The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus is the academic health sciences campus in Aurora, Colorado that houses the University of Colorado's six health sciences-related schools and colleges, including the University of Colorado School of Medicine, the CU Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, the CU College of Nursing, the University of Colorado School of Dental Medicine, and the Colorado School of Public Health, as well as the graduate school for various fields in the biological and biomedical sciences. The campus also includes the 184-acre (0.74 km2) Fitzsimons Innovation Community, UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital, Children's Hospital Colorado, the Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs hospital, and a residential/retail town center known as 21 Fitzsimons.The campus is located on a portion of the former Fitzsimons Army Medical Center. After the base was decommissioned in 1999, the campus became known as the Fitzsimons Medical Campus, or simply "Fitzsimons," and adopted its current name in 2006 after the Anschutz family donated $91 million to construct the Anschutz Centers for Advanced Medicine, which include the Anschutz Outpatient and Cancer Pavilions, and the Anschutz Inpatient Pavilion.
Abstract Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), especially those progressing after Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor and/or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and those with high-risk features, have poor outcomes. The bispecific antibody, mosunetuzumab, combined with the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), polatuzumab vedotin (Mosun-Pola), targets CD20 and CD79b via independent cell-killing mechanisms. In this multicenter phase 2 study, patients with MCL who had received ≥2 previous lines of therapy, including a BTK inhibitor, were enrolled. Patients received outpatient fixed-duration mosunetuzumab subcutaneously (17 cycles), with cycle 1 step-up dosing to mitigate cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and polatuzumab vedotin (1.8 mg/kg IV) for 6 cycles. The primary end point was centrally assessed best objective response rate. A total of 42 patients with a median of 3 previous therapies were enrolled; 26% had previous CAR T-cell therapy. A number of patients had MCL with high-risk features (Ki-67 of ≥50%, 67%; blastoid/pleomorphic morphology, 38%; TP53 aberration, 48%). Objective response occurred in 88.1% of evaluable patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 74.4-96.0) and complete response in 78.6% (95% CI, 63.2-89.7). With a median follow-up of 15.9 months, median progression-free survival was 18.6 months (95% CI, 13.9 to not estimable). Consistent efficacy was observed in high-risk subgroups. CRS occurred in 42.9% of patients and was limited to grade 1/2 events. Mosun-Pola achieved high complete remission rates while maintaining a manageable safety profile in patients with R/R MCL exhibiting high-risk features. This is, to our knowledge, the first bispecific-ADC combination therapy study in MCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03671018.
We report correlative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analyses from TRANSFORM (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03575351) evaluating lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) versus standard of care (salvage immunochemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy, autologous stem cell transplantation [ASCT]) in second-line large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). ctDNA association with efficacy was investigated at predefined time points (random assignment, day 43, day 64, and day 126 [3 months after liso-cel, approximately 2 months after ASCT]) for 136 patients using ultrasensitive PhasED-Seq. ctDNA clearance (measurable residual disease [MRD]neg) predicted longer event-free survival (EFS) at all time points in both arms, with significantly more liso-cel-treated patients achieving MRDneg. Liso-cel demonstrated superior outcomes versus ASCT, including longer EFS, progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response among patients in complete response (CR) and MRDneg. ctDNA re-emergence in patients with CR after ASCT confirmed its potential in predicting relapse. MRDneg remained significantly associated with EFS after adjusting for positron emission tomography (PET) response, while interaction testing revealed a significant interaction between PET status and treatment arm for EFS. Liso-cel achieved deeper, more durable molecular clearance by ctDNA, consistent with superior EFS and PFS versus ASCT for second-line LBCL treatment. ctDNA-MRD provided prognostic value beyond PET, supporting its role as a complementary biomarker for treatment response and relapse prediction.
BACKGROUND:Effective treatments with deep and durable responses for relapsed or refractory marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are lacking. The objective of the primary analysis from the MZL cohort of TRANSCEND FL was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy lisocabtagene maraleucel. METHODS:In this phase 2, single-arm, multicohort study, patients from 30 sites in the USA, Canada, Europe, and Japan with relapsed or refractory MZL who had at least two previous lines of systemic therapy were eligible to receive lisocabtagene maraleucel (100 × 106 CAR+ T cells). Bridging therapy was allowed. The primary endpoint was overall response rate per independent review committee by CT by use of Lugano 2014 criteria (null hypothesis ≤50%). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04245839, and is ongoing. FINDINGS:Of 77 leukapheresed patients recruited between November 11, 2020, and August 24, 2023, 67 received lisocabtagene maraleucel and 66 were efficacy evaluable. MZL subtypes included nodal (n=32 [48%]), splenic (n=18 [27%]), and extranodal-mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (n=17 [25%]). Median (IQR) previous lines of systemic therapy was 3 (2-4). Median on-study follow-up was 24·1 months. The primary endpoint was met, with an overall response rate of 95% (n=63; 95% CI, 87·3-99·1; one-sided p<0·0001). All patients experienced a treatment-related adverse event. Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome or neurological events occurred in three (4%) patients each (no grade 4-5 events). 11 (16%) patients had grade ≥3 infections: six (9%) patients during the 90-day treatment-emergent period and seven (10%) during the post-treatment-emergent period. INTERPRETATION:In patients with relapsed or refractory MZL, lisocabtagene maraleucel showed high rates of durable responses. The safety profile was manageable, with no new safety signals. These results support lisocabtagene maraleucel as a new treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory MZL. FUNDING:Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
BACKGROUND:Cysteine-cysteine chemokine receptors 2 (CCR2) and 5 (CCR5) contribute to immune suppression in tumor microenvironments. CCR2 and CCR5 antagonists have demonstrated antitumor activity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), respectively. This phase 1b/2, open-label study evaluated BMS-813160, a CCR2/5 dual antagonist, in combination with chemotherapy±nivolumab in advanced PDAC or metastatic CRC. METHODS:Part 1 included patients with metastatic untreated (first-line (1L)) PDAC, 1L CRC, or previously treated (second or third line (2/3L)) microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC. Patients received 2 weeks of BMS-813160 monotherapy (300 mg two times a day, 600 mg once daily, 300 mg once daily, or 150 mg once daily) and then BMS-813160+chemotherapy (gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel (gem/nabP; 1L PDAC), 5-fluorouracil+leucovorin+irinotecan (FOLFIRI; 1L CRC)), or nivolumab (2/3L MSS CRC).Part 2 included patients with metastatic 1L PDAC or 2L CRC. Patients received BMS-813160 300 mg two times a day+gem/nabP±nivolumab (1L PDAC), BMS-813160 300 mg two times a day or 150 mg once daily+FOLFIRI (2L CRC), or chemotherapy alone. Primary endpoints were safety and pharmacodynamics (Part 1) and efficacy (Part 2). RESULTS:In Part 1, 22 of 75 (29%) and 54 of 72 (72%) patients experienced a treatment-related adverse event during monotherapy lead-in and overall, respectively. Two dose-limiting toxicities (rash and pericardial effusion with pericarditis, both grade 3) occurred. In Part 2, patients with 1L PDAC who received BMS-813160 300 mg two times a day+gem/nabP+nivolumab achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 37% (13/35); the median duration of response (DOR) was 45 weeks (95% CI 26.1 to not evaluable). ORRs with BMS-813160 300 mg two times a day+gem/nabP and gem/nabP alone were 26% (9/35) and 28% (9/32), respectively; median DORs were 121 and 31 weeks, respectively. Progression-free survival rates at 24 weeks were 56% (BMS-813160 300 mg two times a day+gem/nabP+nivolumab), 56% (BMS-813160 300 mg two times a day+gem/nabP), and 50% (gem/nabP). ORRs in 2L CRC were 19% (6/32; BMS-813160 300 mg two times a day+FOLFIRI), 13% (4/32; BMS-813160 150 mg once daily+FOLFIRI), and 27% (7/26; FOLFIRI). CONCLUSIONS:In 1L PDAC, BMS-813160 300 two times a day+gem/nabP±nivolumab demonstrated durable antitumor response and was well tolerated. BMS-813160 combination regimens were tolerable in other cohorts, but clinical efficacy was not demonstrated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT03184870.
BACKGROUND:In patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive early breast cancer (BC), the POSITIVE trial demonstrated that temporary interruption of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for pregnancy is feasible and safe in early follow-up (median 41 months). In this article, we report updated results from a preplanned analysis with 2.5 years of additional follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS:POSITIVE, a single-arm prospective trial evaluating temporary interruption of adjuvant ET (after 18-30 months and for up to 2 years) to attempt pregnancy in young patients with BC, enrolled 518 eligible women (≤42 years of age, stage I-III BC, desiring pregnancy) from December 2014 to December 2019. Using the bootstrap-matching method, 5-year breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) event rates were compared with those of the SOFT/TEXT trials as external controls. RESULTS:At a median follow-up of 71 months in the POSITIVE cohort and 80 months in the SOFT/TEXT cohort, the 5-year cumulative incidence of BCFI events was 12.3% in POSITIVE and 13.2% in SOFT/TEXT [-0.9% difference, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.2% to 2.6%]. The 5-year cumulative incidence of DRFI events was 6.2% and 8.3%, respectively (-2.1% difference, 95% CI -4.5% to 0.4%). Among 497 women followed for nondisease outcomes, 377 (76%) had ≥1 documented pregnancy on trial, and 343 of 497 (69%) had ≥1 live birth, totaling 440 offspring. In an unadjusted analysis comparing the 180 women (36%) who had pre-enrollment embryo/oocyte cryopreservation with those who did not, the 5-year cumulative incidence of BCFI events was 14.0% (95% CI 9.6% to 20.2%) and 11.5% (95% CI 8.4% to 15.7%), respectively. CONCLUSION:Longer-term follow-up of the POSITIVE trial demonstrates that temporary interruption of ET for pregnancy, including use of fertility preservation, does not increase the risk of BC events. Continued follow-up is warranted given the known risk of late recurrence in this population.
