The most common corrective surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is posterior instrumented spinal fusion, which is a relatively lengthy procedure. Longer procedures are known to have higher rates of negative outcomes and higher economic costs across the surgical specialties. The purpose of this study is to identify the factors that influence the length of this operation in AIS patients. This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study. All primary posterior instrumented arthrodesis procedures in 2011-2013 performed by three surgeons on AIS patients at a tertiary care hospital were included. Age, race, sex, BMI, Cobb angle, curve flexibility, Lenke classification, number of levels fused, number of screws used, osteotomy use, intraoperative O-arm use, and length of surgery (time from incision to closure) were obtained from the electronic medical record. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of length of surgery, and standardized regression coefficients were calculated to compare the relative magnitude of significant variables. A total of 95 procedures were included. The average length of surgery was 375 +/- 72.7 min. The multivariable linear regression analysis contained the variables Cobb angle, number of screws used, osteotomy use, Lenke curve type, surgeon, patient age, and sex. The regression identified the number of screws used [beta = 4.72, P = 0.003, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-7.8], osteotomy use (beta = 50.2, P = 0.004, 95% CI 16.2-84.1), Lenke type 3 curve (beta = 77.9, P = 0.001, 95% CI 31.7-174), male sex (beta = 62.5, P = 0.003, 95% CI 21.5-103), the Cobb angle (beta = 1.04, P = 0.045, 95% CI 0.02-2.1), and the surgeon (beta = 75.2, P < 0.0001, 95% CI 40-110) as independently associated with the length of surgery. The most significant factor associated with operative duration was the surgeon performing the case. We identified male sex, number of screws used, Lenke type 3 curves, osteotomy use, Cobb angle, and the surgeon variable as significantly associated with increased length of surgery in posterior arthrodesis of AIS patients. Copyright (C) 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

BACKGROUND In the past decade, the rate and utilization of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) has increased dramatically. A single catheter technique has recently come into favour for providing VV-ECMO. Although it has been shown that intensivists can safely place these catheters, the safety of decannulation by intensivists has not been reported in the literature. OBJECTIVE We describe a technique for safely decannulating the Avalon Elite VV-ECMO catheter at the bedside and assess the safety of this technique, as compared with the standard technique of decannulation in the operating room by a surgeon. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort design conducted at a tertiary care cardiovascular intensive care unit at an academic medical centre. All patients who underwent VV-ECMO from 2009 to 2014 were included in the study except for those who had been decannulated for withdrawal of care. Complication rates from decannulation were compared between patients who were decannulated by surgeons in the operating room and those decannulated by intensivists in the intensive care unit (ICU). RESULTS Twenty-eight patients were included in this study, of whom twenty-three patients (82%) were decannulated by intensivists, board certified in Critical Care Medicine through the American Board of Anesthesiology, while five (18%) the patients were decannulated by a surgeon. There was no significant difference in the complications rates between the surgeons (0) and intensivists (1) (P = 1.00). There were no major complications requiring operative intervention associated with decannulation identified in this study. CONCLUSIONS It is safe for intensivists to decannulate the Avalon Elite VV-ECMO cannula in the ICU using our purse-string suture technique. Performing these decannulations at the bedside compared to operating room may have positive clinical ramifications that include improved patient safety, timely patient care and reduced operating room costs.

Study Design:A retrospective historical cohort design.Objective:To determine what effect the addition of intrawound vancomycin powder to the prophylactic regimen of posterior instrumented spinal arthrodesis procedures has had on acute surgical site infections (SSIs).Summary of Background Data:SSIs are known complications in instrumented spinal arthrodesis procedures, and are predominately caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Recent reports have suggested that placing vancomycin powder into the surgical wound before closure prevents SSIs in spinal surgery. Risk factors for SSIs in the setting of intrawound vancomycin powder use have not been previously reported on.Materials and Methods:SSI rates after 342 posterior instrumented spinal arthrodeses (October 2008-September 2011) in which intrawound vancomycin powder was used in addition to the standard antimicrobial prophylaxis (Vanco cohort) were compared with 341 posterior instrumented spinal arthrodeses (April 2005-October 2008) in which no vancomycin powder was added (non-Vanco cohort). Both 2 sample t test and (2) test (Fisher where appropriate) were used for group comparisons. A subanalysis of the Vanco cohort was undertaken to identify risk factors for SSIs despite intrawound vancomycin use.Results:There was a significant reduction in the number of acute staphylococcal SSIs in the Vanco cohort (1.1%) compared with the non-Vanco cohort (3.8%; P=0.029). Deep staphylococcal infections decreased to 0 compared with 7 in the non-Vanco cohort (2.1%; P=0.008). Deep methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections decreased to 0 compared with 5 in the non-Vanco cohort (1.5%; P=0.031). A subanalysis of the Vanco cohort identified that being discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility was associated with developing a SSI.Conclusions:Intrawound vancomycin powder use has decreased the rate of acute staphylococcal SSIs in our posterior instrumented spine arthrodesis surgeries. Patients who are discharged to skilled nursing or rehabilitation facilities are at an increased risk for developing SSIs despite intrawound vancomycin use.