• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
      MCP&Skill
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    Applied Ergonomics

    Applied Ergonomics

    JournalISSN 0003-6870eISSN 1872-9126中科院 工程技术 2区

    年发文量

    研究主题

    论文(7127)

    排序
    1NewAt the Crossroads of Change: Executive Functions in the Age of Emerging Simulation Technology – A Scoping Review and Driving Simulator Study on Adaptive Performance
    Eva Gößwein, Jonas Nesensohn,Magnus Liebherr

    Simulators are pivotal in advancing mobility technology, yet human adaptation in the context of these technologies remains underexplored. This study investigates the role of core executive functions (working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility) in adaptive performance within driving simulators based on a scoping review identifying a research gap and conducting a driving simulator study addressing it. Results from the empirical study revealed no significant influence of working memory or inhibitory control, while cognitive flexibility showed a partial positive effect, highlighting its possible enhancing role in adapting to coordinative changes within simulated environments. Findings expand the scarce literature and underscore the need for further exploration, e.g., of how change complexity moderates these relationships. By differentiating executive functions and linking them to adaptive performance, this work advances the theoretical understanding of adaptation in the context of emerging technology. Furthermore, it may inform future research on potential training approaches targeting cognitive flexibility.

    2027
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2NewCognitive Abilities and Trust Calibration: Understanding Individual Differences in Automation Trust Dynamics
    Connie Ku, Anne C. McLaughlin,Richard Pak,Randall Engle

    Individual differences in cognitive abilities may influence how people form and adjust trust in automated systems, yet the mechanisms underlying this relationship remain poorly understood. This study investigated how three foundational cognitive abilities — working memory (WM), attention control (AC), and fluid intelligence (Gf) — shape trust dynamics, particularly focusing on trust decline and recovery after automation failures. Participants (N = 111) completed cognitive tests measuring WM, AC, and Gf before performing a dual-task paradigm where they monitored an automated memory aid exhibiting varying reliability levels (100%-65%-100%) while completing an arithmetic task. Results revealed that WM and Gf positively predicted trust recovery after automation failures, while AC influenced long-term trust calibration, with high-AC individuals showing more nuanced trust adjustments reflecting system reliability history. Trust decline was uniform across ability levels, suggesting that trust loss may occur rapidly after salient failures. The relationship between abilities and trust may have been partially mediated by automation schemas, with WM negatively correlating with all-or-none thinking about automation. These findings suggest different cognitive abilities play distinct roles in trust dynamics: WM supports monitoring automation performance, Gf enables effective schema updating, and AC facilitates appropriate deployment of these resources for trust calibration. This work advances our understanding of trust mechanisms and has implications for designing automation interfaces that accommodate individual cognitive differences.

    2027
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3NewAccuracy is Not Enough: the Roles of Accuracy, Reliability and Personality in the Trust Process
    Gene M. Alarcon,Tyler J. Ryan,August Capiola,Sasha M. Willis
    2027
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4NewHeart Rate Variability As a Physiological Marker of Motion Sickness in Real-World Driving Conditions
    Seonghyeon Kim, Cheong-Un Kim, Jaesik Yang,Chang-Hwan Im,M. Ercan Altinsoy

    This study investigated the utility of heart rate variability (HRV) metrics derived from electrocardiogram (ECG) signals for assessing motion sickness (MS) during real-world driving. While motion sickness is commonly evaluated through subjective reports or multimodal physiological measurements, previous studies have predominantly relied on simulator-based experiments or multimodal physiological sensing, which limit ecological validity and practical deployment in everyday vehicles. In this study, twenty-four female participants were exposed to systematically varied acceleration and deceleration profiles across 13 predefined driving conditions in an electric vehicle. Motion sickness symptoms were measured using the Misery Scale (MISC), and ECG data were segmented into 120-s epochs to extract heart rate, the low-frequency to high-frequency (LF/HF) ratio, and pNN50 (the percentage of successive normal-to-normal intervals differing by more than 50 ms). Using a threshold corresponding to symptom onset (MISC of 2 or above), pNN50 was significantly lower in the high-MS group than in the low-MS group (16.5% versus 24.6%, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = −0.53), indicating reduced parasympathetic (vagal) modulation in the presence of motion sickness symptoms. Heart rate did not differ significantly between groups, and the LF/HF ratio showed a statistically significant but negligible difference. Mean pNN50 values did not, however, decline monotonically across individual MISC scores, indicating that the metric distinguishes the presence of symptoms rather than grading their severity. These findings suggest that pNN50 is the most sensitive of the examined HRV indices and may reflect individual differences in susceptibility to motion sickness. The study demonstrates that motion sickness can be assessed using a single, widely accessible physiological signal such as ECG, providing a foundation for future wearable and in-vehicle motion sickness monitoring systems.

    2027
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5NewSex-specific Electromyographic, Performance, and Symptomatic Differences Between Sitting and Cycling Computer Workstations
    Malak Selim,Erika Renda, SangHoon Yoon, Samuel Lamanuzzi, Julie N. Côté

    Studies suggest that computer workers may benefit from cycling workstations; however, little is known about the sex-specific mechanistic impacts of cycling on computer work-related risk factors. Twenty-six computer users (14 females) underwent two 60-min sessions of typing: one sitting, and one lightly cycling, while performance, symptoms and electromyography were recorded. Results show that males' typing speed was lower during cycling than sitting, while females' performance remained similar between conditions (Sex × Condition, p = 0.029). Neck/shoulder and visual discomfort were lower during cycling for both sexes, with females experiencing less neck/shoulder discomfort than males (Sex × Condition × Time, p = 0.006). Neck/shoulder muscle activation increased with time during sitting but decreased during cycling, especially in females. Low back muscle activity was higher during cycling, particularly in females (Sex × Condition × Time interaction, p = 0.046). Findings suggest sex-specific responses to cycling during computer work.

    2027
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 7127 篇论文

    高被引作者

    作者引用发文
    p o fanger155001
    Ilkka Kuorinka95292
    K Jorgensen86283
    A Kilbom85072
    Fin Biering-Sørensen84631
    H Vinterberg84631
    L McAtamney62802
    E. Nigel Corlett60482
    Neville Stanton336163
    Pascale Carayon333331

    高产作者

    作者引用发文
    Neville Stanton336163
    Paul Salmon101139
    E Nigel Corlett55338
    John R. Wilson222738
    Maury A. Nussbaum126037
    Peter Vink198737
    Colin G. Drury97433
    Pascale Carayon333331
    Jack P. Callaghan80128
    M. Susan Hallbeck96726

    相关期刊

    Human Factors
    Journal of Safety Research
    Theoretical issues in ergonomics science
    IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors
    Ergonomics
    International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
    Human Factors And Ergonomics In Manufacturing& Service Industries
    International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics
    Ergonomics in Design
    Cognition, Technology & Work