Coordinates: 46°24′57″N 06°16′41″E / 46.41583°N 6.27806°E / 46.41583; 6.27806a Also the WWF's first president.The World Wide Fund for Nature Inc. (WWF) is an international non-governmental organization founded in 1961 that works in the field of wilderness preservation and the reduction of human impact on the environment. It was formerly named the World Wildlife Fund, which remains its official name in Canada and the United States.WWF is the world's largest conservation organization, with over five million supporters worldwide, working in more than 100 countries and supporting around 3,000 conservation and environmental projects. They have invested over $1 billion in more than 12,000 conservation initiatives since 1995. WWF is a foundation with 65% of funding from individuals and bequests, 17% from government sources (such as the World Bank, DFID, and USAID) and 8% from corporations in 2020.WWF aims to "stop the degradation of the planet's natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature." The Living Planet Report has been published every two years by WWF since 1998; it is based on a Living Planet Index and ecological footprint calculation. In addition, WWF has launched several notable worldwide campaigns, including Earth Hour and Debt-for-nature swap, and its current work is organized around these six areas: food, climate, freshwater, wildlife, forests, and oceans.WWF received criticism for its alleged corporate ties and has been reprimanded for supporting eco-guards that hounded African forest dwellers in the proposed Messok Dja national park in the Republic of the Congo.WWF is part of the Steering Group of the Foundations Platform F20, an international network of foundations and philanthropic organizations.
Socio-environmental conflicts associated with large-scale economic projects in Indigenous territories are well documented, but conflicts in coastal areas remain largely unexplored, despite the crucial differences between inland and coastal ecosystems. While the empirical literature about socio-environmental conflicts in Indigenous territories in coastal areas is growing, the role of financial institutions and corporations in these conflicts is often overlooked. This study addresses this gap by examining the financial institutions and corporations associated with more than 400 reported socio-environmental conflicts affecting Indigenous Peoples in coastal areas worldwide. Our results show that most financial institutions supporting projects linked to conflicts are based in West Europe and North America, with North American financial institutions linked to multiple projects. The energy sector accounts for the highest number of socio-environmental conflicts, particularly those involving corporations operating across continents. Many European and North American corporations operate mostly in Africa, but also globally. Corporations with overseas operations are associated with a higher intensity of conflicts. These findings highlight the need to scrutinize financial investments and corporate practices driving socio-environmental conflicts in coastal Indigenous territories, where human rights are often at risk. The lack of due diligence and accountability in applying environmental and social safeguards weakens protections for both ecosystems and Indigenous communities. Strengthening the enforcement of national and international laws on environmental sustainability, human rights and Indigenous rights is therefore essential for coastal development projects.
The ocean is essential for humanity1-3. Yet, inequity in ocean-based activities is widespread and accelerating4-8. Addressing this requires governance approaches that can systematically measure equity and track progress9. Here we present the Ocean Equity Index (OEI)-a framework for assessing and improving equity in ocean initiatives, projects and policies. We apply the index, which scores twelve criteria, to case studies at local, national and global scales. We show that the OEI can generate structured data to support evidence-based decision-making across ocean sectors and scales. As a theoretically robust and widely applicable tool, the OEI can guide the design of more equitable ocean initiatives, projects or policies, ensuring better outcomes for coastal people and marine ecosystems.
Freshwater ecosystems are vital for biodiversity and human well-being, but remain amongst the most degraded globally. Nature-based Solutions (NbS) offer a promising pathway to restoration, yet implementation remains fragmented and often limited in scale. This paper synthesises insights from 18 demonstration cases across Europe, carried out under the EU Horizon 2020 MERLIN project, to identify key factors enabling the systemic upscaling of freshwater restoration through NbS. Drawing on practical experiences, five interdependent “building blocks” are proposed: (1) comprehensive status review; (2) narratives of the future; (3) evidence-informed approach; (4) resource management and (5) stakeholder engagement. These dimensions reflect cross-cutting challenges and capacities — such as context-sensitive planning, adaptive learning, financing strategies and inclusive governance. While grounded in diverse local contexts, the framework offers a strategic orientation for scientists, practitioners and policy-makers working to align restoration efforts with the ambitions of the European Green Deal and Nature Restoration Regulation. Rather than prescribing uniform solutions, the paper provides practice-informed guidance for embedding restoration in complex social–ecological systems. Highlights Synthesises lessons from 18 diverse freshwater restoration cases across Europe under the MERLIN project;Proposes five strategic building blocks for scaling Nature-based Solutions: system understanding, shared vision, evidence use, resource management and stakeholder engagement;Emphasises the interdependence of ecological, institutional and societal dimensions in upscaling restoration;Demonstrates the value of transdisciplinary collaboration, adaptive planning and embedded implementation;Offers practice-orientated insights aligned with the European Green Deal and Nature Restoration Regulation.
Given the importance of forests for biodiversity and local livelihoods, governmental, and non-governmental agencies invest funds in conservation projects to engage local communities in biodiversity stewardship. Taking a case study of Barandabhar Corridor Forest including a section of Chitwan National Park in Nepal’s Chitwan –Annapurna Landscape and Tarai Arc landscape of Nepal—a UNESCO World Heritage site and home to many endangered flora and fauna—this study aims to examine the biodiversity conservation practices undertaken by both project-supported and not-supported forest households within the Buffer zone forests (BF) and Community forests (CF). A total of 1195 households comprising 392 supported and 803 not-supported households were surveyed to compare their livelihood and forest-product use patterns before (2010) and after support (2019). The results show that per household collection of timber (54–37 Cft), fuelwood (5450–2255 kg), fodder (11,157–5546 kg) and forage (5562–1914 kg) in BF declined by 31.1–65.5
Coral reefs are vital social-ecological systems, but highly vulnerable to global change and local stressors. While conveying the urgency of existential threats is paramount, bleak outlooks can become self-reinforcing, limiting capacities to act. To counter this, experts working on coral reefs in diverse geographies imagined coral reef futures through a structured visioning process. The resulting visions offer alternatives aspiring to desirability, sustainability, and equity for coral reefs. These broaden the conversation on coral reef futures, enabling discussions beyond siloed conservation, traditional management tools, or pure techno-fixes. Concepts such as earth stewardship, biocultural revitalization, and anticipatory governance emerged as essential to sustaining human well-being and enabling the viability of future coral reef ecosystems before, during, and beyond social-ecological shocks. By fostering forward-thinking dialog, these visions and narratives constitute key stepping stones to reimagining desirable relationships between people and coral reefs and speak to both anticipatory and adaptive pathways toward desired change.
