OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the effect of short-term inhalational exposure to nanoparticles released during dental composite grinding on oxidative stress and antioxidant capacity markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Twenty-four healthy volunteers were examined before and after exposure in dental workshop. They spent 76.8 ± 0.7 min in the testing room during grinding of dental nanocomposites. The individual exposure to aerosol particles in each participant´s breathing zones was monitored using a personal nanoparticle sampler (PENS). Exhaled breath condensate (EBC), blood, and urine samples were collected pre- and post-exposure to measure one oxidative stress marker, i.e., thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), and two biomarkers of antioxidant capacity, i.e., ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and reduced glutathione (GSH) by spectrophotometry. Spirometry and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) were used to evaluate the effect of acute inhalational exposure. RESULTS:Mean mass of dental nanocomposite ground away was 0.88 ± 0.32 g. Average individual doses of respirable particles and nanoparticles measured by PENS were 380 ± 150 and 3.3 ± 1.3 μg, respectively. No significant increase of the post-exposure oxidative stress marker TBARS in EBC and plasma was seen. No decrease in antioxidant capacity biomarkers FRAP and GSH in EBC post-exposure was seen, either. Post-exposure, conjunctival hyperemia was seen in 62.5% volunteers; however, no impairment in spirometry or FeNO results was observed. No correlation of any biomarker measured with individual exposure was found, however, several correlations with interfering factors (age, body mass index, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and environmental pollution parameters) were seen. CONCLUSIONS:This study, using oxidative stress biomarker and antioxidant capacity biomarkers in biological fluids of volunteers during the grinding of dental nanocomposites did not prove a negative effect of this intense short-term exposure. However, further studies are needed to evaluate oxidative stress in long-term exposure of both stomatologists and patients and diverse populations with varying health statuses.
Aim: Today, there is a lack of research studies concerning human acute exposure to nanoparticles (NPs). Our investigation aimed to simulate real-world acute inhalation exposure to NPs released during work with dental nanocomposites in a dental office or technician laboratory. Methods: Blood samples from female volunteers were processed before and after inhalation exposure. Transcriptomic mRNA and miRNA expression changes were analyzed. Results: We detected large interindividual variability, 90 significantly deregulated mRNAs, and 4 miRNAs when samples of participants before and after dental nanocomposite grinding were compared. Conclusion: The results suggest that inhaled dental NPs may present an occupational hazard to human health, as indicated by the changes in the processes related to oxidative stress, synthesis of eicosanoids, and cell division.
Nanoparticles (NPs) have become an important part of everyday life, including their application in dentistry. Aside from their undoubted benefits, questions regarding their risk to human health, and/or genome have arisen. However, studies concerning cytogenetic effects are completely absent. A group of women acutely exposed to an aerosol released during dental nanocomposite grinding was sampled before and after the work. Exposure monitoring including nano (PM0.1) and respirable (PM4) fractions was performed. Whole-chromosome painting for autosomes #1, #4, and gonosome X was applied to estimate the pattern of cytogenetic damage including structural and numerical alterations. The results show stable genomic frequency of translocations (F-G/100), in contrast to a significant 37.8% (p<0.05) increase of numerical aberrations caused by monosomies (p<0.05), but not trisomies. Monosomies were mostly observed for chromosome X. In conclusion, exposure to nanocomposites in stomatology may lead to an increase in numerical aberrations which can be dangerous for dividing cells.
OBJECTIVES:Comparisons of material hardness may be affected by the indentation size effect (ISE), which is characterized by increasing hardness values at decreasing loads. This study aimed to assess the influence of load, dwell time and measurement method on ISE in dental resin-based composites with different filler content. METHODS:Knoop (HK) and Vickers (HV) microindentation hardness of Filtek Ultimate Universal Restorative (FU) and Filtek Supreme Flowable Restorative (FF) was measured under different loads (0.098-2.96 N, i.e. 10-300 gf) and dwell times (5-30 s). Their effects on HK and HV were evaluated using repeated measures ANOVA, which was also used to compare the measurement methods. Coefficients of Meyer's equation, proportional specimen resistance (PSR) model and a modified PSR model were calculated using regression analyses. RESULTS:ISE was more pronounced for the highly-filled FU than for the less-filled FF, and HK was more susceptible to ISE than HV. The effect of dwell time was similar for both materials and measurement methods; hardness values decreased with dwell time, significantly between 5 s and 30 s. SIGNIFICANCE:The possible presence of ISE should be considered when determining measurement conditions for the microindentation hardness of dental resin-based composites. HV was found to be less sensitive to ISE and provided stable hardness values at lower loads than HK. Due to the high variability of composites, any hardness measurement should be preceded by mapping the effect of load to ensure that load-independent hardness is measured. If hardness values continue to decrease in the whole range of increasing loads, load-independent hardness can be calculated using the PSR model.
Bisphenol A (BPA)-based monomers are commonly contained in dental resin-based materials. As BPA is an endocrine disruptor, its long-term release from restorative composites and resin-modified glass ionomers (RM-GICs) under two polymerization conditions was measured in this study. Specimens of two conventional composites containing BPA-based monomers, two “BPA-free” composites, and two RM-GICs were polymerized from one side for 20 s at 1300 mW/cm2 or for 5 s at 3000 mW/cm2. The amounts of BPA released in artificial saliva and methanol after 1, 4, 9, 16, 35, 65, 130, and 260 days were measured using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. The highest amounts of BPA were released from conventional composites, followed by RM-GICs, while the least was released from “BPA-free” composites. Amounts of released BPA were significantly higher in methanol and decreased gradually after the first day. Fast polymerization (5 s at 3000 mW/cm2) resulted in a significantly higher release of BPA after 1 day, but the effect of polymerization conditions was not significant overall. In conclusion, fast polymerization increased the initial release of BPA, but the released amounts were significantly lower than the current tolerable daily intake (4 μg/kg body weight/day) even in methanol, representing the worst-case scenario of BPA release.
This study is aimed at proving the clinical benefit of the MELISA® test in the minimization or complete elimination of health problems in patients with confirmed hypersensitivity to metals used for tissue replacements. A group of 305 patients aged 20-75 years with previously proven metal hypersensitivity (initial MELISA® test), mainly to titanium and then to another fifteen metals, was chosen from the database at the Institute of Dental Medicine. From these patients, a final group of 42 patients agreed to participate in the study, 35 of which were female and 7 were male. The patients completed a special questionnaire aimed at information regarding change of health status from their last visit and determining whether the results of the initial MELISA® test and recommendations based on it were beneficial for patients or not. They were clinically examined, and peripheral blood samples were taken to perform follow-up MELISA® tests. Questionnaire data was processed, and the follow-up MELISA® test results were compared with the results of the initial MELISA® tests. For statistical analysis, the Fisher’s exact test and paired T -test were used. Thirty-two patients reported that they followed the recommendations based on the results of the initial MELISA® tests, and of these, 30 patients (94%) confirmed significant health improvement. Six patients did not follow the recommendation, and from these, only one patient reported an improvement in his health problems. By comparison of the initial and follow-up MELISA® test results, it can be stated that the hypersensitivity to the given metal decreased or disappeared after the therapeutic interventions performed based on the initial MELISA® test results. The evaluation of the data obtained from patients in this study confirmed a significant clinical benefit of MELISA® test.
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of several commercially available disinfectants on the accuracy of various types of impression materials and their compatibility with gypsum including surface quality and structure evaluation. Four alginate and three elastomeric impression materials in combination with disinfectants Aseptoprint Liquid, Zeta 7 solution, Silosept and Dentaclean Form were tested. The dimensional changes, detail reproduction, the compatibility with gypsum and surface/subsurface morphology were evaluated using light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and micro computed tomography. Two alginate materials disinfected in Dentaclean Form exhibited the most significant differences (p<0.0001). The loss of detail on some alginate impressions in combination with this disinfectant including deterioration and change of morphology of gypsum surfaces was observed. Porosity in subsurface area and exposed large particles were detected. It was confirmed that the desired properties of impressions may be negatively affected in combination with some disinfectants.
Introduction: An adhesive bond between hard dental tissues and composite reconstructions is exposed to mechanical load, water, bacteria, enzymes and different chemical compounds. These factors could impair durability and resistance of composite reconstructions. In contrast with extensive research of negative influence of water on degradation of adhesive bonds, the influence of chemical substances on adhesive bond has not been investigated to a greater extent. Aim: The aim of the experimental part of the thesis was to evaluate the influence of hydrogen peroxide containing tooth-whitening products and mouth rinses containing chlorhexidine and fluoride on a long-term stability of class V composite restorations created using four contemporary adhesive systems by a microleakage method. Materials and methods: The following adhesive systems were investigated: total-etch Gluma Comfort Bond (GLU), and self-etch adhesives Clearfil SE Bond (CLF), Adper Prompt (ADP) and iBond (IBO). Standardized class V cavities were prepared in 192 extracted human teeth (one cervical margin in the cementum and one in the enamel). Subsequently, the cavities were restored using microhybride composite Charisma. The specimens were then exposed to the tooth whitening system Opalescence PF 20, mouth rinse Corsodyl containing chlorhexidine and mouth rinse Elmex containing aminfluoride. The exposure times were 2 and 6 months, the whitening system was applied in 25 cycles each 8 hours apart. The control group included restorations exposed to distilled water for 24 hours, 2 and 6 months. After the exposure the specimens were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. The microleakage data were analyzed using Kruskall-Wallis, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests (p = 0.05). The surface morphology was assessed using scanning electron microscopy. Results: After being exposed to water, the specimens bonded by GLU a CLF showed a significantly lower microleakage score in both enamel and dentine. ADP and IBO showed a significantly higher microleakage, especially in the enamel. Compared to the control group, there were only small and statistically insignificant changes in the dentine and enamel microleakage. Differences were observed, when the samples were exposed to chlorhexidine- and fluoride-containing mouth rinses. Compared to the control group, there were statistically significantly lower microleakage scores, particularly for ADP and IBO. Conclusions: The results suggest that the risk of impairment of the adhesive bond stability is higher in self-etch adhesive systems with simplified application procedures. The insignificant effect of the peroxide tooth whitening system and the unexpected increase in resistance of restorations exposed to mouth rinses inevitably lead to certain doubts about appropriateness of the recommended microleakage tests for systems with different bond to the enamel and dentin. Thus, it remains unclear if the tested products for oral hygie-ne really increased the adhesive bond resistance, or the observed effect resulted from the microleakage reduction due to precipitation of components of the exposure media.
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of peroxide bleaching on the marginal seal of composite restorations bonded with several adhesive systems. Combined cylindrical Class V cavities located half in enamel and half in dentin were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of human molars. The cavities were bonded with the self-etch adhesives Clearfil SE-Bond (CLF), Adper Prompt (ADP), and iBond (IBO) and an etch-and-rinse adhesive Gluma Comfort Bond (GLU) and restored with a microhybrid composite Charisma. Experimental groups were treated 25 times for eight hours per day with a peroxide bleaching gel Opalescence PF 20, while the control groups were stored in distilled water for two months and then subjected to a microleakage test using a dye penetration method. Scanning electron microscopy was used to investigate the etching and penetration abilities of the adhesives and morphology of debonded restoration-enamel interfaces after the microleakage tests. Statistical analyses were performed using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Wilcoxon tests at p=0.05. The microleakage of all GLU groups was low and not significantly affected by peroxide bleaching. Low microleakage was recorded for CLF control groups, but after bleaching, a small but significant increase in microleakage at the enamel margin indicated its sensitivity to peroxide bleaching. For ADP and IBO control groups, the microleakage at the enamel margins was significantly higher than for GLU and CLF and exceeded that at the dentin margins. Bleaching did not induce any significant changes in the microleakage. Electron microscopy analysis indicated that in our experimental setup, decreased adhesion and mechanical resistance of the ADP- and IBO-enamel interfaces could be more important than the chemical degradation effects induced by the peroxide bleaching gel.
SUMMARY This study investigated the effect of peroxide bleaching gel on the durability of the adhesive bond between composite material, enamel, and dentin created with the etch-and-rinse adhesive Gluma Comfort Bond (GLU) and with the self-etch adhesives Clearfil SE Bond (CLE), Adper Prompt (ADP), and iBond (IBO). The adhesives were applied to flattened enamel and dentin of extracted human molars and built up with a microhybrid composite (Charisma). After 25 eight-hour cycles of bleaching with a 20% carbamide peroxide bleaching gel (Opalescence PF 20), the shear bond strength was measured and compared with one-day and two-month control specimens stored in water. The data were analyzed using nonparametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis statistics (p<0.05). Detailed fractographic analysis was performed using scanning electron microscopy. The bleaching gel significantly decreased the bond strength on both enamel and dentin for the simplified single-step self-etch adhesives ADP and IBO and markedly affected a fracture pattern of ADP specimens at the periphery of their bonded area. The results of our study indicate that the durability of adhesive restorations can be detrimentally influenced by carbamide peroxide bleaching and that different adhesives show varying sensitivity levels to the bleaching gel.
Peroxide bleaching systems may affect resin composite restorations through their strong oxidative effect. The objective was to investigate the influence of bleaching systems on long-term stability of marginal integrity of composite restorations and composite surface resistance. Class V cavities were prepared at the enamel-dentine junction and filled using a total-etch adhesive system Gluma Comfort Bond (n=36) and self-etching adhesive iBond (n=36) in combination with the microhybrid resin composite material Charisma. The peroxide bleaching gel Opalescence PF 20% (20 wt. % carbamide peroxide) was applied 25 times on the restorations. The control groups were exposed to distilled water for 24 hours and two months before a microleakage test was performed. Composite hardness was characterized after 0, 2, 7, 14 and 25 applications of the gel and compared with the control group (each n=5) exposed to distilled water for two months. Surface morphology was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy. After the gel application no significant changes in marginal integrity were found for both groups of samples. With Gluma Comfort Bond due to its high bonding performance and with iBond due to its decreased performance on enamel causing marginal integrity failure at the beginning of the experiment. On the other hand, pronounced surface porosity and decreased hardness of the composite material indicated its significant degradation in the presence of the bleaching gel.
PURPOSE To estimate the in vitro reliability of typical self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesives of various application protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS The following adhesives were applied on flat dentin surfaces of extracted human teeth (n = 223): self-etching two-step adhesives: AdheSE (AH), Clearfil SE Bond (CL), OptiBond SE (OS); one-step adhesives: Adper Prompt L-Pop (ADP), Adper Prompt (AD), and Xeno III (XE); all-in-one adhesive: iBond (IB); etch-and-rinse three-step adhesives: OptiBond FL (OF), two-step Gluma Comfort Bond (G), Excite (E) and Prime & Bond NT (PB). Composite buildups were prepared using a microhybrid composite, Opticor New. Shear bond strength was determined after 24 h of storage at 37 degrees C in distilled water. The results were analyzed with a nested ANOVA (adhesive, type of adhesive) followed by the Fisher post-hoc tests of group homogeneity at alpha = 0.05. A two-parameter Weibull distribution was used to calculate the critical shear bond strength corresponding to 5% probability of failure as a measure of system reliability. RESULTS ANOVA revealed a significant decrease (p < 0.001) in the mean shear bond strength as follows: AH=CL=OS=G=E=OF>AD=IB=XE>PB=ADP, but no significant difference (p > 0.48) between the etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesives. The corresponding characteristic bond strength of Weibull distribution ranged between 24.1 and 12.1 MPa, Weibull modulus between 8.3 and 2.1, and the critical shear bond strength varied from 16.0 to 3.0 MPa. CONCLUSION Pronounced differences in the critical shear bond strength suggest reliability variations in the adhesive systems tested, which originate from chemical composition rather than type of adhesive.
A shear bond strength and fractography analysis was used to evaluate reliability of nine total- and self-etching adhesives OptiBond FL, Gluma Comfort Bond, Prime&Bond NT, AdheSE, Adper Prompt, Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil SE Bond, Xeno III and iBond. A critical bond strength at which 10 % samples failed was used as a measure of the adhesive reliability. Significant differences in reliability and also in mode of their fracture were found between total- and self-etching systems and also in adhesives in these groups. The highest reliability and mixed mode of fracture were found with group of classical total-etch 3- and 2-step adhesives OptiBond FL a Gluma Comfort Bond and also with 2-step self-etching AdheSE and Clearfil SE Bond. With these adhesives both high bond strength and highly predictable properties can be expected. Compromised reliability as manifested in decreased bond strength and predominantly less energetically demanding cohesive fractures of the adhesive layer or less frequently mixed fractures occurred for Adper Promt, iBond a Xeno III. On the other hand, Prime & Bond NT and especially Adper Prompt L-Pop in blisters were characterized as systems with a low reliability. Adhesive properties of self-etching systems might decrease as a result of aging processes during their shelf-life.