The aim of this article was an attempt to answer the question: is necrotizing sarcoid granulomatosis a late stage of nodular sarcoidosis or an independent disease? In order to better understand the designated topic, as part of the description of the clinical case, a differential diagnosis of a number of granulomatous diseases with vasculitis was carried out. The main emphasis was placed on the accurate interpretation of pathomorphological features in each individual case.

Gout is a chronic inflammatory arthropathy, caused by articular and periarticular sodium monourate (MUN) crystals deposition on the background of chronic hyperuricemia. Gout belongs to the group of autoinflammatory diseases characterized by activation of the innate immune system. In some cases, especially in women, with a long course of the disease and absence of adequate therapy, chronic arthritis is detected, which has little difference from that in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). At the same time, until recently, the combination of RA and gout was considered casuistry due to the inhibition of crystal formation by specific factors associated with RA, what is more mechanisms of inflammation development characteristic of these diseases are completely different. However, according to the latest data, the coexistence of these two diseases in one patient is possible, and the therapy of both, gout and RA (in some patients) can be successful when prescribing biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, in particular inhibitors of the interleukin 1 receptor (IL1r). The article presents a rare clinical case of chronic tophi gout in an elderly patient who was followed up for a long time with a diagnosis of RA, a significant improvement was achieved on therapy with the IL1r antagonist anakinra.

The article discusses the difficulties of differential diagnosis of early arthritis and inflammatory bowel diseases with a predominant clinical picture of extraintestinal manifestations, in particular, articular syndrome. The clinical observation demonstrates features of the course of such conditions, a long diagnostic search and a wide list of diseases included in differential diagnostics range.

Objective: to analyze therapy with rituximab (RTM) in real clinical practice according to the data available in OREL registry of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Subjects and methods. The analysis included 349 patients. All the patients received RTM: 340 – the original drug (MabThera®) and 9 – the biosimilar Acellbia®. 263 patients (75.4%) received RTM in combination with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and 86 (24.6%) – RTM as monotherapy.Results and discussion. Of the 349 patients included in the analysis, 272 (77.9%) patients received RTM as the first biologic agent (BA) (263 patients were treated with the original drug and 9 – with the biosimilar) and 77 (22.1%) patients had previously used the BA. The majority of patients (n=205 (58.7%)) received three or more; 109 (31.2%) patients – one, and 35 (10%) – two RTM courses of RTM therapy. RTM caused a significant reduction in disease activity just after the first therapy course and in the levels of acute-phase reactants (C-reactive protein (CRP) and ESR); after the fifth therapy course, median CRP concentration decreased by 1.4 times and amounted to 7 [1.2; 17.9] mg/l and that of ESR reduced by 1.8 times and was 10 [5; 20] mm/hr (p<0.05).Conclusion. The analysis of RTM therapy in RA patients in real clinical practice demonstrated that in most cases RTM was given as the first BA, in combination with DMARDs, the main agent of which was methotrexate. The use of RTM was accompanied by a significant reduction in disease activity and in the serum levels of acute-phase reactants and autoantibodies.

Objective: to analyze therapy with rituximab (RTM) in real clinical practice according to the data available in OREL registry of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Subjects and methods . The analysis included 349 patients. All the patients received RTM: 340 – the original drug (MabThera®) and 9 – the biosimilar Acellbia®. 263 patients (75.4%) received RTM in combination with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and 86 (24.6%) – RTM as monotherapy. Results and discussion . Of the 349 patients included in the analysis, 272 (77.9%) patients received RTM as the first biologic agent (BA) (263 patients were treated with the original drug and 9 – with the biosimilar) and 77 (22.1%) patients had previously used the BA. The majority of patients (n=205 (58.7%)) received three or more; 109 (31.2%) patients – one, and 35 (10%) – two RTM courses of RTM therapy. RTM caused a significant reduction in disease activity just after the first therapy course and in the levels of acute-phase reactants (C-reactive protein (CRP) and ESR); after the fifth therapy course, median CRP concentration decreased by 1.4 times and amounted to 7 [1.2; 17.9] mg/l and that of ESR reduced by 1.8 times and was 10 [5; 20] mm/hr (p<0.05). Conclusion. The analysis of RTM therapy in RA patients in real clinical practice demonstrated that in most cases RTM was given as the first BA, in combination with DMARDs, the main agent of which was methotrexate. The use of RTM was accompanied by a significant reduction in disease activity and in the serum levels of acute-phase reactants and autoantibodies.

The paper presents the materials of the Russian Arthritis Registry (OREL) that includes 3276 patients from 11 Russian Federation's largest research-and-practical centers situated in Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Novosibirsk, Kazan, Tula, Yaroslavl, Tyumen. It discusses the main goals of setting up registries, compares the results of an analysis of the data available in the Russian Registry OREL and registries of European countries and the USA. The findings suggest that there is non-uniform information on clinical, laboratory, and instrumental parameters in the national registers of a numberof European countries and the USA. According to its basic characteristics, the Russian Registry OREL compares favorably with a number of other registries in the completeness of data collection, which allows a general idea of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Russia. For further development of the OREL Registry, it is necessary to concentrate our attention on the following main areas: to improve the quality of filling out documents; to follow-up patients receiving different RA therapy regimens according to the guidelines of the Association of Rheumatologists of Russia for the treatment of RA; to conduct in-depth studies of comorbidity, primarily depressive disorders; to analyze adverse reactions that make RA therapy difficult; to actively use modules for patients' self-rating of their condition; to develop nursing care, etc.

The paper describes a long-term observation and discusses the possible mechanism of leflunomide-induced clinical and morphological regression of AA-amyloidosis diagnosed at a nephrotic stage in the presence of adult-onset Still's disease.