• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    赫

    赫尔辛基大学中心医院

    Helsinki University Central Hospital
    6,478论文总数
    37.2万引用总数

    Helsinki University Central Hospital (HUCH; in Finnish, Helsingin seudun yliopistollinen keskussairaala or HYKS; in Swedish, Helsingfors universitets centralsjukhus (HUCS)) is the largest university hospital in Finland, and one of the largest hospitals in Europe. It encompasses 17 hospitals in Helsinki, Espoo and Vantaa, and has all major medical specialties represented. The HUCH Hospital Area is one of the five hospital areas making up the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (HUS). HUCH hospitals in Helsinki consist of the following: Aurora Hospital Children's Castle Children's Hospital Department of Oncology Eye and Ear Hospital Meilahti Tower Hospital (Meilahti Hospital) Meilahti Triangle Hospital Psychiatrycenter Skin and Allergy Hospital Surgical Hospital Women's Hospital.HUCH hospitals in Espoo and Vantaa: Jorvi Hospital Peijas Hospital

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Heikki Joensuu
    Heikki Joensuu
    Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital
    论文:104引用:0H-index:0
    Heli Nevanlinna
    Heli Nevanlinna
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University
    论文:101引用:0H-index:0
    Yrjö T. Konttinen
    Yrjö T. Konttinen
    University of Helsinki;Helsinki University Central Hospital
    论文:96引用:0H-index:0
    Sakari Knuutila
    Sakari Knuutila
    Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki
    论文:82引用:0H-index:0
    Turgut Tatlisumak
    Turgut Tatlisumak
    Sahlgrenska Academy at Univ of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp
    论文:82引用:0H-index:0
    Ulf-Håkan Stenman
    Ulf-Håkan Stenman
    Department of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki
    论文:73引用:0H-index:0
    Kristiina Aittomäki
    Kristiina Aittomäki
    University of Helsinki
    论文:54引用:0H-index:0
    Pertti Jaakko Neuvonen
    Pertti Jaakko Neuvonen
    University of Helsinki;Helsinki University Central Hospital
    论文:49引用:0H-index:0
    Mauri Lepantalo
    Mauri Lepantalo
    Department of Vascular Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital
    论文:41引用:0H-index:0

    论文(6479)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Fourteen Year Outcomes of a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Endovenous Laser Ablation, High Ligation and Stripping, and Ultrasound Guided Foam Sclerotherapy for Great Saphenous Varicose Veins.
    Tasnuva Rahman,Katariina Noronen,Sari Vähäaho, Karoliina Halmesmäki,Maarit Venermo

    OBJECTIVE:To compare high ligation and stripping (HLS), endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), and ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) for symptomatic great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux in the long term, given the limited comparative data beyond ten years. METHODS:Patients with symptomatic GSV reflux were randomised (1:1:1) to undergo HLS, EVLA, or UGFS. One hundred and ninety-six patients treated at Helsinki University Hospital were invited to 14 year follow up. Primary outcomes were above knee GSV reflux and GSV re-intervention rates. Secondary outcomes included quality of life. RESULTS:Of 233 randomised patients, 214 were included. UGFS increased the risk of GSV reflux recurrence compared with both HLS (risk ratio [RR] 11.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6 - 85.6) and EVLA (RR 5.0, 95% CI 1.5 - 16.6; 30.8% [12 of 39] after UGFS vs. 2.6% [one of 38] and 6.1% [three of 49] after HLS and EVLA, respectively; overall p < .001). UGFS was associated with a higher risk of GSV re-interventions compared with HLS (RR 4.3, 95% CI 1.8 - 10.2) and EVLA (RR 6.9, 95% CI 2.6 - 18.4; 56.4% for UGFS vs. 13.2% for HLS and 8.2% for EVLA; overall p < .001). Neovascularisation rates did not differ between the treatments (29.0%, 22.5%, and 23.1% for HLS, EVLA, and UGFS, respectively; overall p = .76). Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire scores were comparable across the groups (median [interquartile range] 8.9 [3.7, 13.3] in HLS, 6.1 [0.8, 12.2] in EVLA, and 8.8 [4.1, 13.4] in UGFS, with median differences of +2.8 [HLS vs. EVLA], +0.1 [HLS vs. UGFS], and -2.7 [EVLA vs. UGFS]; overall p = .21). CONCLUSION:UGFS demonstrated inferior outcomes in terms of GSV recurrent reflux and re-intervention rates compared with both HLS and EVLA, whereas HLS and EVLA showed comparable performance across these outcomes. Long term quality of life was comparable across all groups.

    2026European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery the official journal of the European Society ...(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2What Connects the Two Deadliest Widespread Diseases, Peripheral Arterial Disease and Cancer?
    Christian-Alexander Behrendt,Maarit Venermo
    2026European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery the official journal of the European Society ...(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    326. Aortic Root Surgery in Patients with Repaired Congenital Conotruncal Defects – Procedures, Hospital Survival, Risk Factors, an ECHSA Database Study
    Fabian Kari, George Sarris,Attilio Lotto,Tommi Patila,Boulos Asfour,Protopapas Eleftherios, Zdzislaw Tobota, Massimo Padalino,Andrzej Kansy,Simone Speggiorin, Vladimiro Vida, Sara C. Arrigoni,
    2026JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Complications of PI to PIII Hemipelvic Resections for Intermediate and Malignant Tumours : a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Maria A Smolle, Florian A Wenzl,Minna K Laitinen,Lee M Jeys, BOOM Consortium,Andreas Leithner, Yunus Abdul Bari, Ahmed Abood, John Abraham, Marthelena Acosta, Rishi Agarwal, Manish Agarwal,

    Aims:Surgical management of intermediate and malignant tumours in the pelvis is complex. Complications are frequent and either related to the surgery itself or to post-surgical failure of the reconstruction technique. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims at analyzing all reported complications following PI to PIII pelvic resections for intermediate and malignant tumours. Methods:Based on a systematic literature search on PubMed adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, 1,683 study records were identified, of which we included 90 original studies published until 22 July 2025. Overall complication rates were assessed with random-effects meta-analysis. Differences in complication rates between reconstruction types (i.e. megaprosthetic, mostly biological, none) were evaluated with meta regression analysis. Results:Data on 2,199 patients (1,250 males (57%)) with mainly PI to PIII pelvic resections were analyzed. The most common reconstruction types were custom-made implants (21%; n = 451) and ice-cream cone prostheses (14%; n = 312). Pooled rates of infections, wound healing problems, nerve injuries, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) amounted to 15% (95% CI 12% to 18%), 13% (95% CI 10% to 15%), 7% (95% CI 5% to 9%), and 4% (95% CI 2% to 6%), respectively. Further, pooled implant revision/removal and secondary external hemipelvectomy rates were 14% (95% CI 11% to 17%) and 4% (95% CI 3% to 5%). Mostly biological reconstructions were associated with higher rates of nerve injuries (p < 0.001), construct failures (p = 0.010), and secondary implant revision/removal (p = 0.003) compared to megaprosthetic reconstruction. Further, biological reconstructions were associated with increased secondary external hemipelvectomy rates compared to megaprosthetic reconstructions (p = 0.005) or no reconstructions (p = 0.001). Conclusion:Treatment of pelvic malignancies is challenging, with technically demanding resections and complex reconstructions. Across all reconstruction techniques following sacrum-sparing pelvic resections, infections and wound healing problems are the most common complications, yet there is also a considerable proportion of patients with neurovascular complications and DVTs.

    2026Bone & joint open(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Acta Paediatrica | Paediatrics Journal | Wiley Online Library
    Jenny Puputti, Mikko P. Pakarinen,Janne S. Suominen

    Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies in children and differentiating uncomplicated appendicitis from complicated is crucial. Our aim was to examine accuracy of preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) combined with imaging findings in identifying patients with uncomplicated outcome. We retrospectively examined 1520 patients treated for acute appendicitis at the Helsinki University Children's Hospital during 2013–2023. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and areas under the ROC curves (AUROC) were used to estimate optimal CRP cutoff values with maximum sum of sensitivity and specificity for predicting uncomplicated outcomes in patients with uncomplicated imaging findings. Among the 1149 included patients, preoperative imaging included ultrasound examination (98.6%), MRI (9.8%), and/or CT (2.1%). In total, 314 (27.3%) patients had a complicated outcome with higher preoperative CRP levels (133 ± 83 mg/L) compared to patients with uncomplicated outcomes (47.2 ± 46.3 mg/L, p  < 0.001). In patients with uncomplicated imaging findings, the optimal CRP cutoff was 58 mg/L with AUROC 0.819 (95% CI 0.78–0.86), 85.7% sensitivity, and 90.0% specificity. Using CRP cutoff ≤ 58 mg/L, only 20 of 450 patients with uncomplicated imaging findings had a complicated outcome. With CRP cutoff ≤ 58 mg/L and uncomplicated imaging findings, only a minority (4.4%) of children with acute appendicitis had a complicated outcome.

    2026emActa Paediatrica/em Paediatrics Journal Wiley Online Library(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 6479 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    赫尔辛基大学合作论文 1,841
    图尔库大学合作论文 241
    坦佩雷大学医院合作论文 237
    图尔库大学医院合作论文 214
    库奥皮奥大学医院合作论文 183
    奥卢大学医院合作论文 174
    奥卢大学合作论文 159
    坦佩雷大学合作论文 155
    卡罗琳斯卡医学院合作论文 149
    National Institute of Public Health,Ministry of Health合作论文 122

    机构统计