• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    诺

    诺福克和诺维奇大学医院

    Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital,Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    EST. 2001
    5,458论文总数
    12.9万引用总数

    The Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (NNUH) is a large National Health Service academic teaching hospital in the Norwich Research Park on the western outskirts of Norwich, England.The university hospital replaced the former, Norfolk and Norwich Hospital, which was founded in 1771, and the West Norwich Hospital. The Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital was built under the Private Finance Initiative (PFI), and opened in late 2001: it has 1237 acute beds and offers a wide range of NHS acute health services plus private patient facilities. It is one of the largest hospitals in the United Kingdom in terms of in-patient capacity. The hospital is part of the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.NNUH was the first new NHS teaching hospital built in England for more than 30 years and the hospital trust is a partner with the University of East Anglia in the delivery of courses. The hospital is a teaching centre for nurses (adult and children's), midwives, doctors, radiographers, therapists and operating department practitioners. It hosts the Norwich GP speciality training scheme...

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Nick J Levell
    Nick J Levell
    Bertram Diabetes Research Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust
    论文:149引用:0H-index:0
    Karl Gaffney
    Karl Gaffney
    Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust
    论文:107引用:0H-index:0
    Marc D. Moncrieff
    Marc D. Moncrieff
    Discipline of Surgery, The University of Sydney
    论文:88引用:0H-index:0
    Simon T. Donell
    Simon T. Donell
    Norwich Medical School and School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of East Anglia
    论文:84引用:0H-index:0
    Chetan B. Mukhtyar
    Chetan B. Mukhtyar
    University of Oxford
    论文:80引用:0H-index:0
    Toby O. Smith
    Toby O. Smith
    Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick
    论文:79引用:0H-index:0
    Phyo Kyaw Myint
    Phyo Kyaw Myint
    School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen;Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia
    论文:68引用:0H-index:0
    Allan Clark
    Allan Clark
    Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia
    论文:65引用:0H-index:0
    Andoni Toms
    Andoni Toms
    Department of Radiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital;Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia
    论文:64引用:0H-index:0

    论文(5458)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Nonsurgical Versus Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Kamran Hassan Dar, Abdulaziz Alzarooni, Justyna Kaczmarek, Cara Mohammed, Alicia Mary Sequeira, Mrunj Bhavinkumar Patel, K. Venkataramana, Zehra Hasnain, Kabilesh Jothilingam, Seba Sayed Muhammed, Abdalwahab Alenezy, Asma’a Munasar Ali Alsubari,

    There is conflicting evidence regarding the optimal management strategy for cervical radiculopathy. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the relative effectiveness of nonsurgical treatment and surgical care in adult patients with cervical radiculopathy. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing nonsurgical treatment with surgical treatment. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan version 5.4. Five RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Surgical treatment significantly improved neck pain (SMD 0.70, 95

    2026European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology(2026)引用:18
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Understanding Acral Lentiginous Melanoma: from Clinic to Guidelines
    Opeoluwa Fariyike, Nicholas A Johnson,Paul Craig,Jenny Nobes,Nick J Levell, Zoe Venables

    Invasive acral Lentiginous Melanoma (ALM) is a distinct subtype of melanoma, primarily affecting non-sun-exposed extremities such as the palms, soles, and nail beds. First described by Reed in 1976. ALM is characterised by lentiginous proliferation of atypical melanocytes along the basal layer of glabrous skin. While “acral melanoma” refers broadly to melanomas arising on acral sites, “acral lentiginous melanoma” specifically denotes this lentiginous subtype. ALM is disproportionately represented among individuals with richly pigmented skin, including Black, Hispanic and Asian populations, in whom it accounts for a higher proportion of melanoma cases than in White populations. Although it represents only 2–3% of all melanomas, ALM carries a poorer prognosis, with five-year melanoma-specific survival rates averaging 80.6%. The pathogenesis of ALM remains incompletely understood. It is not primarily UV-induced but often associated with mechanical stress on weight-bearing or high-friction areas. Recurrent mutations in KIT, NF1, TERT and TP53 are frequently observed, particularly in older and Asian patients, underscoring its distinct molecular profile. Diagnosis is often delayed due to its subtle presentation as irregularly pigmented macules or patches. Histologically, ALM demonstrates lentiginous basal proliferation with dermal invasion. Management typically involves wide local excision, though advanced disease may require lymph node surgery, radiotherapy or systemic therapy. Prognosis is influenced by tumour thickness, ulceration, and sentinel lymph node involvement. Persistent disparities in outcomes highlight the need for improved awareness, earlier diagnosis, and targeted management strategies to address the biological and sociodemographic complexities of ALM.

    2026Clinical and experimental dermatology(2026)引用:2
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Public Health Policies and Interventions to Address Health Inequities in High-Income Countries: an Umbrella Review.
    Jatinder Hayre, Ellie Canning, Helen Pearce, Raj Khera,John Ford

    Health inequity: defined as systematic and avoidable difference in health outcome, remain entrenched across high-income countries, with socioeconomic gaps in life expectancy exceeding 7–10 years. Upstream interventions addressing the social determinants of health are critical. This umbrella review evaluates which macro-level policies and public health interventions most effectively reduce health inequity. We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews. Four databases (Embase, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane) were searched from May 2017, the date of the last umbrella review on the subject, to September 2024. Eligible reviews reported population-level interventions in OECD countries, with outcomes stratified by socioeconomic status or related disadvantage. Included systematic reviews were appraised using AMSTAR II. We devised a conceptual Health Equity Pyramid that classified interventions by their agentic demand and population reach. Thirty-five systematic reviews were included. This review evaluated evidence across six policy domains. Redistributive and welfare interventions, including cash transfers, basic income and food subsidies, consistently improved food security, household financial stability and maternal–child health outcomes. Legislative and regulatory measures, such as smoke-free policies and pharmaceutical subsidy reforms, demonstrated robust population-level gains, particularly in disadvantaged groups. Community and housing interventions improved psychological health, reduced morbidity and mortality in targeted populations, and enhanced housing stability. Health system interventions, notably tailored smoking cessation and hospital discharge coordination for people experiencing homelessness, were effective in narrowing disparities. By contrast, educational and behavioural programmes and telehealth interventions often demanded high individual agency; without contextual tailoring, may exacerbate intervention-generated inequality. This umbrella review demonstrates that interventions characterised by low agentic demand: welfare reform, housing support, and legislative measures; yield the most consistent reductions in inequity. High agentic interventions can be effective when carefully tailored to disadvantaged populations but may otherwise exacerbate disparities. Future policy should prioritise structural, population-level strategies to achieve sustainable equity in health outcomes. CRD42024529176.

    2026BMC Public Health(2026)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Historical Outcomes for Patients with Stage IA NLPHL: Global NLPHL One Working Group Retrospective Analyses
    Jamie E Flerlage,Dennis A Eichenauer,Michael Fuchs,Sylvia Hartmann,Hans T Eich, Kerry J Savage, Andrea C Lo, Brian Skinnider,Saad Akhtar, M Shahzad Rauf,Irfan Maghfoor,Chelsea C Pinnix,

    Abstract We evaluated outcomes by management type for patients with stage IA nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) in the Global NLPHL One Working Group retrospective database of 2243 patients with stages I to IV disease diagnosed from 1992 to 2021 at 38 international institutions. A total of 779 patients had stage IA disease with median age of 35 years (range, 3-89) and median follow-up of 6.1 years. The 6-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 86.3% and 97.7%, respectively. Outcomes were analyzed for the 2 groups: complete resection and unresected disease. Patients with a complete resection and observation alone (n = 99) had a 6-year PFS of 65.5% vs 90.5% for those who received radiotherapy (RT) (n = 53). Patients with unresected disease (n = 627; 80.5%) had a 6-year PFS of 62.0% for rituximab alone (n = 31), 89.6% for RT alone (n = 325), 76.8% for ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) alone (n = 40), and 94.3% for ABVD plus RT (n = 130). A total of 127 patients relapsed (16.3%), of which 25 (19.7%) had transformation. Our analysis suggests the following: (1) RT improves the PFS in patients with completely resected disease; (2) rituximab or ABVD alone does not appear to achieve a durable response; and (3) chemotherapy was not observed to add additional PFS benefit when used in combination with RT. Thus, for stage IA NLPHL, RT alone is likely sufficient for definitive treatment.

    2026Blood advances(2026)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Effect of Simvastatin on Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing One-Lung Ventilation During Surgery: the Prevention HARP-2 Randomised Controlled Trial
    Adam Glass,Cecilia M O'Kane, Akesh Dhrampal, Eustace Fontaine, James Ryan,Mahmoud Loubani,Sridhar Rathinam,Babu Naidu, Ingeborg D Welters, Jon Silversides, Bilal Alkhaffar, Jeremy Hayden,

    Surgeries that require one-lung ventilation have high rates of postoperative cardiopulmonary complications with associated morbidity and mortality. Statins may limit inflammation involved in the development of these complications. We tested the hypothesis that perioperative simvastatin use reduces postoperative cardiopulmonary complications, compared with placebo, in surgery requiring one-lung ventilation. Randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial of simvastatin versus placebo in patients undergoing elective oesophagectomy, lobectomy or pneumonectomy at 15 sites throughout the UK. Planned sample size is 452 patients. Participants were randomised to either simvastatin 80 mg or placebo for 4 days preoperatively and up to 7 days postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was a composite endpoint of the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome, postoperative pulmonary complications, myocardial infarction and/or myocardial ischaemia during the first 7 days postoperatively or until hospital discharge. A modified intention-to-treat analysis excluded patients who did not receive the intervention preoperatively or proceed with the planned surgery. 251 patients were randomised, 126 assigned to simvastatin and 125 to placebo, with 208 included in the modified intention-to-treat population. The trial was stopped early because of futility following recommendations from the data monitoring and ethics committee. The primary outcome occurred in 45/106 patients (42.5%) in the simvastatin group and 39/102 patients (38.2%) in the placebo group (OR 1.19 (95% CI 0.68 to 2.08); p=0.54). Secondary and safety outcomes were similar between the groups. In patients undergoing one-lung ventilation, simvastatin did not reduce the incidence of postoperative cardiopulmonary complications. isrctn.org identifier, ISRCTN48095567.

    2026Thorax(2026)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 5458 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    东英吉利大学合作论文 497
    阿登布鲁克医院合作论文 207
    剑桥大学合作论文 201
    曼彻斯特大学合作论文 125
    牛津大学合作论文 117
    James Paget University Hospital,James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust合作论文 84
    伯明翰大学合作论文 84
    Ipswich Hospital,Queensland Health,Queensland Government合作论文 83
    纽卡斯尔大学 (澳大利亚)合作论文 71
    帝国理工学院合作论文 67

    机构统计