Inhibition of cyclin dependent kinases (CDK) by cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKI) blocks cell cycle progression and inhibits cellular proliferation. The archetypical member of the INK4 CDKI family, p16INK4A (also called CDKN2), is a tumor suppressor frequently deleted or mutated in certain neoplasms and many cell lines. Because p19INK4D has strong structural and functional similarity to p16INK4A, we have assessed its role as a tumor suppressor. This was accomplished by screening the p19INK4D coding region for mutations, deletions and rearrangements in sarcomas and non-small cell lung cancers. Alterations of the p19INK4D gene were found in samples from five of 67 (7%) patients with osteosarcomas and none were found in other types of sarcomas or in lung cancers. Five osteosarcoma samples had Southern blot patterns consistent with gene rearrangement. These samples included a primary and recurrent osteosarcoma from the same patient; both with the same rearrangement. Four samples had SSCP patterns consistent with sequence alterations, sequencing determined that three were due to silent base changes and apparently polymorphisms. Sequencing the fourth shifted band revealed a one base insertion causing a frameshift beginning with codon 27. In summary, these studies found alterations affecting the p19INK4D gene in a small but significant number of osteosarcomas. Presumably, abnormalities of this gene contribute to the development of cancer of bone cells.

Activation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) by interaction with cyclins regulates progression through cell cycle checkpoints. This process is counterbalanced by CDK inhibitors (CDKIs), which can inhibit progression through the cell cycle. Because CDKI expression acts to inhibit cellular proliferation, CDKIs may have a role as tumor suppressors. One class of CDKIs, characterized by the presence of ankyrin repeats, has at least four members(p15INK4B, p16INK4, p18, and p19). Two of these, p15INK4B and p16INK4, have been mapped to chromosome 9p21, a region of frequent loss in a wide variety of cancers. Alterations of p16INK4 have been detected in various tumors and cell lines. We analyzed p15INK4B, p16INK4, and p18 alterations in 52 osteosarcomas (including 11 explants), and 23 other various sarcomas. Single-stranded conformation polymorphism analysis [polymerase chain reaction (PCR-SSCP)] of the coding regions of these CDKI genes detected a missense mutation of p16INK4 exon 1 in one soft tissue sarcoma. Southern blotting detected complete deletion of p15INK4B and p16INK4 genes in osteosarcomas from 2 patients and a soft tissue sarcoma from another individual. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at chromosome 9p21 was observed with a microsatellite probe closely linked to the INK4 genes in the latter case. Deletions of both p15INK4B and p16INK4 genes were detected in five of eight osteosarcoma cell lines. By contrast, no alterations of p18 were detected in any sample. Together these data suggest that alterations of the p15INK4B and p16INK4 genes, but not p18, may occur in ∼5% of sarcomas. However, deletions of the p15INK4B and p16INK4 genes are frequent in osteosarcoma cell lines and probably have a role in tumor cell growth in culture. Notably, all seven detectable deletions involved both p15INK4B and p16INK4 genes, suggesting that both contribute individual tumor suppressor activity.

Accumulating evidence supports the hypothesis that tumor-suppressor p53 can act as a transcriptional activator. Insertion of high-affinity p53 DNA binding sites upstream of a promoter yields a p53-responsive vector. Chimeric proteins fusing p53 and the GAL4 DNA-binding domain demonstrate the presence of a transcriptional activating domain in the N-terminus of p53. GAL4-p53 chimeras constructed using naturally occurring p53 mutations at either codon 141 (Tyr-141) or 175 (His-175) of p53 had little ability to activate the reporter gene; in contrast, mutations at either codon 248 (Trp-248) or 273 (His-273) produced greater transcriptional activities than did wild-type p53. GAL4 chimeras can be used to analyse interactions between different domains of p53 and between different p53 alleles; a DNA binding site is defined, and a simple measurement can be made of function. We had expected that coexpression of GAL4 chimeras and p53 alleles would squelch transcriptional activation downstream of GAL binding sites. Surprisingly, coexpression of either p53 (Trp-248) or (His-273) with the GALA-p53 (wild-type, His-273, Trp-248, His-175, Tyr-141) effectors conferred an increase in transcriptional activation as compared with the effector alone. Oligomerization of p53 alleles with GAL4-p53 chimeras could underlie this effect, leading to an increase in transcription-activating motifs near the promoter. To test this possibility, we constructed a GAL4-p53 C-terminal chimera with p53 residues 160-393, lacking the transcriptional activating domain but retaining regions believed to be important in p53 oligomerization. Neither GAL4-p53 (C-terminus) nor p53 expression vectors were able to transactivate G5E1B-CAT alone. Both p53 (His-273) and (Trp-248) co-expressed with GAL4-p53 (C-terminus) were able to transactivate the G5E1B-CAT reporter gene; in contrast, p53 (Tyr-141) was not able to activate transcription. p53 (Tyr-141/His-273) behaved as a dominant negative mutant and inhibited the ability of the combination of p53 (His-273) and GAL4-p53 (C-terminus) to stimulate the reporter gene. Double immunoprecipitation by sequentially using GAL4 and p53 antibodies showed that p53 (His-273) and (Tyr-141/His-273), but not p53 (Tyr-141), can efficiently oligomerize in vivo to the C-terminal region of p53. Transcriptional activating function of p53 may be modulated by oligomerization; some mutations, such as His-273 and Trp-248, participate in these functions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Mutation of one p53 allele and loss of the normal p53 allele [loss of heterozygosity (LOH)] occur in many tumors including lung cancers. These alterations apparently contribute to development of cancer by interfering with the tumor suppressor activity of p53. We directly sequenced amplified DNA in the mutational hot spots (exons 4-8) of p53 in DNA samples from 40 lung cancers. Most (31 of 40) samples were preselected for LOH in the region of p53. We detected 23 p53 mutations within these exons in 22 lung cancers; no p53 mutations were found in normal tissue of the patients. One-half of the mutations were G to T transversions on the nontranscribed strand, consistent with mutagenesis by tobacco smoke. Mutations of C to A on the nontranscribed strand, which would result from G to T mutations on the transcribed strand, were detected only in one sample. Three of 23 mutations were nonsense mutations; to date, nonsense mutations of p53 have not been reported in lung cancer. Mutation of this p53-coding region was detected in 20 of 27 small cell lung cancer samples, representing a 70% occurrence. Mutation of the p53 gene is apparently very frequent in small cell lung cancers. When LOH in the p53 region could be determined, complete concordance occurred between a sample having both a p53 mutation and LOH in the region of p53 (18 of 18 samples). Twelve samples of lung cancer had LOH in the region of p53, but the samples had no detectable p53 mutations, suggesting either alterations outside the known mutational hot spots of p53 or alterations of another unidentified tumor suppressor gene in the region of p53.