Astrocytomas are brain tumors with variable responses to radiation and chemotherapy. Tumor grade and patient age are important prognostic factors but do not account for the variability in clinical outcome. We hypothesized that genetic subgroups play a role in the outcome of grade III astrocytomas and studied 80 grade III astrocytomas by comparative genomic hybridization. Some chromosomal aberrations (+7p/q, -9p, -10q, -13q, +19q) were related to aberrations that are frequent in grade IV astrocytoma, whereas others (+10p, -11q, +11p, -Xq) were more frequent in grade III astrocytoma. +7p, +19 and -4q were more frequent in tumors from older patients while -11p was more frequent in tumors from younger patients. Finally, gains of 7p and 7q were associated with shorter patient survival, independent of age. Our results indicate that genetic events underlie the well-known effects of age on survival in grade III astrocytoma and demonstrate the importance of molecular classification in astrocytic tumors.
PURPOSEThe goal of this multi-institutional retrospective study of children with intracranial ependymoma was to identify risk factors associated with unfavorable overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS).PATIENTS AND METHODSClinical data, including demographics, tumor location, spread, histology, details of surgery, radiation treatment, and chemotherapy were collected. Clinical characteristics and univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for OS and EFS are presented.RESULTSEleven U.S. institutions contributed 83 patients treated from 1987 to 1991. The OS at 5 and 7 years was 57% and 46%, and EFS at 5 and 7 years was 42% and 33%. Patients 3 years of age or younger differed from the older group by more common infratentorial location, less common gross total resection (GTR), and postoperative use of chemotherapy rather than radiation. This younger group of patients had worse survival (P < 0.01) than the older age group. Other than young age, less than GTR and World Health Organization (WHO) II grade 3 histology were significant adverse risk factors for EFS in univariate and multivariate analyses. OS shared the same adverse risk factors except for histology in multivariate analysis, which was only of borderline significance (P = 0.05). Progression at the original tumor location, present in 89% of patients, was the major pattern of tumor recurrence. Adjuvant chemotherapy in the group older than 3 years or craniospinal radiation in M0 patients did not significantly change EFS.CONCLUSIONSAdverse outcome in childhood intracranial ependymoma is related to age (3 years or younger), histology (grade 3), and degree of surgical resection (less than GTR). New approaches, particularly for local tumor control in younger patients, are needed to improve survival.
Glioblastoma multiforme (GM) is the most common and most malignant astrocytoma in adults. After surgery, radiation therapy extends patient survival; however, in vivo response to radiation therapy is variable. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether the cytogenetic abnormalities of GM differ according to patient response to radiation therapy. Radiation response was defined by either progression [radiation-resistant (RR)] or resolution [radiation-sensitive (RS)] of tumor at the first postradiation radiographic imaging evaluation. Twenty RR and 10 RS frozen tissue specimens were subjected to cytogenetic analysis by comparative genomic hybridization. RS and RR specimens had different cytogenetic aberrations that mapped predominantly to chromosomes 7, 9, 10, 13, and 19. Relative gain of 7 occurred in 70% of the RR and 30% of the RS cases and was the most significant difference involving a single change between the two groups (P = 0.06). RR and RS specimens also differed in their patterns of simultaneous cytogenetic aberrations. A simultaneous gain of chromosomes 7 and 19 was found in 30% of the RR cases but was absent in the RS group. Concurrent loss of 9p23-24 and 13q14 regions was absent in the RS cohort but occurred in 30% of the RR series. This latter cytogenetic pattern was also associated with older age. Amplifications were more common in the RR series, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. The data suggest that GM with different in vivo responses to radiation therapy also differ cytogenetically.
Gliomas that aggregate in otherwise unremarkable families may have a heritable genetic basis. To determine the spectrum of genetic alterations in glioma-susceptible families, we examined tumor DNA from familial cases for regions of chromosomal gain or loss using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). We compared chromosomal alterations within and among glioma families to those found in sporadic gliomas. A specific chromosomal abnormality common to the tumors of multiple unrelated probands with glioma or a specific chromosomal abnormality common to multiple affected persons in a single glioma-prone family would support the hypothesis of an inherited predisposition to glioma and at the same time identify specific regions of the genome harboring putative glioma susceptibility genes. Tumor DNA from 11 patients from seven families with two or more individuals with glioma was analyzed, including three members of a remarkable family having 10 affected individuals. We found no chromosomal abnormality common to all tumors of all probands nor did we find family-specific abnormalities in two of three glioma-prone kindreds. There were frequent copy number aberrations (CNAs) on chromosomes 7, 10, 19, and the sex chromosomes; other CNAs included +3q(13.3-29), −4q, +5q, −9q34, +12, −13q(21 → 33), −15, −16p, +17qter, −18, −21, and −22. Amplifications occurred at ++7p(11.1 → 12), ++7q(21.2 → 33), ++12q(13.2 → 14), and ++12p(11 → 12). Although there were several novel CNAs [−16p, and ++12p(11-p12)], none could readily explain the inheritance of these tumors.
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a recent molecular cytogenetic method that detects and localizes gains or losses in DNA copy number across the entire tumor genome. We used CGH to examine 9 glioma cell lines and 20 primary and 10 recurrent glioblastoma tumors. More than 25% of the primary tumors had gains on chromosome 7; they also had frequent losses on 9p, 10, 13 and Y. The losses on chromosome 13 included several interstitial deletions, with a common area of loss of 13q21. The recurrent tumors not only had gains on chromosome 7 and losses on 9p, 10, 13 and Y but also frequent losses on 6 and 14. One recurrent tumor had a deletion of 10q22-26. Cell lines showed gains of 5p, 7 and Xp; frequent amplifications at 8q22-24.2, 7q21-32 and 3q26.2-29 and frequent losses on 4, 10, 13, 14 and Y. Because primary and recurrent tumors and cell lines showed abnormalities of DNA copy number on chromosomes 7, 10, 13 and Y, these regions may play a fundamental role in tumor initiation and/or progression. The propensity for losses on chromosomes 6 and 14 to occur in recurrent tumors suggests that these aberrations play a role in tumor recurrence, the development of resistance to therapy or both. Analysis of common areas of loss and gain in these tumors and cell lines provides a basis for future attempts to more finely map these genetic changes.