• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    F

    Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy Systems,Fraunhofer Society

    EST. 2009
    478论文总数
    7,733引用总数

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Bernhard Stoevesandt
    Bernhard Stoevesandt
    University of Oldenburg
    论文:39引用:0H-index:0
    Joachim Peinke
    Joachim Peinke
    Institut fur Physik;Carl-von-Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg;Institut fur Physik, Carl-von-Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg
    论文:22引用:0H-index:0
    Alexandros E. Antoniou
    Alexandros E. Antoniou
    Department of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, University of Patras
    论文:17引用:0H-index:0
    Martin W. Braun
    Martin W. Braun
    Intel Corporation
    论文:17引用:0H-index:0
    Adrian Gambier
    Adrian Gambier
    Automation Laboratory;Institute of Computer Engineering;University of Heidelberg;Institute of Computer Engineering, University of Heidelberg
    论文:16引用:0H-index:0
    Martin Doerenkaemper
    Martin Doerenkaemper
    Fraunhofer Inst Wind Energy Syst IWES
    论文:15引用:0H-index:0
    Jan Wenske
    Jan Wenske
    Institut für Elektrische Energietechnik, Technische Universität Clausthal-Zellerfeld
    论文:14引用:0H-index:0
    Julia Gottschall
    Julia Gottschall
    Div Wind Farm Planning & Operat, Fraunhofer Inst Wind Energy Syst IWES
    论文:11引用:0H-index:0
    Lukas Vollmer
    Lukas Vollmer
    Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy Systems IWES
    论文:8引用:0H-index:0

    论文(479)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Degradation Mechanisms in PEM Water Electrolysis: Diagnosis and Impact
    Annik Bernhardt, Katja Lange, Robert Göckeritz, Erik Grunwald, Angelika Hähnel, Alexander Müller,Volker Naumann, Sistan Rasuli, Wolfram Münchgesang, Bruno G. Pollet, Kerstin Witte‐Bodnar, Klemens Ilse

    ABSTRACT Proton electrolyte membrane (PEM) water electrolyzers (WE) represent a pivotal technology for the electrochemical production of hydrogen. However, a persistent challenge is the loss of efficiency and performance, along with a shortened lifetime caused by degradation of the materials in PEMWE. This review examines the degradation mechanisms of PEMWE components, including the electrolyte membrane, catalyst layers, porous transport layers, bipolar plates, and gaskets. Furthermore, it places particular emphasis on measurement techniques used to examine and differentiate the degradation mechanisms, including a discussion of less‐studied mechanisms and measurement methods. A survey was conducted among PEMWE experts to analyse prevailing opinions on the severity and frequency of different degradation mechanisms. It supplements the literature review and allows for a comprehensive understanding of the impacts of degradation.

    2026Advanced Materials Technologies(2026)引用:2
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2A Modular Approach to Wind Farm Simulation Using Functional Mock-Up Units for Co-Simulation
    Marcus Wiens, Keno Ohrmann, Balthazar Sengers, Jonas Schulte,Niklas Requate

    Abstract The development and design of renewable energy systems relies on system simulations to evaluate constantly changing environments and new requirements. This can require the extension or development of new simulation models, which is a time consuming effort, making reusing models desirable. However, this flexibility is not always given in existing tools. Co-Simulation provides a technique to overcome these issues, but it has not been applied yet for aero-elastic simulation of wind farms. This study investigates how co-simulation techniques can be applied to create modular simulations of wind farms. We utilize functional mock-up units as a model base to wrap existing models as components for a wind farm simulation framework, which we call farmQSim. Additionally, a continuously generating wind model is used to remove the necessity of a precursor wind generating model. The wind farm co-simulation approach shows a good match with results from FAST.farm and allows for flexible setup of simulation. Models of different complexity can be combined into a single simulation case to decrease simulation time while achieving comparable results. Overall, co-simulation has been proven to be suitable for wind farm simulations and therefore enables reusability of simulation models and provides extensibility of the simulation cases.

    2026Journal of Physics Conference Series(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3AI-enhanced Diagnostics for Manufacturer-Independent Validation of Wind Turbine Performance: Results from the WindKI Project
    Lars Osterbrink, Lukas Ditzel, Daniel Hein, Keno Ohrmann, Johannes Fricke

    Abstract Accurate, manufacturer-independent assessment of wind turbine performance remains a key challenge with direct implications for energy yield, as conventional power-curve analyses are often biased by uncertainties in nacelle-mounted wind measurements. This paper presents an anomaly detection framework developed within the WindKI research initiative, which aims to improve wind turbine performance diagnostics using data-driven methods. The proposed framework combines multiple unsupervised anomaly detection models with a rank-based ensemble strategy to identify statistically unusual operating behavior without requiring labeled training data or turbine-specific tuning. The approach is evaluated using the CARE dataset, comprising predefined normal and anomalous events from three wind farms. Results show consistent prioritization of anomalous events across sites, with ROC–AUC values of approximately 0.8, indicating robust performance despite the unsupervised setting. The framework provides a scalable foundation for diagnosing underperformance and investigating potential failure modes in wind energy assets.

    2026Journal of Physics Conference Series(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Scaled Testing for Wind Turbine Drivetrains: State of the Art and Recent Developments
    Muhammad Omer Siddiqui, Felix Leuf, Christoph Paridon, Paul Feja, Julian Röder,Uwe Jassmann, Fabian Renger, Jonas Reicherter,Matthias Stammler,Jan Wenske,Georg Jacobs

    Abstract As wind turbine drivetrains grow in scale and complexity, the practice of full-scale testing has become expensive and logistically demanding. These challenges are inducing a significant shift in the wind energy industry, potentially propelling scaled testing from a specialized academic pursuit into a widely adopted method. While scaled testing has a well-established history in the analysis of the structural integrity of wind turbine components and the aerodynamic performance, its application to drivetrain systems is a recent but expanding field. This paper reviews state-of-the-art scaled testing methods for wind turbine drivetrain components. It addresses recent developments, and the ongoing efforts of standardized scaled testing methods for wind turbine drivetrains. Considering the research and case studies presented in this paper, it is projected that scaled testing will become an integral and essential part of the design, validation, and optimization processes for future wind turbine drivetrain systems.

    2026Journal of Physics Conference Series(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Benchmark Simulations of Rotor Aerodynamics on the IEA Wind 15MW RWT and Associated Modeling Challenges
    K Boorsma, J G Schepers, G R Pirrung, H A Madsen, N, C Grinderslev, M Imiela, F Krimm, G Bangga, W Gonçalves Pinto, L Greco, C Testa,

    Abstract A large comparison exercise has been performed featuring aerodynamic and aero-elastic simulation cases on the IEA 15MW reference wind turbine in various conditions, containing results of 30 codes ranging from BEM to CFD. More than 10 different variable types ranging from lifting line variables to pressures, loads and velocities have been compared for the different conditions, resulting in many comparison plots. The result is a unique insight in the current status and accuracy of rotor aerodynamic modeling. Although there are no measurements on this turbine, mutual comparison of model results provided useful insights into the performance of rotor aerodynamic models. Preparatory simulations on the 15MW RWT at constant uniform conditions generally showed reasonable agreement in the aerodynamic response between engineering and higher-fidelity models, provided the turbine was considered rigid. However, including flexibility effects led to more discrepancies, largely due to differences in blade torsion, which in turn impacts the aerodynamics. Even at very moderate wind speeds the blade tip torsion angle could be in the order of 2 degrees where large differences were found between the partners results. Following the preparatory cases, simulations under turbulent conditions were performed. Several turbulent boxes were generated using high-fidelity CFD models and the results were compared mutually. Some differences appeared in the turbulent boxes, which could be expected from convection differences. At first sight the differences seemed small. However, when the boxes were fed into an aero-elastic code, the differences became significant enough to affect load response. When supplying the sampled wind speeds from the turbulent box as input to engineering-fidelity models, it was interesting to find that these models showed a much higher standard deviation in loads compared to higher-fidelity models. This confirms the finding from previous numerical studies that engineering models tend to overpredict fatigue loads, also for a large sized rotor.

    2026Journal of Physics Conference Series(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 479 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    奥尔登堡大学Carl von Ossietzky合作论文 38
    汉诺威大学合作论文 21
    斯图加特大学合作论文 17
    不来梅大学合作论文 12
    卡塞尔大学合作论文 11
    丹麦技术大学合作论文 11
    National Renewable Energy Centre合作论文 10
    弗劳恩霍夫协会合作论文 9
    南特中央大学合作论文 8
    挪威科技大学合作论文 8

    机构统计