Acute myeloid leukemias (AML) are the most ubiquitous of all adult leukemias. The prognosis of the disease depends on its genetic profile. The mutation in FLT3 gene, which codes FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3, is observed in 1/3 of patients and is responsible for a high rate of relapses. The prognosis of relapsed/refractory FLT3-positive AML is extremely poor. The standard intensive therapy rarely yields long-term responses. The new first- and second-generation FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors enriched treatment opportunities for patients with this mutation. Gilteritinib, a potent second-generation FLT3-ITD/TKD inhibitor, is a new effective and well tolerated drug for the treatment of relapsed/refractory FLT3-positive AML. Due to its efficacy, low toxicity, and good manageability, this drug can be administered to all patients, including the elderly or those with severe comorbidities and complications of previous therapy. Besides, this drug can be used in outpatient units. The present paper contains three case reports dealing with different clinical situations in patients with FLT3-positive AML treated with gilteritinib in real-world clinical practice.

Aim. To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) combined with FLAG/FLAG-Ida chemotherapy or azacitidine in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) in clinical practice. Materials & Methods. The study included 32 patients (16 men and 16 women). The median age was 44 years (range 23-83 years). Among them there were 15 (46.8 %) patients with refractory and 17 (53.2 %) patients with relapsed AML. GO combined with FLAG/FLAG-Ida was administered to 15 (46.8 %) patients, whereas 17 (53.2 %) patients were treated with GO and azacitidine combination. Therapy safety was assessed according to CTCAE v. 5.0. Results. Overall response rate including complete remission (CR), CR MRD-, CR with incomplete hematologic recovery, and morphologic leukemia-free status was 59.4 % (19/32). Refractoriness was observed in 31.25 % (10/32) of patients. Early mortality was 9.4 % (3/32). Overall response was 64.7 % (11/17) in the azacitidine and 53.3 % (8/15) in the FLAG/FLAG-Ida groups. In 4 (80 %) out of 5 patients with prior to FLAG treatment refractoriness, the response was achieved after GO + azacitidine therapy. In 58.9 % (10/17) of patients who received GO + azacitidine therapy, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) could be performed. The incidence of GO infusion complications in the tested groups did not significantly differ (p = 0.72) and was 46.7 % (7/15) (40 % with grade 1/2 and 6.7 % with grade 3) in the GO + FLAG/FLAG-Ida group and 35.3 % (6/17) (29.4 % with grade 1/2 and 5.9 % with grade 4) in the GO + azacitidine group. In the GO + FLAG/FLAG-Ida group 5 (33.3 %) patients experienced serious adverse events (SAE) of sepsis. In the GO + azacitidine group SAEs were reported in 6 (35.3 %) patients: 4 (66.6 %) with sepsis, 1 (16.7 %) with acute cardiovascular failure, and 1 (16.7 %) with acute respiratory failure. The median (range) duration was 23 (10-39) days for neutropenia grade 4, 24 (11-38) days for neutropenia grade 3, 21 (11-41) days for thrombocytopenia grade 4, 26 (16-45) days for thrombocytopenia grade 3, and 25 (22-45) days for thrombocytopenia grade 1/2. Thrombocytopenia duration was longer in patients with GO + FLAG/FLAG-Ida therapy, however, no significant differences were identified. No cases of veno-occlusive liver disease were reported. Median overall survival (OS) for both groups (n = 32) was 31.4 months, median disease-free survival (n = 21) was 13.3 months. In the group of patients with effective treatment, the median OS was not reached. In non-responders, it was 18 months (р = 0.0442). Conclusion. GO combined with FLAG/FLAG-Ida chemotherapy or azacitidine proved effective in relapsed/refractory AML patients. Remission did not appear to be associated with ELN risk, gender, age, CD33 expression, number of prior therapy lines, or number of relapses. GO + azacitidine combination showed efficacy, safety, and good tolerance in patients with prior high-dose chemotherapy refractoriness as well as low ECOG performance status. That allowed for the subsequent allo-HSCT administration to these patients. There was no significant difference between the groups of patients in the incidence of hematologic, non-hematologic toxicity, and time to hematologic recovery. Thrombocytopenia duration was longer in patients with GO + FLAG/FLAG-Ida therapy which is consistent with literature data. GO-based effective treatment in relapsed/refractory AML considerably improves OS: during 36 months of follow-up the median was not reached.

Myeloid sarcoma, also known as chloroma or granulocytic sarcoma, is a rare disease characterized by the proliferation of immature myeloid cells in extramedullary lesions. Chloroma is more commonly observed in patients with acute myeloid leukemias, other myeloproliferative neoplasms, or myelodysplastic syndrome. However, it can also manifest itself as solitary tumor. Sarcoma can develop in different organs and tissues, but most frequently it appears in lymph nodes, soft tissues, and bones. Myeloid sarcoma with primary gynecological lesion is very rarely mentioned. In literature cases of cervical lesions are described. The present article summarizes the literature data concerning different aspects of myeloid sarcoma diagnosis and treatment. The issue under discussion is the role of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, and bone marrow transplantation in the treatment of this malignant tumor. It appears that whatever the primary tumor localization, the best treatment options are chemotherapy and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (allo-BMT). A promising trend is the use of novel targeted drugs improving outcomes of treatment. The article provides a case report of a female patient with cervical myeloid sarcoma and concomitant bone marrow involvement, as well as the description of clinical course, diagnosis, and treatment. The patient received chemotherapy with subsequent allo-BMT. The pre-transplant therapy enabled allo-BMT with the deepest response possible. The patient achieved PET-and MRD-negative complete remission of cervical myeloid sarcoma and bone marrow.