• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    N

    Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine

    EST. 1954
    2,054论文总数
    6.5万引用总数

    .

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Jolanta Walusiak-Skorupa
    Jolanta Walusiak-Skorupa
    Department of Occupational Diseases and Toxicology, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
    论文:179引用:0H-index:0
    Wojciech Wasowicz
    Wojciech Wasowicz
    Department of Toxicology and Carcinogenesis, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
    论文:163引用:0H-index:0
    Wojciech Hanke
    Wojciech Hanke
    Department of Environmental Epidemiology, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
    论文:143引用:0H-index:0
    Kinga Polanska
    Kinga Polanska
    Zakład Środowiskowych i Zawodowych Zagrożeń Zdrowia / Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Hazards), Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
    论文:131引用:0H-index:0
    Marta Wiszniewska
    Marta Wiszniewska
    Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
    论文:125引用:0H-index:0
    Jolanta Gromadzinska
    Jolanta Gromadzinska
    Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Biological and Environmental Monitoring Department
    论文:110引用:0H-index:0
    Jolanta Lissowska
    Jolanta Lissowska
    Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology
    论文:98引用:0H-index:0
    Beata Peplonska
    Beata Peplonska
    Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
    论文:82引用:0H-index:0
    Edyta Reszka
    Edyta Reszka
    Department of Toxicology and Carcinogenesis, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
    论文:78引用:0H-index:0

    论文(2054)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1A Prognostic Signature for Lung Adenocarcinoma in Patients Who Have Never Smoked.
    Wei Zhao,Tongwu Zhang,Xing Hua,Phuc H Hoang, Mona Miraftab, Monjoy Saha, John P McElderry,Jian Sang, Olivia W Lee, Caleb Hartman,Azhar Khandekar, Sunandini Sharma,

    Understanding tumor cell dynamics can improve prognosis and treatment but remains limited for lung adenocarcinoma in people who have never smoked (NS-LUAD). With RNA sequencing data from 684 NS-LUAD cases and validation in an independent dataset, we identified three subtypes with distinct phenotypic traits and cell compositions. Additional genomic and histologic data further characterized the subtypes. "Steady," marked by low proliferation, high alveolar cell fraction, moderate-to-well differentiation, and fewer driver gene alterations, is linked to prolonged survival and low immune evasion. "Proliferative" shows high proliferation markers, TP53 mutations, and gene fusions. "Chaotic," with high epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition markers, has the worst prognosis, even within stage I tumors. Lacking known molecular or histologic characteristics, this aggressive subtype is solely identified by transcriptomic data. A 60-gene signature recapitulates the classification and predicts survival even within subgroups based on tumor stage or known genomic features, emphasizing its potential for improving early-stage NS-LUAD prognostication in clinical settings. SIGNIFICANCE:The transcriptome of 684 NS-LUAD identifies three subtypes with different cellular dynamics and genomic and morphologic features. A 60-gene signature accurately stratifies subjects for mortality risk, even in stage I, offering a potential clinically applicable tool for treatment decision-making in patients with NS-LUAD. See related commentary by Azizi et al., p. 423.

    2026Cancer discovery(2026)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Risk of Head and Neck Cancer in Former Smokers by Subsite: A Multicenter Analysis from the INHANCE Consortium
    Matheus de Abreu,Luiz Paulo Kowalski, Rossana Mendoza López, Christine Barul,Loredana Radoi,Ettore Bidoli,Jerry Polesel,Victor Wunsch-Filho,Andrew F Olshan,Jose Zevallos, Eva Negri,Valeria Edefonti,

    This study investigated risk factors associated with HNC by subsite including oral cavity cancer (OCC), oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), and laryngeal cancer (LC) among former smokers in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium (INHANCE). Case-control study including former smokers from the pooled INHANCE data, with information on sociodemographic, smoking, and alcohol history. Associations were assessed using logistic regression with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The study included 2143 cases with HNC and 5799 controls. Cancer cases were categorized by their respective subsites: 954 LC (44.5%), 685 OPC (32.0%), 504 OCC (23.5%). The risk of developing OCC was 2.8-fold higher [CI: 1.9-4.1], LC 2.6-fold higher [CI: 1.9-3.5], and OPC 2.1-fold higher [CI: 1.5-2.8] in individuals who smoked > 50 pack-years, compared to < 10 pack-years. The risk of OCC/OPC/LC increased with tobacco consumption in North-America, whereas in Western/Southern-Europe and South-America the association plateaued beyond 31-50 pack-years. Cessation after age 55 increased the risk of LC by 3.0-fold [CI: 2.2-4.2], and OCC by 2.2-fold [CI: 1.4-3.3] versus cessation age ≤ 45 years. Consuming ≥ 5 drinks/day was associated with 5-fold higher risk of OPC [CI: 3.7-6.6], 4.4-fold higher risk of OCC [CI: 3.2-6.1] and 3.1-fold higher risk of LC [CI: 2.4-3.9] compared to 0-0.9 drinks/day. The risk of HNC among former smokers is not homogeneous across regions and that there were distinct patterns for OCC, OPC, and LC. The amount of tobacco and alcohol consumption are key risk factors, with alcohol being more important for OCC/OPC, and tobacco being more strongly associated with LC risk.

    2026International journal of cancer(2026)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Uptake and Engagement with Digital Mental Health in the Workplace: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of the EMPOWER Trial
    Stijn B Peeters,Marleen de Mul, Frederick W Thielen,Marjo Sinokki, Kaja Staszewska,Luis Salvador-Carulla,Sue Lukersmith,Beatriz Olaya,Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen

    This study examined contextual factors influencing the uptake and use of the EMPOWER digital mental health platform, implemented in small and medium-sized enterprises and public agencies in Spain, Poland, Finland, and the United Kingdom. The platform was developed within an EU-funded project to promote workplace mental health and evaluated in a randomised controlled trial assessing its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. A mixed-methods design was applied combining logistic regression analyses of baseline employee data with qualitative semi-structured interviews exploring barriers and facilitators to engagement. Results indicated that successful uptake was supported by strong employer involvement, a positive workplace culture, clear communication of benefits and data privacy, tailoring of content to employee needs, and available technical support. Barriers included insufficient communication, limited organisational support, lack of allocated time for use, unclear instructions, and concerns about anonymity. Employers often expressed reluctance to take responsibility for facilitating implementation, reflecting low organisational readiness. While the platform itself was generally regarded as user-friendly, its integration into daily workplace practices was inconsistent, with many employees using it outside of working hours. In conclusion, effective and sustainable implementation of digital workplace mental health interventions requires more active stakeholder engagement, clearer and sustained communication strategies, and alignment with organisational policies and structures. Addressing these contextual factors is essential for maximising uptake and ensuring that digital health platforms such as EMPOWER achiever their intended impact in supporting mental health at work.

    2026Internet interventions(2026)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Occupational Exposure to Chlorinated Solvents and Lung Cancer: Results of the SYNERGY Case-Control Study
    Wenxin Wan,Roel Vermeulen,Lützen Portengen,Ann Olsson,Joachim Schüz, Wendy Bijoux,Wolfgang Ahrens, Christine Barul,Thomas Behrens,Thomas Brüning, Neil E Caporaso,Dario Consonni,

    OBJECTIVE:The association between occupational exposure to chlorinated solvents and lung cancer remains inconclusive. This study investigated this relationship using data from the internationally pooled SYNERGY study. METHODS:Data from 14 case-control studies conducted in 13 European countries and Canada were pooled, including 28 048 participants (12 329 cases and 15 719 controls). Lifetime occupational exposure to chlorinated solvents was assessed using the ALOHA+job-exposure matrix. ORs and 95% CIs were estimated using unconditional logistic regression, adjusted for study centre, age, sex, smoking (pack-years and cessation), cumulative exposure to five occupational lung carcinogens (asbestos, hexavalent chromium, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, respirable crystalline silica and diesel engine exhaust), cumulative benzene exposure and employment in high-risk occupations ('List A' jobs). Associations were estimated across categories of exposure levels, durations and analyses stratified by smoking status and lung cancer subtypes. RESULTS:We found no evidence of an association between ever exposure to chlorinated solvents and lung cancer risk (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.10). Among exposed individuals, a positive trend with cumulative exposure was observed (p=0.031), but not when non-exposed individuals were included (p=0.173). Positive trends were found with exposure duration (p=0.005 for exposed; p=0.048 overall); risks were modestly elevated (OR 1.11) in those exposed for 20 or more years. No increased risk was observed across smoking strata or lung cancer subtypes. CONCLUSIONS:This pooled analysis provides limited evidence of an association between occupational exposure to chlorinated solvents and lung cancer, though exposure-response trends were noted among exposed individuals.

    2026Occupational and environmental medicine(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Dose Constraints for Occupational and Public Exposure in Europe: Survey Findings and Insights from EURADOS WG12
    Mateusz Mirowski, Joanna Domienik-Andrzejewska,Merce Ginjaume,Eleftheria Carinou, Anita Dowling, Dario Faj,Una O’Connor

    Purpose Dose constraints (DC), as a tool of optimization, are still under research. This element of radiation protection seems to be essential, especially in interventional cardiology and radiology, where the occupational and public exposure doses may be relatively prominent. This article presents findings and insights to status of implementation the dose constraints in Europe. Materials and methods Questionnaire has been sent to two target groups in Europe – regulatory bodies representants and medical facilities’ workers, involved in establishing dose constraints and maintaining radiation protection e.g. radiation protection officers/experts or medical physicists. Collected data and analyze of answering show mainly that the dose constraints are implemented, both for occupational and public exposure, nevertheless there are differences in methods of implementation. Results The survey was fulfilled by 17 Regulatory Bodies (RB) from different European countries and by 50 Medical Facility Representants (MF) from 14 European countries. Using dose constraints as defined in the Basic Safety Standard document confirmed 82% of RBs and 76% of MF. Other, most important answers for questions targeted to both groups (RBs and MFs) as responsibility of setting DCs, also divided into two groups – occupational and public exposure, also with analysis are presented in this paper. Conclusions The need of preparing guidance is seen, especially for usage dose constraints in occupational exposure. What is more, respondents see the positive aspects of dose constraints, in terms of optimization, safer work environment and risk reduction.

    2026Physica Medica(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 2054 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    Medical University of Lodz合作论文 150
    查理大学合作论文 56
    卡罗琳斯卡医学院合作论文 49
    中国国家传染病研究中心合作论文 46
    美国国家卫生研究院合作论文 44
    帕拉茨基大学合作论文 39
    温纳贝戈医学中心合作论文 33
    哥本哈根大学合作论文 32
    Gdańsk Medical University合作论文 32
    都灵大学合作论文 29

    机构统计