[Purpose/Significance]This paper aims to analyze the current state of research on the health digital divide,both domestically and internationally,sort out the research framework of the health digital divide,so as to provide a useful reference for scholars looking to carry out further research in this field.[Design/Methodology]77 English and 17 Chinese literatures were selected through subject search and manual screening,and the systematic review was used to examine the research topics and methods of the health digital divide.The paper concludes by presenting future research directions and prospects for the health digital divide.[Findings/Conclusion]Through literature review,we propose the framework of the health digital divide,reveals the research status of the health digital divide,summarizes three performance dimensions,four major influencing factors,two major impacts,and four major intervention measures of the health digital divide.[Originality/Value]Through this comprehensive review,we have revealed the current state of research and future development directions on the health digital divide,providing a theoretical foundation for promoting health digital equity.
[Purpose/Significance] Existing research has realized the impact of innovation on the government data open performance（GDOP）,but there is little analysis of the influencing mechanism.This paper attempts to analyze the impact of exploratory and exploitative innovation sepa ratelyon GDOP,and the impact ofthe balance and complementary effect,so as to provide referencefor the practice.[Design/Methodology] Based on literature review and binary innovation theory,a theoretical model was constructed.Data on civil servants were collected from Beijing,Chengdu and Guiyang through a survey,and data analysis was performed using the Smart PLS 3.0 software,.[Findings/Conclusion] We find that:（1） exploratory and exploitative innovation separately has a significant positive impact on GDOP,while exploitative innovation has a stronger impact;（2） the balance effect,complementary effect hasa positive impact on GDOP,but the complementary effect will only be stimulated when exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation are in a highly balanced state;（3）Exploratory innovation,exploitative innovation has a significant impact on readiness,but balance effect,complementary effect has no significant impact on readiness;exploratory innovation,exploitative innovation,balance effect,complementary effect has a positive impact on the execution.[Originality/Value] This study identifies the mechanism and boundary of the influence of dual innovation on GDOP,and provides a new idea to explore the improvement of GDOP.
[目的/意义]梳理当前情报学中涉及时间序列分析的研究,并总结常见问题,为情报学研究的模型化、预测化发展提供借鉴.[研究设计/方法]从任务、过程与问题视角,对情报学研究中时间序列分析的应用任务场景、研究过程以及存在的问题进行归纳分析.[结论/发现]从任务视角来看,已有研究已经在包括学科主题演化、学术影响力评价、网络舆情分析、技术趋势分析任务场景得到了很好的应用,应用内容主要包括历史演化与未来预测两方面;从过程视角来看,已有研究主要按照时间序列的观测数据选取、时间切片方式、形态规律挖掘、预测与评价的顺序展开;从问题视角来看,未来的研究应多关注时间序列模型在短序列数据方面的应用,加强对时间序列分析结果的评估.[创新/价值]通过综合性的梳理,系统地总结了当前情报学中关于时间序列分析的研究,为该领域的研究者提供了一个全面的概述和参考.
[目的/意义]数字阅读是一个复杂的认知过程,认知神经研究为揭示内部发生机制提供方法.系统梳理该领域成果,有助于深入理解数字阅读心理活动和认知功能,并为未来研究提供借鉴.[研究设计/方法]收集247篇国内外认知神经领域的数字阅读研究,结合已有认知理论,构建数字阅读认知机制框架模型,进而对所收集文献进行梳理分析.[结论/发现]数字阅读认知过程包含注意吸引、识别聚焦、关联推理、学习建构四个阶段.功能性磁共振成像、事件相关电位、眼动追踪的应用,能够求解阅读大脑的运行机制.当前研究虽然形成了一套分析数字阅读认知过程和神经指标的适用方法,但对感官交互影响、脑区功能连接、交流互动因素缺乏系统研究.[创新/价值]从认知过程到神经基础,较为全面地刻画数字阅读认知机制,并分析已有研究的基本脉络和不足之处,提出未来研究方向.
[目的/意义]我国古籍保护事业的可持续发展对古籍保护人才培养提出了紧迫的要求,在大力推进新文科建设的背景下,从学科交叉融合的方向建设和发展古籍保护学势在必行.[研究设计/方法]对当前开办古籍保护专业(或研究方向)的26所院校的学科建制及课程设置情况进行了全面调研;从该学科的概念内涵、学科边界和学科建制三方面对古籍保护的学科范畴进行了理论梳理;以新文科融合发展的思路,建构古籍保护学的知识体系和课程框架.[结论/发现]古籍保护学是一门研究保护古籍实体和内容,传承古籍知识及版本工艺等非物质文化遗产的应用学科;其知识体系主要由古籍本体、古籍鉴定、古籍编目与分类、古籍保护理论、古籍保护方法及技术组成;其课程设置在原生性保护、再生性保护和传承性保护三个层次上,实现文献学、文字学、印刷学、装帧学、材料学、生物学、化学、博物馆学、文物保护学等多学科知识的融合.[创新/价值]对古籍保护学学科范畴的界定,所构建的古籍保护学知识体系和课程框架,对新文科建设背景下古籍保护学的多学科融合发展具有参考价值.
