• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    Facebook 公司

    Facebook 公司

    Facebook, Inc.
    企业
    7,520论文总数
    163万引用总数

    Facebook, Inc. (stylized as FACEBOOK) is an American social media conglomerate corporation based in Menlo Park, California. It was founded by Mark Zuckerberg, along with his fellow roommates and students at Harvard College, who were Eduardo Saverin, Andrew McCollum, Dustin Moskovitz and Chris Hughes, originally as TheFacebook.com—today's Facebook, a popular global social networking website. Facebook is one of the world's most valuable companies. It is considered one of the Big Five technology companies along with Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, and Google. Facebook offers other products and services beyond its social networking platform, including Facebook Messenger, Facebook Watch, and Facebook Portal. It also has acquired Instagram, WhatsApp, Oculus VR, Giphy and Mapillary, and has a 9.9% stake in Jio Platforms.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Qifan Wang
    Qifan Wang
    论文:132引用:0H-index:0
    Luke Zettlemoyer
    Luke Zettlemoyer
    Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington;Facebook AI
    论文:117引用:0H-index:0
    Yuandong Tian
    Yuandong Tian
    Recursive Superintelligence Inc.
    论文:110引用:0H-index:0
    Jason Weston
    Jason Weston
    Meta AI
    论文:104引用:0H-index:0
    Ser-Nam Lim
    Ser-Nam Lim
    Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering & Computer Science, University of Central Florida;Institute of Artificial Intelligence, University of Central Florida
    论文:80引用:0H-index:0
    Gabriel Synnaeve
    Gabriel Synnaeve
    Meta
    论文:66引用:0H-index:0
    Dhruv Batra
    Dhruv Batra
    Yutori
    论文:59引用:0H-index:0
    Yann LeCun
    Yann LeCun
    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University;AMI Labs
    论文:51引用:0H-index:0
    Mike Lewis
    Mike Lewis
    Meta
    论文:46引用:0H-index:0

    论文(7520)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models
    Siyan Zhao,Zhihui Xie, Mengchen Liu,Jing Huang,Guan Pang,Feiyu Chen,Aditya Grover

    Knowledge distillation improves large language model (LLM) reasoning by compressing the knowledge of a teacher LLM to train smaller LLMs. On-policy distillation advances this approach by having the student sample its own trajectories while a teacher LLM provides dense token-level supervision, addressing the distribution mismatch between training and inference in off-policy distillation methods. However, on-policy distillation typically requires a separate, often larger, teacher LLM and does not explicitly leverage ground-truth solutions available in reasoning datasets. Inspired by the intuition that a sufficiently capable LLM can rationalize external privileged reasoning traces and teach its weaker self (i.e., the version without access to privileged information), we introduce On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD), a framework where a single model acts as both teacher and student by conditioning on different contexts. The teacher policy conditions on privileged information (e.g., verified reasoning traces) while the student policy sees only the question; training minimizes the per-token divergence between these distributions over the student's own rollouts. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks, achieving 4-8× token efficiency compared to reinforcement learning methods such as GRPO and superior performance over off-policy distillation methods.

    2026ICML 2026(2026)引用:298
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Deep Think with Confidence
    Yichao Fu, Xuewei Wang,Hao Zhang,Yuandong Tian,Jiawei Zhao

    Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great potential in reasoning tasks through test-time scaling methods like self-consistency with majority voting. However, this approach often leads to diminishing returns in accuracy and high computational overhead. To address these challenges, we introduce \textbf{Deep Think with Confidence (DeepConf)}, a simple yet powerful method that enhances both reasoning efficiency and performance at test time. DeepConf leverages model-internal confidence signals to dynamically filter out low-quality reasoning traces during or after generation. It requires no additional model training or hyperparameter tuning and can be seamlessly integrated into existing serving frameworks. We evaluate DeepConf across a variety of tasks and the latest open-source models, including Qwen3 and GPT-OSS series. Notably, on challenging benchmarks such as AIME 2025, DeepConf@512 achieves up to 99.9\% accuracy and reduces generated tokens by up to 84.7\% compared to full parallel thinking. Our code is available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/deepconf

    ICLR 2026引用:207
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3VLM-3R: Vision-Language Models Augmented with Instruction-Aligned 3D Reconstruction
    Zhiwen Fan, Jian Zhang,Renjie Li,Junge Zhang,Runjin Chen,Hezhen Hu,Kevin Wang,Peihao Wang, Huaizhi Qu, Shijie Zhou,Dilin Wang,Zhicheng Yan,

    The rapid advancement of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) for 2D images and videos has motivated extending these models to understand 3D scenes, aiming for human-like visual-spatial intelligence. Nevertheless, achieving deep spatial understanding comparable to human capabilities poses significant challenges in model encoding and data acquisition. Existing methods frequently depend on external depth sensors for geometry capture or utilize off-the-shelf algorithms for pre-constructing 3D maps, thereby limiting their scalability, especially with prevalent monocular video inputs and for time-sensitive applications. In this work, we introduce VLM-3R, a unified framework for Vision-Language Models (VLMs) that incorporates 3D Reconstructive instruction tuning. VLM-3R processes monocular video frames by employing a geometry encoder to derive implicit 3D tokens that represent spatial understanding. Leveraging our Spatial-Visual-View Fusion and over 200K curated 3D reconstructive instruction tuning question-answer (QA) pairs, VLM-3R effectively aligns real-world spatial context with language instructions. This enables monocular 3D spatial assistance and embodied reasoning. To facilitate the evaluation of temporal reasoning, we introduce the Vision-Spatial-Temporal Intelligence benchmark, featuring over 138.6K QA pairs across five distinct tasks focused on evolving spatial relationships. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our model, VLM-3R, not only facilitates robust visual-spatial reasoning but also enables the understanding of temporal 3D context changes, excelling in both accuracy and scalability.

    2026CVPR 2026(2026)引用:124
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4The Art of Scaling Reinforcement Learning Compute for LLMs
    Fnu Devvrit,Lovish Madaan,Rishabh Tiwari,Rachit Bansal,Sai Surya Duvvuri, Manzil Zaheer,Inderjit S Dhillon,David Brandfonbrener,Rishabh Agarwal

    Reinforcement learning (RL) has become central to training large language models (LLMs), yet the field lacks predictive scaling methodologies comparable to those established for pre-training. Despite rapidly rising compute budgets, there is no principled understanding of how to evaluate algorithmic improvements for scaling RL compute. We present the first large-scale systematic study, amounting to more than 400,000 GPU-hours, that defines a principled framework for analyzing and predicting RL scaling in LLMs. We fit sigmoidal compute-performance curves for RL training and ablate a wide range of common design choices to analyze their effects on asymptotic performance and compute efficiency. We observe: (1) Not all recipes yield similar asymptotic performance, Details such as loss aggregation, normalization, curriculum, and off-policy algorithm primarily modulate compute efficiency without materially shifting the asymptote, and (3) Stable, scalable recipes follow predictable scaling trajectories, enabling extrapolation from smaller-scale runs. Combining these insights, we propose a _best-practice_ recipe, ScaleRL, and demonstrate its effectiveness by successfully scaling and predicting validation performance on a single RL run scaled up to 100,000 GPU-hours. Our work provides both a _scientific framework_ for analyzing scaling in RL and a practical recipe that brings RL training closer to the predictability long achieved in pre-training.

    ICLR 2026引用:81
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5J1: Incentivizing Thinking in LLM-as-a-Judge Via Reinforcement Learning
    Chenxi Whitehouse,Tianlu Wang,Ping Yu,Xian Li,Jason E Weston,Ilia Kulikov,Swarnadeep Saha

    The progress of AI is bottlenecked by the quality of evaluation, making powerful LLM-as-a-Judge models a core solution. The efficacy of these judges depends on their chain-of-thought reasoning, creating a critical need for methods that can effectively optimize this reasoning process. In this work, we introduce J1, a reinforcement learning framework for teaching LLM judges to think before making decisions. Our core contribution lies in converting all judgment tasks for non-verifiable and verifiable prompts into a unified format with verifiable rewards, enabling direct optimization of evaluation quality while mitigating positional bias. We then use RL to train thinking-judges at scales of 8B, 32B, and 70B and show that they obtain state-of-the-art performance across multiple benchmarks. In particular, J1-Qwen-32B, our multitasked pointwise and pairwise judge also outperforms o1-mini, o3, and a much larger 671B DeepSeek-R1 on some benchmarks, while only training on synthetic data. Through comprehensive ablations of pairwise, pointwise, and multitask J1 variants, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach across seed prompts, reward strategies, and training recipes. Qualitative analysis reveals that J1 develops systematic evaluation strategies, including dynamic criteria generation, reference answer creation, iterative self-correction of initial assessments, and feedback generation for low-quality responses.

    ICLR 2026引用:75
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 7520 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    卡内基梅隆大学合作论文 437
    谷歌合作论文 273
    斯坦福大学合作论文 273
    纽约大学合作论文 246
    加利福尼亚大学伯克利分校合作论文 219
    麻省理工学院合作论文 214
    伊利诺伊大学香槟分校合作论文 205
    Georgia Institute of Technology,University System of Georgia合作论文 203
    华盛顿大学合作论文 200
    微软合作论文 182

    机构统计