More and more complex computer programs can create works that qualify for copyright protection if done by a human author. Who has ownership rights to the work created by artificial intelligence (AI) is still an open question. Given the large number of people involved in creating computer-programmed works in the new technology age, a clear regulatory framework is needed for which people qualify as work owners. The article analyzes two main aspects of copyright related to works by AI: (i) whether the work by AI is creative and (ii) the issue of allocation of ownership over AI-generated works. The allocation of ownership rights to works created by AI is analyzed by objects: programmers, users, co-owners of developers with users, and the AI system is in public ownership. The article also outlines the intellectual property laws of the EU, the United States, and Vietnam related to the protection of works created by AI. The article concludes on the need for safety for works created by AI.
Ensuring human rights and civil rights is one of the core missions and efforts to implement in each country. In recent years, in Vietnam, the issue of ensuring human rights has achieved many successes associated with the cause of innovation and comprehensive development of the country. That achievement comes from many factors, including the great influence of Ho Chi Minh's Thought, which has modern values and has been effectively applied by the State. Legal education on ensuring human rights has also been applied by many subjects of Ho Chi Minh's ideology. However, the application of Ho Chi Minh's ideology in this field has just begun, there are still many aspects that need to be approached and researched to apply more effectively, meeting the requirements of strengthening work. legal education, ensuring human rights, building a socialist democratic rule of law state in Vietnam in the coming time. In this article, the author focuses on analyzing and clarifying some issues about awareness, viewpoints and application of Ho Chi Minh's ideology in legal education on ensuring human rights in Vietnam.
The scientific article is devoted to the study of theoretical and applied problems of using the possibilities of criminal analysis in activities to combat crimes committed by organized criminal groups. The main features and types of criminal analysis are highlighted. With the help of a complex of general scientific and special methods, the peculiarities of the use of criminal analysis on the territory of Ukraine were clarified, the prospects of its active implementation at the national level were determined with the aim of increasing counteraction to organized criminal activity. A conclusion was made about the prospects for the further development of the mentioned institute in the development of the theoretical and methodological foundations of its use, the introduction of the latest methods of criminal analysis in order to ensure the fulfillment of the tasks of pre-trial investigation bodies and operational units, in particular, in relation to countermeasures, detection and effective investigation of crimes committed by organized criminal groups.
This article aims to identify information support methods within the investigation of corruption offenses, using the EU and Ukraine as case studies. Employing comparative legal analysis, the research underscores the significance of Europol and Eurojust in corruption investigations, highlighting hybrid cybernetic methods and the increasing role of electronic data. Given corruption's transnational impact, the necessity of cross-border evidence tools becomes evident. Particularly notable is the joint initiative of Europol and Eurojust, the SIRIUS project, which offers vital support to EU law enforcement agencies in handling electronic evidence-related issues. By applying SIRIUS project recommendations, Ukraine can enhance international cooperation in accessing electronic evidence during criminal investigations. Notably, Ukraine's anti-corruption entities have shown adaptability even amidst internal conflicts. The research identifies adaptive methodologies used by EU member states, offering valuable insights for potential legal framework reforms and methodological tool implementation in Ukraine. Further research will focus on the mechanisms of implementation of the proposed methodological tools in the post-war period in Ukraine.
The purpose of the article is to study the current state of legislation, policy, and practice of the European Union Member States in the area of combating domestic violence and protection of its victims, and also to identify and assess possible areas for improving the legal protection of victims. To achieve this goal, the author primarily uses theoretical methods of analysis and synthesis, comparison, regulatory and dogmatic, and systematic methods of legal research. The results show that the basis for effective legal counteraction to domestic violence is international legal instruments which are legally binding. In particular, the Istanbul Convention recognises that domestic violence encompasses all forms of physical, sexual, psychological, and economic abuse that occur within the family or in the place of cohabitation of partners, as well as between former or current spouses or partners, regardless of whether the perpetrator lives or has lived with the victim. At the national level, there is a certain similarity in the functioning of legal provisions in the legislation of EU countries. Particular attention is paid to the isolation of offenders, care for victims, especially children, the possibility of rehabilitation, supervision of offenders, and their integration into society in case of conviction and serving a sentence. The general orientation of the EU legislation is humanistic and aimed at protecting the rights of victims of domestic violence. The conclusions indicate that the regulation of combating domestic violence at the educational level and the protection of victims among migrants requires further research and improvement.
