The Russian News Agency TASS (Russian: Информацио́нное аге́нтство Росси́и ТАСС, romanized: Informatsionnoye agentstvo Rossii, or Information agency of Russia), abbreviated TASS (ТАСС), is a major Russian state-owned news agency founded in 1904. TASS is the largest Russian news agency and one of the largest news agencies worldwide.TASS is registered as a Federal State Unitary Enterprise, owned by the Government of Russia. Headquartered in Moscow, TASS has 70 offices in Russia and in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), as well as 68 bureaus around the world.In Soviet times, it was named the Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union (Телегра́фное аге́нтство Сове́тского Сою́за, Telegrafnoye agentstvo Sovetskogo Soyuza) and was the central agency for news collection and distribution for all Soviet newspapers, radio and television stations. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the agency was renamed Information Telegraph Agency of Russia (ITAR-TASS) (Информацио́нное телегра́фное аге́нтство Росси́и (ИТА́Р-ТАСС), Informatsionnoye telegrafnoye agentstvo Rossii (ITAR-TASS)) in 1992, but regained the simpler TASS name in 2014. Headquartered in Moscow, TASS has 70 offices in Russia and in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), as well as 68 bureaus around the world.
В статье проводится анализ особенностей освещения сберегательных продуктов в российских деловых медиа в 2023–2024 гг. в условиях повышения ключевой ставки Банком России. Цель исследования — выявление различий в нарративах публикаций о сберегательных продуктах традиционных и новых медиа, а также в оценке влияния публикаций на решения аудитории. Эмпирическую базу исследования составили публикации ведущих деловых СМИ и популярных телеграм-каналов экономической тематики, а также данные опросов жителей России. В работе применен смешанный дизайн исследования, включающий в себя количественный и качественный контент-анализ, сентимент-анализ, а также массовый опрос. Результаты показывают, что традиционные деловые медиа преимущественно формируют позитивный образ сберегательных продуктов, акцентируя внимание на их доходности, тогда как новые медиа все чаще подчеркивают риски и сравнительно низкую доходность вкладов по отношению к альтернативным инструментам. Согласно данным опросов, публикации лишь опосредованное влияют на решения россиян, выступая фактором подтверждения уже сформированных намерений. Тем не менее деловые медиа играют значимую роль в формировании повестки дня в сфере сбережений в период жесткой денежно-кредитной политики.
The article presents the presentations of the participants of the round table “Scientific Journals on Library Science, Bibliography Science and Book Studies: History, Realities, Prospects (to the 70th anniversary of the journal “Bibliotekovedenie” (Library Science)”, which took place on April 19, 2022 within the framework of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Rumyantsev Readings — 2022”. The paper reflects the place and role of the professional scientific journals in the development of communications that contribute to the preservation of libraries as cultural heritage institutions and form the human capital and cultural potential of all generations of Russian citizens.The journal “Library Science”, established in 1952, became the nationwide scientific periodical of the library sector. Participants described in their speeches the characteristics of the publication activity of some Russian journals, professional periodicals of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and the international scientific journal “Libri”. The authors highlighted the peculiarities of the creation of periodicals of the designated subject, their functioning, the management models used, the diversity of elements of publication policy and design: regional differences, typological characteristics of the founders, departmental affiliation, cultural traditions, the uniqueness of the historical conditions of creation, etc.The discussion resulted in unanimous recognition of the significant role of professional scientific periodicals in supporting the scientific infrastructure of libraries and providing methodological support of the sector, including research practices, as well as atmosphere of creativity and creative competencies. In the future, the journals are considered as points of growth of professional knowledge, interdisciplinary thinking and cultural communications, activators of the socio-cultural space.
Penggunaan Indeks Desa Membangun (IDM) dalam menentukan “daerah khusus” sebetulnya cukup problematis. Dalam praktiknya, tidak seluruh desa yang masuk kategori “desa sangat tertinggal” dapat disebut daerah terpencil atau desa yang mempunyai kesulitan akses yang tinggi sehingga layak disebut daerah khusus. Ketidaktepatan identifikasi ini menyebabkan problem ketidakadilan dan menimbulkan sejumlah gejolak. Masalah ini akan terus berulang apabila tidak ada perbaikan pengukuran daerah khusus. Menyadari kelemahan penggunaan IDM dalam menentukan “daerah khusus” maka sudah selayaknya mulai dipikirkan parameter alternatif yang dapat menentukan “daerah khusus” secara lebih obyektif, transparan dan berkeadilan. Berdasarkan kriteria daerah khusus sebagaimana Permendikbud No.,13/2006, dapat dikonstruksi suatu indeks yang nantinya dapat digunakan untuk menentukan daerah khusus. Indeks tersebut harus mampu mengukur tingkat kesulitan akses suatu desa. Kesulitan tersebut terutama mencakup dua dimensi strategis yaitu keterjangkauan dan ketersediaan fasilitas. Berdasarkan kedua dimensi ini dapat dilihat sejauhmana suatu desa mengalami kesulitan akses. Penentuan “daerah khusus” berdasarkan indeks yang lebih transparan dan berkeadilan tersebut sudah sangat dibutuhkan untuk mengakhiri kontroversi tunjangan daerah khusus dan kebijakan pendidikan lain terkait daerah khusus. Aneka kebijakan ini hanya dapat dilaksanakan apabila indeks akses satuan pendidikan sudah dirumuskan dan berfungsi membantu pemerintah dalam menentukan daerah khusus The use of the Village Development Index (IDM) in determining "special areas" is actually quite problematic. In practice, not all villages that are categorized as "very disadvantaged villages" can be called remote areas or villages that have high access difficulties so that they are worth mentioning as special areas. This inaccurate identification causes problems of injustice and causes a number of turmoil. This problem will continue to recur if there is no improvement in specific area measurements. Recognizing the weaknesses of the use of IDM in determining "special regions", it is appropriate to start thinking about alternative parameters that can determine "special areas" more objectively, transparently and fairly. Based on the criteria of special regions as Permendikbud No. 13/2006, an index can be constructed that can later be used to determine special regions. The index must be able to measure the level of difficulty of access to a village. These difficulties mainly cover two strategic dimensions, namely affordability and availability of facilities. Based on these two dimensions, it can be seen how far a village has difficulty accessing. The determination of "special regions" based on the index that is more transparent and equitable is urgently needed to end the controversy over special regional allowances and other education policies related to special regions. These various policies can only be implemented if the education unit access index has been formulated and functions to assist the government in determining specific regions
