BACKGROUND:The poor prognosis of hemodialysis (HD) patients following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been established; however, data on the outcomes in the latest generation of devices remain inconsistent. OBJECTIVES:The authors aimed to compare the 1-year clinical outcomes post-TAVR using the latest generation of devices in HD and non-HD patients. METHODS:From the multicenter registry, 760 HD and 3,928 non-HD patients were identified from the OCEAN-TAVI (Optimized transCathEter vAlvular iNtervention-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation; UMINID:000020423) registry. To minimize differences in baseline characteristics, 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed (490 patients each). The primary clinical endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included cardiovascular death, stroke, and heart failure rehospitalization. RESULTS:In the overall cohort, during 208 (41-373) days of follow-up, HD patients had higher 1-year mortality than non-HD patients (105 of 760 [13.8%] vs 189 of 3,928 [4.8%], HR: 2.62; 95% CI: 2.13-3.23; P < 0.001); this difference was attenuated (59 of 490 [12.0%] vs 65 of 490 [13.3%], HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.75-1.42; P = 0.858) following well-balanced PSM. There were no significant differences in any secondary endpoints between the 2 groups after PSM; however, HD remained an independent predictor of 1-year mortality in a multivariate analysis of the cohort before PSM. CONCLUSIONS:The poor prognostic value of HD was attenuated after adjusting for baseline risk factors. These findings suggest that the poor outcomes of HD patients result from the burden of multiple comorbidities in addition to the HD risk itself. Considering TAVR as a treatment option for exceptionally high-risk populations will aid in the careful patient selection and realistic prognostic assessments.
INTRODUCTION:Antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been associated with the reduced efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study assessed the clinical impact of these medications in the neoadjuvant setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS:This multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 29 Japanese institutions. Between March 2023 and July 2024, 131 patients with resectable clinical stage II-III NSCLC who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with nivolumab were enrolled. In total, 113 patients who underwent definitive surgery were included in the surgical outcome analysis. We investigated the association between the use of antibiotics and PPIs within 30 days before treatment initiation and clinicopathological factors, including the pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR). RESULTS:Among 113 patients, 5 (4.4%) had received antibiotics and 23 (20.4%) PPIs. Antibiotic and PPI use showed no significant differences in any clinicopathological factors. Antibiotic and PPI use was not significantly associated with the objective response rate (ORR), pCR, or MPR; antibiotic (use/non-use): 80.0%/70.4% (p = 1.000), 40.0%/35.8% (p = 1.000), 60.0%/59.6% (p = 1.000) and PPI (use/non-use): 78.3%/68.9% (p = 0.532), 43.5%/33.3% (p = 0.507), 60.9%/58.9% (p = 1.000). CONCLUSION:Prior use of antibiotics and PPIs was not significantly associated with radiological or pathological response of neoadjuvant ICI in patients with resectable NSCLC. Further studies with larger sample size and longer survival follow-up are needed.
