BACKGROUND:Stroke is the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of disability worldwide, with global economic costs exceeding US $890 billion annually and a projected 50% rise in deaths between 2020 and 2050. So far, stroke has been addressed within the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Noncommunicable Disease (NCD) Action Plan 2023-2030 and the Intersectoral Global Action Plan on Epilepsy and Other Neurological Disorders 2022-2031, but until now, no World Health Assembly resolution has been specifically dedicated to stroke. OBJECTIVES:To present the first WHO Resolution specifically dedicated to stroke (EB158/CONF./9), describe its content and significance, and analyze its implications for global public health. METHODS:This article presents and analyzes resolution EB158/CONF./9-"Reducing the burden of stroke: strengthening prevention, acute care, rehabilitation and health-system readiness", as advanced by the WHO Executive Board at its 158th session on 3 February 2026 and adopted by the Member States in the Seventy-ninth World Health Assembly.Key content of the resolution:In February 2026, the 158th session of the WHO Executive Board advanced the first WHO resolution dedicated to stroke, proposed by Egypt and co-sponsored by Chile, Georgia, Palestine, Paraguay, and Tunisia, and adopted by Member States at the Seventy-ninth World Health Assembly. The resolution frames stroke as a continuum of care and sets out 16 operative actions for Member States (OP1), organized under three categories: (1) primary interventions across the prevention spectrum; (2) acute care and rehabilitation; and (3) surveillance and data; all underpinned by a health-system strengthening approach. A further eight requests to the Director-General (OP2) provide WHO's mandate to act, covering normative guidance, technical support, monitoring, research, medicine access, regional cooperation, and progress reporting.Public health implication:The resolution establishes a comprehensive stroke action plan across the full continuum of care. Its legacy will depend not on its adoption in Geneva but on whether political commitment is matched by sustained implementation, investment, robust monitoring, and accountability grounded in stroke-specific indicators.

All countries have pledged to tackle the growing burden of non-communicable diseases and mental health conditions, but financing has not followed. This Health Policy summarises the background research and key messages from a financing dialogue convened by WHO and the World Bank in June, 2024. Although each country context is unique, policies to lower the costs of essential medicines and improve the implementation of excise taxes on tobacco and other unhealthy products would be priorities for most countries. Multisectoral coalitions play a key role in advocating for non-communicable disease and mental health services and for increased and smarter spending on health in general. Development assistance, although limited in size, can be used to catalyse national action and overcome implementation barriers. Adopting the seven key actions recommended in this Health Policy can help governments to increase their spending for non-communicable disease and mental health services and improve efficiency in the use of available resources.

Background:Integrated health services are advocated for primary health care to address non-communicable diseases (NCDs), especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, evidence of care delivery models and means of scaling up is limited. This study examines community-integrated NCD service models in China, providing evidence on the steps that China took to reorient health services towards primary health care to address the NCD epidemic. Methods:A systematic review identified and included 20 studies (from 3959 records screened from five databases) conducted in various regions of China, published in English or Chinese. The evidence synthesis is narrative and thematic. Themes are built upon from the Chronic Care Model framework and issues identified in the World Health Organization package of essential noncommunicable (PEN) disease interventions. They cover priority diseases, interventions included in packages of care, delivery strategies at the community level, the roles of stakeholders, approaches to overcome health system challenges, outcomes, and gaps. Results:Despite facing common challenges like other LMICs, such as inadequate infrastructure and insufficient human resources, various community-level integrated NCD service models have been trialled and scaled up through health reform and policy implementation. Key interventions include health promotion, screening, tiered diagnosis and treatment, patient education, self-management, and digital health models. Family physicians and nurses are the main providers, supported by local governments and hospitals. The review identified creative service delivery strategies at the community, highlighting changes in patient clinical pathways, improved access to services, and positive clinical outcomes. Conclusions:China's experience with community-integrated NCD service models offers valuable insights for other LMICs. Key elements include prioritising universal health coverage, integrating public health and primary care, and optimising accessibility, efficiency, and patient-centredness. Future research should focus on long-term effects and sustainability, particularly in rural settings.

Background Rehabilitation services are essential health services that should be made available to a population. Measuring effective coverage requires the assessment of whether a population's health services needs are met and whether they are met through quality interventions that produce the desired health gain. We propose a global indicator and corresponding questions to measure effective coverage of rehabilitation through population-based surveys. Methods An indicator to measure effective coverage of rehabilitation requires a clear definition of rehabilitation service need, utilization, and quality. These terms are defined for a tracer health condition with impact on functioning and for which rehabilitation services are beneficial. We selected chronic primary low back pain as the tracer health condition. Following technical input from experts early 2023, we drafted and cognitively tested a set of questions from August till November 2023 to provide key data points for calculating the number of people living with chronic primary low back pain who received rehabilitation services. To determine whether quality rehabilitation services have been delivered, the health gain or benefit can be measured using a valid functioning measure with a known Minimal Important Change value, i.e. a minimal improvement that is meaningful to the client. We selected the shorter version of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 to meet this criterion. Findings The proposed global indicator is defined as the proportion of adults with chronic primary LBP experiencing limitations in functioning that benefited from rehabilitation. There are eight corresponding questions to calculate the number of adults with chronic primary LBP experiencing limitations in functioning and utilizing rehabilitation services. The assessment of a benefit of received rehabilitation services is based on a change in functioning that is greater than the Minimal Important Change measured with World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 12-item (simple scoring). The Minimal Important Change was set at 6 points following a secondary analysis of studies reporting on rehabilitation outcomes for people with chronic low back pain. Interpretation We propose a global tracer indicator for measuring effective coverage of rehabilitation at the population level that is captured through population-based surveys. This global indicator uses chronic primary low back pain as the tracer health condition and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 12-item to assess whether quality interventions have been provided that produce the desired health gain. Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Global health has traditionally focused on the primary health development with disease-specific focus such as HIV, malaria and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). As such, surgery has traditionally been neglected in global health as investment in them is often expensive, relative to these other priorities. Therefore, efforts to improve surgical care have remained on the periphery of initiatives in health system strengthening. However, today, many would argue that global health should focus on universal health coverage with primary health and surgery and perioperative care integrated as a part of this. In this article, we discuss the past developments and future-looking solutions on how surgery can contribute to the delivery of effective and equitable healthcare across the world. These include bidirectional integration of surgical and chronic disease pathways and better understanding financing initiatives. Specifically, we focus on access to safe elective and emergency surgery for NCDs and an integrated approach towards the rising multimorbidity from chronic disease in the population. Underpinning these, data-driven solutions from high-quality research from clinical trials and cohort studies through established surgical research networks are needed. Although challenges will remain around financing, we propose that development of surgical services will strengthen and improve performance of whole health systems and contribute to improvement in population health across the world.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:The need for rehabilitation is growing due to health and demographic trends, especially the rise of non-communicable diseases and the rapid ageing of the global population. However, the extent to which rehabilitation is integrated into health systems is mostly unclear. Our objective is to describe and compare the nature and extent of integration of rehabilitation within health systems across nine middle-income countries using available Systematic Assessment of Rehabilitation Situation (STARS) reports.METHODS:Cross-country comparative study with variable-oriented design using available rehabilitation health system assessment reports from nine middle income countries.FINDINGS:The integration of rehabilitation into health systems is limited across countries. Governance and financing for rehabilitation are mostly established within health ministries but weakly so, while health information systems are characterized by no available data or data that is insufficient or not routinely generated. The overall numbers of rehabilitation workforce per capita are low, with frequent reports of workforce challenges. In most countries the availability of longer-stay, high-intensity rehabilitation is extremely low, the availability of rehabilitation in tertiary hospitals is modest and in government supported primary care its almost non-existent. Multiple concerns about rehabilitation quality arose but the lack of empirical data hinders formal appraisal.CONCLUSION:The study sheds light on the limited integration of rehabilitation in health systems and common areas of difficulty and challenge across nine middle income countries. All countries were found to have a basis on which to strengthen rehabilitation and there were often multiple areas within each health system building block that required action in order to improve the situation. Findings can inform governments, regional and global agencies to support future efforts to strengthen rehabilitation. Additionally, our study demonstrates the value of STARS reports for health policy and systems research and can serve as a model for further comparative studies.

Purpose: The world is approaching the sustainable development goals deadline, but many countries still do not produce the data required to track their indicators by disability. Integrating valid and relievable disability measurement tools into existing data platforms is key to ensuring that "no one is left behind." In this paper, we aim to demonstrate that it is possible to gather valid data on disability for disaggregation using the WHO Functioning and Disability Disaggregation Tool.Materials and methods: Using representative data from India, Lao PDR, and Tajikistan collected through the Gallup World Poll, we estimated the likelihood of a positive sustainable development indicator by disability level. Logit regression was used, adjusted for age, sex, household size, number of children, marital status, urban or rural area, and country-fixed effects.Results: Our estimates showed a consistent disability gradient across all countries and indicators: the higher the level of disability, the lower the probability of having a positive outcome in barely any sustainable development goal.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that it is not too late to generate sound and precise data about inequalities faced by persons with mild, moderate, or severe disability. This data is essential for reducing inequalities through evidence-based policymaking.

The World Health Organization is often called upon to develop global guidance; here is how a range of evidence and expertise was used to develop one such guide.

Objective: To determine the measurement properties and minimal important change (MIC) of the World Health Organization Disability Assess-ment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) short (12 questions) and full (36 questions) versions in persons with nonspecific low back pain (LBP).Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, APA PsycInfo, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception to May 2021). Study Selection: Eligible studies assessed measurement properties or MIC of WHODAS 2.0 in persons with LBP.Data Extraction: Paired reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using Consensus-Based Standards for Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) and COSMIN-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology checklists.Data Synthesis: We descriptively synthesized results stratified by measurement property and LBP duration (subacute: 6 weeks to 3 months; chronic: >= 3 months).Results: We screened 297 citations and included 14 studies (reported in 15 articles). Methodological quality of studies was very good for internal consistency and varied between very good and doubtful for construct validity, doubtful for responsiveness, and adequate for all other properties assessed. Evidence suggests that WHODAS 2.0 full version has adequate content validity (2 studies); WHODAS 2.0 short and full versions have adequate structural validity (3 studies), but construct validity is indeterminate (9 studies). WHODAS 2.0 short and full versions have adequate internal consistency (10 studies), and the full version has adequate test-retest and interrater reliability (3 studies) in persons with LBP. Minimal detectable change (MDC) was 10.45-13.99 of 100 for the full version and 8.6 of 48 for the short version in persons with LBP (4 studies). WHO-DAS 2.0 full version has no floor or ceiling effects, but the short version has potential floor effects in persons with chronic LBP (3 studies). One study estimated MIC for the full version as 4.87 of 100 or 9.74 of 100 (corresponding to 1-and 2-point change on 0-to 10-cm visual analog scale for pain, respectively), and 1 study estimated 3.09-4.68 of 48 for the short version.Conclusions: In persons with LBP, WHODAS 2.0 full version has adequate content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, and reliabil-ity. WHODAS 2.0 short version has adequate structural validity and internal consistency. Construct validity of the short and full versions is inde-terminate. Since MDC is estimated to be larger than MIC, users may consider both MIC and MDC thresholds to measure change in functioning for LBP.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2023;104:287-301 (c) 2022 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

BackgroundPersons with disabilities experience health inequities in terms of increased mortality, morbidity, and limitations in functioning when compared to the rest of the population. Many of the poor health outcomes experienced by persons with disabilities cannot be explained by the underlying health condition or impairment, but are health inequities driven by unfair societal and health system factors. A synthesis of the global evidence is needed to identify the factors that hinder equitable access to healthcare services for persons with disabilities, and the interventions to remove these barriers and promote disability inclusion.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review following the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley, Int J Soc Res Methodol 8:19-32. We searched two scholarly databases, namely MEDLINE (Ovid) and Web of Science, the websites of Organizations of Persons with Disabilities and governments, and reviewed evidence shared during WHO-led consultations on the topic of health equity for persons with disabilities. We included articles published after 2011 with no restriction to geographical location, the type of underlying impairments or healthcare services. A charting form was developed and used to extract the relevant information for each included article.ResultsOf 11,884 articles identified in the search, we included 182 articles in this review. The majority of sources originated from high-income countries. Barriers were identified worldwide across different levels of the health system (such as healthcare costs, untrained healthcare workforces, issues of inclusive and coordinated services delivery), and through wider contributing factors of health inequities that expand beyond the health system (such as societal stigma or health literacy). However, the interventions to promote equitable access to healthcare services for persons with disabilities were not readily mapped onto those needs, their sources of funding and projected sustainability were often unclear, and few offered targeted approaches to address issues faced by marginalized groups of persons with disabilities with intersectional identities.ConclusionPersons with disabilities continue to face considerable barriers when accessing healthcare services, which negatively affects their chances of achieving their highest attainable standard of health. It is encouraging to note the increasing evidence on interventions targeting equitable access to healthcare services, but they remain too few and sparce to meet the populations' needs. Profound systemic changes and action-oriented strategies are warranted to promote health equity for persons with disabilities, and advance global health priorities.

Background Establishing a workforce capable of meeting population needs is contingent on evaluation that can inform sound policy and planning. Health workforce evaluation has traditionally relied on health labour market analysis and workload estimations. To date, competency analysis has not been included in national health workforce evaluation, despite that fact that the findings may go far in guiding decisions around workforce composition, optimisation and education and training. This case study sought to assess the feasibility and perceived added value of integrating competency analysis into national rehabilitation workforce evaluation, and to determine how competency analysis can shape rehabilitation workforce planning. The findings of the case study can be used to explore the integration of competency analysis in the evaluation of other health-related occupational groups. Methods Participant observation was complemented by key informant interviews with experts engaged in the national rehabilitation workforce evaluation in Poland. These experts represented stakeholders in policy, education, research, clinical practice and professional associations. Results The results indicated that competency analysis can be feasibly integrated into national rehabilitation workforce evaluation, particularly when implementation is supported through the use of online platforms. However, the collection of additional data using other tools, such as a survey of the behaviours and tasks of a wider sample of rehabilitation workers, could strengthen data reliability. Experts perceived findings of the competency analysis to be valuable for expanding the understanding of rehabilitation, shedding light on task allocation and deployment of the existing rehabilitation workforce, and advocating for the rehabilitation workforce to be strengthened, especially in relation to those occupations which may not be recognised or valued as rehabilitation workers. Although it was not possible to fully explore the impact of competency analysis data on rehabilitation workforce planning and development in this study, experts suggested that its availability would likely foster greater cooperation among occupations, which has been missing at the policy and planning level to date. It further demonstrates what competency data should be collected and reported, and provides richer information to guide decisions. Conclusions Competency analysis complements traditional labour market analysis and workload estimates, adding depth to the understanding of how members of the workforce perform and perceive themselves, and how deficiencies in the workforce impact on the provision of care to specific population groups.

Background Data on functioning and disability collected at population level is essential to complement mortality and morbidity, to estimate rehabilitation needs of countries and regions and to monitor the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The objective of this paper is to briefly report the development process of the WHO Model Disability Survey, its data analysis strategy as well as its reliability and ability to measure low to high levels of functioning and disability across countries. Methods The development process is described in detail, and a secondary analysis using Rasch methods is conducted to report reliability and targeting using data from eight national and two regional implementations of the survey. Results The currently available versions of the Model Disability Survey are presented. The survey has good to very good internal reliability and good targeting in all included countries. Conclusion The participatory and evidence-based development, consideration of the expertise of stakeholders, the availability of previously developed ICF-based surveys, and WHO tools targeting functioning and disability are reflected in its good to very good psychometric properties. The survey has been implemented to date in Afghanistan, Cameroon, Chile, Costa Rica, India, Laos, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka, and Tajikistan, and is used to inform policy-making, to monitor the CRPD and SDGs and to plan the delivery of rehabilitation services.

BACKGROUND:Cataract is the leading cause of blindness globally. Effective cataract surgical coverage (eCSC) measures the number of people in a population who have been operated on for cataract, and had a good outcome, as a proportion of all people operated on or requiring surgery. Therefore, eCSC describes service access (ie, cataract surgical coverage, [CSC]) adjusted for quality. The 74th World Health Assembly endorsed a global target for eCSC of a 30-percentage point increase by 2030. To enable monitoring of progress towards this target, we analysed Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) survey data to establish baseline estimates of eCSC and CSC. METHODS:In this secondary analysis, we used data from 148 RAAB surveys undertaken in 55 countries (2003-21) to calculate eCSC, CSC, and the relative quality gap (% difference between eCSC and CSC). Eligible studies were any version of the RAAB survey conducted since 2000 with individual participant survey data and census population data for people aged 50 years or older in the sampling area and permission from the study's principal investigator for use of data. We compared median eCSC between WHO regions and World Bank income strata and calculated the pooled risk difference and risk ratio comparing eCSC in men and women. FINDINGS:Country eCSC estimates ranged from 3·8% (95% CI 2·1-5·5) in Guinea Bissau, 2010, to 70·3% (95% CI 65·8-74·9) in Hungary, 2015, and the relative quality gap from 10·8% (CSC: 65·7%, eCSC: 58·6%) in Argentina, 2013, to 73·4% (CSC: 14·3%, eCSC: 3·8%) in Guinea Bissau, 2010. Median eCSC was highest among high-income countries (60·5% [IQR 55·6-65·4]; n=2 surveys; 2011-15) and lowest among low-income countries (14·8%; [IQR 8·3-20·7]; n=14 surveys; 2005-21). eCSC was higher in men than women (148 studies pooled risk difference 3·2% [95% CI 2·3-4·1] and pooled risk ratio of 1·20 [95% CI 1·15-1·25]). INTERPRETATION:eCSC varies widely between countries, increases with greater income level, and is higher in men. In pursuit of 2030 targets, many countries, particularly in lower-resource settings, should emphasise quality improvement before increasing access to surgery. Equity must be embedded in efforts to improve access to surgery, with a focus on underserved groups. FUNDING:Indigo Trust, Peek Vision, and Wellcome Trust.

Discriminatory health systems and inequalities in service provision inevitably create barriers for certain populations in a health emergency. Persons with disabilities have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. They commonly experience three increased risks - of contracting the disease, of severe disease or death, and of new or worsening health conditions. These added risks occur due to a range of barriers in the health sector, including physical barriers that prevent access to health facilities and specific interventions; informational barriers that prevent access to health information and/or reduce health literacy; and attitudinal barriers which give rise to stigma and exclusion, all of which add to discrimination and inequality. Furthermore, national health emergency preparedness and planning may fail to consider the needs and priorities of persons with disabilities, in all their diversity, thus leaving them behind in responses. This commentary discusses the importance of inclusive health systems strengthening as a prerequisite for accessible and comprehensive health emergency preparedness and response plans that reach everyone. Lessons learned relating to disability inclusion in the COVID-19 pandemic can inform health systems strengthening in recovery efforts, addressing underlying barriers to access and inclusion, and in turn improving preparedness for future health emergencies.

The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of the World Health Organization - International Telecommunication Union MyopiaEd programme - a digital message programme targeting education on myopia and its prevention. The development of the MyopiaEd programme included 4 key steps: (1) Conceptualization and consultation with experts in the field of myopia, mHealth and health behavior change; (2) Creation of SMS message libraries and programme algorithm; (3) Review of the message libraries to ensure relevance to the target audience; and (4) Pre-testing amongst end-user groups to ensure that the design of the programme and the message content were understandable. After reviewing the available evidence and considering input of the experts, the aims, end users and key themes of the programme were finalized. Separate SMS-adapted message libraries were developed, reviewed and pre-tested for four target end-user groups; (1) general population involved in the care of children (2) parents or caregivers of children with myopia; (3) adolescents with myopia; and (4) adults with myopia. The message libraries are part of a comprehensive toolkit, developed through a consultative process with experts in digital health, to support implementation within countries. The development of the MyopiaEd programme aims to provide a basis for Member States and other stakeholders to develop, implement and monitor large-scale mHealth programmes. It is aimed at raising awareness of good eye care behaviors and addressing common reasons for non-compliance to spectacle wear. The next steps will involve adapting and evaluating the MyopiaEd programme in selected settings.

Background There is a global scarcity of good quality disability data, which has contributed to a lack of political will to address the challenges that persons with disabilities face. The current paper proposes a way forward to overcome this gap by demonstrating the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Functioning and Disability Disaggregation Tool (FDD11) - a brief disability disaggregation instrument that countries can use. Results The study demonstrated that FDD11 is a valid and reliable tool. Unidimensionality of the scale produced by each calibration was supported by the factor analysis performed. The analysis indicated good fit of the items, and targeting of the items was deemed to be sufficient. The person separation index was 0.82, indicating good reliability of the final scale. Conclusion FDD11 provides a good opportunity to researchers and governments to capture good quality disability data and to disaggregate existing data by disability. The tool can facilitate low- and middle-income countries in their efforts to develop evidenced-based policies to address any barriers faced by persons with disabilities, to monitor the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Sustainable Development Goals, and to take stock of the challenges that still remain.

Knowledge of the pre-rehabilitation generic status of functioning in individuals with low back pain is necessary to understand the clinical utility of rehabilitation care. We conducted a scoping review to describe the pre-rehabilitation functioning status of persons with nonspecific low back pain using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS)-36 or WHODAS-12. We searched multiple databases from 2010 to 2021 for studies reporting pre-rehabilitation scores using WHODAS in persons with low back pain. Reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data, and we descriptively summarized results by the duration of low back pain (acute/subacute <3 months; chronic ≥3 months), and the WHODAS version. Of 1770 citations screened, eight citations were relevant. Five studies were conducted in Europe, two in America, and one in the African Region (mostly high-income countries). In persons with acute low back pain, the mean WHODAS-36 pre-rehabilitation summary score (complex scoring) was 22.8/100 (SD = 15.4) (one study). In persons with chronic low back pain, the mean WHODAS-36 summary score (complex scoring) ranged from 22.8/100 (SD = 5.7) to 41.5/100 (SD = 13.8) (two studies). For WHODAS-12 in persons with chronic low back pain, the mean summary score was 11.4/48 (SD = 8.7) or 14.4/48 (SD = 9.4) using simple scoring (two studies), and 25.8/100 (SD = 2.2) using complex scoring (one study). No floor or ceiling effects were observed in WHODAS-36 summary scores for chronic low back pain. Our scoping review comprehensively summarizes available studies reporting pre-rehabilitation levels of functioning using WHODAS in persons with low back pain. Persons with low back pain seeking rehabilitation have moderate limitations in functioning, and limitations level tends to be worse with chronic low back pain.

Objective: To present the development process of the World Health Organization (WHO) Systematic Assessment of Rehabilitation Situation (STARS). Design: A conceptualization phase to establish its objective and identify the content for comprehensively describing rehabilitation in countries, a second phase to draft, and a third phase to refine the tool. Reviews of existing health system assessment (HSA) tools used in other areas of health as well as expert consultations occurred. Setting: The WHO initiated the development of STARS because there is currently no comprehensive HSA tool for rehabilitation that supports stakeholders describing their country situation and identifying priority actions. Participants: The WHO rehabilitation team, experts representing rehabilitation professions and from all WHO regions, and government and rehabilitation consumer groups. Interventions: Conceptualizing, drafting, consulting, and reviewing of the WHO STARS. Main Outcomes Measures: Development of a tool that is comprehensive and able to support countries to describe rehabilitation and identify priorities. Results: STARS was developed in a participatory process, uses a logic model to structure the 50 components of rehabilitation selected for assessment, and assesses both capacity and performance. Conclusions: STARS is the first HSA shaped to rehabilitation, has been developed by the WHO in a participatory process based on several expert consultations, and has the potential to meaningfully support governments to better understand the status of rehabilitation in their countries, define priorities for action to strengthen rehabilitation, and facilitate the monitoring of system level changes. Moreover, STARS information can be used in research to support evidence-informed policy and programs. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2022;103:29-43 (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. CCBYLICENSE This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND IGO license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/)

The year 2020 marked the end of the global initiative Vision 2020: The Right to Sight launched by World Health Organization (WHO) in 1999 to intensify and accelerate activities to tackle avoidable blindness. Over the three decades of this initiative, four resolutions on avoidable blindness and vision impairment were adopted by the World Health Assembly (WHA; 56.26 [2003], 59.25 [2006], 62.1 [2009] and 66.4 [2013]). Evidence of the impact of these concerted efforts is clear, with a significant reduction in the age-adjusted prevalence of blindness (27% reduction between 1990 and 2020) and a substantial reduction in the number of children and adults who are blind due to vitamin A deficiency and infectious causes, such as onchocerciasis and trachoma.1,2 Despite the successes, eye care services in many countries have been unable to keep pace with the increasing need associated with demographic, behavioural and lifestyle trends that have led, and will continue to lead, to an increase in the number of non-communicable eye conditions. As a result, >1 billion people worldwide have vision impairment that could have been prevented or has yet to be addressed due to causes such as cataracts, myopia, glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy.2 To accentuate these challenges, significant inequalities in access to eye care services exist—the burden of eye conditions and vision impairment is greater in lowand middle-income countries and underserved populations, such as people living in rural areas, those with low incomes, women, older people, indigenous populations and ethnic minorities.2 As the eye care sector transitions from Vision 2020: The Right to Sight, it is clear that new strategies are needed to address the current and projected eye care needs.