The search for new therapeutic options for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an urgent issue in rheumatology. The article presents the results of the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial BCD-132-5/LIBERIUS on the efficacy and safety of divozilimab (BCD-132) in the treatment of SSc.Objective: to investigate the efficacy and safety of divozilimab in patients with SSc compared to placebo.Material and methods. After enrolment in the study, patients received divozilimab or placebo for 48 weeks, after which they were switched to an open-label divozilimab therapy until week 96.Results and discussion. Divozilimab was superior to placebo regarding the primary endpoint change in mRSS at week 48 compared to baseline, and the therapy had a positive effect on respiratory function parameters. Divozilimab treatment was well tolerated.Conclusion. Thus, divosilimab may represent a new therapeutic option for patients with SSc.

The article presents the results of the three-year use of netakimab (NTK) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) as part of the phase III BCD-085-5/ASTERA study. Objective : to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of NTK over a three-year period in patients with active AS. Material and methods . BCD-085-5/ASTERA – double-blind, multicenter, randomized phase III clinical trial that enrolled patients with active AS (BASDAI ≥4) and a back pain intensity ≥4 on a numeric rating scale with inefficacy or intolerance of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or biologic drugs. A total of 228 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio and assigned to either the NTK group or the placebo/NTK group. Starting at week 16, patients who did not achieve ASAS20 (20% improvement according to ASAS criteria) received NTK 120 mg once every 2 weeks in an open-label regimen. Patients who achieved ASAS20 response at week 52 in the NTK group and week 68 in the placebo/NTK group continued to receive NTK (120 mg every 2 weeks) until week 156 in the NTK group and until week 172 in the placebo/NTK group. Results and discussion . Over the course of three years of NTK use, most patients experienced a sustained decline in AS activity (according to ASDAS-CRP, BASDAI) with sustained response (ASAS20/40, ASAS5/6) to therapy. Most adverse events reported were mild to moderate. 36.7% of patients had adverse events, which were mainly laboratory abnormalities, blood and lymphatic system abnormalities and infectious complications. Conclusion . The clinical effect of NTK was maintained in most patients with AS over a three-year period, with no significant loss of response. NTK was well tolerated and the safety profile remained favorable.

Objective: The aim of the NiSaXPA study is to evaluate the quality of diagnosing, socio-demographic characteristics and treatment tactics of patients with axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA) in real-world clinical practice in the Russian Federation.Material and methods. The study involved 600 patients from 21 clinical centers in the Russian Federation.Results and discussion. The diagnosis of axPsA was confirmed in 357 (59.5%) of 600 patients according to the centralized expert assessment. All 357 patients with axial lesions met criteria of the clinical guidelines for the treatment of patients with PsA. Of these, 201 (69%) patients had radiologically significant sacroiliitis (SI) according to Kellgren and 103 (59.2%) had active SI according to magnetic resonance imaging. The presence of syndesmophytes was confirmed in 119 (43.9%) patients. Inflammatory back pain was observed in approximately 80% of patients, most commonly in the lumbar and cervical spine. "Silent" sacroiliitis were found in 1.1–3.5 % of cases. 26.8% of patients were positive for HLA-B27. In the 6 months prior to the study, high PsA activity was present in 21.6% of patients according to the rheumatologist's assessment, while high activity according to the BASDAI index was found in 71.9 % of patients, and moderate and high activity according to the DAPSA index – in 82.7%. On the 24th week of observation, the number of patients with low activity according to BASDAI doubled and reached 66.3 %, while low activity and remission according to the DAPSA index amounted to 52.5% and 8.1% of patients, respectively. In most cases (about 27%), patients with axial manifestations were prescribed interleukin (IL) 17A inhibitors, about 14% of patients received tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors, and about 4% received IL23 inhibitors.Conclusion. In 40.5% of patients, axial skeletal involvement in PsA was over-diagnosed due to misinterpretation of clinical and imaging data. The vast majority of patients (77%) were treated with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, mainly methotrexate, which do not affect the activity of spondylitis. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were taken by 46.5% of patients. Switching therapy to bDMARDs led to a significant reduction in disease activity.In order to improve the quality of medical care, the Russian clinical guidelines for the treatment of patients with PsA and the algorithms for the diagnosis of axial involvement need to be comprehensively implemented.

The aim – to evaluate the clinical effectiveness, safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of seniprutug (BCD-180) in patients with radiographic active axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA, or ankylosing spondylitis).Subjects and methods. 260 patients with active r-axSpA and inadequate response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were randomized into three groups: seniprutug (BCD-180) at doses of 5 mg/kg or 7 mg/kg, or placebo. BCD-180 was administered on weeks 0–12–36. Patients in the placebo group were switched to BCD-180 at a dose of 5 mg/kg at week 24 and continued therapy at week 36. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving 40% improvement by Assessment in Spondyloarthritis International Society scale (ASAS40) at week 24. Secondary endpoints were proportion achieving ASAS20/40, improvement of 5 out of 6 criteria of ASAS (ASAS5/6), ASAS partial remission, clinically important improvement in ASDAS-CRP (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein) (ASDAS-CII) and major improvement in ASDAS-CRP (ASDAS-MI). The dynamics of the disease activity status according to ASDAS-CRP, the BASDAI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index) and BASFI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index) indices, as well as the dynamics of laboratory markers (C-reactive protein anderythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) were analyzed. Safety was assessed by the frequency and profile of adverse events (AEs) and adverse reactions (ARs).Results. The proportion of patients achieving ASAS40 at week 24 with seniprutug (BCD-180) at the dose of 7 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg was 51.4% and 40.8%, respectively, compared with 24% in the placebo group (p=0.0012 and p=0.0417, respectively). Analysis of secondary endpoints showed that in patients with r-axSpA, BCD-180 at both study doses was significantly superior to placebo at week 24 in the following measures: decrease in the proportion of subjects with very high disease activity (ASDAS-CRP>3.5) achieving ASDAS-CII, ASAS20, ASAS5/6. A statistically significant decrease in the ASDAS-CRP, BASDAI, BASFI indices, as well as the concentration of CRP and ESR were demonstrated. Tolerability of seniprutug therapy was assessed as acceptable. Infusion reactions were the most common observed adverse events, the vast majority of which were mild to moderate in severity according to CTCAE 5.0 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and developed predominantly during the first administration. The proportion of patients with binding antibodies was 5.1%. However, no neutralizing antibodies were detected.Conclusion. Seniprutug (BCD-180) demonstrated superiority over placebo in clinical efficacy with a favorable safety profile and low immunogenicity as a treatment of r-axSpA.

Background. Previously, 24-week results of phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical study (SOLAR) of levilimab in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) proved a superiority of levilimab over placebo. Here we present 1-year efficacy and safety data of the SOLAR study.Objective – to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levilimab in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in subjects with MTX resistant active RA.Methods. The study was conducted at 21 clinical sites in Russia and Belarus. All randomized subjects have completed the study between November 2019 and October 2021.154 adults, aged ≥18 years with confirmed diagnosis of RA were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either levilimab (162 mg, SC, QW) + MTX (n=102) or placebo + MTX (n=52).After W24 of the study all subjects continued to receive open label levilimab. Subjects who have achieved DAS28-CRP≤2.6 at W24 were switched to maintenance (Q2W) regimen of levilimab at W28 (LVL QW/Q2W and PBO/LVL Q2W arms). Those with DAS28-CRP>2.6 at W28 continued with QW regimen (LVL QW and PBO/LVL QW arm). The PBO/LVL Q2W arm contained only one subject, thus not included in the analysis. The efficacy analysis was done in a population of all randomized subjects. Those with missing data due to study discontinuation or rescue therapy prescription were considered non-responders. Otherwise, the analysis was performed on complete cases.Safety was assessed through monitoring of adverse events (AEs) in a population of those, who received at least on dose of LVL (n=152).Results. Better response to treatment was observed in LVL QW/Q2W as it composed of those who reach DAS28-CRP≤2.6 at W24. At this time point 15/27 (55.6%) of them achieved ACR70; 23/27 (85.2%) achieved DAS28-CRP remission (<2.6) and 7/27 (25.9%) achieved ACR/EULAR 2011 remission of RA. After switching to LVL Q2W, rates of ACR70 and DAS28-CRP<2.6 did not significantly changed until W52: 17/27 (63.0%) and 21/27 (77.8%), respectively, yet the proportion of subject with ACR/EULAR 2011 remission further increased and reached 12/27 (44.4%).LVL QW arm was diminished by subjects who achieved high response to treatment at W24 and composed LVL QW/Q2W arm. Thus, ACR70, and remissions rate in this arm was close to zero at W24. However, continuation of LVL QW in those who not achieved DAS28-CRP≤2.6 at W24 induced ACR70 response in 37/75 (36.0%), DAS28-CRP remission in 35/75 (46.7%) and ACR/EULAR 2011 remission in 8/75 (10.7%) at W52.The most common adverse events (reported in ≥5% of subjects) were blood cholesterol increase (30.3%), ALT increase (23.0%), lymphocyte count decrease (17.1%), ANC decrease (16.4%). blood triglycerides increase (13.8%), bilirubin increase (11.2%), AST increase (9.9%), WBC decrease (9.9%), IGRA with Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen positive (7.2%) and injection site reactions (5.9%). No deaths were occurred.Conclusions. Open label period confirmed the lasting efficacy and safety of levilimab in combination with MTX in subjects with MTX resistant active RA and suggested the possibility of switching to maintenance (Q2W) regimen in those who achieved remission of RA at week 24.

The article contains the data obtained during the 156-week follow-up of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the ASTERA phase III study.Objective: to evaluate the effect impact of netakimab (NTK) on quality of life (QoL), back pain and work capacity in patients with active AS.Material and methods. The study enrolled 228 patients with active AS who were randomized 1:1 to receive NTK 120 mg or placebo. At week 52, patients in Group 1 (NTK) who achieved ASAS20 continued therapy (NTK at a dose of 120 mg once every 2 weeks) until week 156. Patients in Group 2 (placebo/NTK) received the study drug at a dose of 120 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks from week 20 until week 68, after which the efficacy of therapy was determined (by achieving an ASAS20 response). Patients who achieved ASAS20 received treatment (NTK at a dose of 120 mg once every 2 weeks) until week 172.Results and discussion. Under NTK therapy, a significant improvement in QoL was observed in the assessment of the physical and psychological components of the SF-36 questionnaire, which was maintained during the three years of therapy: increase in indicator by 12.68±9.92; 13.27±10.14; 12.92±10.03; 14.10±10.35; 14.76±9.77 and 6.10±11.59; 5.50±11.82; 6.32±11.01; 5.87±11.45; 5.25±11.98 points at week 52, 76, 104, 128 and 156, respectively. During the extended therapy period, a reduction in the proportion of working hours missed for health reasons, an improvement in work capacity and work efficiency and an increase in daily activity were observed. Back pain (BASDAI question 2) and nocturnal back pain decreased steadily during the entire follow-up period compared to the screening values.Conclusion. NTK is an effective therapy for active AS that improves QoL scores, significantly reduces pain intensity and improves work productivity.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic immunoinflammatory disease of the joints, spine and entheses from the group of spondyloarthritis, which is usually observed in patients with psoriasis. In recent years, the axial form of PsA (axPsA) has been actively researched. However, there is insufficient data on approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with axPsA in real-life clinical practice. This article presents the results of an interim analysis of data from a non-interventional multicenter observational study on the treatment of patients with axPsA in real-life clinical practice (NiSaXPA) in Russian centers. Objective : to identify patients with axPsA, their characteristics and describe treatment tactics in real-life clinical practice. Material and methods . Patients with PsA who met the inclusion criteria were prospectively followed up during routine visits to a rheumatologist. Participants' axial radiographs were uploaded to a database in order for it to be confirmed the presence or absence of axPsA by two independent experts, a rheumatologist and a radiologist. Patients with a confirmed axPsA diagnosis participated in a further data collection phase (Visit 2, week 24). Results and discussion . Six hundred patients were enrolled into the study. At the time of analysis, 386 (64.3%) of them (209 men and 177 women) were screened for axPsA. The diagnosis of axPsA was confirmed in 241 (62.4%) cases; these patients formed the Per Protocol (PP) population. The mean age of patients with axPsA in the PP population was 46.30±12.6 years and the body mass index (BMI) was 27.4±5.2 kg/m2 . In 14.9% of patients, the duration of psoriasis was less than 1–5 years, in 21.5% – 5–10 years and in 63.6% – more than 10 years. The duration of PsA symptoms was less than 1–5 years in 31.2 % of patients, 5–10 years in 31.6 % and more than 10 years in 37.2 %. Low disease activity (BASDAI ˂ 4) was achieved in 33.3 % of patients with axPsA at visit 1 and in 64.3 % at visit 2; the BASDAI index declined on average from 4.67±1.95 to 3.31±1.89 points. In real-life clinical practice, patients were most frequently prescribed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) – 88.7% and 71.7% (visits 1 and 2, respectively), and synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs) –79.1% and 70.7%, respectively; therapy with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) was initiated in 40.2% and 60.6% of patients, respectively. Conclusion . The results of the interim analysis of this observational study showed that in 87.2% of patients who met the CASPAR criteria for PsA there was a suspicion of axial manifestations of PsA on the primary care level. However, only 62.4% of them had a confirmed diagnosis of axPsA on centralized expert assessment, which may indicate a possible overdiagnosis of axial lesions in real-life practice and emphasizes the importance of collaboration between a rheumatologist and a radiologist when analyzing the results of imaging studies. 33.3% of patients with axPsA had low disease activity according to BASDAI at baseline and 64.3% after 24 weeks, meaning that the disease was only adequately controlled in one third of cases despite therapy; the number of these patients doubled after a change in therapy. In real-world clinical practice, patients with axPsA are most commonly prescribed drugs from the NSAID and sDMARD groups; the frequency of use of biologic drugs varied between 40.2 and 60.6% by the end of the observation period.

Levilimab (LVL) is a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-6 receptor (IL6R). The article presents data obtained during 56 weeks of the AURORA phase II study.Objective: to evaluate the efficacy safety and immunogenicity of LVL in methotrexate (MTX) resistant patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Materials and methods. 105 patients with active RA were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into two LVL or placebo groups. LVL was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 162 mg every week (QW) or every other week (Q2W). All patients received MTX. After evaluating the primary endpoint of 20% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR20) at week 12, patients in the placebo group were switched to LVL Q2W. The study duration was 56 weeks. The frequency, profile, degree and severity of adverse events were determined in each group for safety assessment. The immunogenicity of LVL was determined by the proportion of patients with identified binding and neutralizing antidrug antibodies. Results. LVL in both regimens was superior to placebo. At week 12, the incidence of ACR20 achievement was 77.1% (LVL QW), 57.1% (LVL Q2W), and 17.1% (placebo) with 95% confidence intervals [37.53; 82.54] (p<0.0001) and [19.08; 68.42] (p=0.003) for the effect difference between LVL and placebo groups. The clinical response, more pronounced in the LVL QW group, persisted until week 52 with an increase in the proportion of patients with ACR50/70, low activity and RA remission. The most common treatment-related adverse events were laboratory abnormalities (predominantly grade 1–2) such as neutropenia, elevated alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase levels, hypercholesterolemia, and elevated triglyceride levels. Antidrug antibodies were not identified.Conclusion. In MTX-resistant patients with active RA, the efficacy of both LVL regimens at a dose of 162 mg in combination with MTX was significantly superior to MT monotherapy. LVL QW lead to highest treatment response. LVL has been shown to be well tolerated and low immunogenicity. LVL safety profile is similar to IL6R inhibitors.

Levilimab is anti-interleukin-6 receptor (IL6R) monoclonal antibody. The article presents data obtained during 24 weeks of the SOLAR phase III study.Objective: to confirm efficacy and safety of levilimab in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with methotrexate resistant active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Patients and methods. 154 adult patients, aged ≥18 years with the diagnosis of RA (ACR/EULAR 2010) and confirmed disease activity at screening despite treatment with MTX for at least 12 weeks (in a stable dose 15-25 mg/week). Patients were randomized 2:1 in levilimab (162 mg once a week, subcutaneously) + MTX (n=102) or placebo + MTX (n=52) group.The hypothesis of superiority of levilimab over placebo was tested for two co-primary efficacy endpoints: proportion of subjects who achieved ACR20 at week 12 and proportion of subjects who achieved low disease activity (LDA) of RA (DAS28-CRP <3.2) at week 24. Safety was assessed through monitoring of adverse events (AEs).Results and discussion. Seventy (68.6%) subjects who received levilimab and 20 (38.5%) who received placebo achieved ACR20 response at week 12. Fifty three (52%) subjects who received levilimab and 3 (5,8%) subjects who received placebo achieved LDA at week 24. The most common adverse events (reported in ≥5% of subjects) in levilimab and placebo arms, respectively were (by decreasing frequency): blood c holesterol increase (24% vs 12%), alanine aminotransferase elevation (11% vs 8%), lymphocyte count decrease (9% vs 8%), blood total bilirubin increase (11% vs 0%), blood triglycerides increase (10% vs 2%), aspartate aminotransferase elevation (7% vs 4%), positive interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) with M.tuberculosis antigen blood test (5% vs 6%), absolute neutrophil count decrease (8% vs 0%). No deaths were occurred.Conclusion. The study confirmed superior efficacy of levilimab + MTX over placebo + MTX in subjects with MTX resistant active RA. Levilimab showed favorable safety profile and low immunogenicity. No new important safety risks were detected.

Netakimab (NTK) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-17A.Objective. The main objective of BCD-085-5/ASTERA study was to prove superiority of NTK over placebo and assess its’ safety in patients with active AS.Subjects and methods. BCD-085-5/ASTERA was a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III study, which included 228 adult patients with active AS, persisting despite active treatment with NSAIDs. AS was considered active at BASDAI score ≥ 4.0. Patients were blindly randomized (1:1) to receive subcutaneous injections of NTK (120 mg) or placebo at weeks 0, 1, 2 and then every other week up to week 14. Starting from week 16 all patients from NTK group and patients from placebo group not achieving ASAS20 were switched to open label 120 mg NTK s/c once every two weeks. The total duration of treatment with NTK was 3 years.Results. Higher proportion of patients had ASAS40 response at week 16 (primary endpoint) in NTK arm compared to placebo (40,4 vs 2,6%, р <0,0001, 95% CI [27,4%; 48,1%]). Spinal pain subsided and laboratory inflammation markers decreased within one week after the first NTK injection. NTK safety profile was comparable to that of placebo. The most common for NTK adverse events were neutropenia (7,0%) and ALT increase (6,1%).Conclusion. Subcutaneous NTK at 120 mg dose demonstrated superior efficacy vs placebo, with fast onset of response and favorable safety profile when used in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Netakimab (NTK) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-17A. Objective . The main objective of BCD-085-5/ASTERA study was to prove superiority of NTK over placebo and assess its’ safety in patients with active AS. Subjects and methods . BCD-085-5/ASTERA was a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III study, which included 228 adult patients with active AS, persisting despite active treatment with NSAIDs. AS was considered active at BASDAI score ≥ 4.0. Patients were blindly randomized (1:1) to receive subcutaneous injections of NTK (120 mg) or placebo at weeks 0, 1, 2 and then every other week up to week 14. Starting from week 16 all patients from NTK group and patients from placebo group not achieving ASAS20 were switched to open label 120 mg NTK s/c once every two weeks. The total duration of treatment with NTK was 3 years. Results . Higher proportion of patients had ASAS40 response at week 16 (primary endpoint) in NTK arm compared to placebo (40,4 vs 2,6%, р <0,0001, 95% CI [27,4%; 48,1%]). Spinal pain subsided and laboratory inflammation markers decreased within one week after the first NTK injection. NTK safety profile was comparable to that of placebo. The most common for NTK adverse events were neutropenia (7,0%) and ALT increase (6,1%). Conclusion . Subcutaneous NTK at 120 mg dose demonstrated superior efficacy vs placebo, with fast onset of response and favorable safety profile when used in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Netakimab (NTK) is a humanized anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody. To date, the drug has been approved to treat ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis, and plaque psoriasis. The paper gives the data obtained during 52-week follow-up of AS patients in the phase III ASTERA study.Objective: to study the efficacy and safety of NTK when used long in patients with active AS.Patients and methods. The investigation enrolled 228 patients with active AS, in whom nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or biological agents were ineffective. The patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive NTK 120 mg or placebo. The drug was administered subcutaneously at weeks 0, 1, 2, and then once every 2 weeks. Patients who received placebo and achieved a 20% improvement according to the ASAS criteria (ASAS20) were excluded from the study at week 16. At this week, patients who took placebo and did not achieve an ASAS20 response were switched to subcutaneous NTK at 120 mg dose once every two weeks. The follow-up period was 52 weeks.Results and discussion. Patients with active AS who received NTK were more likely to respond to treatment than those who took placebo. The proportion of people who achieved 40% improvement (ASAS40) during treatment with NTK increased throughout the follow-up period and amounted to 80.7% at week 52. Positive changes were achieved in all used clinical and laboratory parameters of AS activity. There was also a decrease in inflammatory changes, as shown by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The adverse events (AEs) were mainly laboratory abnormalities and upper respiratory tract infections. Treatment-related AEs were recorded in no more than one third of patients and they were mild to moderate. Severe AEs were singular.Conclusion. Response to NTK therapy generates in the first weeks of drug use and increases throughout a year. The safety profile of NTK when used long is generally favorable.

The aim of the study was to develop ways to improve the diagnosis and treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc)-ILD. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common manifestation of SSc. In the territory of the Siberian Federal District (SFD), the number of patients with the progressive phenotype of SSc-ILD is approximately 750 people. When immunosuppressive therapy is ineffective and pulmonary fibrosis progresses, lung transplantation is indicated. The emergence of new possibilities of pathogenetic therapy currently requires studying the possibilities of their applications in real clinical practice on the territory of the SFD. Discussion. The results of a discussion of diagnostics, therapy, and routing of a rheumatology patient during the interdisciplinary observation of SSc-ILD in the SFD are presented. The reason for this discussion was the new data on the use of nintedanib in this category of patients Conclusion . To improve the efficiency of diagnosis and treatment of patients with SSc in the SFD, it is necessary to implement the principle of a multidisciplinary approach with the obligatory involvement of a pulmonologist and a radiologist (a specialist in CT diagnostics), and, if differential diagnosis is necessary in difficult clinical situations, of a pathomorphologist. An urgent task is the introduction of an algorithm for examining patients with SSc for the timely diagnosis of ILD in the territory of the Siberian Federal District. To improve the quality of medical care in the territory of the SFD for patients with ILD-SSc it is necessary to create a reference center in the city of Novosibirsk with the possibility of initiating anti-fibrosis therapy.

The paper gives data on the clinical efficiency and safety profile of long-term use of the infliximab (INF) biosimilar BCD-055 versus the reference drug Remicade® (REM) in a population of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).Subjects and methods. An international multicenter randomized double-blind Phase III clinical trial was conducted in 199 patients who were randomized into two groups in a 2:1 ratio and who received BCD-055 or REM at a dose of 5 mg/kg at 0, 2, and 6 weeks, then every 8 weeks. Efficiency assessment was made at 14, 30 and 54 weeks in patients who received at least one dose of INF [intent-to-treat (ITT)], as well as at 54 weeks in those who completed the study according to the Protocol (PP) (per protocol). The efficiency endpoints were the proportion of patients who had achieved ASAS20/ASAS40 responses; changes in BASDAI, BASMI, BASFI, MASES, and SF-36 scores. Immunogenicity was assessed by the proportion of patients in each group with identified binding and neutralizing antibodies (BAbs and NAbs) against INF. The safety analysis included the overall rate of adverse events (AEs), including those that met the respective criteria for serous AEs (SAEs), and grade 3–4 toxicity, as well as the number of cases of early termination of the study because of AEs and SAEs.Results and discussion. The ITT population included 199 patients and the PP one consisted of 161 people. The groups were not statistically different in the rate of and reasons for patient withdrawal from the study. A comparable number of patients achieved ASAS20/ASAS40 responses at 14, 30, 54 weeks (р ≥ 0.05). At 54 week, the proportion of patients who received BCD-055 and REM therapy and achieved an ASAS20 response was 67.42 and 52.24% in the ITT population (p = 0.053) and 80.91 and 68.63% in the PP population (p = 0.128). The BCD-055 and drug comparison groups achieved an ASAS40 response in 53.03 and 38.81% in the ITT population (p = 0.081) and in 63.64 and 50.98% in the PP one (p = 0.177). The proportion of persons with identified BAbs and NAbs was comparable: 21.26 and 3.15% in the BCD-055 group (p = 0.920) and 20.63 and 6.35% in the group REM (p = 0.443), respectively. It was found that the presence of NAbs did not affect the therapeutic response. Both groups did not differ in the detection rate and profile of AEs and SAEs or in the rate of patient withdrawal due to AEs. Most identified AEs were mild to moderate.Conclusion. The efficacy of the INF biosimilar BCD-055 used long in patients with AS did not significantly differ from that of the original drug REM; the safety profile of both drugs was comparable.

This article presents results from two clinical trials of infliximab biosimilar, BCD-055, including comparative data on the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy and safety of BCD-055 and innovator infliximab (IFX) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Objective : The purpose of phase I clinical study ASART-1 was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of BCD-055 and to prove its equivalence with Remicade®, phase III study ASART-2 was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of BCD-055 in comparison with Remicade® in patients with active AS. Patients and methods : Both studies were conducted as international multi-center randomized double-blind studies in direct comparison with innovator IFX. Inclusion and exclusion criteria, main examination methods, and drug regimens were the same in both trials. A total of 199 patients were enrolled in the studies. After the screening, the patients were stratified by CRP and BASDAI score, randomized (1:1 ratio in ASART-1; 2:1 ratio in ASART-2) into 2 arms and received BCD-055 or innovator IFX at a dose 5 mg/kg IV at 0, 2, 6 and then every 8 weeks (up to week 54). The primary endpoint for PK profile evaluation was the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-tau)), maximum serum concentration of infliximab at steady state Cmax,ss. Efficacy was assessed by achieving ASAS20 at week 30, the endpoints for safety profile were the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events during the maintenance-dosing phase and withdrawals from the study due to the safety reasons. Results : A total of 81 patients (ASART-1 study) were included in PK analysis, 199 patients were in efficacy and safety analysis. AUC(0-tau) value were 25,420,996.25±11,635,015.74 (ng/ml) Cmax,ss for BCD-055 and 26,114,705.71±12,102,376.9 (ng/ml)⋅h for INF innovator (p>0.05). Cmax,ss for BCD-055/Remicade® was 122,752 [99,401–151,553] ng/ml and 119,844 [98,120–132,772] ng/ml, respectively (p>0.05). ASAS20 was achieved at week 30 by 81.30% of the patients in the BCD-055 group, and 67.74% in the INF innovator group (p=0.061). The analysis of secondary endpoints (BASDAI, BASMI, BASFI, MASES, quality of life, chest excursion, and number of pathologically changed joints) showed no difference between the biosimilar and innovator groups. BCD-055 and innovator IFX showed highly similar safety profiles in both studies without cases of unexpected toxicity. The rates of AEs were equivalent for both drugs and were 48.48% and 58.21% of patients in the BCD-055 and Remicade®, respectively. Conclusion : BCD-055 is found to be equivalent in terms of PK, and showed the similarity in efficacy and safety profile compared with innovator IFX in patients with active AS.

This article presents results from two clinical trials of infliximab biosimilar, BCD-055, including comparative data on the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy and safety of BCD-055 and innovator infliximab (IFX) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).Objective: The purpose of phase I clinical study ASART-1 was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of BCD-055 and to prove its equivalence with Remicade®, phase III study ASART-2 was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of BCD-055 in comparison with Remicade® in patients with active AS.Patients and methods: Both studies were conducted as international multi-center randomized double-blind studies in direct comparison with innovator IFX. Inclusion and exclusion criteria, main examination methods, and drug regimens were the same in both trials. A total of 199 patients were enrolled in the studies. After the screening, the patients were stratified by CRP and BASDAI score, randomized (1:1 ratio in ASART-1; 2:1 ratio in ASART-2) into 2 arms and received BCD-055 or innovator IFX at a dose 5 mg/kg IV at 0, 2, 6 and then every 8 weeks (up to week 54). The primary endpoint for PK profile evaluation was the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-tau)), maximum serum concentration of infliximab at steady state Cmax,ss. Efficacy was assessed by achieving ASAS20 at week 30, the endpoints for safety profile were the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events during the maintenance-dosing phase and withdrawals from the study due to the safety reasons.Results: A total of 81 patients (ASART-1 study) were included in PK analysis, 199 patients were in efficacy and safety analysis. AUC(0-tau) value were 25,420,996.25±11,635,015.74 (ng/ml) Cmax,ss for BCD-055 and 26,114,705.71±12,102,376.9 (ng/ml)⋅h for INF innovator (p>0.05). Cmax,ss for BCD-055/Remicade® was 122,752 [99,401–151,553] ng/ml and 119,844 [98,120–132,772] ng/ml, respectively (p>0.05). ASAS20 was achieved at week 30 by 81.30% of the patients in the BCD-055 group, and 67.74% in the INF innovator group (p=0.061). The analysis of secondary endpoints (BASDAI, BASMI, BASFI, MASES, quality of life, chest excursion, and number of pathologically changed joints) showed no difference between the biosimilar and innovator groups. BCD-055 and innovator IFX showed highly similar safety profiles in both studies without cases of unexpected toxicity. The rates of AEs were equivalent for both drugs and were 48.48% and 58.21% of patients in the BCD-055 and Remicade®, respectively.Conclusion: BCD-055 is found to be equivalent in terms of PK, and showed the similarity in efficacy and safety profile compared with innovator IFX in patients with active AS.

Cogan's syndrome is a rare disease from a group of systemic vasculitides with variable vascular involvement. It is a concurrence of ophthalmic symptoms and audiovestibular disorders (Meniere's disease and sensorineural hearing loss). There is often fever, arthralgia or arthritis; neurological disorders and aortitis with the development of aortic aneurysms are encountered. Hearing loss is frequently irreversible. Changes in the organ of vision usually occur favorably.The paper describes a case of Cogan's syndrome in a 33-year-old patient. The disease is manifested by papilledema, conjunctivitis, acute sensorineural deafness with rapid loss of hearing, and microfocal changes in the brain, as detected by computed tomography. Pulse therapy with glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide led to a rapid and obvious regression of all symptoms. The case is of interest due to the rare occurrence of the disease and to the success of performed therapy. The description stresses the importance of a rheumatologist's consultation and the need for the collective management of young patients with clinical presentations of acute sensorineural hearing loss.

The paper describes a clinical case of a female patient with signs of visceral scleroderma systematica and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Interstitial pulmonary fibrosis was the first manifestation of overlap syndrome. The articular and cutaneous of the syndrome were moderate and cast doubts upon whether the systemic rheumatic disease was present. Postmortem examination confirmed the presence of pulmonary fibrosis, scleroderma, and RA. The case is of interest from the point of view of the atypical onset of the disease.

Aim. To study coagulation and vascular-platelet haemostasis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and coronary heart disease (CHD), who receive various non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) in combination with low doses of aspirin. Material and methods. The study included 79 patients (59 women and 20 men; mean age 61,0 years; mean disease duration 8,5 years) with confirmed RA diagnosis. All participants received disease-modifying anti-inflammatory therapy and NSAID, as well as standard pharmacological CHD therapy. The parameters of coagulation and vascular-platelet haemostasis were compared by the type of administered NSAID (diclofenac, tenoxicam, nimesulide, or meloxicam). In total, 40 patients with increased platelet aggregation but no previous antiaggregant therapy were administered aspirin (100 mg/day). Platelet aggregation was reassessed at Day 7–8 of aspirin therapy. The control group included 25 untreated healthy men (mean age 55 years). Results. Activated coagulation haemostasis was observed in 58,2% of patients with RA and CHD, as manifested in increased levels of fibrinogen, soluble fibrin monomer complexes (SFMC), factor XII-dependent fibrinolysis, and von Willebrand factor, compared to controls. The therapy with most NSAID was linked to similar changes in coagulation haemostasis. The patients receiving diclofenac, nimesulide, and meloxicam demonstrated an activation of vascular-platelet haemostasis, as manifested in a significant increase of spontaneous platelet aggregation and ADPinduced platelet aggregation, compared to controls. Among patients receiving tenoxicam, there was a tendency towards a reduction in ADP-induced platelet aggregation (aspirin-like effect). Among patients already receiving diclofenac, nimesulide, or meloxicam, aspirin administration typically resulted in reduced platelet aggregation. In total, 42,4% of the patients did not respond to aspirin therapy. Conclusion. Patients with RA and CHD who receive NSAID are also in need of antiaggregant therapy. The latter should be administered under control of vascularplatelet haemostasis, as in a substantial proportion of these patients (42,4%), aspirin effectiveness is not adequate.

We report a case of multifocal fibrosis extending retroperitoneally (Ormond's syndrome) with urinary tract obstruction and bilateral ureterohydronephrosis that resulted in chronic renal insufficiency. The development of mediastinal and pericardial fibrosis was accompanied by clinical symptoms of exudative and constrictive pericarditis. Fibrosis of cardiac conducting system was associated with compromised sinus node and intraventricular blockade. Paraaortic, paraorbital, and periportal extension of fibrosis was documented. Diagnosis was made based on clinical observations and results of MSCT. Duration of the disease was 20 years. Immunosuppressive therapy failed to improve the patient's condition because of irreversible structural and functional changes in the organs.