STUDY DESIGN:Prospective, case series.OBJECTIVE:To identify and characterize any differences in specific patient factors, MRI findings, features of spontaneous disc resorption, and outcomes between patients with single-level and multilevel LDH.BACKGROUND:Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the most common spinal pathologies worldwide. Though many cases of LDH resolve by spontaneous resorption, the mechanism underlying this "self-healing" phenomenon remains poorly understood, particularly in the context of multilevel herniations.METHODS:A one-year prospective study was conducted of patients presenting with acute symptomatic LDH between 2017 and 2019. Baseline demographics, herniation characteristics, and MRI phenotypes were recorded before treatment, which consisted of gabapentin, acupuncture, and the avoidance of inflammatory-modulating medications. MRIs were performed approximately every three months after the initial evaluation to determine any differences between patients with single-level and multilevel LDH.RESULTS:Ninety patients were included, 17 demonstrated multilevel LDH. Body mass index was higher among patients with multilevel LDH ( P <0.001). Patients with multilevel LDH were more likely to exhibit L3/L4 inferior endplate defects ( P =0.001), L4/L5 superior endplate defects ( P =0.012), and L4/L5 inferior endplate defects ( P =0.020) on MRI. No other differences in MRI phenotypes ( e.g. Modic changes, osteophytes, etc .) existed between groups. Resorption rate and time to resolution did not differ between those with single-level and multilevel LDH.CONCLUSIONS:Resorption rates were similar between single-level and multilevel LDH at various time points throughout one prospective assessment, providing insights that disc healing may have unique programmed signatures. Compared with those with single-level LDH, patients with multilevel herniations were more likely to have a higher BMI, lesser initial axial and sagittal disc measurements, and endplate defects at specific lumbar levels. In addition, our findings support the use of conservative management in patients with LDH, regardless of the number of levels affected.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level 3.

Introduction: Resorption after lumbar disk herniation is a common yet unpredictable finding. It is hypothesized that nearly 70% of lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) undergo the resorption to a significant degree after acute herniation, which has led to nonoperative management before surgical planning. Methods: This narrative review on the literature from 4 databases (MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and Cochrane) examines historical and recent advancements related to disk resorption. Studies were appraised for their description of the predictive factor (e.g., imaging or morphologic factors), pathophysiology, and treatment recommendations. Observations: We reviewed 68 articles considering the possibility of resorption of lumbar HNP. Recent literature has proposed various mechanisms (inflammation and neovascularization, dehydration, and mechanical traction) of lumbar disk resorption; however, consensus has yet to be established. Current factors that increase the likelihood of resorption include the initial size of the herniation, sequestration, percentage of rim enhancement on initial gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), composition of inflammatory mediators, and involvement of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Conclusion: Heterogeneity in imaging and morphologic factors has led to uncertainty in the identification of which lumbar herniations will resorb. Current factors that increase the likelihood of disk resorption include the initial size of the herniation, sequestration, percentage of rim enhancement on initial MRI, composition of cellular and inflammatory mediators present, and involvement of the posterior longitudinal ligament. This review article highlights the role of disk resorption after herniation without surgical intervention and questions the role of traditional noninflammatory medications after acute herniation. Further research is warranted to refine the ideal patient profile for disk resorption to ultimately avoid unnecessary treatment, thus individualizing patient care.

INTRODUCTION Resorption after lumbar disk herniation is a common yet unpredictable finding. It is hypothesized that nearly 70% of lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) undergo the resorption to a significant degree after acute herniation, which has led to nonoperative management before surgical planning. METHODS This narrative review on the literature from 4 databases (MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and Cochrane) examines historical and recent advancements related to disk resorption. Studies were appraised for their description of the predictive factor (e.g., imaging or morphologic factors), pathophysiology, and treatment recommendations. OBSERVATIONS We reviewed 68 articles considering the possibility of resorption of lumbar HNP. Recent literature has proposed various mechanisms (inflammation and neovascularization, dehydration, and mechanical traction) of lumbar disk resorption; however, consensus has yet to be established. Current factors that increase the likelihood of resorption include the initial size of the herniation, sequestration, percentage of rim enhancement on initial gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), composition of inflammatory mediators, and involvement of the posterior longitudinal ligament. CONCLUSION Heterogeneity in imaging and morphologic factors has led to uncertainty in the identification of which lumbar herniations will resorb. Current factors that increase the likelihood of disk resorption include the initial size of the herniation, sequestration, percentage of rim enhancement on initial MRI, composition of cellular and inflammatory mediators present, and involvement of the posterior longitudinal ligament. This review article highlights the role of disk resorption after herniation without surgical intervention and questions the role of traditional noninflammatory medications after acute herniation. Further research is warranted to refine the ideal patient profile for disk resorption to ultimately avoid unnecessary treatment, thus individualizing patient care.

We performed a prospective one-year multi-imaging study to assess the clinical outcomes and rate of disc resorption in acute lumbar disc herniation (LDH) patients undergoing inflammation-preserving treatment (i.e. no NSAIDS, steroids). All patients received gabapentin to relieve leg pain, 12 sessions of acupuncture. Repeat MRI was performed, every 3 months, after 12 sessions of treatment continued for those without 40

Introduction Paracetamol is one of the most frequently used analgesics for people with low back pain, but despite its frequent use there is still debate regarding its efficacy and safety for this indication. Areas covered We describe the origin of paracetamol and its proposed mechanisms of action. We focus in on low back pain and describe the evidence it has on the efficacy of paracetamol (taken by patients orally) and current insights on its side-effects. When searching for relevant publications we focused mainly on recent Cochrane reviews and published RCTs. We found that there is increasing evidence that shows paracetamol is not more effective than placebo in patients with acute low back pain. Concerning patients with subacute and chronic back pain, the evidence for or against the efficacy of paracetamol vs placebo is lacking and would need more research. Expert opinion We argue that we still need better evidence on the efficacy of paracetamol for acute and chronic back pain. Until that evidence becomes available paracetamol should still be considered as an option for patients with back pain. However, we suggest that a strategy focusing on non-pharmacological management as the first treatment option in low back pain may be equally effective with less side effects.

Migraine and sleep disorders are common and often burdensome chronic conditions with a high prevalence in the general population, and with considerable socio-economic impact and costs.The existence of a relationship between migraine and sleep disorders has been recognized from centuries by clinicians and epidemiological studies. Nevertheless, the exact nature of this association, the underlying mechanisms and interactions are complex and not completely understood. Recent biochemical and functional imaging studies identified central nervous system structures and neurotransmitters involved in the pathophysiology of migraine and also important for the regulation of normal sleep architecture, suggesting a possible causative role, in the pathogenesis of both disorders, of a dysregulation in these common nervous system pathways.This systematic review summarizes the existing data on migraine and sleep disorders with the aim to evaluate the existence of a causal relationship and to assess the presence of influencing factors. The identification of specific sleep disorders associated with migraine should induce clinicians to systematically assess their presence in migraine patients and to adopt combined treatment strategies.

Paracetamol is one of the most frequently used analgesics for people with low back pain, but despite its frequent use there is still debate regarding its efficacy and safety for this indication.We describe the origin of paracetamol and its proposed mechanisms of action. We focus in on low back pain and describe the evidence it has on the efficacy of paracetamol (taken by patients orally) and current insights on its side-effects. When searching for relevant publications we focused mainly on recent Cochrane reviews and published RCTs. We found that there is increasing evidence that shows paracetamol is not more effective than placebo in patients with acute low back pain. Concerning patients with subacute and chronic back pain, the evidence for or against the efficacy of paracetamol vs placebo is lacking and would need more research.We argue that we still need better evidence on the efficacy of paracetamol for acute and chronic back pain. Until that evidence becomes available paracetamol should still be considered as an option for patients with back pain. However, we suggest that a strategy focusing on non-pharmacological management as the first treatment option in low back pain may be equally effective with less side effects.

Poster: ECR 2020 / C-11869 / Resorption of a herniated disc. Stages of development and associated visual effects in MRI diagnosis by: A. Smirnova 1, A. Tkachev2, D. Archakov2, A. Epifanov3, N. Plakhotina4; 1St. Petersburg/RU, 2Volgograd/RU, 3Samara/RU, 4Saint-Petersburg/RU

Poster: ECR 2016 / B-1194 / MRI criteria for disease management decision in patients with herniated intravertebral discs by: A. Smirnova 1, A. Tkachev2, N. Plakhotina1, D. Archakov2; 1St. Petersburg/RU, 2Volgograd/RU