OBJECTIVE To determine in a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial the safety profile of daily anakinra (Kineret) use in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and concurrent comorbid conditions. METHODS In 169 centers in 9 countries, 1,414 patients with active RA were randomly assigned to receive either anakinra (100 mg) or placebo treatment (4:1 anakinra-to-placebo allocation ratio), with study drug administered by daily subcutaneous injection for 6 months. The current post hoc analysis assessed baseline comorbid conditions, and patients were considered at high risk for the occurrence of adverse events if they had a history of at least one of the following: cardiovascular event, pulmonary event, central nervous system-related event, infection, diabetes, malignancy, or renal impairment. Within each treatment group (anakinra or placebo), incidence rates were summarized for serious adverse events, infectious events, and serious infectious events in high-risk patients and compared with these incidence rates in patients without comorbid conditions. RESULTS The majority of patients in the trial had one or more comorbid conditions. In these high-risk patients, there were no differences in the incidence of serious adverse events or infectious events between treatment groups. The incidence of serious infectious events with anakinra use was similar between high-risk patients (2.5%) and the entire study population (2.1%) and was not attributable to any single comorbidity. CONCLUSION Results of the analysis of adverse events in patients with active RA and coexisting comorbidities suggest that the favorable safety profile of anakinra is maintained in a high-risk patient population.

OBJECTIVE The goal of this single infusion, dose escalation study was to evaluate the safety of the PRIMATIZED anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (Mab), IDEC-CE9.1, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Twenty-five patients received single infusions of IDEC-CE9.1 in dose escalation form (0.03 to 4 mg/kg). Cohorts consisted of 3 patients each with seropositive RA. Following treatment, patients were monitored for 2 weeks before initiation of treatment of the next cohort. Peripheral blood samples were taken during and after treatment to measure immune function. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and in vitro proliferative responses to antigens and recall antigens were assessed pre and post-treatment. Cell surface markers CD3, CD4 (OKT4 and Leu 3a), CD8, CD20, CD25, CD45Ro, CD45Ra and DR were analyzed, and proliferation to mitogens and recall antigens was measured. RESULTS No infusion related adverse events were noted and other drug related adverse events were mild. Reduction in peripheral CD4 T cell number was brief (3 to 7 days) and not associated with infection. CD4 cell surface antigen downmodulation was observed postinfusion. Suppression of CD25 expression was associated with a positive clinical response. In vitro proliferative responses to mitogens and antigen were inhibited for up to one month with no association to positive clinical response. CONCLUSION IDEC-CE9.1 appears to have a benign safety profile and may modulate immune function rather than deplete CD4+ T cells.

Solinger, A M; Yocum, D E*; Tesser, J+; Gluck, O+; O'Sullivan, F#; Henkel, C; Cornett, M*; Lipani, J† Author Information