• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    T

    The Eye Care Institute

    51论文总数
    823引用总数

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    John Meyer
    John Meyer
    The Eye Care Institute
    论文:9引用:0H-index:0
    Colin Tan
    Colin Tan
    Tan Tock Seng Hospital
    论文:7引用:0H-index:0
    Blake Simmons
    Blake Simmons
    Vision Inst, Colorado Springs, CO USA
    论文:7引用:0H-index:0
    Mark Holdbrook
    Mark Holdbrook
    Tarsus Pharmaceut Inc
    论文:7引用:0H-index:0
    Gregg J Berdy
    Gregg J Berdy
    Washington University in St. Louis
    论文:6引用:0H-index:0
    Elizabeth Yeu
    Elizabeth Yeu
    Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Virginia Eye Consultants
    论文:6引用:0H-index:0
    Guruprasad R Pattar
    Guruprasad R Pattar
    The Eye Care Institute
    论文:6引用:0H-index:0
    Joseph B. Ciolino
    Joseph B. Ciolino
    Harvard Medical School, Harvard University
    论文:5引用:0H-index:0
    Stephen C. Teoh
    Stephen C. Teoh
    Bristol Eye Hospital, University of Bristol
    论文:5引用:0H-index:0

    论文(51)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Safety and Efficacy of Lotilaner Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) in Treating Demodex Blepharitis: Pooled Analysis of Two Pivotal Trials.
    Elizabeth Yeu,James D. Paauw,Patrick Vollmer,Gregg J. Berdy, William E. Whitson,John Meyer,Blake Simmons, Jared D. Peterson,Laura M. Periman, Blair E. Boehmer, Marc R. Bloomenstein,Walter O. Whitley,

    IntroductionLotilaner ophthalmic solution (0.25%) is the first United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA)-approved drug for treating Demodex blepharitis. In pivotal trials, it was found to be well tolerated and demonstrated a significant reduction in collarettes and mite density after a 6-week treatment regimen. This study aimed to report the safety and efficacy profile of lotilaner ophthalmic solution (0.25%) from a pooled analysis of two pivotal trials in patients with Demodex blepharitis. MethodsPooled data were analyzed from two randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled clinical trials [phase 2b/3 Saturn-1 (NCT04475432) and phase 3 Saturn-2 (NCT04784091)] in which patients with Demodex blepharitis were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either lotilaner ophthalmic solution (0.25%) (study group) or the vehicle formulation without lotilaner (control group), twice daily for 6 weeks. The outcome measures were the proportion of patients with 0-2 collarettes (grade 0 collarettes), mite eradication, erythema cure, and the proportion of patients with <= 10 collarettes (grade 0 or 1 collarettes) at day 43. ResultsOverall, 833 participants were randomized to receive either the study drug (N = 415) or vehicle (N = 418). On day 43, 49.8% of patients in the study group vs. 9.9% in the control group (p < 0.0001) had collarette grade 0 (0-2 collarettes). A reduction to <= 10 collarettes (grade 0 or 1 collarettes) was achieved in 85.1% of patients in study group vs. 28.0% in control group (p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients achieving mite eradication (60.2% vs. 16.1%, p < 0.0001) and erythema cure (24.9% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.0001) were also statistically significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group. The rates of adverse events were low in both studies, with no serious drug-related ocular adverse events reported. As many as 92% of patients rated the study drop as neutral to very comfortable. ConclusionsTwice-daily treatment with lotilaner ophthalmic solution (0.25%) for 6 weeks demonstrated statistical significance for all outcome measures compared to the vehicle control, with low rates of adverse events and a high rate of drop comfort.

    2025OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY(2025)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2A Multicenter Randomized Double-Masked Study Comparing Preservative-free Brimonidine Tartrate Ophthalmic Solution 0.025
    Melissa Toyos, Melinda DiVito,Elisabeth M. Messmer, Selina McGee, Jared Peterson, Assem Patel,Guruprasad Pattar, David G. Evans, Patrick M. Vollmer

    Ocular redness is common, can affect quality of life, and can be relieved by short-term use of topical adrenergic receptor (AR) agonists. Brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.025

    2025Ophthalmology and Therapy(2025)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Safety and Efficacy of Lotilaner Ophthalmic Solution (0.25
    Elizabeth Yeu,James D. Paauw,Patrick Vollmer,Gregg J. Berdy, William E. Whitson,John Meyer,Blake Simmons, Jared D. Peterson,Laura M. Periman, Blair E. Boehmer, Marc R. Bloomenstein,Walter O. Whitley,

    Lotilaner ophthalmic solution (0.25

    2025Ophthalmology and Therapy(2025)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Efficacy and Safety of PL9643 in Participants with Dry Eye Disease: Results from a Phase 3, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Study
    George Ousler, David Wirta, Sherif Mustafa El-Harazi, Guruprasad Pattar, Eric D. Donnenfeld, Carl Spana, Robert Jordan, Brian Dodge
    2025INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE(2025)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5A Multicenter Randomized Double-Masked Study Comparing Preservative-free Brimonidine Tartrate Ophthalmic Solution 0.025% with LUMIFY® 0.025% for Ocular Redness in Adults.
    Melissa Toyos, Melinda DiVito,Elisabeth M Messmer, Selina McGee, Jared Peterson, Assem Patel,Guruprasad Pattar, David G Evans, Patrick M Vollmer,Gina Wesley

    INTRODUCTION:Ocular redness is common, can affect quality of life, and can be relieved by short-term use of topical adrenergic receptor (AR) agonists. Brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.025% (LUMIFY® 0.025%) is the first α2-AR-selective agonist approved for ocular redness. The preservative benzalkonium chloride (BAK) maintains ophthalmic solution sterility, reducing the risk of ocular infections, but may cause symptoms of ocular surface disease (OSD) in some patients. A BAK-free formulation of LUMIFY 0.025% (BTOS-PF 0.025%) could offer a solution for BAK-sensitive patients. METHODS:This randomized, active-controlled, multicenter study aimed to establish non-inferior efficacy of BTOS-PF 0.025% to LUMIFY 0.025% and compare safety. Randomized participants received either formulation instilled as a single drop four times daily, for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ocular redness at 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 min post-instillation at visit 1 (day 1). Eight hierarchical secondary endpoints included additional post-instillation timepoints at visit 1 and visits 2 and 3 (days 14 and 28), and participant-assessed redness. RESULTS:BTOS-PF 0.025% was statistically non-inferior to LUMIFY 0.025% for ocular redness reduction across the eight timepoints at visit 1. Efficacy for both formulations was seen as early as 1 min and up to 8 h post-instillation. BTOS-PF 0.025% performed similarly to LUMIFY 0.025% after 14 and 28 days, rebound redness rates were low and similar, and total clearance of ocular redness and participant-evaluated redness were similar. The safety profile of both formulations was similar, with no severe or serious ocular events. CONCLUSIONS:BTOS-PF 0.025% was non-inferior to LUMIFY 0.025% in reducing ocular redness in adults, was well-tolerated, and offers an alternative topical solution, without loss of efficacy or compromised safety, for patients who prefer a preservative-free formulation or are at increased risk of OSD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05360784. Date of registration: 29 April 2022.

    2025Ophthalmology and therapy(2025)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 51 篇论文

    合作机构(44)

    Virginia Eye Consultants合作论文 6
    Complete Eye Care of Medina合作论文 3
    Tauber Eye Center合作论文 3
    科罗拉多州立大学合作论文 2
    Eye Center of North Florida合作论文 2
    新加坡国家眼科中心合作论文 2
    Columbus Ophthalmology Associates合作论文 2
    新加坡国立大学合作论文 2
    National Healthcare Group合作论文 2
    博士伦合作论文 2

    机构统计