• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    M

    Michigan Headache and Neurological Institute

    EST. 1978
    135论文总数
    5,962引用总数

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Joel R. Saper
    Joel R. Saper
    Director, Michigan Headache and Neurological Institute
    论文:74引用:0H-index:0
    Stephen Silberstein
    Stephen Silberstein
    Jefferson Headache Center, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University;Methodist Hospital Division, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
    论文:26引用:0H-index:0
    Richard B. Lipton
    Richard B. Lipton
    Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine;Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
    论文:16引用:0H-index:0
    Alvin Lake III
    Alvin Lake III
    Michigan Head-Pain and Neurological Institute
    论文:15引用:0H-index:0
    TD Rozen
    TD Rozen
    Jefferson Headache Ctr, Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp
    论文:15引用:0H-index:0
    Peter Goadsby
    Peter Goadsby
    NIHR-Wellcome Trust King’s Clinical Research Facility, King’s College London;King’s College Hospital;Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco
    论文:13引用:0H-index:0
    David W. Dodick
    David W. Dodick
    Mayo Clinic;Atria
    论文:11引用:0H-index:0
    Roger Cady
    Roger Cady
    Lundbeck
    论文:9引用:0H-index:0
    Rozen Todd D
    Rozen Todd D
    Dept Neurol, Mayo Clin Florida
    论文:9引用:0H-index:0

    论文(135)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Prevention of Migraine: the Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled PREMIUM II Trial.
    Umer Najib,Timothy Smith,Nada Hindiyeh,Joel Saper,Barbara Nye,Sait Ashina,Candace K. McClure,Michael J. Marmura,Serena Chase,Eric Liebler,Richard B. Lipton

    Aim Evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for migraine prevention. Methods After completing a 4-week diary run-in period, adults who had migraine with or without aura were randomly assigned to receive active non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation or sham therapy during a 12-week double-blind period. Results Of 336 enrolled participants, 113 (active, n = 56; sham, n = 57) completed ≥70 days of the double-blind period and were ≥66% adherent with treatment, comprising the prespecified modified intention-to-treat population. The COVID-19 pandemic led to early trial termination, and the population was ∼60% smaller than the statistical target for full power. Mean reduction in monthly migraine days (primary endpoint) was 3.12 for the active group and 2.29 days for the sham group (difference, −0.83; p = 0.2329). Responder rate (i.e. the percentage of participants with a ≥50% reduction in migraine days) was greater in the active group (44.87%) than the sham group (26.81%; p = 0.0481). Prespecified subgroup analysis suggested that participants with aura responded preferentially. No serious device-related adverse events were reported. Conclusions These results suggest clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for migraine prevention, particularly for patients who have migraine with aura, and reinforce the well-established safety and tolerability profile of this therapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03716505).

    2022CEPHALALGIA(2022)引用:32
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Eptinezumab in Episodic Migraine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study (PROMISE-1)
    Messoud Ashina,Joel Saper,Roger Cady,Barbara A Schaeffler,David M Biondi,Joe Hirman,Susan Pederson,Brent Allan,Jeff Smith

    OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab, a humanized anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody, in the preventive treatment of episodic migraine. METHODS:The PRevention Of Migraine via Intravenous ALD403 Safety and Efficacy-1 (PROMISE-1) study was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Adults with episodic migraine were randomized to eptinezumab 30 mg, 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo for up to four intravenous (IV) doses administered every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMDs) over weeks 1-12. RESULTS:A total of 888 patients received treatment across 84 study sites. Mean MMDs at baseline was ∼8.6 across treatment groups. Eptinezumab 100 mg and 300 mg met the primary endpoint, significantly reducing MMDs across weeks 1-12 compared with placebo (30 mg, -4.0; 100 mg, -3.9, p = 0.0182; 300 mg, -4.3; placebo, -3.2, p = 0.0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 58.4% (30 mg), 63.2% (100 mg), 57.6% (300 mg), and 59.5% (placebo) of patients. Treatment-emergent adverse events reported by ≥2% of eptinezumab-treated patients at an incidence greater than placebo included: upper respiratory tract infection (30 mg, 11.4%; 100 mg, 9.9%; 300 mg, 10.3%; placebo, 7.2%), and fatigue (30 mg, 2.3%; 100 mg, 3.6%; 300 mg, 3.6%; placebo, <1%). CONCLUSION:Eptinezumab (100 mg or 300 mg) significantly reduced migraine frequency, was well tolerated, and had an acceptable safety profile when used for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults with episodic migraine. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02559895.

    2020Cephalalgia an international journal of headache(2020)引用:302
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3The Multicenter, Randomised, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled PREMIUM 2 Trial: Study Design for Evaluating Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation (nvns) As a Preventive Treatment of Migraines
    Stephen D. Silberstein,Joel R. Saper,Laszlo L. Mechtler,Eric Liebler,Timothy Smith
    2019CEPHALALGIA(2019)引用:2
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Safety of Galcanezumab in Patients with Episodic Migraine: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Dose-Ranging Phase 2b Study.
    Tina Marie Myers Oakes,Vladimir Skljarevski,Qi Zhang,William Kielbasa,Michael E. Hodsdon,Holland C. Detke,Angelo Camporeale,Joel R. Saper

    Background Safety findings from a Phase 2b study of galcanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against calcitonin gene-related peptide, for prevention of migraine (NCT02163993) are reported here. Methods Patients aged 18–65 years with episodic migraine were evaluated in this multicenter, double-blind, randomized study. After randomization, 410 patients were administered 5, 50, 120 or 300 mg of galcanezumab or placebo subcutaneously once every 4 weeks for 12 weeks, followed by a post-treatment off-drug period lasting 12 weeks. Results Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were primarily rated as mild to moderate. Serious adverse events reported in galcanezumab dose groups were appendicitis, Crohn’s disease, suicidal ideation, and congenital ankyloglossia in an infant of a paternal pregnancy; each of these were reported by one patient. Adverse events leading to discontinuation with galcanezumab treatment were abdominal pain, visual impairment, and upper limb fracture, each reported by one patient. Treatment-emergent injection-site reactions were reported significantly more frequently ( p = 0.013) with galcanezumab (13.9%) than with placebo (5.8%). Injection-site pain was the most common injection-site reaction (galcanezumab 11.4%; placebo 2.9%, p = 0.004). Upper respiratory tract infection (galcanezumab 10.0%; placebo 8.8%) and nasopharyngitis (galcanezumab 7.0%; placebo 2.2%) also occurred more frequently with galcanezumab treatment. Potential hypersensitivity events were reported at similar frequencies in galcanezumab (3.3%) and placebo (5.1%) groups. Incidence of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies in galcanezumab dose groups (4.6% of patients during treatment period) did not appear to have any meaningful effects on safety, the pharmacokinetics of galcanezumab, or its ability to bind to the target ligand. Conclusion The results from this 3-month Phase 2b study support the initiation of larger Phase 3 trials of longer duration.

    2018CEPHALALGIA(2018)引用:50
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Eptinezumab for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Results of the PROMISE-2 (PRevention of Migraine via Intravenous Eptinezumab Safety and Efficacy-2) Trial
    R. B. Lipton,J. Saper,M. Ashina,D. Biondi,S. Bhattacharya,J. Hirman,B. Schaeffler,R. Cady
    2018HEADACHE(2018)引用:6
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 135 篇论文

    合作机构(56)

    Headache Care Center合作论文 7
    托马斯杰斐逊大学合作论文 5
    安进合作论文 4
    温纳贝戈医学中心合作论文 4
    Carolina Headache Institute合作论文 4
    克利夫兰诊所合作论文 4
    Diamond Headache Clinic合作论文 4
    德雷塞尔大学合作论文 3
    哥本哈根大学合作论文 3
    杜克大学合作论文 3

    机构统计