This paper proposes a new channel through which long-term interest rates transmit to credit spreads. When life insurers carry negative duration gaps, higher rates reduce their liabilities more than assets. Rate increases therefore boost equity and risk-bearing capacity, lowering equilibrium credit spreads. Empirically, I test this channel with bond-level yields and a maturity-based discontinuity in bond ownership. Insurers' trades confirm the mechanism: after rates rise, insurers shift portfolios towards riskier, high-yield bonds. As rates increase, bonds more heavily held by life insurers experience greater spread reductions. The results show that institutional duration mismatch shapes credit spreads and corporate financing conditions.
Performance chasing is pervasive in active mutual funds, index mutual funds, and ETFs, with positive flow-performance sensitivity evident in both broad-based and niche funds and for the skill and nonskill components of returns. The sensitivity of ETFs is greatest, with insignificant differences between active and index mutual funds. The heightened sensitivity of ETFs is not explained by benchmark design or exchange trading, and is amplified by institutional ownership. Institutional trading of ETFs follows a momentum strategy, rather than flow management or benchmarking. Institutional herding and the outsourcing of investment management to model portfolios heightens the performance sensitivity of ETF flows.
Do impact investors seek impact, or merely "impact wash"? We provide systematic evidence on the nonfinancial determinants of impact investing. Impact investors focus on firms aligned with the priorities of the federal government and disproportionately invest in economically disadvantaged regions. While we find high levels of coinvestment between impact and traditional investors, we also show that impact investors influence the strategies of their traditional coinvestors, are more likely to fund firms in nascent industries, and invest countercyclically. Finally, we characterize investment heterogeneity based on a novel classification of impact investment theses, with a focus on climate, environment, and jobs and equity.
We introduce the nonlinear arbitrage correction (NAC), the residual that renders a linear benchmark model arbitrage-free while preserving the law of one price. The price of NAC captures the marginal Sharpe ratio increase consistent with no-arbitrage and upper-bounds the constrained Hansen-Jagannathan distance. Using four decades of international equity, currency, and factor returns, NAC is strongly countercyclical, peaking during crises when linear models turn negative. The implied Sharpe ratio increase reaches 0.3, underscoring its economic relevance. While linear models perform well on average, they fail in distressed states, underpricing nonlinear payoffs. Incorporating NAC restores positivity and stabilizes pricing across regimes.
We demonstrate how private equity (PE) promotes nonbank lending by substituting for bank monitoring. Relative to non-PE-backed loans, PE-backed loans exhibit lower bank monitoring, smaller loan shares retained by lead banks, and larger shares held by nonbanks. The substitution is strongest when sponsors have greater incentives to engage with portfolio firms, is not associated with weaker loan performance, and persists during borrower distress. Our findings suggest that PE sponsors' active engagement-through monitoring and support in distress-reduces banks' need for monitoring and information production, enabling them to retain less skin in the game and sell loans to nonbanks.
