Jacksonville College is a private junior college in Jacksonville, Texas. It is the only accredited junior college in Texas that is privately owned and operated, owned by the Baptist Missionary Association of America, with additional financial support provided by Southern Baptists of Texas, the conservative state convention affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention.The college's current president is Dr. Joe Lightner, who has served in that capacity since 2021.The college is known for its singing groups - a main choir, a smaller group called The Singers, a women's trio, and a men's quartet.Jacksonville College, the oldest junior college in the state of Texas, opened in 1899 and has operated continuously since that time, though before 1918 it operated as a four-year institution.The college believes in the importance of each student making a personal commitment to Christianity, make behavioral changes in Christian applications to 21st century personal, family, community, and global issues, endorse lifelong Christian learning for their vocation, and broaden Biblical literacy..
BACKGROUND:Sickle cell disease is characterized by chronic hemolytic anemia and recurrent severe vaso-occlusive crises. Ristoglogene autogetemcel (risto-cel) includes autologous CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells that have been base-edited to target the HBG1 and HBG2 promoters and inhibit BCL11A binding without altering BCL11A expression, yielding a switch in hemoglobin production from sickle hemoglobin (HbS) to antisickling fetal hemoglobin (HbF). METHODS:In this phase 1-2 study, we enrolled patients 12 to 35 years of age with sickle cell disease who had had at least four severe vaso-occlusive crises in the 2 years before enrollment. After myeloablative conditioning with pharmacokinetically guided administration of busulfan, patients received a single infusion of risto-cel (at a dose of ≥3.0×106 viable CD34+ cells per kilogram of body weight). The primary efficacy end point was freedom from severe vaso-occlusive crises for 12 consecutive months, starting later than 60 days after the last red-cell transfusion. This interim analysis was unplanned; here, we describe safety, editing, engraftment, and hemoglobin production and the number of severe vaso-occlusive crises starting later than 60 days after the last red-cell transfusion. RESULTS:A total of 31 patients received risto-cel and were followed for a mean of 6.6 months (range, 0.3 to 20.4). A median of one cycle (range, one to five) was required for stem-cell collection. Neutrophil engraftment occurred at a median of 17.5 days, and platelet engraftment at a median of 19 days. One patient died from idiopathic pneumonia syndrome. All 31 patients had at least one adverse event, 27 (87%) had an adverse event of grade 3 or higher, and 12 (39%) had a serious adverse event. At 6 months, the mean fraction of on-target edited alleles in peripheral blood was 67.4%, the mean HbF as a fraction of total hemoglobin was more than 60%, and the HbS as a fraction of total hemoglobin was less than 40% (among 13 patients); these levels were maintained throughout follow-up. No investigator-reported severe vaso-occlusive crises occurred later than 60 days after the last red-cell transfusion. CONCLUSIONS:Treatment with risto-cel was followed by rapid engraftment and durable expression of HbF and reduction in HbS. These data support further investigation of risto-cel to treat sickle cell disease. (Funded by Beam Therapeutics; BEACON ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05456880.).
IntroductionApproximately 50% of patients with uveal melanoma develop metastatic disease, most commonly involving the liver, and prognosis remains poor. Immunoembolization (IE) is an established liver-directed therapy for patients with liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM), though comparative data with other regional therapies remain limited. We present a single-center retrospective analysis of IE in hepatic mUM and compare outcomes with those reported in the Phase 3 FOCUS trial evaluating melphalan via percutaneous hepatic perfusion.MethodsAll patients with liver-dominant mUM treated with IE between 2010 and 2023 at our institution were included. Clinical records were reviewed for demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR), defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), with subgroup analyses based on prior systemic therapy exposure. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.ResultsForty-three patients (62.8% female; median age 62 years; all Caucasian) underwent 249 IE procedures (mean 5.8 procedures per patient) over a median treatment duration of 9.1 months. Choroidal primaries accounted for 95.3% of cases, and 90.7% had liver-only metastases. The overall DCR was 27.9% (CR 4.7%, PR 20.9%, SD 2.3%), while 62.8% experienced disease progression. Median PFS was 0.85 months, and median OS was 32.7 months. One- and two-year OS rates were 69.8% and 55.8%, respectively. In subgroup analysis, patients who had received prior systemic therapy (n=12) demonstrated improved outcomes compared with treatment-naïve patients, with longer median PFS (29.9 vs. 7.2 months) and higher 2-year OS (60.0% vs. 47.0%). Compared with outcomes reported in the FOCUS trial, IE demonstrated shorter median PFS (0.85 vs. 9.0 months) and lower DCR (27.9% vs. 73.6%), but longer median OS (32.7 vs. 20.5 months).DiscussionIE produced overall survival outcomes comparable to hepatic melphalan delivery despite lower radiographic response rates. Notably, patients previously treated with systemic therapy experienced improved outcomes, suggesting a potential sequencing effect. These findings support IE as a viable liver-directed therapy for liver-dominant mUM. Prospective, multicenter trials are warranted to clarify optimal sequencing strategies and enhance therapeutic outcomes.
TPS11587 Background: Recurrent or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) remains a difficult disease to treat. Available agents such as doxorubicin, eribulin, trabectedin, ifosfamide, dacarbazine, or gemcitabine-based regimens are associated with low response rates and only modest improvements in progression free or overall survival. The oncogene CDK4 is ubiquitously amplified in this disease and represents a rational therapeutic target. In single-arm phase 2 studies, treatment with selective CDK4 inhibitors resulted in clinical benefit (12-week progression-free survival (PFS) of 57% with palbociclib and 74% with abemaciclib). We hypothesize that treatment with abemaciclib will improve PFS compared to placebo in patients with recurrent or metastatic DDLS. Methods: This is a phase 3 randomized double-blind study of abemaciclib versus placebo. Eligible patients have recurrent or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma (purely well-differentiated liposarcoma excluded), progression of disease by RECIST 1.1 in the 6 months prior to study entry, any number of prior systemic therapies, and adequate organ function and performance status. Patients are stratified by number of prior lines of therapy (0 vs 1 or more) and randomized 1:1 between abemaciclib 200 mg PO twice a day and matching placebo. Patients are followed with scans every 6 weeks (every 12w after 36w) and those with progression of disease on placebo may cross over to open label abemaciclib. The primary endpoint is PFS. Target enrollment is 108 evaluable patients which provides 80% power with two-sided 10% significance level to detect a hazard ratio of 0.6. Secondary endpoints include response rate, PFS and response rate after crossover, and overall survival. Archival tissue will be collected to explore potential biomarkers. As of Feb 1, 2023, 43 patients have been accrued at 9 participating centers. Clinical trial information: NCT04967521 .
Background:Computed tomography-guided transthoracic biopsy (CTTB) and shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB) are diagnostic modalities for evaluating high-risk pulmonary nodules. Previous studies have been limited by inconsistencies in defining diagnostic yield. The advent of strict diagnostic yield criteria enables a more accurate comparison of these modalities. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of ssRAB and CTTB in evaluating pulmonary nodules. Methods:DYSTRICT is a retrospective cohort including patients with high-risk pulmonary nodules who underwent ssRAB or CTTB between November 2022 and December 2024. A 1:1 matched analysis was performed based on nodule characteristics. Diagnostic yield was assessed using strict criteria, defining diagnostic lesions as those with a specific malignant or benign diagnosis. Associations between variables were analysed using descriptive statistics, and logistic models where appropriate. Results:A total of 574 nodules were evaluated (287 in each arm). Both groups had similar baseline characteristics, including age, sex, lesion size, nodule type and location. Strict diagnostic yield was comparable between ssRAB (n=213 (74%)) and CTTB (n=226 (79%)) (p=0.201). However, ssRAB demonstrated a significantly safer profile, with lower rates of pneumothorax (OR 0.04 (95% CI 0.01-0.08); p<0.001) and hospitalisation (OR 0.35 (95% CI 0.15-0.75); p=0.010) compared with CTTB. Conclusion:ssRAB and CTTB achieved comparable strict diagnostic yield rates in pulmonary nodules with similar baseline characteristics. However, ssRAB demonstrated a higher safety profile, with significantly lower rates of pneumothorax, chest tube placement and hospitalisation compared with CTTB.
