Rectal cancer presents a significant burden globally, often requiring multimodal therapy for locally advanced cases. Long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by surgery have been conventional neoadjuvant approaches. Recent trials favor LCRT due to improved local control. However, distant tumor recurrence remains a concern, prompting the exploration of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) as a comprehensive treatment strategy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show promise, particularly in mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, potentially revolutionizing neoadjuvant regimens. Nonoperative management (NOM) represents a viable alternative post-neoadjuvant therapy for selected patients achieving complete clinical response (cCR). Additionally, monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) emerges as a non-invasive method for the assessment of treatment response. This review synthesizes current evidence on TNT, ICIs, NOM, and ctDNA, elucidating their implications for rectal cancer management and highlighting avenues for future research and clinical application.

BACKGROUND:In resectable gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) confers improved survival, but limited benefit from chemotherapy. Immunotherapy may eliminate the need for chemotherapy or surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS:INFINITY is a multicenter, multicohort phase II trial (NCT04817826) investigating in cohort 1 the activity and safety of tremelimumab + durvalumab (T300/D) as neoadjuvant treatment of mismatch repair deficient/MSI-H, resectable gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate; Secondary endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), quality of life, and translational analyses. In cohort 2, the activity and safety of T300/D was explored as definitive treatment in patients achieving clinical complete response (cCR). Primary endpoint was 2-year cCR rate, and secondary endpoints were PFS, OS, quality of life, gastrectomy-free survival and translational analyses. RESULTS:In cohort 1, 18 patients were recruited and 15 evaluable. pCR and major pathologic response-pCR were 60% and 80%, respectively. Since pCR rate in T4 tumors was 17%, this subgroup of patients was excluded from enrollment in cohort 2. At 28.1 months median follow-up, 24-month gastric cancer-specific PFS and OS rates were 85% and 92%, respectively. In cohort 2, 18 patients were enrolled and 17 assessable, and 13 had cCR and started non-operative management. At 11.5 months median follow-up, one patient had local regrowth and underwent salvage surgery; 12-month gastrectomy-free survival was 64.2%. CONCLUSIONS:The INFINITY study provided promising activity results of a chemo-free T300/D combination regimen as preoperative treatment in mismatch repair deficient/MSI gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and the first available feasibility results of a non-operative management strategy in this disease setting, worthy of further validation in larger cohorts.

The efficacy and cost-effectivness of Multigene Panel Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in directing patients towards genomically matched therapies remains uncertain. This study investigated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who underwent NGS analysis on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples. Data from 179 patients were analyzed, revealing no mutations in 39 patients (21.8%), one mutation in 83 patients (46.4%), and two or more mutations in 57 patients (31.8%). KRAS mutations were found in 87 patients (48.6%), including KRAS G12C mutations in 5 patients (2.8%), PIK3CA mutations in 40 patients (22.4%), BRAF mutations in 26 patients (14.5%). Less common mutations were identified: ERBB2 in 5 patients (2.8%) and SMO in 4 patients (2.2%). Additionally, MAP2K1, CTNNB1, and MYC were mutated in 3 patients (2.4%). Two mutations (1.1%) were observed in ERBB3, RAF1, MTOR, JAK1, and FGFR2. No significant survival differences were observed based on mutation numbers. 40% of patients had druggable molecular alterations, but only 1.1% received genomically guided treatment, suggesting limited application in standard practice. Despite this, expanded gene panel testing can identify actionable mutations, aiding personalized treatment strategies in metastatic CRC, although current eligibility for biomarker-guided trials remains limited.

The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of Multigene Panel Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in directing patients towards genomically matched therapies remain uncertain. This study investigated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who underwent NGS analysis on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples. Data from 179 patients were analyzed, revealing no mutations in 39 patients (21.8%), one mutation in 83 patients (46.4%), and two or more mutations in 57 patients (31.8%). KRAS mutations were found in 87 patients (48.6%), including KRAS G12C mutations in 5 patients (2.8%), PIK3CA mutations in 40 patients (22.4%), and BRAF mutations in 26 patients (14.5%). Less common mutations were identified: ERBB2 in five patients (2.8%) and SMO in four patients (2.2%). Additionally, MAP2K1, CTNNB1, and MYC were mutated in three patients (2.4%). Two mutations (1.1%) were observed in ERBB3, RAF1, MTOR, JAK1, and FGFR2. No significant survival differences were observed based on number of mutations. In total, 40% of patients had druggable molecular alterations, but only 1.1% received genomically guided treatment, suggesting limited application in standard practice. Despite this, expanded gene panel testing can identify actionable mutations, aiding personalized treatment strategies in metastatic CRC, although current eligibility for biomarker-guided trials remains limited.

Background: Validated predictors of sensitivity or resistance to Bevacizumab (Bev) are not available, and Inflammatory Indexes (IIs) has been reported to be useful prognostic factors in various malignant solid tumours, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Objectives: To explore the prognostic value of IIs in mCRC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus Bev. Design: One hundred and eighty-two patients diagnosed with mCRC and treated with first line chemotherapy plus Bev were considered for this prospective non-pharmacological study. Neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet, aspartate transaminase (AST) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) tests were carried out at baseline and before each treatment cycle, according to clinical practice. Methods: Pre-treatment Systemic Immune-inflammation Index (SII), Colon Inflammatory Index (CII) and Aspartate aminotransferase-Lymphocyte Ratio Index (ALRI) were evaluated to assess a correlation with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: In the overall population, PFS and OS were lower in patients with high SII (HR 1.64, p = 0.006 and HR 1.75, p = 0.004, respectively) and high ALRI (HR 2.13, p = 0.001 and HR 1.76, p = 0.02, respectively), but no difference was detected according to CII value. The multivariate analysis confirmed both SII and ALRI as independent prognostic factors for PFS (HR 1.64 and 2.82, respectively) and OS (HR 1.65 and 2.12, respectively). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate and confirm that IIs, and in particular SII and ALRI, are easy to measure prognostic markers for patient candidates to first line chemotherapy plus Bev for mCRC.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Europe. About 5% of metastatic CRC (mCRC) are characterized by high microsatellite instability (MSI) due to a deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR), and this condition has been related to a high sensitivity to immunotherapy, in particular to the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). In fact, in MSI-H or dMMR mCRC, treatment with ICIs induced remarkable response rates and prolonged survival. However, the majority of mCRC cases are mismatch-repair-proficient (pMMR) and microsatellite-stable (MSS), and unfortunately these conditions involve resistance to ICIs. This review aims to provide an overview of the strategies implemented to overcome ICI resistance and/or define subgroups of patients with MSS or dMMR mCRC who may benefit from immunotherapy.

Background: FLOT perioperative chemotherapy represents the standard of care in non-metastatic gastric cancer patients. Signet-ring cell positivity is associated with a worse prognosis in patients with gastric cancer treated with chemotherapy. Comparison between FLOT perioperative chemotherapy vs. surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy based on signet-ring cell positivity is lacking. The aim of the analysis was to compare perioperative FLOT with adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients stratified by signet-ring cell positivity. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis based on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with gastric cancer who received perioperative chemotherapy with a FLOT regimen and compared their survival with a historical cohort of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, matched by cT and cN stage and by tumor histological features. Results: Seventy-six patients were enrolled and 24 (32%) were signet-ring cell positive. At a median follow-up time of 39 months, the median DFS was 26.3 months and the median OS was 37.3 months. Signet-ring cell positivity was associated with a shorter OS (median OS: 20.4 vs. 46.9 months, HR: 3.30, 95%CI: 1.56–6.99, p = 0.0018) and DFS (mDFS: 15.2 vs. 38.6 months, HR: 3.18, 95%CI: 1.55–6.54, p = 0.0016). This was confirmed by multivariate analysis for DFS (Exp(B): 2.55) and OS (Exp(B): 2.68). After propensity score matching, statistically significant shorter DFS (HR: 3.30, 95%CI: 1.50–7.35, p = 0.003) and OS (HR: 5.25, 95%CI: 2.18–12–68, p = 0.0002) were observed for patients with signet-ring cell positivity who received perioperative treatment vs. those who received surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: Signet-ring positivity was associated with shorter DFS and OS in patients who received perioperative treatment with FLOT compared with surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. These data suggest that for patients with signet-ring cell histology, FLOT perioperative treatment might not always be the best choice of treatment, and further research should be focused on this group of patients.

EDITORIAL article Front. Oncol., 01 February 2023Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs Volume 13 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1147849

In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), after a first-line induction with doublet/triplet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, fluoropyrimidine+bevacizumab is the recommended maintenance option. The combination of anti-EGFR agents and chemotherapy is a guideline-endorsed first-line option for RAS/BRAF wild-type (wt) mCRC patients, but the optimal maintenance schedule has not been defined, yet. The Valentino trial showed that, after 4-month FOLFOX+panitumumab induction, single-agent panitumumab induced inferior progression-free survival (PFS) than FUFA+panitumumab, though slightly reducing toxicity.

Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) harbouring germline BRCA1-2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1-2pv) is a distinct nosological entity. Information on second-line therapy (2LT) outcome in this setting is lacking. Methods Data of gBRCA1-2pv metastatic PDAC patients treated with chemotherapy were collected. A primary analysis of 2LT RECIST response, median progression-free survival (mPFS 2 ) and overall survival (mOS 2 ), was performed. A secondary analysis addressed the impact of timing of platinum introduction on the outcome of patients receiving at least a first-line combination chemotherapy (1LT). Results Eighty-four gBRCA1-2pv metastatic PDAC patients were enrolled. The primary analysis, including 43 patients, highlighted a significant improvement of mPFS 2 and a doubled response rate, in the platinum-based 2LT subgroup as compared to the platinum-free (8.8 versus 3.7 months, p = 0.013). Seventy-seven patients were included in the secondary analysis. Median PFS 1 of 3- and 4-drug platinum-based 1LT significantly outperformed both platinum-free combinations and platinum-based doublets (11.4 versus 6.4 versus 7.9 months, p = 0.01). Albeit still immature, data on mOS paralleled those on mPFS. Conclusions This study highlighted the beneficial role of platinum agents in gBRCA1-2pv PDAC patients also in second-line treatment setting. However, our data suggest that early use of 3- and 4-drug platinum-based chemotherapy combinations provides a survival outcome advantage.

e15571 Background: Currently, no validated biomarkers are available for second-line anti-angiogenic treatment in RAS wild type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) progressing after first-line anti-EGFR. Here, we present the results of a pre-planned interim analysis of the DISTINCTIVE trial (NCT04252456) on prognostic groups identified with the combination of hematologic parameters and based on the association of clinical and translational biomarkers. Methods: RAS wt mCRC pts progressing after first line oxaliplatin-based + anti-EGFR therapy receive FOLFIRI-aflibercept and are prospectively stratified in 2 groups according to Elisa-assessed baseline VEGFR2 plasma levels. Other circulating angiogenic factors are evaluated at specific timepoints. Clinical and laboratory data are collected to assess their correlation with outcome. Primary endpoint is overall survival (OS) according to VEGFR2 levels. Secondary endpoints are OS, progression free survival (PFS), response rate, safety and angiogenic factors levels. Statistical analysis is performed with MedCalc (survival distribution: Kaplan-Meier; survival comparison: log-rank test; multivariate analysis: logistic regression; cut-off: ROC curves). Results: Of 73 pts enrolled (04/2018-06/2020), 44 were eligible for interim analysis. Median OS was 11.9 months (m) (95% CI 10-14.2). We identified at first 2 prognostic groups: favorable prognosis (baseline monocytes ≤0.7x103/μL + RBC > 3.81x106/μL + MRR≤1528) and unfavorable prognosis (monocytes > 0.7x103/μL and/or RBC ≤3.81x106/μL and/or MRR > 1528). OS was 14.2 months (m) (95% CI 10.467-14.2) in the favorable prognosis group vs 6.9 m (95% CI 4.867-9.133) in the unfavorable prognosis group (HR 0.008, p < 0,0001). Then, we performed multivariate analysis on circulating angiogenic factors and on laboratory values; VEGFR2 levels at disease progression (PD) and baseline RBC maintained an independent role (Exp(b) 0.0891, p = 0.0464 and Exp(b) 0.1170, p = 0.0148, respectively). By combining these findings we separated pts in a favorable prognosis group (VEGFR2≤4ng/ml + RBC > 3.81x106/μL) and unfavorable prognosis group (VEGFR2 > 4ng/ml and/or RBC ≤ cut off). OS was significantly improved in the favorable prognostic group (14.2 m [95% CI 11.167-14.2] vs 9.1 m [95% CI 6. 367-10.067], HR 0.03, p = 0.0001). Conclusions: Our results showed the prognostic role of the combination of hematologic parameters and VEGFR2 levels + RBC count in RAS WT anti-EGFR resistant mCRC pts treated with FOLFIRI-Aflibercept. These findings represent a promising association of translational and clinical factors in predicting survival in the specific study population. Clinical trial information: NCT04252456.

Despite novel drugs, the prognosis for patients with metastatic gastric cancer remains poor. In rare instances, locoregional therapies are used in addition to standard chemotherapy in patients with oligometastatic involvement. This type of approach has not been supported by solid published evidence. The aim of the present retrospective study was to assess the prognostic impact of factors such as metastatic site, tumour histology and locoregional treatment in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. A total of 184 patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who received at least one line of palliative therapy with doublet or triplet chemotherapy were enrolled in the current analysis. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.32 months (95% CI, 7.02-9.41) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.16 months (95% CI, 3.24-5.08). Lung metastases vs. other sites of metastatic involvement [hazard ratio (HR), 0.27; P=0.0133] and intestinal histology (HR, 0.48; P=0.08) were significantly associated with an improved OS. Improved PFS was also observed (HR, 0.49; P=0.10 and HR, 0.72; P=0.08 for lung metastases and intestinal histology, respectively). Second line chemotherapy and locoregional treatment of metastases (surgery or radiotherapy) were associated with improved OS (HR, 0.52; P<0.0001 and HR, 0.35; P<0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent prognostic role for OS only for locoregional treatment, second line treatment and intestinal histology. The present results suggested that the presence of lung metastases alone was not a relevant prognostic factor and was influenced by the availability of further lines of treatment or by locoregional treatments. Locoregional treatments in patients with oligometastatic disease should be offered as they allow prolonged survival in patients with otherwise relatively short life expectancy.

BACKGROUND:Germline BRCA1-2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1-2pv)-related pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) showed increased sensitivity to DNA cross-linking agents. This study aimed at exploring safety profile, dose intensity, and activity of different chemotherapy regimens in this setting.PATIENTS AND METHODS:gBRCA1-2pv PDAC patients of any age and clinical tumor stage who completed a first course of chemotherapy were eligible. A descriptive analysis of chemotherapy toxicity, dose intensity, response, and survival outcomes was performed.RESULTS:A total of 85 gBRCA1-2pv PDAC patients treated in 21 Italian centers between December 2008 and March 2021were enrolled. Seventy-four patients were assessable for toxicity and dose intensity, 83 for outcome. Dose intensity was as follows: nab-paclitaxel 72%, gemcitabine 76% (AG); cisplatin 75%, nab-paclitaxel 73%, capecitabine 73%, and gemcitabine 65% (PAXG); fluorouracil 35%, irinotecan 58%, and oxaliplatin 64% (FOLFIRINOX). When compared with the literature, grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea were increased with PAXG, and unmodified with AG and FOLFIRINOX. RECIST responses were numerically higher with the three- (81%) or four-drug (73%) platinum-containing regimens that outperformed AG (41%) and oxaliplatin-based doublets (56%). Carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA19.9) reduction >89% at nadir was reported in two-third of metastatic patients treated with triplets and quadruplets, as opposed to 33% and 45% of patients receiving oxaliplatin-based doublets or AG, respectively. All patients receiving AG experienced disease progression, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 6.4 months, while patients treated with platinum-containing triplets or quadruplets had an mPFS >10.8 months. Albeit still immature, data on overall survival seemed to parallel those on PFS.CONCLUSIONS:Our data, as opposed to figures expected from the literature, highlighted that platinum-based regimens provoked an increased toxicity on proliferating cells, when dose intensity was maintained, or an as-expected toxicity, when dose intensity was reduced, while no change in toxicity and dose intensity was evident with AG. Furthermore, an apparently improved outcome of platinum-based triplets or quadruplets over other regimens was observed.

Opinion statementAdvanced colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease, characterized by several subtypes with distinctive genetic and epigenetic patterns. During the last years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revamped the standard of care of several tumors such as non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma, highlighting the role of immune cells in tumor microenvironment (TME) and their impact on cancer progression and treatment efficacy. An “immunoscore,” based on the percentage of two lymphocyte populations both at tumor core and invasive margin, has been shown to improve prediction of treatment outcome when added to UICC-TNM classification. To date, pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed death protein 1 (PD1) inhibitor, has gained approval as first-line therapy for mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) advanced CRC. On the other hand, no reports of efficacy have been presented in mismatch-repair-proficient (pMMR) and microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L) or microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC. This group includes roughly 95% of all advanced CRC, and standard chemotherapy, in addition to anti-EGFR or anti-angiogenesis drugs, still represents first treatment choice. Hopefully, deeper understanding of CRC immune landscape and of the impact of specific genetic and epigenetic alterations on tumor immunogenicity might lead to the development of new drug combination strategies to overcome ICIs resistance in pMMR CRC, thus paving the way for immunotherapy even in this subgroup.

BACKGROUND:Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) detains a dismal prognosis and has a limited number of prognostic factors. Inflammation has been demonstrated to play a key role both in PDAC initiation and progression and several inflammation-based prognostic scores have been investigated in a wide range of malignancies. We compared the most analyzed inflammation-based prognostic scores in order to establish their potential impact on prediction of the outcome in advanced PDAC patients. METHODS:A total of 234 advanced PDAC patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy in our institute were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline clinicopathological and pre-treatment laboratory data were collected. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and survival differences were evaluated using the log-rank test. Level of statistical significance P was set at 0.05. Only those variables that proved to be associated with statistically significant differences in outcome were compared in multivariate analysis using multiple Cox regression, as to identify their independent role and their relative power against each other. RESULTS:In the whole cohort, median overall survival (OS) was 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.8-9.4 months), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.8 months (95% CI: 3.1-4.2 months). At univariate analysis high systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) was related to shorter OS [hazard ratio (HR) =2.04, 95% CI: 1.59-4.19, P=0.0001] and PFS (HR =1.52, 95% CI: 1.11-2.20, P=0.01). This was maintained at multivariate analysis both for OS (HR =2.11, 95% CI: 1.29-3.46, P=0.003) and PFS (HR =1.64, 95% CI: 1.14-2.37, P=0.008), whereas other inflammation-based scores lost their independent role. Elevated SII (≥1,200) was associated with low albumin levels (P=0.03) and with elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Elevated SII represents an independent negative prognostic factor above all others for both OS and PFS in advanced PDAC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy, thus confirming a pivotal role of systemic inflammation on PDAC progression and on patient outcome.

Caveolin-1 (Cav-1) plays a key role in various neoplastic diseases and is upregulated in different cancers, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Furthermore, Cav-1 is critical for the uptake of albumin as well as nab-paclitaxel in PDAC cells. Here, we investigated the prognostic impact of Cav-1 expression in a cohort of 39 metastatic PDAC patients treated with different first-line chemotherapy regimens. We also assessed the predictive value of Cav-1 in patients treated with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. Cav-1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry staining in neoplastic and stromal cells, using metastatic sites or primary tumor tissue specimens. Higher levels of Cav-1 expression were associated with significantly worse overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). No differences in OS were found between patients treated with gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel vs. other chemotherapy options. Multivariate analysis for OS and PFS confirmed the independent prognostic role of Cav-1 expression. Our study evidenced a negative prognostic role of Cav-1 in patients affected by metastatic/locally advanced unresectable PDAC. Moreover, Cav-1 expression seems not to predict different response rates to different types of first-line treatment. Future prospective trials will be necessary to confirm the prognostic role of Cav-1 and explore Cav-1 specific inhibitors as a therapeutic option for advanced PDAC patients.

The prognosis of patients affected by cholangiocarcinoma is extremely variable, owing to different symptoms, sites of disease involvement, and unpredictable chemotherapy response rates. Different scores have been suggested for survival estimation: baseline neutrophil count combined with serum albumin and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR) is one of the latest additions (ALAN score). Even though durable responses to chemotherapy are rarely seen in this setting, second-line treatment has proven to be effective in some patients. The aim of this analysis is to assess whether ALAN score might be used to estimate survival in patients with bile duct cancer treated with second-line chemotherapy. Patients with unresectable bile duct cancer treated with second-line chemotherapy with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI were enrolled. The primary objective of the analysis was to assess differences in overall survival in patients stratified by each of the different components of ALAN score (neutrophil count 8000/mmc, serum albumin 3.5 g/dl, NLR 3, LMR 2.1) and the complete ALAN score (0 vs 1-2 vs 3-4). Survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and differences in survival among stratification factors were assessed by Log-rank test. Cox-proportional-hazard regression was used for multivariate analysis. Level of statistical significance p was set at 0.05 for all tests. 45 patients were eligible. mOS of the entire cohort was 8.68 months (95%CI:6.75-14.59) while mean OS was 18.107 months (standard error: 4.007). At the time of the present analysis, 26/45 patients have died already. 13/45 (29%) patients had albumin levels lower than 3.5 g/dl, 9/45 (20%) had neutrophil count greater than 8000/mmc, 17/45 (38%) had LMR lower than 2.1 and 27/45 (60%) had NLR higher than 3. Low albumin was associated with shorter OS (mOS: 5.96 vs 9.24 months, HR:2.86, 95%CI:0.99-8.18, p=0.05). High neutrophil count was associated with shorter OS (mOS: 1.73 vs 9.24, HR:10.91, 95%CI:2.71-43.89, p=0.008). High NLR was associated with shorter OS (mOS:7.44 vs 12.13 months, HR:2.50, 95%CI: 1.09-5.72, p=0.0289). Low LMR was not associated with significantly different overall survival (mOS: 7.44 vs 9.24 months, HR:1.96, 95%CI:0.80-4.80, p=0.138). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent prognostic impact only for albumin levels (p=0.0313) and neutrophil count (p=0.0012). Stratifying patients by ALAN score, OS was significantly different (mOS 27.57 vs 8.19 vs 1.73 months for 0 vs 1-2 vs 3-4 respectively, p=0.0072). Using only neutrophil count and albumin levels to stratify patients, a statistically significant difference was also proven (mOS 12.31 vs 8.19 vs 1.31 months for 0 vs 1 vs 2 respectively, p < 0.0001). Second-line treatment can be a potentially useful option for a few patients with bile duct cancer; our analysis suggests that ALAN score might be used in this setting for patient survival estimates, helping treatment decisions. In addition, a simplified version of ALAN score, comprised only of serum albumin levels and neutrophil count, might be used instead as it was able to define patient prognosis more accurately compared to the standard ALAN score.