• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    E

    European Council,European Union

    EST. 1974
    85论文总数
    438引用总数

    The European Council (informally EUCO) is a collegiate body that defines the overall political direction and priorities of the European Union. It is composed of the heads of state or government of the EU member states, the President of the European Council, and the President of the European Commission. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy also takes part in its meetings. Established as an informal summit in 1975, the European Council was formalised as an institution in 2009 upon the commencement of the Treaty of Lisbon. Its current president is Charles Michel, former Prime Minister of Belgium.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Ira Harkavy
    Ira Harkavy
    Center for Community Partnerships, University of Pennsylvania
    论文:3引用:0H-index:0
    Lisette Jansen
    Lisette Jansen
    University of Twente
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Dennis Reidsma
    Dennis Reidsma
    Digital Society Institute, Universiteit Twente
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Ronaldo Munck
    Ronaldo Munck
    University of Durban-Westville
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Anton Nijholt
    Anton Nijholt
    University of Twente;computer science
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Françoise Meunier
    Françoise Meunier
    EORTC, The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Nikolaos Sitaropoulos
    Nikolaos Sitaropoulos
    Off Council Europe Commissioner Human Rights
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Janet Hooper
    Janet Hooper
    University of Southampton
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Marie Rota
    Marie Rota
    Institute for Social Sciences and Humanities
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0

    论文(85)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Rethinking the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement and the Multilateral Investment Court to Enhance Third-Party Rights in Investment Treaty Arbitration
    Zamira Xhaferri, Jesus Robles
    2025FUTURE-PROOFING LAW IN A TIME OF ENVIRONMENTAL EMERGENCY(2025)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2“Conhecimento Se Compartilha E Faz Cada Um Olhar Para Seu Processo De Trabalho!” Um Relato De Experiência a Partir De Portfólios Reflexivos
    Katarina Dudienas Dovidauskas, Bruna Rego Rangel Cabral, Adernanda de Rocco Guimarães, Márcia Cristina Carneiro Cruz, Flávio César Braga Reis, Willian Fernandes Luna, Aline Guerra Aquilante

    Active teaching-learning methodologies (MAEA) are characterized by valuing student participation in the construction of knowledge, making the learning process more autonomous, dialogical, contextualized and with the potential to transform reality. This paper is an experience report, with a qualitative approach, constructed by five master degree students and two professors from the Postgraduate Program in Clinical Management at the Federal University of São Carlos (PPGGC/UFSCar) who experienced a mandatory theoretical discipline called Curricular Activity of Educational Processes in Health (ACPES) in 2022. Objectives: Describe and analyze experiences and learning developed by master degree students at ACPES, through reflective portfolios constructed by the students themselves. Briefing of Experience: The methodological path had four moments: survey of documents related to ACPES and the portfolios of the five student authors; individual construction of a conceptual map about the experiences and significant transformations that occurred as a result of ACPES; selection of the three most evident and representative sets of experiences identified in the portfolios; and elaboration of a single conceptual map, bringing together the three sets of senses, meanings and values in relation to experiences, based on visualization in meaning cores. The analysis of the portfolios was guided by the theoretical frameworks of constructivism and resulted in three distinct categories: 1) Individual learning; 2) Learning in interpersonal relationships; and 3) Transformations in professional practice. It was observed that the process experienced in the AC produced motivation, responsibility, criticality, reflexivity and autonomy from an individual point of view. In the field of interpersonal relationships, the richness of diversity, construction of a space of empathy and acceptance for the consolidation of collaborative learning stand out. The transformations in professional practice are the highlight of this work, which reports actions to qualify the work processes of master's students. Conclusions: The organized and expressed subjectivities produced reflections on the MAEA that retrace previous theories in each discourse, rebuilding what we know as Active Methodologies and their potential to transform reality.

    2025Saúde em Redes(2025)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Contributions and Struggles. Some Theological Explorations
    Keith Clements
    2025Baptist Quarterly(2025)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Fundamental Values at the Crossroads Between Politics, Policy, and Research
    Sjur Bergan
    2025International Higher Education(2025)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5The Impact of Peer Learning on Conceptual Understanding in Online Engineering Education
    Sunday Clement, Marcellin Yovogan,Purvi Pujari, Afsha Matloob

    This study aims to critically explore the impact of peer learning on conceptual understanding in online engineering education. By leveraging current peer-reviewed articles, the research provides an extensive analysis of the efficacy, variations, and challenges of peer learning approaches in virtual engineering classrooms. A comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR) methodology is used in the study, adhering to PRISMA for transparent identification, screening, and assessment of suitable studies. The major databases searched for articles were PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed articles published from 2015 to 2025, in the English language, and aligning with the scope of this study. The selected articles were then analyzed using a thematic analysis approach to identify patterns related to peer learning approaches like peer instruction, collaborative projects, and discussion forums, improving the conceptual gains of engineering students. Comparative findings were drawn from these parameters related to the study. Based on the extensive review and analysis of literature, a conceptual framework is presented in this paper, highlighting the relationships between peer learning approaches and their implications for online pedagogy. Recommendations focused on optimization of peer learning structures for the online environment in engineering and identifying support mechanisms for diverse learning groups. The review also identified research gaps, promoted adaptive peer learning models and longitudinal studies, and significantly contributed to the advancement of inclusive and effective online engineering education.

    2025INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING PEDAGOGY(2025)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 85 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    宾夕法尼亚大学合作论文 3
    卢布尔雅那大学合作论文 2
    都柏林城市大学合作论文 2
    European Commission,European Union合作论文 2
    飞利浦合作论文 2
    马克斯·普朗克学会合作论文 2
    European CanCer Organisation合作论文 2
    Clinique de Genolier合作论文 2
    哥本哈根大学合作论文 2
    查尔姆斯理工大学合作论文 2

    机构统计