Background While data on multiple sclerosis (MS) prevalence are widely available, incidence data, crucial for understanding disease onset dynamics, are less frequently reported. This study aims to estimate MS incidence in Switzerland from 2017 to 2021 and characterize persons newly diagnosed with MS. Methods The Swiss MS Registry is an ongoing longitudinal study in Switzerland. It has established an innovative methodology to assess MS epidemiology by integrating SMSR data with administrative data on reimbursement approvals for disease-modifying therapies and by use of a modified benchmark-multiplier method. We calculated overall, sex- and age-specific MS incidence (2017-2021) and described the demographic and clinical characteristics of newly diagnosed individuals. Results The estimated annual MS incidence in Switzerland was 663 [95% simulation interval 617-711] cases, corresponding to an annual MS incidence of 7.7 [7.1-8.3] per 100,000 inhabitants. This equates to approximately two new MS diagnoses per day. Incidence remained stable throughout the study period. Peak incidence occurred in the 30 to 35-year age group for women and 35 to 40-year age group for men. Most individuals were diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS (94.0%). Following diagnosis, 56.9% received oral therapy, 27.7% infusion therapy, and 15.4% injectable therapy. Conclusion Our study found stable MS incidence over five years, consistently higher in women than men. Most diagnoses occurred between ages 20-40, though new diagnoses among middle-aged individuals appear to be increasingly common.

Objectives This study aimed to develop a core outcome set (COS) for trials evaluating the effects of complementary therapies in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). We sought to identify the outcomes most relevant to pwMS, their relatives and friends, healthcare professionals and researchers and to propose these for inclusion in future trials.Design A participatory international research project using a mixed-method approach with qualitative and quantitative methods. The study included a scoping review and a national survey in Switzerland to identify candidate outcomes, followed by an international COS survey to rate the importance of these outcomes. The final phases involved two consensus meetings to refine and finalise the COS.Setting Data were sourced from the published literature and input from international stakeholders.Participants pwMS and other relevant stakeholders, including their relatives and friends, healthcare professionals and researchers.Results A total of 770 individuals participated in the international COS survey of 39 candidate outcomes (662 pwMS, 27 relatives/friends, 58 healthcare professionals and 23 researchers). According to the survey results, 13 outcomes were added to the COS, 5 were excluded and 21 were classified as ‘no consensus’. 13 individuals (six pwMS, one pwMS’s friend, three healthcare professionals and three researchers) attended the first consensus meeting. Following the voting on the outcomes without consensus, seven outcomes were added to the COS, four were excluded and 10 outcomes were still classified as ‘no consensus’. The six members of the stakeholders advisory board (one pwMS, four healthcare professionals and two researchers) attended the second consensus meeting to define the final COS. Nine additional outcomes were included in the COS. Sexual problems, an outcome previously excluded, were also added. In total, 30 outcomes were included in the final COS.Conclusion We have developed the first COS for future trials of complementary therapies for pwMS. The use of this COS will promote that future research in complementary therapies is relevant for pwMS and other stakeholders involved in MS care. Future COS research should integrate diverse geographical regions, where perspectives and access to complementary therapies may vary.Study registration number https://osf.io/ys7xt/.

Introduction: Understanding the prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS) provides information for healthcare planning and helps identify trends and patterns of disease occurrence. For Switzerland, the number of persons with MS (pwMS) was last estimated at approximately 15,000 in 2016. The study's objectives were to update estimates of MS prevalence and characterise the change in MS prevalence in Switzerland between 2016 and 2021, the last year with complete administrative data. Methods: The Swiss MS Registry (SMSR) is an ongoing, longitudinal study in Switzerland. It has previously established a methodology to assess the epidemiology of MS in Switzerland by integrating SMSR data with administrative data on reimbursement approvals for disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Subsequently, the benchmark-multiplier method is applied to the combined data. Using the same methodology, we calculated overall and sex- and age-specific prevalence rates for 2021. Furthermore, we descriptively analysed changes since 2016 by comparing the prevalence figures and demographic and clinical characteristics of pwMS in both years. Results: We estimated the population of pwMS in Switzerland at 18,140 (95% simulation interval: 17,550-18,750), corresponding to a period prevalence of 200.8-214.5/100,000 inhabitants. Peak prevalence was observed in the 50- to 55-year age group. Compared to 2016, the 2021 estimate corresponds to a 20% increase (n = 3,000). Extrapolating from Swiss population growth, we estimated that one-fifth of the observed prevalence increase may be attributed to a rising population. The proportion of pwMS in the age range from 50 to 64 (32.5% vs. 35.9%) and above 65 (8.0% vs. 11.1%) years increased. Consequently, the median (interquartile range) age increased from 47 (37-55) to 49 (38-57) years. The median age at diagnosis (36 [28-45] years) and the female-to-male ratio (2.7:1) remained stable since 2016. The proportion of pwMS treated with DMTs increased from 62.1% to 69.0%, with the largest change observed in infusion therapies (15.7% vs. 23.3%). Conclusion: The estimated MS prevalence in Switzerland has increased since the previous estimate in 2016, with a shift in peak prevalence towards older ages. Population growth explained around one-fifth of this increase, thus leaving room for contributions by additional factors, which require further investigation. The rising MS prevalence has several implications for healthcare, research, and society.

Background While potential risk factors for multiple sclerosis (MS) have been extensively researched, it remains unclear how persons with MS theorize about their MS. Such theories may affect mental health and treatment adherence. Using natural language processing techniques, we investigated large-scale text data about theories that persons with MS have about the causes of their disease. We examined the topics into which their theories could be grouped and the prevalence of each theory topic.Methods A total of 486 participants of the Swiss MS Registry longitudinal citizen science project provided text data on their theories about the etiology of MS. We used the transformer-based BERTopic Python library for topic modeling to identify underlying topics. We then conducted an in-depth characterization of the topics and assessed their prevalence.Results The topic modeling analysis identifies 19 distinct topics that participants theorize as causal for their MS. The topics most frequently cited are Mental Distress (31.5%), Stress (Exhaustion, Work) (29.8%), Heredity/Familial Aggregation (27.4%), and Diet, Obesity (16.0%). The 19 theory topics can be grouped into four high-level categories: physical health (mentioned by 56.2% of all participants), mental health (mentioned by 53.7%), risk factors established in the scientific literature (genetics, Epstein-Barr virus, smoking, vitamin D deficiency/low sunlight exposure; mentioned by 47.7%), and fate/coincidence (mentioned by 3.1%). Our study highlights the importance of mental health issues for theories participants have about the causes of their MS.Conclusions Our findings emphasize the importance of communication between healthcare professionals and persons with MS about the pathogenesis of MS, the scientific evidence base and mental health. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disease that affects the brain and spinal cord, causing a wide range of symptoms. Our study investigated what people living with the disease think causes MS. We analyzed the replies given by 486 people who were questioned about their MS to look for patterns in the responses. We identified 19 distinct themes, notably mental and work-related stress, genetics, and dietary factors, which we grouped into 4 categories: physical health, mental health, established scientific risk factors, and chance. We found that mental health problems were viewed as a key factor for MS. Our work highlights the need for healthcare professionals to have transparent conversations with people with MS about what is known about the disease course and potential causes. In addition, it highlights the importance of fully informing and supporting people with MS regarding their mental health. Haag et al. examine the theories of persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) about the causes of MS using natural language processing techniques. Their study identifies unique topics and highlights the role of mental health and the need for an open dialogue about the scientific and mental health aspects of MS.

This is a summary of a previously published paper: Joint Healthcare Professional and Patient Development of Communication Tools to Improve the Standard of MS Care. It describes a collaboration between people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) to identify challenges in multiple sclerosis (MS) care and design tools to improve communication during consultations.

This Summary of Research summarizes a previously published discussion between people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and their caregivers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) about how to include caregivers in consultations and decisions about multiple sclerosis (MS) care. The aim of the discussion was to help HCPs to understand differences in these relationships so they can adapt the style of consultations to support everyone.

Introduction: Several disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), covering a broad spectrum of mechanisms of action, have been approved by regulatory agencies for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However, only little is known about the current real-world treatment situation in Switzerland. Based on data from a diverse population of 668 persons with RRMS from the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry (SMSR), the present study aims to fill this gap with a descriptive, cross-sectional approach. Methods: Data originated from the SMSR baseline questionnaire and follow-up surveys. Data on current health status and life situation in the last 6 months were extracted from the survey distributed throughout 2020 and 2021, while data on disease-modifying therapy (DMT) histories were included from preceding surveys. Initially, data was stratified into three DMT groups according to the current DMT status (NO (No DMT), CONTINUED (DMT started more than 6 months ago), and NEW (DMT started less than 6 months ago)). In a subsequent analysis, the sample was stratified into groups corresponding to the five most frequently prescribed DMTs. Self-reported outcomes including therapy discontinuation or interruption, relapses and side-effects in the last 6 months were analyzed per group. Life and health situation parameters were also determined and analyzed. Results: The study population consisted of 445 (66.6%) individuals belonging to the CONTINUED, 84 (12.6%) to the NEW, and 139 (20.8%) to the NO group. Within the NO group, 24 (17.3%) reported relapses. Furthermore, self-reported relapses (28 (33.3%)), side-effects (39 (46.4%)), and treatment discontinuations or interruptions (30 (35.7%)) occurred more frequently in the NEW compared to the CONTINUED group (37 (8.3%), 125 (28.1%), 8 (1.8%), respectively). The three groups also differed with respect to age, time since diagnosis, number of symptoms, DMT history, and health-related quality of life. The five most frequently prescribed DMTs included fingolimod (33.4%), dimethyl fumarate (25.0%), ocrelizumab (23.6%), natalizumab (10.6%) and teriflunomide (7.5%). The frequency of self-reported relapses ranged from 9.7% to 13.6%. Notable differences were found in the number of self-reported side-effects, ranging from 9.1% with natalizumab to 56.7% with dimethyl fumarate. Discussion: This cross-sectional analysis suggested that the majority of individuals with RRMS in Switzerland continuously receive tolerable DMT. However, groups not receiving DMT or struggling with side-effects or continued disease worsening while on DMT still persist. It is conceivable that the number of self-reported symptoms indicates the need for more detailed clarification of the DMT characteristics and expectations of treatment outcomes. Injectable DMTs no longer play a major role in the treatment of RRMS in Switzerland and a trend toward an early use of potent drugs is emerging.

Background Fingolimod is a disease-modifying drug approved for multiple sclerosis but its benefit–harm balance has never been assessed compared to other active treatments. Objectives Our aim was to compare the benefits and harms of fingolimod with interferon beta-1a using individual patient data from TRial Assessing injectable interferon versus FTY720 Oral in RRMS trial. Methods We modelled the health status of patients over time including Expanded Disability Status Scale measurements, relapses and any adverse events. We assessed the mean health status between arms and the proportion of patients whose health deteriorated or improved relatively to baseline, using a prespecified minimal important difference of 4.6. We performed sensitivity analyses to test our assumptions. Results Main and sensitivity analyses favoured fingolimod 0.5 mg over interferon beta-1a. The average health status difference was 1.01 (95% CI 0.93–1.08). Patients on fingolimod 0.5 mg were 0.47 (95% CI: 0.35–0.63, p < 0.001) times less likely to experience a relevant decline in health status compared to interferon beta-1a patients, with a number needed to treat of 7.10 [5.18, 11.23]. Conclusions Fingolimod's net benefit over interferon beta-1a did not reach the clinical relevance over 1 year, but the decreased risk for health status deterioration may be more pronounced more long term and patients may prefer less treatment burden associated with fingolimod.

The aim of our study was to investigate whether self-reported feeling of loneliness (FoL) and COVID-19-specific health anxiety were associated with the presence of depressive symptoms during the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave. Questionnaires of 603 persons of the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry (SMSR) were cross-sectionally analyzed using descriptive and multivariable regression methods. The survey response rate was 63.9%. Depressive symptoms were assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS). COVID-19-specific health anxiety and FoL were measured using two 5-item Likert scaled pertinent questions. High scoring FoL (2.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.06—2.98)) and/or COVID-19 specific health anxiety (1.36, 95% CI (0.87–1.85)) were significantly associated with depressive symptoms. Further stratification analysis showed that the impact of FoL on depressive symptoms affected all age groups. However, it was more pronounced in younger PwMS, whereas an impact of COVID-19 specific health anxiety on depressive symptoms was particularly observed in middle-aged PwMS. FoL and COVID-19-specific health anxiety were age-dependently associated with depressive symptoms during the first COVID-19 wave in Switzerland. Our findings could guide physicians, health authorities, and self-help groups to better accompany PwMS in times of public health crises.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex condition with numerous physical, cognitive and emotional symptoms. These may necessitate significant, permanent lifestyle changes for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and their caregivers and families, meaning it is important in contemporary neurological practice to consider including families and/or caregivers in the management of MS. However, existing evidence suggests that family involvement is not always beneficial; for example, it can exert either a strong positive or negative influence on the ability of PwMS to achieve optimal outcomes from their treatment and disease management. This paper, based on a live debate between neurologists and PwMS, examines the current perceptions on constructive involvement of families and caregivers in consultations for and management of MS, and reveals several areas where additional studies are warranted. Shared decision-making in MS has historically been a collaboration solely between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS, but PwMS are now more frequently being accompanied to appointments by a support person. This paper encourages HCPs to understand the dynamics between PwMS and their support person, and to individualize consultations and information accordingly. Family and caregiver involvement in the provision of care for PwMS needs to be for the benefit of, and at the discretion of, the PwMS. Support for families of PwMS, although important, may be more effectively and appropriately delivered through other channels outside of the clinical setting. Educating HCPs on the current patient experience to enable them to provide improved personalized care will ensure a mutualistic, patient-centred relationship with PwMS, which will help to optimize outcomes. Communication tools may also facilitate these interactions. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly variable condition. The uncertainty this brings can affect the mental well-being of the entire family of someone living with MS. Additionally, people with MS may need help administering and remembering to use medicines, and require changes to the way they live their life (e.g. employment decisions, home adjustments and care), which can also disrupt the family’s lifestyle. The family undoubtedly needs to be involved in certain decisions, such as family planning, or when caring for very young or old people with MS. However, extensive family involvement may not always be a good thing for all people with MS. Therefore, it is the responsibility of healthcare professionals to understand the pivotal role of the caregiver and seek appropriate opportunities to engage with family and support persons on a case-by-case basis. To highlight the importance of family members in the management of MS, an international group of expert neurologists and people with MS discussed the best ways to involve families in consultations and decision-making, without disrupting care or undermining the independence of the people with MS. The group stresses that a family’s involvement in the provision of care needs to be for the benefit of the people with MS and that many factors can influence whether family involvement is perceived positively or negatively by the people with MS. Support for the family is important; however, it may be more appropriately delivered outside the healthcare professional consultation, and instead provided by a patient or caregiver organization.

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms are expected to aggregate in specific patterns across different stages of the disease. Here, we studied the clustering of onset symptoms and examined their characteristics, comorbidity patterns and associations with potential risk factors. Methods: Data stem from the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry, a prospective study including 2,063 participants by November 2019. MS onset symptoms were clustered using latent class analysis (LCA). The latent classes were further examined using information on socio-demographic characteristics, MS-related features, potential risk factors, and comorbid diseases. Results: The LCA model with six classes (frequencies ranging from 12 to 24%) was selected for further analyses. The latent classes comprised a multiple symptoms class with high probabilities across several symptoms, contrasting with two classes with solitary onset symptoms: vision problems and paresthesia. Two gait classes emerged between these extremes: the gait-balance class and the gait-paralysis class. The last class was the fatigue-weakness-class, also accompanied by depression symptoms, memory, and gastro-intestinal problems. There was a moderate variation by sex and by MS types. The multiple symptoms class yielded increased comorbidity with other autoimmune disorders. Similar to the fatigue-weakness class, the multiple symptoms class showed associations with angina, skin diseases, migraine, and lifetime prevalence of smoking. Mononucleosis was more frequently reported in the fatigue-weakness and the paresthesia class. Familial aggregation did not differ among the classes. Conclusions: Clustering of MS onset symptoms provides new perspectives on the heterogeneity of MS. The clusters comprise different potential risk factors and comorbidities. They point toward different risk mechanisms.

1Deparment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; 2The Neurology Centre, Craigavon Area Hospital, Portadown, UK; 3MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Riga, Latvia; 4Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, UK; 5Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Italy and IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy; 6Patient Member of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Bucharest, Romania; 7Patient Member of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Buckinghamshire, UK; 8Patient Member of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Southampton, UK; 9Patient Member of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Ascot, UK; 10Patient Member of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Overijse, Belgium; 11Global Medical Affairs, Neurology and Immunology, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; 12Department of Neurology & Neurorehabilitation, Kliniken Valens, Valens, Switzerland Purpose: Multiple sclerosis (MS) prognosis is often uncertain. This literature review considers patients’ understanding of, and perspectives on, MS progression to better comprehend the unmet needs of people with MS (PwMS), in order to improve treatment adherence and quality of life (QoL). Methods: Literature searches for peer-reviewed papers concerning patient perspectives on the progression of MS and comparable conditions, published between January 2000 and January 2020, were conducted. Results: Little qualitative evidence exists that examines PwMS’ perspectives on MS progression. The understanding and meaning ascribed to terms such as “disease progression” vary. Some PwMS find disease labels stigmatizing, confusing, and disconnected from reality. The lack of a clear definition of progression and discrepancies between PwMS and healthcare professional (HCP) perspectives may contribute to misunderstanding and poor communication. Patient descriptions of progression and relapses include symptoms in addition to those evaluated by standard severity and disability measures. Compared with HCPs, PwMS are still focused on relapse prevention but place higher priority on QoL and ascribe different relative importance to the causes of poor adherence to treatment plans. PwMS want to discuss progression and likely prognosis. Such communication needs to be personalized and delivered with sensitivity, at an appropriate time. Poor treatment adherence may arise from a lack of understanding and poor communication, particularly around treatment goals. The few studies that directly considered patient perspectives on the progression of comparable conditions supported and extended the perspectives of PwMS. Lack of adequate communication by HCPs was the most common theme. Conclusion: Patient perspectives on disease progression in MS and other chronic progressive conditions are under-investigated and under-reported. The limited evidence available highlights the importance of providing adequate information and effective HCP communication. While further studies are needed, the current evidence base offers information and insights that may help HCPs to enhance patient care, well-being, and treatment adherence.

OBJECTIVE:To compare and characterize major depressive disorder (MDD) subtypes (i.e., pure atypical, pure melancholic and mixed atypical-melancholic) and depression symptoms in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) with persons without MS (Pw/oMS) fulfilling the DSM-5 criteria for a past 12-month MDD. METHODS:MDD in PwMS (n = 92) from the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry was compared with Pw/oMS (n = 277) from a Swiss community-based study. Epidemiological MDD diagnoses were based on the Mini-SPIKE (shortened form of the Structured Psychopathological Interview and Rating of the Social Consequences for Epidemiology). Logistic and multinomial regression analyses (adjusted for sex, age, civil status, depression and severity) were computed for comparisons and characterization. Latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted to empirically identify depression subtypes in PwMS. RESULTS:PwMS had a higher risk for the mixed atypical-melancholic MDD subtype (OR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.03-4.80) compared to Pw/oMS. MDD in PwMS was specifically characterized by a higher risk of the two somatic atypical depression symptoms 'weight gain' (OR = 6.91, 95% CI = 2.20-21.70) and 'leaden paralysis' (OR = 3.03, 95% CI = 1.35-6.82) and the symptom 'irritable/angry' (OR = 3.18, 95% CI = 1.08-9.39). CONCLUSIONS:MDD in PwMS was characterized by a higher risk for specific somatic atypical depression symptoms and the mixed atypical-melancholic MDD subtype. The pure atypical MDD subtype, however, did not differentiate between PwMS and Pw/oMS. Given the high phenomenological overlap with MS symptoms, the mixed atypical-melancholic MDD subtype represents a particular diagnostic challenge.

Purpose: Multiple sclerosis (MS) prognosis is often uncertain. This literature review considers patients' understanding of, and perspectives on, MS progression to better comprehend the unmet needs of people with MS (PwMS), in order to improve treatment adherence and quality of life (QoL). Methods: Literature searches for peer-reviewed papers concerning patient perspectives on the progression of MS and comparable conditions, published between January 2000 and January 2020, were conducted. Results: Little qualitative evidence exists that examines PwMS' perspectives on MS progression. The understanding and meaning ascribed to terms such as "disease progression" vary. Some PwMS find disease labels stigmatizing, confusing, and disconnected from reality. The lack of a clear definition of progression and discrepancies between PwMS and healthcare professional (HCP) perspectives may contribute to misunderstanding and poor communication. Patient descriptions of progression and relapses include symptoms in addition to those evaluated by standard severity and disability measures. Compared with HCPs, PwMS are still focused on relapse prevention but place higher priority on QoL and ascribe different relative importance to the causes of poor adherence to treatment plans. PwMS want to discuss progression and likely prognosis. Such communication needs to be personalized and delivered with sensitivity, at an appropriate time. Poor treatment adherence may arise from a lack of understanding and poor communication, particularly around treatment goals. The few studies that directly considered patient perspectives on the progression of comparable conditions supported and extended the perspectives of PwMS. Lack of adequate communication by HCPs was the most common theme. Conclusion: Patient perspectives on disease progression in MS and other chronic progressive conditions are under-investigated and under-reported. The limited evidence available highlights the importance of providing adequate information and effective HCP communication. While further studies are needed, the current evidence base offers information and insights that may help HCPs to enhance patient care, well-being, and treatment adherence.

Introduction: Physiotherapy may alleviate many multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms, yet very little is known about physiotherapy accessibility and possible barriers in persons with MS (pwMS). We therefore aimed to elucidate physiotherapy use and possible access-barriers using data from 1493 pwMS from the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry (SMSR), a patient-centered, longitudinal, observational MS study. Methods: We used data of the SMSR to investigate the question at hand in a multivariable logistic regression model with regularly receiving physiotherapy (yes/no) as the outcome. Potential explanatory variables were investigated following an AIC-driven model selection approach and consisted of a priori specified sociodemographic variables, health status, and personal or social mobility variables. As a last step, the impact of physiotherapist supply on regular use was assessed in the final model. Missing data were handled by multiple imputation (main analysis), and complete case sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: The main analysis included 1493 participants. In the multivariable logistic regression, positive associations were found between the use of physiotherapy and the following variables: having a primary-progressive MS (Odds Ratio (OR) [95% Confidence Intervals] 1.97 [1.18; 3.29]), being more severely impaired (EDSS 4-6.5 OR 1.84 [1.16; 2.91]), higher number of current symptoms (1 OR 3.31 [1.63; 6.74], 2-3 OR 3.43 [1.8; 6.53], 4-5 OR 4.44 [2.28; 8.66], 6-7 OR 4.06 [1.90; 8.70], 8-9 OR 3.87 [1.71; 8.75], being on disability pension (OR 1.75 [1.24; 2.46], or having applied for it OR 2.25 [1.31; 3.85]), having gait problems (OR 1.58 [1.11; 2.23]), having been in a rehabilitation clinic in the past 12 months (OR 4.43 [2.17; 9.03]), and currently being on disease-modifying treatment (OR 1.61 [1.12; 2.31]). Negative associations were found for a higher quality of life (OR 0.92 [0.85; 0.98]), working more than 80% (OR 0.47 [0.30; 0.75]) and being from the French language region (OR 0.66 [0.47; 0.94]). No association between physiotherapist supply and regular physiotherapy use was detected. Discussion: In a large, Swiss-based MS population, little evidence for socio-demographic barriers to physical therapy was found. Physiotherapy uptake was higher among pwMS with more impairments, lower health-related quality of life, or who have been discharged recently from inpatient rehabilitation. The uptake differences by language region warrant further investigations.

Background Patient satisfaction is predictive of adherence, malpractice litigation and doctor-switching. Objective To investigate which factors of the first diagnostic consultation ( FDC) influence patient satisfaction and which topics persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) thought were missing. Methods Using retrospective patient-reported data of the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry from PwMS with relapsing disease onset, we fitted ordered logistic regression models on satisfaction with FDC, with socio-demographic and FDC features as explanatory factors. Results 386 PwMS diagnosed after 1995 were included. Good satisfaction with the FDC was associated with a conversation more than 20 min [multivariable odds ratio, 95% confidence interval 3.9 ( 2.42; 6.27)], covering many topics [1.35 (1.19; 1.54) per additional topic], the presence of a significant others [1.74 (1.03; 2.94)], and shared decision making [3.39 (1.74; 6.59)]. Not receiving a specific diagnosis was main driver for low satisfaction [0.29 (0.15; 0.55)]. Main missing topics concerned long-term consequences (reported by 6.7%), psychological aspects (6.2%) and how to obtain support and further information (5.2%). Conclusions A conversation of more than 20 min covering many MS relevant topics, a clear communication of the diagnosis, the presence of a close relative or significant other, as well as shared decision making enhanced patient satisfaction with the FDC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02980640

Background Although multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs are commonly used in clinical practice for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), they are currently underexamined. Objective This study aims to investigate the efficacy and underlying brain mechanisms of an inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Methods Twenty-four patients with relapse-onset MS underwent a 4-week personalized inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation and three assessment sessions including MRI, clinical, cognitive and motor function evaluation. Twenty-four healthy controls underwent two assessment sessions 4 weeks apart. Test performances were compared using repeated measures ANOVA, Tukey and t tests. A motor sequence learning (MSL) task was presented during fMRI and data were analysed using FSL. Results Patients had less perceived fatigue, improved walking speed and quality of life following the rehabilitation, which could be maintained at follow-up 4 weeks after rehabilitation. After rehabilitation, differences in accuracy of the MSL task between groups diminished, indicating an improved performance in patients. Improved accuracy went along with changes of brain activity in the left cerebellum and right frontal lobe post-rehabilitation, which could be maintained at follow-up. No changes between sessions were observed in controls. Conclusion Multidisciplinary rehabilitation may improve highly impacting symptoms through more efficient recruitment of brain regions and therefore positively influence MS patients’ quality of life.