荷兰研究委员会

A catalytic machine is a model of computation where a traditional space-bounded machine is augmented with an additional, significantly larger, “catalytic” tape, which, while being available as a work tape, has the caveat of being initialized with an arbitrary string, which must be preserved at the end of the computation. Despite this restriction, catalytic machines have been shown to have surprising additional power; a logspace machine with a polynomial length catalytic tape, known as catalytic logspace ( ), can compute problems which are believed to be impossible for . A fundamental question of the model is whether the catalytic condition, of leaving the catalytic tape in its exact original configuration, is robust to minor deviations. This study was initialized by Gupta et al. (2024), who defined lossy catalytic logspace ( [e] ) as a variant of where we allow up to e errors when resetting the catalytic tape. They showed that [e] = for any e = O(1) , which remains the frontier of our understanding. In this work we completely characterize lossy catalytic space ( [s,c,e] ) in terms of ordinary catalytic space ( [s,c] ). We show that [s,c,e] = [Θ (s + e log c), Θ (c)] In other words, allowing e errors on a catalytic tape of length c is equivalent, up to a constant stretch, to an equivalent errorless catalytic machine with an additional e log c bits of ordinary working memory. As a consequence, we show that for any e, [e] = implies [e log n] ⊆ , thus giving a barrier to any improvement beyond [O(1)] = . We also extend all our results to every variant of catalytic space.

In the classic longest common substring (LCS) problem, we are given two strings $S$ and $T$, each of length at most $n$, over an alphabet of size $\sigma$, and we are asked to find a longest string occurring as a fragment of both $S$ and $T$. Weiner, in his seminal paper that introduced the suffix tree, presented an $\mathcal{O}(n \log \sigma)$-time algorithm for this problem [SWAT 1973]. For polynomially-bounded integer alphabets, the linear-time construction of suffix trees by Farach yielded an $\mathcal{O}(n)$-time algorithm for the LCS problem [FOCS 1997]. However, for small alphabets, this is not necessarily optimal for the LCS problem in the word RAM model of computation, in which the strings can be stored in $\mathcal{O}(n \log \sigma/\log n )$ space and read in $\mathcal{O}(n \log \sigma/\log n )$ time. We show that, in this model, we can compute an LCS in time $\mathcal{O}(n \log \sigma / \sqrt{\log n})$, which is sublinear in $n$ if $\sigma=2^{o(\sqrt{\log n})}$ (in particular, if $\sigma=\mathcal{O}(1)$), using optimal space $\mathcal{O}(n \log \sigma/\log n)$. We then lift our ideas to the problem of computing a $k$-mismatch LCS, which has received considerable attention in recent years. In this problem, the aim is to compute a longest substring of $S$ that occurs in $T$ with at most $k$ mismatches. Thankachan et al.~showed how to compute a $k$-mismatch LCS in $\mathcal{O}(n \log^k n)$ time for $k=\mathcal{O}(1)$ [J. Comput. Biol. 2016]. We show an $\mathcal{O}(n \log^{k-1/2} n)$-time algorithm, for any constant $k>0$ and irrespective of the alphabet size, using $\mathcal{O}(n)$ space as the previous approaches. We thus notably break through the well-known $n \log^k n$ barrier, which stems from a recursive heavy-path decomposition technique that was first introduced in the seminal paper of Cole et al. [STOC 2004] for string indexing with $k$ errors.

Answering a question of Gamarnik and Smedira [15], we give a polynomial time algorithm that approximately computes the volume of a truncation of a relaxation of the independent set polytope, improving on their quasi-polynomial time algorithm. Our algorithm is obtained by viewing the volume as an evaluation of a graph polynomial and we approximate this evaluation using Barvinok’s interpolation method.

The endeavor to emulate the extraordinary efficiency and adaptability inherent in the human brain via spike-based neuromorphic computing presents significant potential across a diverse array of applications. The attainment of this objective necessitates the translation of biological principles into artificial systems, a task that continues to pose a complex challenge requiring a profound comprehension of the mechanisms by which neural systems produce robust computational outcomes. This tutorial paper provides a comprehensive overview of the foundational concepts and emerging design trends in spike-based neuromorphic computing, covering advances from materials and circuits to hardware architectures and learning mechanisms. It begins with an examination of key aspects of brain biology and their influence on neuromorphic design, followed by a brief discussion of biologically plausible neuron and synapse models. The paper then defines the core principles and defining attributes of neuromorphic computing, highlighting the trade-offs and design choices underlying current implementations. Building on these foundations, it explores the critical properties of neuromorphic systems, surveys a variety of learning algorithms, and reviews hardware-level realizations of bioinspired neurons and synapses. Subsequent sections discuss state-of-the-art spiking neural network architectures, mapping and compilation strategies, and representative application domains. By providing this end-to-end perspective, the article aims to guide the development of future neuromorphic systems that more closely emulate brain efficiency, scalability, and resilience.

Sparse suffix sorting is the problem of sorting $b=o(n)$ suffixes of a string of length $n$. Efficient sparse suffix sorting algorithms have existed for more than a decade. Despite the multitude of works and their justified claims for applications in text indexing, the existing algorithms have not been employed by practitioners. Arguably this is because there are no simple, direct, and efficient algorithms for sparse suffix array construction. We provide two new algorithms for constructing the sparse suffix and LCP arrays that are simultaneously simple, direct, small, and fast. In particular, our algorithms are: simple in the sense that they can be implemented using only basic data structures; direct in the sense that the output arrays are not a byproduct of constructing the sparse suffix tree or an LCE data structure; fast in the sense that they run in $\mathcal{O}(n\log b)$ time, in the worst case, or in $\mathcal{O}(n)$ time, when the total number of suffixes with an LCP value greater than $2^{\lfloor \log \frac{n}{b} \rfloor + 1}-1$ is in $\mathcal{O}(b/\log b)$, matching the time of the optimal yet much more complicated algorithms [Gawrychowski and Kociumaka, SODA 2017; Birenzwige et al., SODA 2020]; and small in the sense that they can be implemented using only $8b+o(b)$ machine words. Our algorithms are simplified, yet non-trivial, space-efficient adaptations of the Monte Carlo algorithm by I et al. for constructing the sparse suffix tree in $\mathcal{O}(n\log b)$ time [STACS 2014]. We also provide proof-of-concept experiments to justify our claims on simplicity and efficiency.