Introduction Single-agent docetaxel is active as second-line chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pretreated patients; seven phase II studies have shown response rates of about 20% and 9 months of median survival. Two phase III studies documented a survival benefit at 1 year compared to BSC and vinorelbine or ifosfamide. Recent trials indicate acceptable activity and a good safety profile of weekly docetaxel with doses of 25–43 mg/m2. The aim of our study was to confirm this evidence and to evaluate activity and toxicity of weekly docetaxel at the dose of 40 mg/m2. Patients and methods Twenty-one patients with NSCLC entered the study (7 stage NIB and 14 stage IV): 13 males and 8 females. Median age was 66 years (range, 53–75). ECOG was O in 6, 1 in 9 and 2 in 6 patients. All patients were pretreated with a first-line chemotherapy (13 patients progressed soon after the first line); 6 of them received palliative radiotherapy on the chest. The treatment consisted of weekly docetaxel, 40 mg/m2 in 1 hr for six weeks with two weeks of rest (1 cycle). A total of 87 administrations was delivered (median, 4; range, 1–12). Responses All patients were assessable for response (according to the “intent-to-treat principle”) and for toxicity. No complete or partial remission was observed; 2 minor responses (9.5%), 1 stable disease (5%), 8 progressive diseases (38%) were documented. Seven patients dropped out the study due to severe toxicity (33.5%) and 3 due to early death (14%). Median survival was 3 months (range, 1–17), and 1-year survival was 9.5%. Toxicity was as follows: grade 4 diarrhea in 1; grade 3 asthenia in 8 (38%), grade 3 stomatitis in 2; grade 3 neutropenia in 1; allergic reactions in 2. No treatment-related death was recorded. Conclusions The trial showed only very modest activity of weekly docetaxel, with severe side effects that induced us to stop the accrual in order to prevent other worse toxicities. We therefore concluded that a dose of 40 mg/m2 of weekly docetaxel is not manageable and does not seem to provide a real benefit in terms of response and quality of life.

This case report concerns a patient with double synchronous neoplasm, small cell lung and gastric cancer, successfully treated with chemotherapy. The cancers had a good response with complete remission of lung cancer and partial remission of gastric cancer. The management of double neoplasms has been reviewed.

BACKGROUNDAnthracyclines combined with paclitaxel are one of the most active schedules in patients with advanced breast cancer: response rates range from 40 to 80%, considering all metastatic sites (visceral and soft tissues). We performed a non-randomized phase II trial with anthracyclines/paclitaxel combination to evaluate response and toxicity only in patients with visceral metastases.METHODSTwenty-seven patients (median age 50 years; range 30-72) with visceral metastases of breast cancer were enrolled in this study. Overall, 11 patients had lung metastases (41%), 10 liver (37%), 4 liver-lung metastases (15%) and 2 peritoneal carcinosis (7%). 7 patients had received adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy (26%) and 10 patients adjuvant CMF combination chemotherapy (37%); 10 patients (37%) received hormonal therapy for advanced disease. Treatment schedules were: group A) 17 patients, Adriamicyn 50 mg/m2 on day 1 i.v. bolus and Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 2 i.v. 3 hours infusion, every 3 weeks; group B) 10 patients, epirubicin 90 mg/m2 on day 1 i.v. bolus and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on day 2 i.v., 3 hours infusion, every 3 weeks. The number of cycles administered was 141 with a median of 5 (range 3-9).RESULTSAll patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The objective response rate was 59% - 16 patients - (15% complete and 44% partial remission), 95% C.I. 40.7-77%; 10/17 in group A and 7/10 in group B. Stable disease 30% (8 patients) and progressive disease 11% (3 patients). The median duration of response was 5 months (range 1-16); median time to progression 13 months (range 3-18) and median survival 17 months (range 4-24). The main toxicity was neutropenia, occurred in 16 patients (59%; grade IV in 7 patients, of whom 2 febrile neutropenia, and grade III in 9 patients); grade III gastrointestinal toxicity in 2 patients; grade III neurological toxicity in 1 patient; grade III stomatitis in 2 patients. No congestive hearth failure or treatment death related was observed.CONCLUSIONSThese schedules of anthracyclines and paclitaxel confirmed their efficacy in metastatic breast cancer even in patients with visceral disease. Neutropenia was the main toxicity; grade IV neutropenia was more frequently observed in epirubicin/paclitaxel arm.

BACKGROUND:Cisplatin/gemcitabine are one of the "standard" chemotherapy schedules in locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC cancer. A number of trials documented that omission of gemcitabine on day 15 and reduction of cisplatin up to 70 mg/mq are equivalent in term of response rates to "classic" administrations on days 1, 8 and 15 with cisplatin 100 mg/mq. The aim of this study was to confirm this evidence and to demonstrate that a further reduction of gemcitabine dose-intensity may be performed with the same efficacy on response.PATIENTS AND METHODS:Fifty untreated patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC entered the study: 24 stage IIIB and 26 stage IV. The median age was 65 years (range 32-76); 44 males and 6 females Genicitabine was administered 1000 mg/mq weekly on days 1 and 8 followed by a 2-week rest and cisplatin 80 mg/mq on day 2 of each 28-day-cycle.RESULTS:Forty-five patients were evaluable for response and all for toxicity. The overall response rates were 35.5% with 16 partial responses (95% Confidence Interval: 32%-61%). Most of the objective responses were seen in IIIB patients (56% of the stage IIIB and 44% of the stage IV patients responded). According to the intent-to-treat-principle, the response rates were 32% (16 out of 50 patients). The median dose-intensity of gemcitabine and cisplatin was respectively 477.6 mg/mq/week (481.4 for responders) and 19.5 mg/mq/week (19.9 mg/mq for responders). The median response duration was 5 months (range 1-18) and the median time to progression was 5 months (1-21); median survival was 9 months (range 2-31). The main toxicity was haematological: thrombocytopenia grade IV in 5 patients (10%) and grade III in 11 patients (22%); neutropenia grade III-IV in 4 patients (8%); grade III anemia in 3 (6%). Asthenia was the most significant non-haematological toxicity and was observed in 19 patients (38%).CONCLUSION:This trial confirmed the efficacy of a schedule with 2 administrations of gemcitabine (on days 1, 8) and a cisplatin dose on day 2 lower than 100 mg/mq. Moreover, the same efficacy was obtained with a median-dose intensity of cisplatin and gemcitabine lower than planned in a 21-day-schedule. For safety and low toxicity, we think that this schedule provides another chance to treat patients with non-small cell lung cancer, especially the elderly or patients with coexistent medical illnesses.

To assess the possibility of increasing the detection rates of cytological examination in malignant effusions by the selection of specific tumor markers for a given type of tumor, we measured CEA, CA 19.9, CA 15.3, MCA, PSA, and AFP in malignant effusions from 89 patients with the following primary malignancies: colon, stomach, breast, liver, prostate, lung, and kidney. Cytological examination was positive in only 35 of 89 patients (40%), while the tumor markers were positive in 72 of 89 cases (80%). However, apart from small cell lung and kidney cancers, where the lack of a specific tumor marker resulted in no advantage, in the other types of tumors, the specific marker for each tumor identified correctly malignant effusions in 72 of 74 cases (97%). In fact, CEA was positive in 11 of 11 effusions induced by colorectal cancer; CA 19.9 in 28 of 30 gastric cancer effusions, while MCA and CA 15.3 were positive in breast cancer effusions (16/22 and 20/22). Finally, elevated AFP and PSA indicated hepatocellular and prostate cancer, respectively. In conclusion, in cancer patients with elevated effusion levels of specific tumor markers, the effusions could be considered of a malignant nature even without cytologically demonstrable tumor cells.

The activity of FEM regimen in metastatic gastric cancer patients was assessed in seventy-seven patients receiving, as palliative treatment, 5FU 600 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 8, 29, 36; epiADR 70 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 29; MIT-C 10 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 29. Cycles were repeated every 58 days. One patient achieved a complete response and 12 a partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 16% (95% CI: 8% to 24%). Median remission duration was 6 months. Median survival time for all patients was 8 months. Side-effects were mild and principally in the form of leukopenia (three episodes grade III). Our results support the recent findings about the lack of effectiveness of this regimen. Although it is a safe and well tolerable chemotherapeutic combination, FEM regimen should not be recommended as routinary treatment for gastric cancer patients who are not eligible for clinical trials.

The efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) on the increase in hemoglobin levels was assessed in patients with cisplatin (CDDP)-induced anemia older than 70 years. Furthermore, we compared the results obtained in this group of patients with those observed in other patients receiving rHuEPO for a CDDP-associated anemia with similar clinical features (chemotherapeutic regimen, primary tumor; CDDP cumulative dose) but of an age less than 70 years. Twenty patients older than 70 years with a CDDP-associated anemia (hemoglobin levels < 90 milligrams) received rHuEPO at the dose of 100 U/kg subcutaneously, three times a week. The control group consisted of 20 younger patients, anemic after CDDP chemotherapy, treated with rHuEPO. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Hemoglobin concentrations showed a statistically significant increase after the 3rd, 6th and 9th week of therapy in both older (93.1 +/- 10.7, 103.5 +/- 8.2 and 102.7 +/- 8.2, respectively, vs. baseline, 84.6 +/- 4.9) and younger patients (95.3 +/- 11.7, 101.5 +/- 13.4 and 101.9 +/- 8.7, respectively, vs. baseline, 86.6 +/- 4.0). Furthermore, 30% of older patients required blood transfusions versus 35% of younger patients, with the mean unit of blood transfused per patient being 0.7 U in elderly and 0.65 U in younger patients. Treatment was well tolerated with no significant side effects. The CDDP-induced anemia seems to be corrected by rHuEPO also in elderly patients, without differences with respect to younger patients.

Multidrug resistance, a major factor in the resistance to drugs, can be reversed by cyclosporin A. It is generally given by intravenous route. The aim of the present study was to assess the possibility of achieving useful plasma levels, giving cyclosporin A orally in advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with 4-epidoxorubicin. Cyclosporin A was given orally twice a day, for four days. The starting study dose was 5 mg/kg. Dose in cohorts of 3 patients was escalated to 10, 15, 20, 30, 40 mg/kg if the previous dose was not able to determine the target blood level (2,000 ng/ml). Cyclosporin A blood levels were analyzed by a specific fluorescence polarization immunoassay method (TDx; Abbot Laboratoires, North Chigaco, IL). 4-epidoxorubicin was given at a fixed dose of 75 mg/m(2), every 3 weeks. None of the dose levels of cyclosporin A given orally produced the target blood level. Only two patients, receiving cyclosporin at a dose of 30 mg/kg, and two after a CsA dose of 40 mg/kg, presented blood levels higher than 1,000 ng/ml, but however, lower than 1,500 ng/ml. In conclusion, the oral route of administration of cyclosporin does not seem recommendable in order to reverse multidrug resistance because it is not able to produce sufficient plasma levels.

Cisplatin-related diarrhea is a relatively common complication in the clinical management of cancer patients and until now no treatment for this condition has been identified. Octreotide has been reported effective in the treatment of 5-fluorouracil-related diarrhea. To assess the safety and efficacy of octreotide in controlling diarrhea caused by cisplatin, 43 patients who had already had diarrhea during the 24-hour period following a previous cisplating administration were randomized to receive either octreotide or placebo during the next cisplatin course. The patients given octreotide experienced less diarrhea (5 vs. 75%, p = 0.01). There were no side effects. We conclude that octreotide is more effective than placebo in controlling diarrhea following cisplatin chemotherapy.

On the basis of preclinical data suggesting the possibility of maximising the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin by interferon, a pilot clinical trial was initiated in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer. Thirty-four patients were treated with cisplatin at 100 mg m-2, followed by 5-fluorouracil at 1,000 mg m-2 by continuous infusion for 5 days. Interferon alpha 2b was administered at the dose of 3 million U i.m. daily for 7 days, beginning the day before chemotherapy. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks. Two patients achieved a complete remission, six a partial response, 14 had stable disease and 12 progressed on therapy, for an overall response rate of 23% (95% confidence interval 10-36%). Median survival time was 5 months. Toxicity was severe. Stomatitis, diarrhoea and myelosuppression were the most common side-effects. Because of the poor response rate and the presence of severe toxicity, in our opinion further clinical trials in head and neck cancer should be attempted only after a better definition in preclinical studies of interactions among 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and interferon.

Recently, a randomised study demonstrated the utility of oral cooling (cryotherapy) in the prevention of 5-fluorouracil (5FU)-induced stomatitis. In order to verify these results a confirmatory study, using identical treatment regimen, was initiated. 84 patients treated with a 5-FU-containing regimen were randomised to a control arm or to receive oral cryotherapy. End point evaluation was obtained by a global assessment of the physician's judgement and patients' description of mucositis severity graded 0-4. Mucositis was significantly reduced by cryotherapy considering both the first cycle of therapy (the mean toxicity score for cryotherapy was 0.59 and it was 1.1 for the control group, P < or = 0.05) and all the chemotherapeutic courses (the mean toxicity score for cryotherapy was 0.36 when it was 0.69 for the control group, P < or = 0.05). In conclusion, the present study confirms that cryotherapy can decrease 5FU-induced stomatitis and should be recommended for patients receiving bolus 5FU-containing regimens.

PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of exogenous recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) on the increase of hemoglobin levels and on the transfusion requirements in patients with cisplatin (CDDP)-induced anemia, we performed a double-blind randomized trial with placebo. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred patients with CDDP-associated anemia (hemoglobin level < 90 g/L) were randomized to receive either placebo (saline solution) or rHuEPO (100 U/kg body weight subcutaneously) three times per week. The end points of this study were the increase in hemoglobin levels to greater than 100 g/L after 3, 6, and 9 weeks and the effect on transfusion requirements. RESULTS Ninety-nine of 100 patients were assessable for response and toxicity. In the rHuEPO arm, mean hemoglobin levels were statistically significantly increased after the third, sixth, and ninth weeks of therapy (101.1 +/- 9.0, 102.4 +/- 6.6, and 105.1 +/- 9.4 g/L, respectively) compared with the mean baseline value (86.3 +/- 6.2 g/L). In the placebo arm, there were no increases in mean hemoglobin levels at the third, sixth, and ninth weeks (81.0 +/- 5.2, 81.3 +/- 9.2, and 81.2 +/- 11 g/L, respectively) compared with the mean baseline value (87.3 +/- 5.2 g/L). Furthermore only 20% of patients required blood transfusions in the rHuEPO arm versus 56% of patients in the placebo arm (P = .01), with a mean units of blood transfused per patient of 0.30 in the rHuEPO arm and 1.8 in the placebo arm (P = .01). Treatment was well tolerated, with no significant side effects. CONCLUSION CDDP-induced anemia is corrected by rHuEPO, which results in reduced blood transfusion requirements.

In nineteen patients with carboplatin-induced anemia (hemoglobin less than 90 g/l), recombinant human erythropoietin was administered subcutaneously three times a week on an outpatient basis. The initial dose was 50 Units/kg of body weight. If response was not achieved within 3 weeks, dose was increased to 75 Units/kg. Using the same criteria further escalations to 100 and 150 Units/kg were performed. If there was no response erythropoietin was terminated. Two patients obtained an increase of hemoglobin levels greater than 100 g/l, which was considered as a clinical response in this study, with a dose of 75 U/kg; eleven patients needed an erythropoietin dose of 100 U/kg and three a dose of 150 U/kg. The other three patients required hemotransfusions and were considered non responders. Hemoglobin increases occurred despite continuation of carboplatin chemotherapy. In conclusion, subcutaneous eryhtropoietin is effective and safe in the treatment of carboplatin-induced anemia.

Although declining in frequency gastric cancer remains one of the leading cause of death in western countries [1].

Although carboplatin shows interesting pharmacokinetic properties for intracavitary treatment, up to now no data on intrapleural administration has been obtained. In order to evaluate the feasibility and the maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin administered by intrapleural route we performed a phase I study. In view of a possible phase II study we added interferon to carboplatin because preclinical data suggest a synergy between the two agents. Forty-four patients with malignant pleural effusion, received carboplatin at doses of 150-950 mg every three weeks and interferon alpha-2b at a dose of 20 million U, weekly. All patients but two completed at least two cycles of therapy and were considered evaluable for response. The maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin was identified at 850 mg, which corresponds to 400-450 mg/m2, accounting to the median body surface of our patients. Unacceptable toxicity was seen at 950 mg and consisted of the following grade 3-4 toxicity; thrombocytopenia in three patients; leukopenia in two patients and nausea/vomiting in one patient. Local toxicity was not present at any level. Interferon was reduced at 10 million U weekly after the first four patients because of severe systemic toxicity. Responses were seen at all dosage levels. 28 patients (12 non small cell lung carcinoma:NSCLC; 6 breast; 4 small cell lung carcinoma: SCLC; 2 mesothelioma; 2 stomach; 1 ovary; 1 kidney) (63%; 95% Cl, 50% to 76%) responded, with 8 complete responses observed (3 NSCLC; 2 SCLC; 2 mesothelioma; 1 ovary). The median duration of response was 4 months. In conclusion, intrapleural administration of carboplatin and interferon seems to be safe and effective. The outcome of this study is sufficiently encouraging to test this combination in a subsequent phase II study, using the dosage levels defined as the maximum tolerated dose.