• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    甲

    甲骨文公司

    Oracle Corporation
    企业
    1,917论文总数
    5.9万引用总数

    甲骨文公司,全称甲骨文股份有限公司(甲骨文软件系统有限公司),是全球最大的企业级软件公司,总部位于美国加利福尼亚州的红木滩。1989年正式进入中国市场。2013年,甲骨文已超越 IBM ,成为继 Microsoft 后全球第二大软件公司。

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Ashok V. Krishnamoorthy
    Ashok V. Krishnamoorthy
    Axalume Inc.
    论文:45引用:0H-index:0
    Meikel Poess
    Meikel Poess
    Oracle Corporation
    论文:41引用:0H-index:0
    Xuezhe Zheng
    Xuezhe Zheng
    Oracle Labs
    论文:38引用:0H-index:0
    Zhen Hua Liu
    Zhen Hua Liu
    Oracle
    论文:37引用:0H-index:0
    Hiren Thacker
    Hiren Thacker
    Oracle Labs
    论文:26引用:0H-index:0
    Raghu Nambiar
    Raghu Nambiar
    Cisco Systems, Inc
    论文:23引用:0H-index:0
    Guoliang Li
    Guoliang Li
    Oracle Labs
    论文:23引用:0H-index:0
    Ying Luo
    Ying Luo
    Networking Group, Oracle
    论文:22引用:0H-index:0
    Christoph Bussler
    Christoph Bussler
    Xtime, Inc.Redwood Shores, CA, USA
    论文:21引用:0H-index:0

    论文(1917)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1AI Data Centres As Grid-Interactive Assets
    Philip Colangelo, Ayse K. Coskun, Jack Megrue, Ciaran Roberts, Shayan Sengupta, Varun Sivaram, Ethan Tiao, Aroon Vijaykar, Chris Williams, Daniel C. Wilson, Brandon Records, Zack MacFarland,

    The exponential growth in electricity demand driven by artificial intelligence (AI) is threatening grid reliability, increasing energy costs for communities funding new infrastructure and slowing AI innovation as data centres await interconnection to constrained grids. Here we present a field demonstration of a software-based method that enables AI data centres to operate as flexible grid resources. Tested on a 256-Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) cluster running representative AI workloads in a hyperscale cloud facility in Phoenix, Arizona, the system reduced power usage by 25% for 3 hours during peak demand while maintaining AI quality of service guarantees. By coordinating workloads in response to real-time grid signals, without hardware modifications or energy storage, this approach demonstrates the potential for data centres to contribute to grid stability and affordability while sustaining computational performance within existing power-system constraints.

    2026NATURE ENERGY(2026)引用:21
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Rethinking Analytical Processing in the GPU Era
    Bobbi Yogatama, Yifei Yang, Kevin Kristensen, Devesh Sarda, Abigale Kim, Adrian Cockcroft, Yu Teng, Joshua Patterson, Gregory Kimball, Wes McKinney, Weiwei Gong,Xiangyao Yu

    The era of GPU-powered data analytics has arrived. In this paper, we argue that recent advances in hardware (e.g., larger GPU memory, faster interconnect and IO, and declining cost) and software (e.g., composable data systems and mature libraries) have removed the key barriers that have limited the wider adoption of GPU data analytics. We present Sirius, a prototype open-source GPU-native SQL engine that offers drop-in acceleration for diverse data systems. Sirius treats GPU as the primary engine and leverages libraries like libcudf for high-performance relational operators. It provides drop-in acceleration for existing databases by leveraging the standard Substrait query representation, replacing the CPU engine without changing the user-facing interface. On TPC-H, Sirius achieves 7x speedup when integrated with DuckDB in a single node at the same hardware rental cost, and up to 12.5x speedup when integrated with Apache Doris in a distributed setting.

    2026Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research(2026)引用:13
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3ToolScope: Enhancing LLM Agent Tool Use Through Tool Merging and Context-Aware Filtering
    Marianne Menglin Liu, Daniel Garcia, Fjona Parllaku, Vikas Upadhyay, Fahad Shah,Dan Roth

    Large language model (LLM) agents rely on external tools to solve complex tasks, but real-world toolsets often contain redundant tools with overlapping names and descriptions, introducing ambiguity and reducing selection accuracy. LLMs also face strict input context limits, preventing efficient consideration of large toolsets. To address these challenges, we propose ToolScope, which includes: (1) ToolScopeMerger with Auto-Correction to automatically audit and fix tool merges, reducing redundancy, and (2) ToolScopeRetriever to rank and select only the most relevant tools for each query, compressing toolsets to fit within context limits without sacrificing accuracy. Evaluations on three state-of-the-art LLMs and three open-source tool-use benchmarks show gains of 8.38% to 38.6% in tool selection accuracy, demonstrating ToolScope’s effectiveness in enhancing LLM tool use.

    2026ACL 2026(2026)引用:12
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4AgentSM: Semantic Memory for Agentic Text-to-SQL
    Asim Biswal,Chuan Lei, Xiao Qin, Aodong Li,Balakrishnan Narayanaswamy,Tim Kraska

    Recent advances in LLM-based Text-to-SQL have achieved remarkable gains on public benchmarks such as BIRD and Spider. Yet, these systems struggle to scale in realistic enterprise settings with large, complex schemas, diverse SQL dialects, and expensive multi-step reasoning. Emerging agentic approaches show potential for adaptive reasoning but often suffer from inefficiency and instability-repeating interactions with databases, producing inconsistent outputs, and occasionally failing to generate valid answers. To address these challenges, we introduce Agent Semantic Memory (AgentSM), an agentic framework for Text-to-SQL that builds and leverages interpretable semantic memory. Instead of relying on raw scratchpads or vector retrieval, AgentSM captures prior execution traces-or synthesizes curated ones-as structured programs that directly guide future reasoning. This design enables systematic reuse of reasoning paths, which allows agents to scale to larger schemas, more complex questions, and longer trajectories efficiently and reliably. Compared to state-of-the-art systems, AgentSM achieves higher efficiency by reducing average token usage and trajectory length by 25

    2026CoRR(2026)引用:11
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Pushing on Multilingual Reasoning Models with Language-Mixed Chain-of-Thought
    Guijin Son, Donghun Yang, Hitesh Laxmichand Patel, Amit Agarwal, Hyunwoo Ko, Chanuk lim, Srikant Panda, Minhyuk Kim, Nikunj drolia, Dasol Choi, Kyong-Ha Lee,Youngjae Yu

    Recent frontier models employ long-chain-of-thought reasoning to explore solution spaces in context and achieve stronger performance. While many works study distillation to build smaller yet capable models, most focus on English and little is known about language-specific reasoning. To bridge this gap, we first introduce **Language-Mixed CoT**, a reasoning schema that switches between English and a target language, using English as an anchor to excel in reasoning while minimizing translation artifacts. As a Korean case study, we curate **Yi-Sang-HQ**: 5.79M native-Korean prompts from web Q&A, exams, STEM, and code; 3.7M long reasoning traces generated from Qwen3-32B; and a targeted 260k high-yield subset. We train nine models (4B–35B) across six families (Qwen2.5, Llama-3.1, Gemma-3, etc). Our best model, **KO-REAson-35B**, achieves state-of-the-art performance, with the highest overall average score ($64.0_{\pm2.5}$), ranking first on 5/9 benchmarks and second on the remainder. Smaller and mid-sized models also benefit substantially, with an average improvement of $+18.6$ points across the evaluated nine benchmarks. Ablations show **Language-Mixed CoT** is more effective than monolingual CoT, indicating that reasoning patterns can be engineered to improve non-English performance. We release our data-curation pipeline, evaluation system, datasets, and models to advance research on language-specific reasoning.

    ICLR 2026引用:7
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 1917 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    国际商业机器公司合作论文 32
    英特尔公司合作论文 29
    微软合作论文 27
    思科系统合作论文 22
    德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校合作论文 21
    加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校合作论文 19
    斯坦福大学合作论文 19
    Georgia Institute of Technology,University System of Georgia合作论文 16
    伊利诺伊大学香槟分校合作论文 16
    卡内基梅隆大学合作论文 16

    机构统计