• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
      MCP&Skill
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    Review of Educational Research

    Review of Educational Research

    JournalISSN 0034-6543eISSN 1935-1046中科院 教育学 1区

    年发文量

    研究主题

    论文(3934)

    排序
    1NewContent and Language Integrated Learning, English-Medium Instruction, and English for Specific Purposes in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review
    Luxi Wang,Tessa Mearns,Wilfried Admiraal

    The growing use of English in higher education, particularly where it functions as a second or foreign language, has increased attention to teaching that supports access to disciplinary content and language development. This review synthesizes teaching practices in higher education across content and language integrated learning (CLIL), English-medium instruction (EMI), and English for specific purposes (ESP) contexts. It examines 64 studies from 2013 to 2023, identifying 320 teaching-practice records. Practices were analyzed using a coding framework informed by high-leverage and core teaching practices and classified by their primary focus on language, content, or integrated learning. Findings show substantial overlap across CLIL, EMI, and ESP alongside differences in emphasis. Integrated learning was most prominent in CLIL, language-focused practices were most prominent in EMI, and ESP showed the most balanced distribution across language, content, and integrated learning. These patterns suggest that the three approaches differ less in the practices used than in how those practices are emphasized and oriented toward distinct learning goals.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2NewThe Assets of Transgender College Students in the United States: A Scoping Review
    Alex C. Lange, Dianna Morganti, Nick Fahnders, Alie Ehrensaft, Megan Battleson,Romeo Jackson

    Amid growing political hostility toward transgender rights in U.S. education, this scoping review synthesizes scholarship on transgender college students through an asset-based lens. Drawing from 153 empirical studies published since 2003, including a 62-study asset-focused analytic subset, we identify research that highlights transgender students’ resilience, agency, and thriving within higher education. Findings reveal six recurring asset domains through which transgender students cultivate kinship, mobilize navigational knowledge, practice resilience, pursue affirming contexts, engage in advocacy, and reimagine identity and futures. While most studies have emphasized disparities, an emerging shift recognizes transgender students as active contributors to campus life. Differences by race, gender identity, student status, and disability underscore the necessity of intersectional approaches. This review advances a reframing of transgender students not as victims of oppression alone but as actors who cultivate relational, navigational, and transformative capacities within unequal institutional conditions. Centering assets is both ethically imperative and strategically necessary to support transgender students thriving in the current reactionary climate.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3NewUnlocking Early Mathematics Potential at Home: A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Home Mathematical Activity Interventions on Preschool Children’s Mathematical Learning
    Jiajia Li,Jin Sun, Dandan An, Ziying Zhang,Jianbin Li

    Home mathematical activities (HMAs) are increasingly promoted as a promising approach to support early mathematical development, yet empirical findings on their effectiveness remain mixed. This meta-analysis synthesized 110 effect sizes from 26 studies across 28 independent samples ( N = 3,405; M age = 4.3 years; range = 3.04–5.60 years) to evaluate the impact of HMA interventions on preschool children’s mathematical learning, including both skills and dispositions. Overall, HMA interventions produced a small but statistically significant effect ( g = 0.188, p = .022, 95% CI = [0.027, 0.350]). Moderator analyses identified parent training mode as a significant factor, with coaching-based interventions yielding stronger effects than workshops or self-guided formats. These findings underscore the value of supporting home-based mathematical experience and highlight the essential role of quality caregiver support. Implications for designing interventions that are both scalable and effective in fostering children’s mathematical skills and positive dispositions are discussed.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4NewA Systematic Review of the Implications of Diagnostic Classification Modeling for Cognitive Models of Mathematics
    Adam Coates

    In education, cognitive models are often representations of knowledge and processes required to solve a task. These models can be used as foundations of pedagogy, curricula, and educational software. Diagnostic classification modeling (DCM) is a family of statistical approaches designed to combine responses to an assessment with a cognitive model to estimate students’ mastery of each skill in the assessment. This article systematically reviews the use of DCM with mathematics tests, focusing on the implications for developing and improving cognitive models. The literature was systematically searched, finding 182 articles analyzing mathematics assessments with DCM. This review highlights insights from DCM studies across a range of topics, including the sequences in which skills are learned, differences between problem-solving strategies, differences in learning across education systems, and the role of foundational knowledge when learning more advanced skills. Concerns about some uses of DCM are raised and future research directions are recommended.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5NewLearning to Disagree Differently: Comparing Agonistic and Controversial Issues Literatures to Expand Conceptual and Classroom Approaches to Democratic Disagreement
    Edda Sant

    Educational research increasingly supports diversifying pedagogical approaches to the teaching and learning of controversial issues. This article engages with agonistic scholarship, that sees disagreement as a desirable force for democracy, to identify pathways for such expansion. It analyzes how agonistic literature (n = 203) conceptualizes disagreement and uses this as a lens to re-examine publications on controversial issues (n = 106). The perspective comparative review suggests that the field could be conceptually expanded by understanding disagreements as practices where different actors gather around public things, interacting through varied modes and tones of communication and different forms of knowledge for multiple purposes. Pedagogical approaches could be diversified by incorporating bodily, performative, and object-based practices such as music, clothes, humor, sports, and games. Distinguishing civic-literacy aims from efforts to cultivate responsive and respectful relations could enable further pluralization of knowledge and purpose, while enhancing inclusivity. The article concludes that defining democratic boundaries in classroom disagreements requires attention to controversial matters and processes as well as to the human and non-human actors, and purposes.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 3934 篇论文

    高被引作者

    作者引用发文
    John Hattie377907
    Helen Timperley325331
    P. C. Blumenfeld256691
    J. A. Fredricks256691
    Vincent Tinto207371
    Frank Pajares141672
    Rich Shavelson128203
    Paul Pintrich107392
    George C. Stanton94981
    Valerie J. Shute91003

    高产作者

    作者引用发文
    William C. Reavis2818
    Walter C. Reusser216
    Samuel M Brownell513
    William E. Arnold512
    Henry J. Otto611
    Howard Y. Mcclusky1411
    Robert E. Slavin282511
    William E. Young2311
    C. Robert Pace2810
    Ward G. Reeder610

    相关期刊

    Journal of advanced academics
    Educational Psychologist
    Educational Researcher
    Review of Research in Education
    Theory into Practice
    Phi Delta Kappan
    Gifted Child Today
    AERA Open
    Review Of Education
    Journal of Education-US