• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    M

    Medical Products Agency

    EST. 1990
    185论文总数
    8,240引用总数

    The Medical Products Agency (MPA; Swedish: Läkemedelsverket) is the government agency in Sweden responsible for regulation and surveillance of the development, manufacturing and sale of medicinal drugs, medical devices and cosmetics.Its task is also to ensure that both patients and healthcare professionals have access to safe and effective medicinal products and that these are used in a rational and cost-effective manner.The Swedish Medical Products Agency is one of the leading regulatory authorities in the EU. During the last five years,[when?] the Swedish MPA has been among the top three agencies in Europe, counting the number of approvals processes managed for central (i.e. European) approvals of medicines. The Swedish MPA also has strong representation in more than 110 working groups and committees in the scope of the Heads of Medicines Agencies (HMA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) for regulation of medical products in Europe.The Medical Products Agency is a government body under the aegis of the Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. Its operations are largely financed through fees. Approximately 750 people work at the agency; most are pharmacists and doctors..

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Rickard Ljung
    Rickard Ljung
    Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Analyses, Swedish Medical Products Agency;Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet
    论文:13引用:0H-index:0
    Anders Sundstrom
    Anders Sundstrom
    Swedish Medical Products Agency
    论文:10引用:0H-index:0
    Bertil Jonsson
    Bertil Jonsson
    Medical Products Agency
    论文:8引用:0H-index:0
    Tomas Salmonson
    Tomas Salmonson
    Comm Med Prod Human Use, EMA
    论文:7引用:0H-index:0
    Ahmad Amini
    Ahmad Amini
    Medical University of Vienna
    论文:5引用:0H-index:0
    Francesco Pignatti
    Francesco Pignatti
    European Medicines Agency
    论文:5引用:0H-index:0
    Björn Beermann
    Björn Beermann
    Medical Products Agency P.O. Box 26 751 03 Uppsala Sweden
    论文:4引用:0H-index:0
    Janet R. Wade
    Janet R. Wade
    Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Glasgow University
    论文:4引用:0H-index:0
    Westermark Kerstin
    Westermark Kerstin
    Swedish Medical Products Agency
    论文:4引用:0H-index:0

    论文(185)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Physicians’ Gender and Specialty in Relation to Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Sweden
    Lina-Maria Nordvall,Bo Rolander, Maria Larsson, Linnea Melin,Staffan Hägg, Anders Kling

    To evaluate the possible influence of gender and specialty on adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting among physicians before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This retrospective nationwide register study analysed all ADR reports submitted by physicians to the Swedish Medical Products Agency during 2017 and 2023 (n = 4079 and 3740, respectively). The reporting rates were calculated and stratified by gender and specialty. The highest reporting rate among physicians was observed in medical specialties, followed by primary care and psychiatry (27, 10, and 12, reports/100 physicians in 2017; 18, 15, and 9 in 2023). The lowest reporting rates were observed for surgical and hospital service specialties (8 and 1 in 2017; 6 and 1 in 2023). Male and female physicians reported ADRs to a similar extent and both reported more frequently on female patients. Gender concordance between physician and patient was associated with significantly higher reporting (p < 0.001 in 2017; p = 0.041 in 2023). Reporting varied across specialties, and gender concordance emerged as a previously unrecognized factor influencing ADR reporting. These findings provide new opportunities for targeted interventions to enhance physician participation in pharmacovigilance.

    2026European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology(2026)引用:42
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Second Regulatory Workshop on Utilising in Silico Models to Expedite Vaccine Development, Testing, and Lifecycle Management-an Expert Meeting Report
    Irina Meln, Wim Van Molle, Mónica Perea Vélez,Marc Baay, Daniel G Bracewell, Koen Brusselmans, Antonio Gaetano Cardillo, Didier Clénet, Caroline Forestieri, Lea Girardon, Arnar Gudjonsson, Antonio Guzzi,

    The Inno4Vac consortium, funded under the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking, was launched in September 2021. Among its four key objectives is the development of an open-source, in silico simulation platform designed to support the design, scale-up, operation, and technology transfer of vaccine manufacturing processes, including stability testing. A workshop was held on May 27, 2025, in Brussels, Belgium, which provided an opportunity for modellers to show the progress made, and have an open dialogue with regulatory health authorities' representatives. Regulators are increasingly open to advanced kinetic modelling and other modelling approaches for predicting vaccine stability and shelf-life, provided they are transparent, scientifically justified, and validated with real-time data. Initial claims can rely on accelerated studies and modelling simulating worst-case scenarios, with extensions supported by additional data. In urgent contexts, extrapolation from similar products or processes may be accepted if scientifically sound. Platform-based extrapolation requires strong similarity, but product-specific data remain critical, as small formulation changes can alter stability. Simulation studies that demonstrate robustness and predictive accuracy enhance confidence. Projects like Inno4Vac highlight Bayesian methods for formulation design, though formal guidance is limited. Regulatory scrutiny depends on model risk, with low-risk models probably still requiring justification. Transparent data practices, including justified handling of outliers, are essential. Collaboration between regulators, industry, and academia remains key to advancing science-based innovation while ensuring product quality.

    2026Vaccine(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Drug Utilisation of Antipsychotics and Lithium in Sweden 2008–2021 – a Nationwide Study of Children Aged 5–17 Years
    Elin Dahlén,Håkan Jarbin,Anders Sundström, Ida Walles, Sverre Wikström, Elin Eyfells Kimland

    Antipsychotics are mainly used for severe psychiatric disorders. Risperidone is the only antipsychotic approved for younger children. Aripiprazole is approved for older children, ziprasidone and lurasidone for adolescents. To describe paediatric utilisation of antipsychotic drugs in Sweden. Dispensations of antipsychotic drugs to children aged 5-17 years from 2008 to 2021 were analysed using the National Prescribed Drug Register and recorded diagnoses were obtained from the National Patient Register. Overall, dispensations of antipsychotics to children increased from 16.7 to 36.9/10,000 between 2008 and 2021. The increase was larger in girls, from 12.3 to 36.6/10,000. New users of antipsychotics increased by 121% in the same period, from 7.9 to 17.5/10.000. In 2019, in children aged 12-17, 63% of girls and 71% of boys were dispensed had at least three dispensations of antipsychotics, while the corresponding proportion in children aged 5-11 were 52% for girls and 63% for boys. Risperidone was the most common drug in boys of all ages and in girls aged 5-11. In girls aged 12-17, aripiprazole and quetiapine were most common. The proportion of on-label antipsychotic use was 21% in girls and 15% in boys based in authorised product information and increased to 37% and 45%, respectively, when aligning with national guidelines. The use of antipsychotics has increased, with the proportion of girls starting treatment at the end of study period exceeding that of boys. A considerable proportion of prescriptions was off-label, even when considering national guidelines.

    2026European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Effectiveness of JN.1 Monovalent COVID-19 Vaccination in EU/EEA Countries Between October 2024 and January 2025: a VEBIS Electronic Health Record Network Study.
    James Humphreys, Alexandre Blake,Nathalie Nicolay,Toon Braeye, Izaak Van Evercooren,Christian Holm Hansen, Ida Rask Moustsen-Helms,Chiara Sacco, Alberto Mateo-Urdiales,Jesús Castilla,Iván Martínez-Baz,Ausenda Machado,

    We estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) of Omicron JN.1-adapted COVID-19 vaccines administered during the 2024 autumnal vaccination campaign against COVID-19 hospitalisation and death among eligible individuals aged ≥65 years. The study period was October 2024-January 2025. Using a common protocol across six EU/EEA study sites, we linked electronic health records to construct retrospective cohorts and applied Cox modelling to estimate VE via confounder-adjusted hazard ratios. The majority of vaccines administered during the study period were Omicron JN.1-adapted COVID-19 vaccines (99 %). VE against hospitalisation was 60 % (95 % Confidence Interval: 48-70 %) and against COVID-19-related death was 78 % (95 %CI: 64-87 %) among individuals aged 65-79 years; 58 % (95 %CI: 48-66 %) and 62 % (95 %CI: 32-79 %) among those aged ≥80 years. These results indicate high effectiveness in the initial months of the campaign. Continued monitoring is necessary to confirm these results, including estimates of VE in those with longer time since vaccination and during different variant predominance periods.

    2025Vaccine(2025)引用:7
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Trends in the Use of Drugs with Weight-Loss Effect: Scandinavian Study from 2017 to 2023.
    Paz Lopez-Doriga Ruiz, Lars Bakke Hindenes,Øystein Karlstad,Kjersti Nøkleby,Haakon E Meyer,Aurélie Mailhac,Rickard Ljung,Reimar W Thomsen,Kari Furu
    2025Diabetes, obesity & metabolism(2025)引用:4
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 185 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    乌普萨拉大学合作论文 27
    卡罗琳斯卡医学院合作论文 13
    European Medicines Agency,European Union合作论文 13
    Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices合作论文 9
    哥德堡大学合作论文 7
    卡罗林斯卡大学医院合作论文 7
    隆德大学合作论文 7
    挪威公共卫生研究所合作论文 5
    Statens Serum Institut合作论文 5
    芬兰健康与福利研究所合作论文 4

    机构统计