Nicotinic acid has been used clinically for over 40 years in the treatment of dyslipidemia producing a desirable normalization of a range of cardiovascular risk factors, including a marked elevation of high density lipoprotein and a reduction in mortality. The precise mechanism of action of nicotinic acid is unknown, although it is believed that activation of a G(i)-G protein-coupled receptor may contribute. Utilizing available information on the tissue distribution of nicotinic acid receptors, we identified candidate orphan receptors. The selected orphan receptors were screened for responses to nicotinic acid, in an assay for activation of G(i)-G proteins. Here we describe the identification of the G protein-coupled receptor HM74 as a low affinity receptor for nicotinic acid. We then describe the subsequent identification of HM74A in follow-up bioinformatics searches and demonstrate that it acts as a high affinity receptor for nicotinic acid and other compounds with related pharmacology. The discovery of HM74A as a molecular target for nicotinic acid may facilitate the discovery of superior drug molecules to treat dyslipidemia.

The gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(B)) receptor has been shown to be a heterodimer consisting of two receptor subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2). We have stably co-expressed these two subunits in a CHO cell line, characterised its pharmacology and compared it to the native receptor in rat brain membranes. Radioligand binding using [3H]CGP54626A demonstrated a similar rank order of potency between recombinant and native receptors: CGP62349>CGP54626A>SCH 50911>3-aminopropylphosphinicacid(3-APPA)>GABA>baclofen>saclofen>phaclofen. However, differences were observed in the affinity of agonists, which were higher at the native receptor, suggesting that in the recombinant system a large number of the receptors were in the low agonist affinity state. In contrast, [35S]GTPgammaS binding studies did not show any differences between recombinant and native receptors with the full agonists GABA and 3-APPA. Measurement of cAMP accumulation in the cells revealed a degree of endogenous coupling of the receptors to G-proteins. This is most likely to be due to the high expression levels of receptors (B(max)=22.5+/-2.5pmol/mg protein) in this experimental system. There was no evidence of GABA(B2) receptors, when expressed alone, binding [3H]CGP54626A, [3H]GABA, [3H]3-APPA nor of GABA having any effect on basal [35S]GTPgammaS binding or cAMP levels.

Following identification of the human motilin receptor, we isolated the rabbit orthologue by PCR amplification and found this to be 85% identical to the open reading frame of the human receptor. The protein encoded was 84% identical to the human polypeptide. In HEK293T cells transfected with the rabbit receptor, motilin concentration-dependently increased intracellular calcium mobilisation (pEC50=9.25). After transfection with Go1alpha, motilin similarly stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding (pEC50=8.87). Using both systems, similar values were obtained with the human receptor, with rank-order potencies of motilin=[Nle13]-motilin>erythromycin; ghrelin was ineffective. In circular muscle preparations of rabbit gastric antrum, [Nle13]-motilin 0.1-30 nM concentration-dependently increased the amplitude of electrically-evoked, neuronally-mediated contractions (pEC50=8.3); higher concentrations increased the muscle tension (30-3000 nM). Both responses to [Nle13]-motilin faded rapidly during its continual presence. Rat or human ghrelin 0.01-10 microM were without activity. Erythromycin 30-3000 nM and 10 microM, respectively, increased neuronal activity and muscle tension in rabbit stomach. Unlike [Nle13]-motilin, the increase in neuronal activity did not fade during continual presence of submaximally-effective concentrations of erythromycin; some fade was observed at higher concentrations. We conclude that the pharmacology of the rabbit motilin receptor is similar to the human orthologue and, when expressed as a recombinant, comparable to the native receptor. However, in terms of their ability to increase neuronal activity in rabbit stomach, [Nle13]-motilin and erythromycin are distinguished by different response kinetics, reflecting different rates of ligand degradation and/or interaction with the receptor.

Several lines of evidence suggested that the first gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptor to be cloned required an additional factor for functional expression. GABA(B1) was retained within the endoplasmic reticulum and failed to couple to signal transduction pathways on stimulation with agonists. In radioligand binding experiments it was found that although the affinity of antagonists showed a close agreement between rat brain membranes and membranes expressing the cloned receptor, agonist ligands were significantly weaker at recombinant receptors. Using the C-terminal tail as bait, a yeast two-hybrid screen was run against a human brain cDNA library and identified a second receptor, GABA(B2), as a major interacting protein. This interaction was confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation as well as extensive colocalization studies. Coexpression of the two seven-transmembrane proteins generated a fully functional receptor, which was expressed at the cell surface confirming the importance of receptor heterodimerization for GABA(B) receptor activity.

Recent experiments have demonstrated that formation of functional type B gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(B)) receptors requires co-expression of two receptor subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2). Despite the identification of these subunits and a number of associated splice variants, there has been little convincing evidence of pharmacological diversity between GABA(B) receptors comprising different subunit combinations. However, Ng et al. [Mol. Pharmacol., 59 (2000) 144] have recently suggested a novel and important pharmacological difference between GABA(B) receptor heterodimers expressing the GABA(B1a) and GABA(B1b) receptor subunits. This study suggested that the antiepileptic GABA analogue gabapentin (Neurontin) is an agonist at GABA(B) receptors expressing the GABA(B1a) but not the GABA(B1b) receptor subunit. The importance of this finding with respect to identifying novel GABA(B) receptor subunit specific agonists prompted us to repeat these experiments in our own [35S]-GTPgammaS binding and second messenger assay systems. Here we report that gabapentin was completely inactive at recombinant GABA(B) heterodimers expressing either GABA(B1a) or GABA(B1b) receptor subunits in combination with GABA(B2) receptor subunits. In addition, in both CA1 and CA3 pyramidal neurones from rodent hippocampal slices we were unable to demonstrate any agonist-like effects of gabapentin at either pre- or post-synaptic GABA(B) receptors. In contrast, gabapentin activated a GABA(A) receptor mediated chloride conductance. Our data suggest that gabapentin is not a GABA(B)-receptor agonist let alone a GABA(B) receptor subunit selective agonist.

In recombinant cell lines, functional GABA(B) receptors are only formed by the heterodimerisation between two related G-protein coupled receptor proteins GABA(B)R1 (GBR1) and GABA(B)R2 (GBR2), whilst the individual GBR1 or GBR2 do not produce fully functional receptors. To determine whether the heterodimerisation occurs in vivo, novel polyclonal antibodies targeting the C termini of GBR1 and GBR2, were raised in different species, characterised, and used to determine the relative localisation of the reported heterodimer components in human brain tissue, using immunohistochemistry. The use of different species for the raising of the antisera allowed double immunofluorescent labelling of the receptors as an indication of GBR1/GBR2 receptor co-localisation in human brain. The presence of both proteins is reported in cerebellum, hippocampus, cortex, thalamus and basal ganglia. Regions of the brainstem including pons and medulla, also express GBR1 and GBR2 protein. The double immunofluorescence demonstrated that GBR1 and GBR2 are co-localised in the human cerebellar cortex. Together these results suggest the widespread distribution of GABA(B) receptors in human brain, and that GABA(B) receptors GBR1 and GBR2 can exist in the same cell, and therefore may function as a heterodimer in the human brain.

The calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) can function as either a receptor for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or for adrenomedullin (ADM), depending upon the coexpression of a novel family of single transmembrane proteins, which we have called receptor activity modifying proteins or RAMPs. RAMPs 1, 2, and 3 transport CRLR to the plasma membrane with similar efficiencies, however RAMP1 presents CRLR as a terminally glycosylated, mature glycoprotein and a CGRP receptor, whereas RAMPs 2 and 3 present CRLR as an immature, core glycosylated ADM receptor. Characterization of the RAMP2/CRLR and RAMP3/CRLR receptors in HEK293T cells by radioligand binding (125I-ADM as radioligand), functional assay (cAMP measurement), or biochemical analysis (SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) revealed them to be indistinguishable, even though RAMPs 2 and 3 share only 30% identity. Chimeric proteins were created with the transmembrane and cytosolic portions of RAMP1 associated with the amino terminus of RAMP2 (RAMP2/1) and vice versa (RAMP1/2). Coexpression of RAMP2/1 with CRLR formed a core glycosylated ADM receptor, whereas the RAMP1/2 chimera generated both core glycosylated and mature forms of CRLR and enabled both ADM and CGRP receptor binding. Hence, the glycosylation state of CRLR appears to correlate with its pharmacology.

Conference Article| August 01 1999 The N-terminus of RAMPs is a critical determinant of the glycosylation state and ligand binding of calcitonin receptor-like receptor S. M. Foord; S. M. Foord 1Receptor Systems, Molecular Pharmacology, GlaxoWellcome Medicines Research Centre, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire SG1 2NY, U.K. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar A. Wise; A. Wise 1Receptor Systems, Molecular Pharmacology, GlaxoWellcome Medicines Research Centre, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire SG1 2NY, U.K. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar J. Brown; J. Brown 1Receptor Systems, Molecular Pharmacology, GlaxoWellcome Medicines Research Centre, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire SG1 2NY, U.K. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar M. J. Main; M. J. Main 1Receptor Systems, Molecular Pharmacology, GlaxoWellcome Medicines Research Centre, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire SG1 2NY, U.K. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar N. J. Fraser N. J. Fraser 1Receptor Systems, Molecular Pharmacology, GlaxoWellcome Medicines Research Centre, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire SG1 2NY, U.K. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Biochem Soc Trans (1999) 27 (4): 535–539. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0270535 Article history Received: March 05 1999 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Cite Icon Cite Get Permissions Citation S. M. Foord, A. Wise, J. Brown, M. J. Main, N. J. Fraser; The N-terminus of RAMPs is a critical determinant of the glycosylation state and ligand binding of calcitonin receptor-like receptor. Biochem Soc Trans 1 August 1999; 27 (4): 535–539. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0270535 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsBiochemical Society Transactions Search Advanced Search Keywords: CGRP, calcitonin gene-related peptide, ADM, adrenomedullin, CRLR, calcitonin receptor-like receptor, CFTR, cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator, ER, endoplasmic reticulum, RAMP, receptor activity modifying protein This content is only available as a PDF. © 1999 Biochemical Society1999 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Our current understanding is that functional GABA(B) receptors exist as heterodimers of two related seven-transmembrane proteins, GABA(B)-R1 and GABA(B)-R2. GABA(B)-R1 requires GABA(B)-R2 to be expressed at the cell surface as a mature glycoprotein. Cloning of the GABA(B) receptor has failed to provide molecular evidence to support the existence of true receptor subtypes. The discovery of the heterodimeric nature of the GABA(B) receptor has already changed the way we think about GPCR function and it is likely that future studies will change our understanding about how receptor subtypes can be formed.

The GABA(B) receptor has been shown to consist of a heterodimer of two related 7-transmembrane receptors GABAB-R1 and GABA(B)-R2. These receptors share close homology to the Ca2+-sensing receptor and also to the metabotropic glutamate receptors, which have also been shown to respond to extracellular calcium. We show here that the GABA(B) receptor also has Ca2+ sensing properties. Ca2+ (0.001-1 mM) potentiated the GABA stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding in membranes prepared from CHO cells stably expressing the GABA(B)-R1/R2 heterodimer. The GABA EC50 was reduced from 72 to 7.7 microM by addition of 1 mM Ca2+, with no change in the maximum response. A similar effect was observed in membranes from rat brain cortex. Ca2+ also potentiated GABA inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP levels in the CHO cells and enhanced coupling to GIRK K+ channels in Xenopus oocytes. Other divalent cations were ineffective. The effects of Ca2+ were found to be agonist dependent with baclofen having a reduced sensitivity compared to GABA. Calcium appears to act allosterically to enhance GABA responses at the GABA(B) receptor, however, unlike the Ca2+-sensing receptor and some of the mGluR family, Ca2+ does not act as a ligand in its own right.