The Royal Bournemouth Hospital is an acute general hospital in Bournemouth, Dorset, England. It is managed by the University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust. The hospital was managed by The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust until the merger with Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust on 1 October 2020.
Abstract Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is a rare B-cell malignancy with notable genetic, epigenetic, and clinical heterogeneity. In this study, we used coding and noncoding sequencing (n = 74), including whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of 24 paired tumor-normal samples, targeted sequencing (n = 55), and DNA methylation in 126 patients to characterize the disease. From WGS, we identified recurrent, predominantly clonal coding mutations in KLF2 (50%), KMT2D (25%), and NOTCH2 (25%), alongside rare mutations in FLNC (8%), novel mutations in FAM135B (17%), and noncoding mutational hot spots in BCL6, PAX5, and BACH2 linked to aberrant somatic hypermutation. At least 1 noncoding hot spot was detected in 69% of patients. Copy number aberrations were present in 73% of patients, including del(7q) (27%), gain(3q) (17%), and trisomy 12 (13%). DNA methylation profiling revealed 2 epigenetic subgroups: high-risk (HR) SMZL (n = 67) and low-risk SMZL (n = 59). SMZL-HR was associated with adverse features, including female sex, IGHV1-2∗04 usage, KLF2 mutations, del(7q), shorter telomeres, and elevated epigenetically determined cumulative mitoses scores. Transcriptomic analysis highlighted enhanced cell proliferation in SMZL-HR, with enrichment of E2F and G2M checkpoint pathways and epigenetic regulation via EZH2. Patients with SMZL-HR had significantly shorter time to first treatment (TTFT) (hazard ratio, 1.9; P = .003) and reduced overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.5; P = .039): 85% of patients with SMZL-HR required treatment and showed a higher frequency of transformation (P = .007) and mortality (P< .001). Multivariate analysis confirmed SMZL-HR as an independent predictor of shorter TTFT (hazard ratio, 2.4; P = .001). These findings demonstrate the role of DNA methylation and molecular profiling in SMZL risk stratification.
BACKGROUND:Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO PCI) is offered for symptom and quality of life improvement, despite the absence of blinded randomized evidence. OBJECTIVES:The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of CTO PCI in the first randomized, placebo-controlled trial of CTO PCI. METHODS:ORBITA-CTO is a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial comparing CTO PCI with a placebo procedure. Patients had angina attributable to a single-vessel CTO, without bystander coronary disease. Angina symptoms were recorded daily using the ORBITA app. After dual-injection coronary angiography, patients were randomized to either CTO PCI or placebo. Blinding was maintained using auditory isolation and deep conscious sedation. Antianginal medications were stopped at randomization and reintroduced on a patient-initiated protocol. At the 6-month follow-up, assessments were repeated. The primary efficacy outcome was the angina symptom score, an ordinal scale combining the daily symptom burden assessed by the ORBITA app, antianginal use, and over-ride events. Secondary outcomes were symptom and quality of life questionnaires and blinding fidelity. RESULTS:Between October 19, 2021 and October 21, 2025, 50 patients were randomly assigned to CTO PCI (n = 25) or placebo (n = 25). One patient randomized to PCI was withdrawn during the procedure because of a complication. All 50 patients were included in the primary analysis. Compared with placebo, CTO PCI resulted in an immediate and sustained improvement in the angina symptom score (OR: 4.38; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 1.57-12.69; probability of benefit [Pr{Benefit}] = 0.996), arising from a clear reduction in the number of episodes of angina (OR: 4.38; 95% CrI: 1.55-11.78; Pr[Benefit] = 0.997). This resulted in an additional 30.6 days free of angina (95% CrI: 11.1-50.7; Pr[Benefit] >0.999). Improvements were also observed with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire in angina frequency (+10.7; 95% CrI: 1.4-20.2; Pr[Benefit] = 0.988), physical limitation, quality of life, and summary score and Canadian Cardiovascular Society class. Blinding of patients, staff, and researchers was maintained. CONCLUSIONS:In patients with symptomatic single-vessel CTO, CTO PCI improves angina beyond placebo. (A Placebo-controlled Trial of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for the Relief of Stable Angina [ORBITA-CTO]; NCT05142215).
BACKGROUND:Dedicated randomised studies on intravascular imaging guidance in unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease are lacking. AIMS:We aimed to investigate the clinical feasibility of optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of true LMCA bifurcation lesions and to evaluate its prognostic impact compared with angiographic guidance. METHODS:Patients with true LMCA bifurcation lesions who were randomised to either OCT or angiographic guidance in the OCTOBER Trial were included. The feasibility of OCT guidance was assessed as the proportion of patients with successful and analysable OCT pullbacks before, during, and after stenting. Clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared based on the incidence of a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), comprising cardiac death, any myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularisation. RESULTS:In total, 227 patients were included (OCT: 111, angiography: 116). OCT guidance was successful, with 98% of cases having a pre-stenting pullback performed and 96% a final pullback, as per protocol. The proximal LMCA stent edge was analysable in 43% of patients, and in the remaining 57%, only 5% were limited by insufficient image quality. No statistically significant difference in MACE was observed between the two groups (OCT: 14.4% vs angiography: 18.4%, hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval: 0.39-1.51). CONCLUSIONS:OCT-guided PCI in true LMCA bifurcation lesions was clinically feasible, but visibility of the LMCA ostium was limited by short pullbacks, insufficient clearance, or guide catheter shadowing. OCT guidance was associated with a non-significant reduction in MACE, consistent with the effect estimate in the main trial.
BACKGROUND:Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly used for revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Whether intravascular ultrasonographic (IVUS) guidance during PCI results in better clinical outcomes than conventional angiographic guidance alone is uncertain. METHODS:In an international, multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either IVUS-guided PCI or angiography-guided PCI. The primary end point was a patient-oriented composite of any stroke, any myocardial infarction, any revascularization, or death from any cause at the longest follow-up. RESULTS:A total of 806 patients underwent randomization; 401 were assigned to undergo IVUS-guided PCI and 405 to undergo angiography-guided PCI. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 71.4±10.7 years, 78.4% of the patients were men, and 34.7% had diabetes. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, a primary end-point event had occurred in 135 patients (33.7%) in the IVUS-guided PCI group and in 125 patients (30.9%) in the angiography-guided PCI group (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.42; P = 0.40). The incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization appeared to be similar in the two groups. The percentages of patients with procedure-related and overall safety events also appeared to be similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS:Among patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease, IVUS-guided PCI showed no additional benefit over angiography-guided PCI with respect to the incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, any revascularization, or death from any cause at a median follow-up of 2.9 years. (Funded by Philips Image Guided Therapy Devices and Boston Scientific; OPTIMAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04111770.).
