepIndex has been migrated to TaxonWorks and is now maintained as the Global Lepidoptera Index (GLI), but addressing a shortfall of nearly 40 years of active taxonomy and fixing other legacy issues remains a major challenge. COL has recently worked with several groups of taxonomists to develop modern digital checklists for several families, but some groups can only practically be improved through edits to GLI. This presentation will summarise progress and metrics indicating the scale of the remaining task and the effort that will be required to maintain a comprehensive checklist that rapidly and accurates reflects new taxonomic findings.
