• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    思

    思科系统

    Cisco Systems Inc.
    企业EST. 1984
    2,176论文总数
    5.3万引用总数

    思科是全球最大的网络技术公司,主要提供网络硬件,软件,结构等

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Shi-Jie Wen
    Shi-Jie Wen
    Cisco Systems
    论文:48引用:0H-index:0
    Jun Fan
    Jun Fan
    论文:46引用:0H-index:0
    James Drewniak
    James Drewniak
    Electromagnetic Compatibility Laboratory|Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering|University of Missouri
    论文:34引用:0H-index:0
    Rick Wong
    Rick Wong
    QuickLogic
    论文:32引用:0H-index:0
    Brice Achkir
    Brice Achkir
    Cisco System Inc
    论文:29引用:0H-index:0
    Bharat L. Bhuva
    Bharat L. Bhuva
    Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Vanderbilt Univ
    论文:28引用:0H-index:0
    Tae-Kyu Lee
    Tae-Kyu Lee
    Component Quality and Technology Group, Cisco Systems, Inc.
    论文:27引用:0H-index:0
    Gaowen Liu
    Gaowen Liu
    Cisco Systems, Inc.
    论文:22引用:0H-index:0
    Raghu Nambiar
    Raghu Nambiar
    Cisco Systems, Inc
    论文:19引用:0H-index:0

    论文(2176)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1SAIF: A Sparse Autoencoder Framework for Interpreting and Steering Instruction Following of Language Models
    Zirui He,Haiyan Zhao,Yiran Qiao,Fan Yang,Ali Payani, Jing Ma,Mengnan Du

    The ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow instructions is crucial for their practical applications, yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. This paper presents a novel framework that leverages sparse autoencoders (SAE) to interpret how instruction following works in these models. We demonstrate how the features we identify can effectively steer model outputs to align with given instructions. Through analysis of SAE latent activations, we identify specific latents responsible for instruction following behavior. Our findings reveal that instruction following capabilities are encoded by a distinct set of instruction-relevant SAE latents. These latents both show semantic proximity to relevant instructions and demonstrate causal effects on model behavior. Our research highlights several crucial factors for achieving effective steering performance: precise feature identification, the role of final layer, and optimal instruction positioning. Additionally, we demonstrate that our methodology scales effectively across SAEs and LLMs of varying sizes.

    2026Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases Research Track(2026)引用:25
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Agent Name Service (ANS): A Universal Directory for Secure AI Agent Discovery and Interoperability
    Ken Huang, Vineeth Sai Narajala, Idan Habler, Akram Sheriff

    The proliferation of AI agents requires robust mechanisms for secure discovery. This paper introduces the Agent Name Service (ANS), a novel architecture based on DNS addressing the lack of a public agent discovery framework. ANS provides a protocol-agnostic registry infrastructure that leverages Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) certificates for verifiable agent identity and trust. The architecture features several key innovations: a formalized agent registration and renewal mechanism for lifecycle management; DNS-inspired naming conventions with capability-aware resolution; a modular Protocol Adapter Layer supporting diverse communication standards (A2A, MCP, ACP etc.); and precisely defined algorithms for secure resolution. We implement structured communication using JSON Schema and conduct a comprehensive threat analysis of our proposal. The result is a foundational directory service addressing the core challenges of secured discovery and interaction in multi-agent systems, paving the way for future interoperable, trustworthy, and scalable agent ecosystems.

    20262026 IEEE 5th International Conference on AI in Cybersecurity (ICAIC)(2026)引用:22
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3A Survey on LLM-based Conversational User Simulation.
    Bo Ni, Leyao Wang,Yu Wang,Branislav Kveton,Franck Dernoncourt,Yu Xia,Hongjie Chen, Reuben Leura,Samyadeep Basu,Subhojyoti Mukherjee,Puneet Mathur,Nesreen Ahmed,

    User simulation has long played a vital role in computer science due to its potential to support a wide range of applications. Language, as the primary medium of human communication, forms the foundation of social interaction and behavior. Consequently, simulating conversational behavior has become a key area of study. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have significantly catalyzed progress in this domain by enabling high-fidelity generation of synthetic user conversation. In this paper, we survey recent advancements in LLM-based conversational user simulation. We introduce a novel taxonomy covering user granularity and simulation objectives. Additionally, we systematically analyze core techniques and evaluation methodologies. We aim to keep the research community informed of the latest advancements in conversational user simulation and to further facilitate future research by identifying open challenges and organizing existing work under a unified framework.

    2026Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics(2026)引用:15
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Kaleidoscope: In-language Exams for Massively Multilingual Vision Evaluation
    Israfel Salazar, Manuel Fernández Burda, Shayekh Bin Islam, Arshia Soltani Moakhar,Shivalika Singh, Fabian Farestam,Angelika Romanou, Danylo Boiko, Dipika Khullar,Mike Zhang, Dominik Krzemiński,Jekaterina Novikova,

    The evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs) has mainly relied on English-language benchmarks, leaving significant gaps in both multilingual and multicultural coverage. While multilingual benchmarks have expanded, both in size and language, many rely on translations of English datasets, failing to capture cultural nuances. In this work, we propose Kaleidoscope, as the most comprehensive exam benchmark to date for the multilingual evaluation of vision-language models. Kaleidoscope is a large-scale, in-language multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate VLMs across diverse languages and visual inputs. Kaleidoscope covers 18 languages and 14 different subjects, amounting to a total of 20,911 multiple-choice questions. Built through an open science collaboration with a diverse group of researchers worldwide, Kaleidoscope ensures linguistic and cultural authenticity. We evaluate top-performing multilingual vision-language models and find that they perform poorly on low-resource languages and in complex multimodal scenarios. Our results highlight the need for progress on culturally inclusive multimodal evaluation frameworks.

    ICLR 2026引用:12
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Omni-SimpleMem: Autoresearch-Guided Discovery of Lifelong Multimodal Agent Memory
    Jiaqi Liu, Zipeng Ling, Shi Qiu,Yanqing Liu, Siwei Han, Peng Xia,Haoqin Tu, Zeyu Zheng,Cihang Xie, Charles Fleming,Mingyu Ding,Huaxiu Yao

    AI agents increasingly operate over extended time horizons, yet their ability to retain, organize, and recall multimodal experiences remains a critical bottleneck. Building effective lifelong memory requires navigating a vast design space spanning architecture, retrieval strategies, prompt engineering, and data pipelines; this space is too large and interconnected for manual exploration or traditional AutoML to explore effectively. We deploy an autonomous research pipeline to discover Omni-SimpleMem, a unified multimodal memory framework for lifelong AI agents. Starting from a naïve baseline (F1=0.117 on LoCoMo), the pipeline autonomously executes ∼50 experiments across two benchmarks, diagnosing failure modes, proposing architectural modifications, and repairing data pipeline bugs, all without human intervention in the inner loop. The resulting system achieves state-of-the-art on both benchmarks, improving F1 by +411

    2026引用:11
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 2176 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    范德比尔特大学合作论文 45
    Georgia Institute of Technology,University System of Georgia合作论文 38
    斯坦福大学合作论文 36
    萨省大学合作论文 33
    国际商业机器公司合作论文 33
    英特尔公司合作论文 28
    北卡罗来纳州立大学合作论文 24
    甲骨文公司合作论文 22
    密歇根州立大学合作论文 22
    微软合作论文 21

    机构统计