BACKGROUND & AIMS:Evidence for the benefit of scheduled imaging for early detection of hepatobiliary malignancies in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is limited. We aimed to compare different follow-up strategies in PSC with the hypothesis that regular imaging improves survival.METHODS:We collected retrospective data from 2975 PSC patients from 27 centres. Patients were followed from the start of scheduled imaging or in case of clinical follow-up from 1 January 2000, until death or last clinical follow-up alive. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.RESULTS:A broad variety of different follow-up strategies were reported. All except one centre used regular imaging, ultrasound (US) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Two centres used scheduled endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in addition to imaging for surveillance purposes. The overall HR (CI95%) for death, adjusted for sex, age and start year of follow-up, was 0.61 (0.47-0.80) for scheduled imaging with and without ERCP; 0.64 (0.48-0.86) for US/MRI and 0.53 (0.37-0.75) for follow-up strategies including scheduled ERCP. The lower risk of death remained for scheduled imaging with and without ERCP after adjustment for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) or high-grade dysplasia as a time-dependent covariate, HR 0.57 (0.44-0.75). Hepatobiliary malignancy was diagnosed in 175 (5.9%) of the patients at 7.9 years of follow-up. Asymptomatic patients (25%) with CCA had better survival if scheduled imaging had been performed.CONCLUSIONS:Follow-up strategies vary considerably across centres. Scheduled imaging was associated with improved survival. Multiple factors may contribute to this result including early tumour detection and increased endoscopic treatment of asymptomatic benign biliary strictures.
Objective: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become part of the multimodality treatment for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Summary Background Data: It is currently uncertain which are the preferable NAT regimens, who benefits from surgery, and whether more aggressive surgical strategy is motivated. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed for all patients with BRPC/LAPC discussed and planned for NAT at multidisciplinary conference at Karolinska University Hospital from 2010 to 2017. Results: Of 233 patients eligible, 168 (72%) received NAT and were reevaluated for possibility of resection. A total of 156 (67%) patients (mean 64 yrs, 53% male) had pancreatic adenocarcinoma, comprising the study group for survival analysis. LAPC was diagnosed in 132 patients (85%), BRPC in 22 (14%), and resectable tumor in 2 (1.3%). Fifty patients (40.3%) received full-dose NAT. Only 54 (34.6%) had FOLFIRINOX. The overall survival among resected patients was similar for BRPC and LAPC (median survival 15.0 vs 14.5 mo, P = 0.4; and 31.9 vs 21.8 mo, P = 0.7, respectively). Resected patients had better survival than nonresected, irrespective of the type or whether full-dose NAT was given (median survival 22.4 vs 12.7 mo; 1-, 3-, and 5-yr survival: 86.4%, 38.9%, 26.9% vs 52.2%, 1.5%, 0%, respectively (P < 0001). For all preoperative values of Ca 19-9, surgical resection had positive impact on survival. Conclusions: All patients with BRPC/LAPC who do not progress during NAT should be considered for surgical resection, irrespective of the type or dose of NAT given. Higher levels of Ca 19-9 should not be considered an absolute contraindication for resection.
To investigate association between molecular biomarkers and computed tomography (CT) imaging findings in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).Fifty-three consecutive patients with PDAC (34 men and 19 women; mean age, 70.6 ± 8.1 years; range, 56–86 years) who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced CT prior to pancreatectomy were included. The Ki-67 index and expressions of E-cadherin, Vimentin, and TWIST were immunohistochemically evaluated. Qualitative image analysis and histogram analysis of CT numbers were conducted. Clinical and molecular biomarkers were tested as possible prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) using Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. In addition, associations between CT imaging findings and significant molecular biomarkers were investigated.The TNM stage (P = 0.018) and E-cadherin expression status (P = 0.018) were independently associated with OS. E-cadherin-negative PDACs had a worse prognosis than E-cadherin-positive PDACs (hazard ratio: 2.21). Irregular tumor margin was observed more frequently in E-cadherin-negative PDACs (54.7%) than in E-cadherin-positive PDACs (45.3%) (P = 0.00054). The kurtosis of CT number during the pancreatic parenchymal phase was significantly higher in E-cadherin-negative PDACs than in E-cadherin-positive PDACs (P = 0.035).E-cadherin suppression was found to be a prognostic factor for OS in patients with PDAC, and irregular tumor margin and kurtosis of CT numbers during the pancreatic parenchymal phase could be indicators for E-cadherin suppression.