• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
      MCP&Skill
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    Resource and Energy Economics

    Resource and Energy Economics

    JournalISSN 0928-7655eISSN 1873-0221中科院 经济学 3区

    年发文量

    研究主题

    论文(1064)

    排序
    1Balancing Risk Diversification and Option Values in Irreversible Environmental Investment Decisions
    Charles Sims,Payal Shah, Amy Ando, Andrew M. Liebhold
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2When Cutting Subsidies Increases Farmers’ Profits. Modelling Groundwater Management in India
    Tharayil Shereef Amjath-Babu,Renan Goetz, A.V. Manjunatha, Ernst-August Nuppenau, Javier Tapia,Angels Xabadia

    Groundwater depletion threatens the sustainability of agriculture in India, where subsidised electricity for irrigation has led to over-extraction and expensive well deepening. This study develops a distributed optimal control model to assess the efficiency and equity impacts of electricity subsidy reforms in Karnataka, calibrated with primary data from 67 groundwater-dependent farms. The model captures heterogeneity in farm size, crop types (seasonal and perennial), and investment in well infrastructure. Using Nonlinear Model Predictive Control, this study evaluates six policy scenarios, including full and partial subsidy removal, tiered pricing, and lump-sum transfers. The complete removal of subsidies reduces water extraction and increases discounted social welfare by 19.20% over a 30-year horizon, while reducing discounted farm profits by 7.23% over the same period. However, lump sum transfers and two-tier pricing curb aquifer depletion while raising farm profits, particularly for small and medium farms. By raising the effective cost of pumping, these policies limit over-extraction, reduce aquifer decline, and lower the need for costly well deepening. Intervals of subsidy reduction are identified where cost savings outweigh revenue losses, resulting in win-win outcomes for sustainability and farm profits. These findings highlight pathways for efficient, equitable, and politically feasible groundwater management that support farmer livelihoods and reduce the risk of social unrest.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Did China’s Pilot Emissions Trading Scheme Reduce CO2 Emissions? Evidence from a Meta-Analysis
    Yanxia Yu,Chenfei Qu,Tom Coupé, Mathilda Featherston-Lardeux,Andreas Löschel, Arne R. Weiss,Da Zhang

    How effective are Emission Trading Schemes (ETS) in reducing carbon emissions? This paper addresses this question using a meta-analysis of 80 primary studies and 732 effect sizes assessing the impact of China’s pilot ETS, introduced in seven provinces and cities in 2011. Our findings suggest that China’s pilot ETS led to small to medium-sized abatement in CO2 emissions, with estimated abatement ranging from 5.5% to 16.6% compared to a no-ETS counterfactual. Meta-regression and Bayesian Model Averaging analyses further show that the estimated impacts of the ETS vary with the empirical methods employed and the control variables used. The range of estimates we obtain from synthesizing the literature provide policy makers with an evidence-based expectation of the potential scale of emissions abatement in the initial phase of developing an ETS.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Does Renewable Energy Policy Reduce Recycling? Considering the Conflicts Between Environmental Targets
    Daisuke Ichinose

    This study examined the effects of classifying waste power generation as a renewable energy source under policies aimed at expanding renewable energy use. It focuses on Japan’s renewable portfolio standards policy, which requires electricity utilities to supply a certain amount of electricity using renewable sources, including electricity generated by burning the biomass component of waste. The main results from the quasi-experimental design show that defining electricity generated by burning waste as renewable energy increased incineration rates by 2–4 percentage points and decreased recycling rates by a similar magnitude for relatively low-value recyclables that cannot be recycled without sophisticated treatment, such as mixed waste.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Bankruptcy, Ownership Turnover and the Fate of U.S. Coal Mines
    Sara E. Guffey, Shuichiro Nishioka

    The rapid decline of the U.S. coal industry has triggered a wave of bankruptcies in which environmental liabilities such as mine reclamation and water treatment are often left unfunded. Bankruptcy courts frequently relieve firms of these legal obligations to facilitate mine transfers to new owners, aiming to preserve local operations and limit the economic impacts of closures. This study examines whether such transfers sustain mining activity. Using mine-level data from the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) on production and ownership turnover, we estimate the effect of ownership turnover on mine survival, distinguishing between court-supervised and private deals. We find that ownership turnover substantially increases the probability of closure within a few years, regardless of court involvement. Our findings indicate that even bankruptcy procedures do not reverse structural decline and may shift environmental costs to local communities.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 1064 篇论文

    高被引作者

    作者引用发文
    William D. Nordhaus10491
    George R. Parsons10072
    Michael Hoel10048
    Meryl P. Gardner9901
    Michael K. Hidrue9901
    Willett Main Kempton9901
    Karen Fisher-Vanden9342
    Gary H. Jefferson8821
    Quan Tao8821
    Chien‐Chiang Lee8302

    高产作者

    作者引用发文
    Jason Shogren46711
    Knut Einar Rosendahl30110
    Franz Wirl1858
    Michael Hoel10048
    Charles F Mason1547
    Lucas Bretschger2317
    Cathrine Hagem1496
    Andreas Löschel3056
    John C. Whitehead8036
    Heidi J. Albers3406

    相关期刊

    Environment and development economics
    Climate change economics
    Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
    Review of Environmental Economics and Policy
    Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
    International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics
    Environmental and Resource Economics
    Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
    Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy
    JOURNAL of GLOBAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS