Objective: to compare the efficacy and toxicity of aflibercept and bevacizumab in combination with fOLfIRI in secondline therapy for patients with metastatic colon cancer.Materials and methods. we performed a retrospective analysis of data on patients with metastatic colon cancer treated in 9 clinics in the Russian federation. The inclusion criteria were as follows: metastatic or locally advanced colon cancer; treatment with bevacizumab or aflibercept plus fOLfIRI in the second-line therapy. The primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PfS). Secondary outcome measures included objective response rate and incidence of adverse events.Results. A total of 271 patients with metastatic colon cancer who received second-line therapy with bevacizumab (n = 81) or aflibercept (n = 190) between 2014 and 2018 were selected for this study. Study groups were matched for main prognostic signs. The objective response rate was 18.1 % in the bevacizumab group and 20.5 % in the aflibercept group (p = 0.7). The median PfS was 5 months (95 % confidence interval 3.8–6.1) in the aflibercept group and 7 months (95 % confidence interval 0.81–2.1) in the bevacizumab group (hazard ratio 1.4; 95 % confidence interval 0.99–2.1; p = 0.04). multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the type of the targeted drug independently had no effect on PfS (hazard ratio 1.3; 95 % confidence interval 0.9–1.9; p = 0.2). we observed no statistically significant differences in the incidence of complications of any grades between the groups (58 % vs 72 %, p = 0.1). Patients receiving aflibercept were more likely to develop grade III–Iv arterial hypertension (2 % vs 9.5 %) and diarrhea (0 % vs 5.4 %), whereas thrombotic complications were more common in the bevacizumab group (10 % vs 1.8 %).Conclusion. we observed no significant differences in objective response rate and PfS between patients with metastatic colon cancer receiving bevacizumab or aflibercept in combination with fOLfIRI as second-line therapy. The toxicity profiles were different. Our findings can be used for choosing an optimal targeted drug for second-line treatment.

There is a number of unresolved issues regarding the systemic therapy administration for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Their solution is facilitated by accumulating real‑world study results. Lenvatinib therapy is a recognized drug with a good efficacy and safety profile for the treatment of HCC. Subanalyses of the REFLECT study showed that the absence of stratification by baseline AFP and baseline liver function, as well as the lack of options for subsequent drug therapy after lenvatinib, also affects the outcomes. Once these factors are taken into account, the hypothesis of superiority of lenvatinib to sorafenib and other drugs can be tested. Real‑world clinical studies have demonstrated positive results of lenvatinib therapy in patients with Child‑Pugh class B liver function, provided recommendations on the sequence of systemic therapy after lenvatinib and on the use of lenvatinib in patients with BCLC stage B, along with considering the possibility of lenvatinib monotherapy and the prospects for its use in patients with nHCC. Further real‑world studies of lenvatinib for HCC in the Russian population are required.

Introduction. The standard of 1st line treatment of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) is double blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab + taxane, 2nd line – Trastuzumab-emtazine. There are no standards for further treatment, as well as the optimal drug sequence. Expansion of the arsenal of therapeutic possibilities and the use of new combinations will certainly improve the results of treatment of this category of patients and increase their life expectancy.Aim. We sought to describe treatment patterns of eribulin and clinical outcomes of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer treated with eribulin plus trastuzumab combination in academic institutions and community oncology practices across the Russian Federation.Materials and methods. Patients treated with eribulin anytime between Jan, 2014 and Sep, 2019 with a diagnosis of MBC were identified by 23 providers from Russia. Providers retrospectively reviewed the health records and abstracted selected data points into an electronic case report form for each eligible patient.Results. 100 HER2-positive pts received eribulin in combination with trastuzumab. Median age was 55 (31–80) yrs and ECOG status 0–3. 67% pts had visceral metastases. Eribulin was administered as 1st and 2nd line to 23 (23%) pts, 3rd line to 31 (31%) pts, 4th line and later to 46 (46%). Median number of cycles was 5 (2–27). ORR was 12%, SD – 72%, SD > 6 months – 23%, PD – 16%. Clinical efficacy rate achieved in 35%. Median PFS was 5.07 months (95% CI 4.021–6.119). According to the ER-status the response to eribulin and trastuzumab was different. ORR was 18.8%, SD 72.9% in pts with ER-positive MBC (n = 48) and 5.8% and 71.2% respectively in ER-negative MBC (n = 52). Median PFS was 6.97 months (95% CI 3.924–10.016) in pts with ER-positive MBC and 4.67 months (95% CI 3.841–5.499) in ER-negative MBC (р = 0.3). The combination was well tolerated: dose reductions were required in 12% pts, withdrawal due to toxicity in 4% pts. The most common type of toxicity was hematological with neutropenia Gr III-IV in 14 (14%) pts. Peripheral neuropathy Gr III was observed in 5 (5%) pts. No cardiotoxicity was detected.Conclusions. This is the real-life data of clinical outcomes for patients receiving eribulin plus trastuzumab for HER2-positive MBC throughout the Russian Federation. Our experience with eribulin plus trastuzumab demonstrates that this combination may be a potential effective treatment option for HER-2 positive MBC patients.

Background. The implementation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors into clinical practice improved treatment outcomes in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC). Lenvatinib is recommended as a first-line drug for these patients. The study objective is to analyze clinical experience with lenvatinib in patients with RR-DTC in the Russian Federation. Materials and methods. The data from 18 clinical sites in Russia was analyzed for the period December 2015 and September 2019. Seventyseven patients with histologically verified DTC, proven resistance to radioactive iodine therapy, and tumor progression (according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria) were included in the study. Results.Median progression-free survival in patients included into analysis (n = 72) was 26.1 months. In patients who responded to therapy (including those with partial and complete response), median progression-free survival reached 36.2 months, which is higher than that reported in the updated results of the SELECT study (33.1 months). Lenvatinib-associated adverse events (AEs) were observed in 87 % of patients. Severe AEs were registered in 18.2 % of participants. In 6.5 % of cases, AEs lead to lenvatinib cessation; in 74 % of cases, AEs required dose reduction.Conclusion. Our findings suggest high efficacy and good tolerability of lenvatinib in patients with RR-DTC in routine clinical practice in the Russian Federation.

Objective: to identify factors associated with efficacy of an aflibercept-chemotherapy combination in patients with metastatic colon cancer. Materials and methods. This retrospective multicenter study was conducted in 20 clinics from 15 regions of the Russian Federation. The main efficacy outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). We performed univariate and multivariate analysis to assess the impact of various factors of PFS. Results. Two hundred and fifty-seven patients received aflibercept-containing chemotherapy; of them, 175 participants (68.1 %) received it as a second-line therapy. The objective response rate and median PFS were 18.7% and 5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.2—5.8) respec -tively. The following factors were found to have a positive effect of PFS at multivariate analysis: grade I—II adverse events to aflibercept therapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.58; 95 % CI 0.38—0.89; p = 0.01), therapy for concomitant diseases (HR 0.47; 95 % CI 0.29—0.76; p = 0.002), and ECOG performance status of 0 (HR 0.53; 95 % CI 0.34—0.81; p = 0.004). Patient with all 3 factors present had median PFS of 9 months, whereas patients without them demonstrated PFS of only 3 months (HR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.5—2.6; p <0.001). Conclusions. Satisfactory performance status, adequate therapy for concomitant diseases, and adverse events to aflibercept therapy were associated with better PFS in patients receiving aflibercept-containing chemotherapy.

Objective: to identify factors associated with efficacy of an aflibercept-chemotherapy combination in patients with metastatic colon cancer.Materials and methods. This retrospective multicenter study was conducted in 20 clinics from 15 regions of the Russian Federation. The main efficacy outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). We performed univariate and multivariate analysis to assess the impact of various factors of PFS.Results. Two hundred and fifty-seven patients received aflibercept-containing chemotherapy; of them, 175 participants (68.1 %) received it as a second-line therapy. The objective response rate and median PFS were 18.7% and 5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.2—5.8) respec -tively. The following factors were found to have a positive effect of PFS at multivariate analysis: grade I—II adverse events to aflibercept therapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.58; 95 % CI 0.38—0.89; p = 0.01), therapy for concomitant diseases (HR 0.47; 95 % CI 0.29—0.76; p = 0.002), and ECOG performance status of 0 (HR 0.53; 95 % CI 0.34—0.81; p = 0.004). Patient with all 3 factors present had median PFS of 9 months, whereas patients without them demonstrated PFS of only 3 months (HR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.5—2.6; p <0.001).Conclusions. Satisfactory performance status, adequate therapy for concomitant diseases, and adverse events to aflibercept therapy were associated with better PFS in patients receiving aflibercept-containing chemotherapy.

Introduction. The randomized MPACT study showed that nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine results in statistically significantly longer life expectancy. The objective of this retrospective study is to obtain relevant data on the efficacy of this combination in real clinical practice in Russia. Materials and methods. The study included patients with morphologically proven locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, with a general condition assessed on the ECOG scale between 0-2, which received gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. Immediate and long-term treatment outcomes were evaluated. Results. 142 patients, who received treatment from 2009 to 2019 in 17 centers from 11 regions of Russia, were included in the study. Assessment of the objective effect was made in 134 patients. Objective effects were detected in 34 (25.4%) cases. The median time-to-progression was 6.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.8-7.4), the median length of life was 14.2 months (95% CI 10.6-17.9). An elevated CA19-9 level is the only independent adverse prognostic factor for progression-free survival (RR = 8.0, 95% CI 1.4 -43.8, p = 0.02) according to Cox multivariate regression analysis. The number of previously conducted chemotherapy lines (p = 0.34), ECOG status (p = 0.70), age over 70 years (p = 0.45), serious comorbidity (p = 0.97) did not have a statistically significant effect on progression-free survival. Findings. The gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel combination has a relatively higher efficacy in advanced pancreatic cancer. The immediate and long-term results of its use in real clinical practice in Russia are consistent with data obtained in the Western countries.

Purpose . To assess the incidence and severity of adverse events; to explore clinical factors associated with grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity; to assess the immediate efficacy and progression-free survival during treatment with the FOLFIRI regimen in combination with aflibercept in Russia. Materials and Methods . A retrospective multicenter study has been conducted with data collected from 20 clinics in 15 regions of Russia. There was no statistical hypothesis. Progression-free survival was the main efficacy criterion. The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPPS Statistics v. 20 software. Results . FOLFIRI and Aflibercept combination was administered to 264 patients. The mean number of treatment cycles was 6 (1 to 29). The toxicity of aflibercept was addressed by dose reduction and dosing delay in 10.1 % and 11.4 % of patients, respectively, and dose reductions and dosing delays in any of FOLIFRI components were reported in 20.1 % of participants. The objective response rate was 20.3 %. The median progression-free survival in patients receiving second-line treatment was 6 months (95 % CI: 5.3–6.6 months). Seventy-two percent of patients experienced any grade of adverse events most of which were limited to grade 1–2 (62.1 %). Non-hematologic toxicity was reported in 64 % of patients (grade 3–4 in 17.9 %). Hematologic events were detected in only 17.9 % of patients. Multifactorial analysis has shown that drug therapy for concomitant diseases (OR 1.98, 95 % CI: 1.04–3.78, p = 0.037) and the number of chemotherapy lines prior to aflibercept (ОR 1.5, 95 % CI: 1.06–2.11, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity. Conclusions . Objective response rate, progression-free survival, and frequency of toxicity-related aflibercept discontinuations in the Russian study with patients receiving aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI regimen as a second-line treatment has shown the results that were comparable with VELOUR study. Comorbidities requiring drug treatment and the number of prior chemotherapy lines appear to be risk factors for grade 3–4 nonhematological toxicity events.

Purpose. To assess the incidence and severity of adverse events; to explore clinical factors associated with grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity; to assess the immediate efficacy and progression-free survival during treatment with the FOLFIRI regimen in combination with aflibercept in Russia.Materials and Methods. A retrospective multicenter study has been conducted with data collected from 20 clinics in 15 regions of Russia. There was no statistical hypothesis. Progression-free survival was the main efficacy criterion. The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPPS Statistics v. 20 software.Results. FOLFIRI and Aflibercept combination was administered to 264 patients. The mean number of treatment cycles was 6 (1 to 29). The toxicity of aflibercept was addressed by dose reduction and dosing delay in 10.1 % and 11.4 % of patients, respectively, and dose reductions and dosing delays in any of FOLIFRI components were reported in 20.1 % of participants. The objective response rate was 20.3 %. The median progression-free survival in patients receiving second-line treatment was 6 months (95 % CI: 5.3–6.6 months). Seventy-two percent of patients experienced any grade of adverse events most of which were limited to grade 1–2 (62.1 %). Non-hematologic toxicity was reported in 64 % of patients (grade 3–4 in 17.9 %). Hematologic events were detected in only 17.9 % of patients. Multifactorial analysis has shown that drug therapy for concomitant diseases (OR 1.98, 95 % CI: 1.04–3.78, p = 0.037) and the number of chemotherapy lines prior to aflibercept (ОR 1.5, 95 % CI: 1.06–2.11, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity.Conclusions. Objective response rate, progression-free survival, and frequency of toxicity-related aflibercept discontinuations in the Russian study with patients receiving aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI regimen as a second-line treatment has shown the results that were comparable with VELOUR study. Comorbidities requiring drug treatment and the number of prior chemotherapy lines appear to be risk factors for grade 3–4 nonhematological toxicity events.

The article presents a pooled experience of the use of eribulin in the real clinical practice of treatment of metastatic breast cancer in Russian oncological institutions. The effectiveness of the drug in monotherapy with HER2‑negative breast cancer was analyzed, groups of patients with most effective use of eribulin were identified depending on the localization of metastases, the most effective lines of therapy. The effectiveness of the drug in combination with trastuzumab in HER2‑positive breast cancer is described, as well as toxic reactions.

The article presents a pooled experience of the use of eribulin in the real clinical practice of treatment of metastatic breast cancer in Russian oncological institutions. The effectiveness of the drug in monotherapy with HER2‑negative breast cancer was analyzed, groups of patients with most effective use of eribulin were identified depending on the localization of metastases, the most effective lines of therapy. The effectiveness of the drug in combination with trastuzumab in HER2‑positive breast cancer is described, as well as toxic reactions.

The article shows the experience of eribulin application in actual clinical practice in Oncology institutions of the Russian Federation concerning metastatic breast cancer. We have analyzed the efficacy of the drug in case of different subtypes of the tumor and have chosen patients, depending on the location of metastases and with proven maximum efficacy of eribulin. We have shown the side reactions and the possibility of application of eribulin in combination with other antineoplastic agents.

В статье представлен обобщенный опыт применения эрибулина в реальной клинической практике онкологических учреждений Российской Федерации при метастатическом раке молочной железы. Проанализирована эффективность препарата при различных подтипах опухоли, выделены группы больных в зависимости от локализации метастазов, у которых эрибулин оказался максимально эффективным. Описаны токсические реакции, а также оценена возможность комбинации препарата с другими противоопухолевыми средствами.