• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    N

    New Economics Foundation

    企业EST. 1986
    67论文总数
    615引用总数

    The New Economics Foundation (NEF) is a British think-tank that promotes "social, economic and environmental justice".NEF was founded in 1986 by the leaders of The Other Economic Summit (TOES) with the aim of working for a "new model of wealth creation, based on equality, diversity and economic stability".The foundation has 50 staff in London and is active at a range of different levels. Its programmes include work on well-being, its own kinds of measurement and evaluation, sustainable local regeneration, its own forms of finance and business models, sustainable public services, and the economics of climate change.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    griffin carpenter
    griffin carpenter
    New Economics Foundation, 10 Salamanca Place, SE1 7HB London, UK
    论文:5引用:0H-index:0
    Saamah Abdallah
    Saamah Abdallah
    Seminar Media & Commun, Univ Erfurt
    论文:3引用:0H-index:0
    Josh Ryan-Collins
    Josh Ryan-Collins
    Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, University College London;Government of the United Kingdom, Department of Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
    论文:3引用:0H-index:0
    Kai-Uwe Kühn
    Kai-Uwe Kühn
    Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica, (CSIC), University of Michigan
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Laurie Macfarlane
    Laurie Macfarlane
    OpenDemocracy
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Mathilde Brabant
    Mathilde Brabant
    Engie
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Christelle Adjémian
    Christelle Adjémian
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Emmanuel Frot
    Emmanuel Frot
    Institute of Group Analysis
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Ole Bjerg
    Ole Bjerg
    Copenhagen Business Sch, Copenhagen Business Sch
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0

    论文(67)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Central Banking, Monetary Policy and Gender
    Ignacia Pinto
    2026Feminist Economics(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2The Brexit Deal and UK Fisheries-Has Reality Matched the Rhetoric?
    Stewart Bryce D.,Williams Chris, University of Tromsø, Walmsley Suzannah F.,Carpenter Griffin

    Fisheries management has been a strongly contested aspect of the UK’s position in the EU since UK accession, with the fishing industry frequently questioning both the efficacy and fairness of arrangements. During the campaign for UK exit (Brexit) from the EU, and the subsequent negotiations of a new legal and political relationship from 2016 to 2020, senior UK political leaders strongly committed to deliver radically changed fisheries arrangements with respect to the three central issues: regulatory autonomy; access to waters; and quota shares, all while maintaining minimal trade impacts. The Trade and Cooperation Agreement diverges from this Brexit rhetoric. While some regulatory independence has been achieved, UK fisheries management continues in a state of interdependence and significant EU access to UK waters remains, even in the 6–12 nautical mile territorial waters. While the UK gained an increase in quota shares which is estimated to reach 107 thousand tonnes of landed weight annually by 2025 (an increase of 21.3% for quota species and 16.9% for all species, or 17.8% and 12.4% by value), this pales in comparison to the UK Government’s stated ambitions for zonal attachment (achieving 68% by weight and by value - a potential shortfall of 229,000 tonnes / £281 million). This modest change explains the negative reaction of the fishing industry and claims of betrayal in the face of the UK Government’s announcement of a “successful” deal. The stark delivery gap between rhetoric and reality means the UK government faces a challenging start to managing fisheries outside of the Common Fisheries Policy.

    2022Maritime Studies(2022)引用:22
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3The Contribution of Peer Research in Evaluating Complex Public Health Interventions: Examples from Two UK Community Empowerment Projects
    Kris Southby,Susan Coan, Sara Rushworth,Jane South,Anne-Marie Bagnall, Tiffany Lam,Jenny Woodward, Danial Button

    Background Peer-research is steered and conducted by people with lived experience of the issues being researched. This paper explores the value of peer-research in two complex public health intervention evaluations in the UK. Methods Reports from 18 peer research projects, completed by residents from 12 communities in the UK taking part in two community empowerment interventions, were analysed using cross-case analysis. Results Undertaking peer research helped to build the evaluation and research skills within individual projects as well as providing data on other outcomes related to the programmes Theory of Change. Some peer researchers, however, felt unprepared for the activity despite support from the academic team and were unsatisfied with project outcomes. While peer research projects provided more opportunities for local residents to engage with the overall evaluations, there was an overreliance on people closely connected to the programmes to be peer researchers. The peer research projects explored topics that were broader than the aims and objectives of the overall programme evaluations. All provided insight into the context in which projects occurred, while some also informed understanding of programme change mechanisms. Conclusions Including peer research as part of complex public health intervention evaluations can help uncover important contextual and ecological details beyond the reach of more traditional evaluation data collection. Peer research can also empower and build research/evaluation capacity within communities, which is particularly pertinent for community empowerment interventions.

    2022BMC Public Health(2022)引用:6
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Happy Planet Index
    Saamah Abdallah
    2022Perspectives on the History of Global Development(2022)引用:4
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Routing Protocols for Internet of Vehicles: A Review
    Farhana Ajaz,Mohd. Naseem,Gulfam Ahamad,Qamar Rayees Khan,Sparsh Sharma,Ehtesham Abbasi

    As the rapid invention and innovation has been performed in the automobile sectors, the modern vehicles are supposed to perform communication through heterogeneous technologies. In this process, the modern vehicles should be able to commutate tremendous amount of data and information within their neighborhood. To incorporate these requirements of modern vehicles, the conventional VANET are emerging to the Internet of Vehicles (IoV). In this chapter, we intend to contribute in review of routing protocols of the IoV. We will classify different type of routing protocols based on different parameters (information based, topology based, position based, delay based, target network). We will also discuss the challenges of routing protocols and future direction. This chapter ought to guide and motivate researchers of IoV to develop efficient routing protocols.

    2021Studies in Big DataAI and Machine Learning Paradigms for Health Monitoring System(2021)引用:8
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 67 篇论文

    合作机构(51)

    European Commission,European Union合作论文 4
    University Grants Commission合作论文 2
    Fulbright Commission合作论文 2
    Sterling Research Group合作论文 2
    Belgian Development Agency合作论文 2
    Engie Inc.合作论文 2
    Institute of Group Analysis合作论文 2
    约克大学合作论文 2
    东英吉利大学合作论文 2
    哥本哈根商学院合作论文 2

    机构统计