Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of surgeries via frontal keyhole approach assisted by neuro-endoscope and via temporal keyhole approach assisted by microscope in cerebral basal ganglia hemorrhage. Methods:One hundred and five patients with basal ganglia cerebral hemorrhage admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to January 2020 were chosen in our study; 51 patients underwent surgeries via frontal keyhole approach assisted by neuro-endoscope (neuro-endoscopy group) and 54 patients underwent surgeries via temporal keyhole approach assisted by microscope (microscopy group). The clinical data of these patients were retrospectively analyzed; and the differences of hematoma clearance rate, intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, length of hospital stays, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores one week after surgery, incidence of postoperative complications, and activity of daily living (ADL) scores 6 months after surgery were compared between the 2 groups. Results:There were no significant differences in hematoma clearance rate and length of hospital stays between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). As compared with the microscopy group, the neuro-endoscopy group had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, significantly shorter duration of surgery, and statistically higher GCS scores one week after surgery ( P<0.05). There were no significant differences in incidence of postoperative complications and ADL scores 6 months after surgery between 2 groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Both surgeries via frontal keyhole approach assisted by neuro-endoscope and via temporal keyhole approach assisted by microscope can effectively clear the intracranial hematoma in patients with cerebral hemorrhage in the basal ganglia and protect neurological function; however, surgeries via frontal keyhole approach assisted by neuro-endoscope has advantages of shorter duration of surgery and lower intraoperative blood loss, and earlier neurological function recovery.

目的探讨老年股骨颈骨折患者的康复护理,以提高老年患者的治愈率。方法将2003年1月~2004年1月我院骨科收治的120例老年股骨颈骨折患者随机分为康复护理组和常规骨科护理组各60例,康复护理组实施针对性的康复护理程序。结果康复护理组患者无并发症发生,疗效好于常规骨科护理组(P<0.001)。结论合理的康复护理可促使老年股骨颈骨折患者早日痊愈。