Within precision agriculture, yield mapping is important in the evaluation of crop management and delineation of management zones. It can also be used to assess within-field yield potential, in order to guide different precision agriculture practices. However, some farmers do not have a yield monitoring system, and some who do may obtain incomplete or erroneous yield data. This study examined the accuracy with which winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield could be mapped in 18 fields in southern Sweden using a simple empirical relationship between Sentinel-2 (ESA, Paris, France) data, vegetation index (VI) maps and combined harvester data collected in nearby fields. The results showed that a decrease in map resolution to 40 m reduced the error in the yield maps obtained. Normalised difference water index (NDWI) was the most efficient VI, while a combination of satellite data from earlier and later plant development (booting and milk development stages) performed slightly better than data for other development stages and combinations. The best-performing model at a within-field scale (40-m resolution) had an average mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.40 tonnes ha-1 in a leave-one-field-out cross validation. When the prediction model at field-means scale was applied on 69 farms in a 1055 km2 area, MAE was 0.75 tonnes ha-1 when comparing predictions with mean yields reported by farmers in a phone survey. Therefore, if adequate combined harvester and/or mean yield data are available, a modelling framework that translates satellite imagery into yield maps on-the-fly could be made available for different stakeholders via decision support systems for precision agriculture.
原文链接
分享
引用
