• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
      MCP&Skill
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    O

    Open Book Publishers

    企业EST. 2008
    23论文总数
    176引用总数

    Open Book Publishers (OBP) is an open access academic book publisher based in the United Kingdom. It is a non-profit social enterprise and community interest company (CIC) that promotes open access for academic monographs, edited collections, critical editions and textbooks in the Humanities, Social Sciences, Mathematics and Science. All OBP books are peer-reviewed.All OBP titles are open access, and are available in free editions in PDF, HTML and XML formats on the publisher's website, and a number of platforms including Google Books, Worldreader, OpenEdition, DOAB, The European Library and Europeana. Some editions are hosted on Wikiversity in socially editable format, e.g. In the Lands of the Romanovs: An Annotated Bibliography by Anthony Cross (Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2015). Readers in developing countries can access OBP titles using e-readers and 2G mobile phones via Worldreader. Open Book Publishers is a partner in the COPIM project, building not-for-profit community-owned, open infrastructures to enable open access book publishing to prosper. OBP is a founder member of ScholarLed, a collective of not-for-profit, academic-led, open access book publishers. It is also a founder and co-ordinator of the Open Access Books Network, a free and open network for anyone interested in open access books.g.g.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    论文(23)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1From Mission to Market: a Case Study and Analysis of the Commercialisation of Institutional Publishing
    Kevin Sanders, Lucy Barnes, Tom Grady, Kira Hopkins, Anna Hughes

    The recent partial acquisition of a university press by Taylor and Francis provoked strong reaction from some quarters and walkouts by academic editors at the press. This case, however, fits into a much broader set of interrelated questions about the role, the marketable 'brand', and the very identity of the university press in the 21st Century. In this article, we situate the case of this acquisition in these wider debates around university governance, the usefulness of the 'commercial' vs 'non-profit' dichotomy, the flow of revenue from libraries to publishers, and the lack of awareness by many researchers around their rights as authors. We also elucidate the case for good, participatory governance and more transparency around governance as safeguards for the longevity, efficacy, and reputation of institutional publishing.

    2026Scottish Journal of Open Research(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Building the Conditions for Open Access Books to Thrive: A Reflection on Thoth Open Metadata’s Work Across Infrastructures, Research, and Communities Between 2023-26
    Tobias Steiner,Javier Arias,Rupert Gatti, Ross Higman, Hannah Hillen, Amanda Ramalho, Vincent van Gerven Oei
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3The Copim Perspective on Sustainability
    Lucy Barnes,Judith Fathallah,Toby Steiner,Joe Deville, Kira Hopkins,Tom Grady,Janneke Adema,Rupert Gatti,Miranda Barnes, Joanne Fitzpatrick, Anna Hughes,Kevin Sanders

    The Copim perspective on Sustainability

    2024Copim(2024)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4The Copim Perspective on Community-Led
    Kira Hopkins,Janneke Adema,Lucy Barnes,Joe Deville,Judith Fathallah,Rupert Gatti, Anna Hughes,Kevin Sanders,Toby Steiner
    2024Copim(2024)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Copim Response to UKRI Funding Mechanism for Diamond Open Access Book Models
    Janneke Adema,Lucy Barnes,Joe Deville,Judith Fathallah,Rupert Gatti,Tom Grady, Kira Hopkins,Rebekka Kiesewetter,Kevin Sanders,Toby Steiner, Elaine Sykes

    2The Copim community welcomes the update on UKRI open access policy and fund for books.We are a group of librarians, publishers, publishing service providers, and academics committed to collectively reimagining and reconfiguring the funding and circulation of open access (OA) books.We particularly welcome that the update confirms that 'Diamond' OA schemes are eligible funding recipients.Diamond OA publishing models are those that do not require fees from either authors or readers.The Copim community includes many Diamond OA publishers, alongside colleagues and organisations working to increase funding for Diamond OA publishing through more collective funding approaches.The explicit recognition and institutionalisation of the importance of Diamond OA publishing to the future of the scholarly ecosystem marks an important moment in the history of open research in the UK.It will aid various parts of the Copim community, including participants in the Open Book Futures (OBF) project, helping them to adapt their workflows to accommodate the policy, which now includes funding to make diverse longform outputs (including books, chapters, and edited collections) openly available.The update has prompted significant discussion in various on-and offline spaces within UK higher education.Given we are highly invested in such issues, we thought it would be helpful to make some of our own discussions public.We hope this can feed into conversations within the open research community, as well as potentially into the further refinement of funder policies.In this response we provide three distinct contributions.The first includes a collectively authored reflection from members of Copim's ongoing OBF project and examines the general implications of the policy for Diamond OA book publishing.This is followed by two more sector-specific analyses from OBF project partners: from Lancaster University Library, which is playing a key role in the OBF project, and from Open Book Publishers, a leading UK-based Diamond OA book publisher.

    2024Copim(2024)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 23 篇论文

    合作机构(23)

    考文垂大学合作论文 8
    Jisc合作论文 4
    伦敦大学合作论文 4
    兰卡斯特大学合作论文 3
    剑桥大学合作论文 3
    拉夫堡大学合作论文 3
    哈马德·本·哈利法大学合作论文 2
    中国科学院合作论文 2
    东京大学合作论文 2
    捷克科学院合作论文 2

    机构统计