Colorectal cancer is one of the most common tumour types with approximately one third of the tumours located within the rectum. Rectal cancer differs somewhat from colon cancer, e.g. regarding the method of operation and the use of preoperative radiotherapy due to a tendency for local tumour recurrence. Proteolytic enzymes have been identified as key molecules in tumour invasion and metastasis, and factors within the urokinase-plasminogen activation (uPA) system have been associated with prognosis in several tumour types, including colorectal cancer. Recently, methods have been developed to analyse the soluble fraction of the plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in blood samples. An association between elevated suPAR levels and poor prognosis has recently been demonstrated in colorectal cancer. We have measured suPAR levels in pretreatment plasma samples from 173 rectal cancer patients in order to confirm its prognostic strength in this clinical entity. suPAR levels were determined in ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma by a kinetic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and analysed with respect to sex, age, Dukes' stage, tumour differentiation grade and survival. In a univariate analysis, continuous suPAR plasma levels were associated with survival (P<0.001) with shorter survival among patients with high suPAR values. Patients with suPAR values within the upper quartile had significantly shorter survival (hazard ratio (HR) 2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–43.7, P=0.002). In a multivariate Cox analysis, increasing suPAR values predicted shorter survival independent from Dukes' stage and tumour differentiation grade with an adjusted HR of 2.2 per ng/ml suPAR (95% CI 1.2–4.0, P=0.01). This study thus confirms that measurement of suPAR in preoperative plasma samples gives independent prognostic information in rectal cancer patients, higher values being associated with shorter survival.

We analysed microsatellite instability (MSI) in a consecutive series of 165 rectal carcinomas. Data on a personal and/or family history of cancer were collected from all patients and revealed metachronous cancer in 9 patients, 2 of whom had developed colorectal cancer, and a suspected familial aggregation of colorectal cancer in three families. Only three of the 165 (2%) rectal cancers showed MSI. The patients whose tumours displayed MSI had clinical histories suggesting hereditary cancer—a family history of colorectal cancer and/or synchronous colorectal cancers. Denaturing gradient gel (DGGE) analysis was used to screen the MSI+ patients for mutations in the hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes and revealed two new germline mutations; a 1 bp deletion in exon 10 of hMSH2 creating a premature stop-codon and a splice donor site mutation in intron 16 of hMLH1. Considering colorectal carcinomas as a group, MSI has been reported to occur in approximately 10–20% of the tumours and thus can not, per se be used for clinical detection of hereditary tumours. This study shows, however, that MSI is rare in rectal carcinomas and when present strongly suggests a hereditary predisposition for colorectal cancer development.